The British Museum is known for housing a vast collection of artifacts from across the globe. But what was the way some of these treasures were acquired? That’s where things get a little complicated.
Today, we’ve compiled a list of truly fascinating pieces, spanning cultures from China to Kenya. Each one has its own story to tell, and not all of them come without controversy. Curious to see what’s inside? Keep scrolling for a glimpse into the marvels and the mysteries they hold.
This post may include affiliate links.
The Elgin Marbles
In the early 19th century, the Elgin Marbles, a collection of sculptures dating back 2500 years, were taken by a British diplomat from the Parthenon in Greece. He sold them to the British government, which then shipped them off to the British Museum. Believing the marbles were looted, the Greek government listed a dispute with UNESCO over their return, but the British government declined the organization’s attempt at mediation. Today, the Elgin Marbles remain in the British Museum, and discussions between the two countries regarding their return are in progress.
Fun fact: The British excused taking them out of Greece because they claimed that the Greek government at time was crazy. Hence, they "lost their marbles." (I've seen highly unconvincing refutations of this, citing uses of the phrase that are earlier than any context referencing Elgin, but (1) the issue of Elgin's marbles predates any reference to toy marbles by over half of a century, and (2) references to the toy marbles older than to Elgin's marbles are meant literally, not implying any reference to insanity.)
Load More Replies...These do need to go back. Especially as right after acquiring them, we managed to damage them. We can't really argue we're keeping them protected.
At that time the Parthenon was just a pile of unattended, weed ridden junk. Everyone took bits and pieces of it. But let's forget all about those other guys and just hate on the British. It's popular to hate the British. Can't we just go back to hating the French?
Poor British Museum, its usual excuse "we are just protecting these valuable artefacts from the violence in its home country" doesn't work here.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Elgin-Marbles Greece was under the control of the Ottoman empire at the time. See the comments in this article.
Load More Replies...It's time to send foreign cultural artifacts back where they belong. We need to concentrate on restoring and reflecting on our own culture not other people's.
The Hoa Hakananai'a Head
The Hoa Hakananai’a Head, a moai statue, was stolen from Orongo Easter Island in 1868 by a British Royal Navy ship crew and taken to the British Museum. The Rapa Nui people consider the statue as stolen and in 2018, the governor of Easter Island requested that the British Museum return it to them. Discussions to repatriate the statue have since stalled, and it remains in the British Museum.
Years ago (mid to late 1800s) some folks from Seattle went north and stole a totem pole to place in a park. In the 1970s they decided that they needed another so they went to the same tribe and gave them $20K - the elder said "the payment was a little late but acceptable, now if you want another it is $40k" Seattle paid up
They could make a very high quality copy, keep that and return the original. Or they could return it and borrow for a fixed term for a fee if the Rapa Nui approved.
That's what they V&A cast court is full of. They have plaster replicas of classical statues that were made in the late 1800s. It's very cool because compared to the originals that have experienced acid rain weathering, they're in better condition
Load More Replies...Presuming it was truly stolen since they were hardly lost, the hypothetical I asked in the post about the Lamassu doesn't apply. But back on Easter Island, it simply joins hundreds or at least scores of others, somewhere so remote that few people will ever see them. So, recognizing the Rapa Nui has the right to set such conditions, would it not make sense to find some way to allow it to stay in London? Or perhaps touring the way King Tut or the Terracotta Soldiers of China did?
The Gold Crown Of Maqdala
In 1868, after capturing the city of Maqdala, the British brought back many royal treasures. Of these treasures, the regal and highly detailed gold Crown of Maqdala was the most valuable. Currently owned by the Victoria and Albert Museum, the crown has been the subject of restitution claims made by Ethiopia since 2007. Many other royal treasures, far less significant than the crown, have since been returned to Ethiopia.
So the Ethiopian emperor, a Christian, appealed to other Christian empires to help defend his empire against Turkish invaders. The Brits, eager to keep open trade routes through lands controlled by the Turks (and angered at the Ethiopian's detention of a couple of diplomats) instead appeased the Turks by ransacking Ethiopia.
"...owned by the Victoria and Albert Museum". How can they own it, when it was stolen. from Ethiopia? They're handling, and keeping, stolen goods.
So this one isn't in the British Museum as the title says. Absolutely should be returned.
The British Museum states on its official website that its collection has been built through a variety of means. Some pieces, however, have drawn attention due to their disputed origins and have even been subject to requests for repatriation by other countries. This ongoing debate continues to raise questions about rightful ownership tied to cultural artifacts.
A considerable part of the museum’s holdings came from donations or bequests, especially throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. One notable example is the Sutton Hoo collection, a magnificent Anglo-Saxon ship burial discovery from 1939. Edith Pretty, the landowner of the site, donated the entire find, contributing significantly to the museum’s medieval treasures.
The Lamassu
The Lamassu is a statue of a winged lion or bull with a human head that was placed in front of the Northwest Palace of Ashurnasirpal in Nimrud as a symbol of protection. Acquired by the British Museum in 1851, the statue dates back to 865 BC and was excavated by Austen Henry Layard. Other Lamassu statues are housed in museums across the world, such as the National Museum of Iraq and the Louvre Museum.
Given the damage done by both the extremists and the Americans in Iraq, this entry might be a very good thing.
I can't stand it when people always assume the British Museum is always wrong. They have preserved a lot of history that might've been lost.
Load More Replies...And in Paris. Probably in a lot of other places, too.
Load More Replies...So, this is a non-rhetorical question, and I don't know how well the premise fits this situation: A treasure is lost by an Elbonian. Two thousand years later, a Westerner expends a fortune seeking the treasure, finds it, and chooses to preserve it and share it with the world as he sees fit. Make the case that it belongs to someone else. Who? And keep in mind, Elbonia is not a person, even a fictitious one. So don't just say "Elbonia." If you mean to say the ruler or government of Elbonia, say so, and defend that.
Just because it costs a lot to rob a grave does not stop it being thievery. It's not up to the person who finds it to "share it with the world as he sees fit". There's a heritage that morally belongs to the nation and ancestors of the people who live there. The British ground up mummies in the 19th century to use as a colour for paint. It was on display as they saw fit... Should some oligarch be allowed to buy the Original US constitution and take it to Moscow? What about the statue of liberty?
Load More Replies...The Benin Bronzes
In the 1500s, a group of brass and bronze sculptures known as the Benin Bronzes was made in the West African Kingdom of Benin. Many of the pieces were used in ancestral rituals during that time. The artifacts were plundered by British troops in 1897 and were sent to the British Museum and other European institutions. Today, the Benin Royal Court has called for the return of the sculptures, but no plans have yet been made to fulfill its requests.
These absolutely need to go back, but the government needs to stop passing the buck. The government keeps saying it's a matter for the museum, but the British Museum is governed by certain legal statutes which means that, with certain exceptions for duplicates or irretrievably damaged items, they need parliamentary permission to dispose of items in the collection. The Museum have said a couple of times they're open to returning them but they need legal permission and the government just keeps saying it's not their business, despite it clearly being exactly their business.
Typical of politicians, passing the buck :(
Load More Replies...The Smithsonian Museum in USA also has many Benin Bronzes that it acquired from the British raid, as well as many other African artefacts. Its also holding something like 30,000 different human remains. Its not just the British Museum, many large institutions around the world hold artefacts that were acquired by ethically dubious means. They all need to look at how to deal with these.
The Rosetta Stone
The Rosetta Stone is a fragment of a larger black basalt stone slab dating back to 196 BCE that was discovered by French troops in 1799. It contains a decree about King Ptolemy V written in Egyptian hieroglyphics, Demotic language, and Greek. The stone made its way to the British Museum in 1802 and remains one of its most famous pieces despite Egypt’s many attempts to reclaim it over the years.
There is actually a 1:1 copy in the British Museum you can touch. The original is under glass and the copy is next to it.
The nerve of Egyptians who are insane looters themselves. You better hope you're not a mummy or have an elaborate gravesite, because your grave will absolutely get robbed by new Egyptians.
What the f**k does that have to do with anything? Its all bad you moron.
Load More Replies...Generosity hasn’t waned in modern times either. In 2003, Alexander Walker, a prominent film critic for the Evening Standard, bequeathed a remarkable collection of modern prints and drawings. His donation included works by artistic giants like Matisse and Bridget Riley, further enriching the museum’s 20th-century archives.
The "Under The Wave Off Kanagawa" Print
Katsushika Hokusai is one of Japan’s most revered and innovative artists. Hokusai’s painting “Under the Waves off Kanagawa,” also known as “the Great Wave,” is considered his best work. The painting is a color woodblock print depicting an enormous wave crashing down on three fishing boats off the coast of Kanagawa. One of the surviving prints of "Under The Wave Off Kanagawa" and many of his other works are displayed at an exhibition called “The Great Picture Book of Everything” in the British Museum.
Because it's a Japanese artist we have to send the picture to them? So do all deVinci arts have to go back to Italy? Picasos must be sent to Spain? etc.?
The Asante Gold Regalia
The Asante Gold Regalia comprises more than 200 gold items, including jewelry, royal insignia worn by the King of the Asante people, and badges worn by his officials. Many of the pieces were looted from Kumasi, the Asante capital, during the war in the 1800s. While some were sold to the British Museum, others formed part of a forced British indemnity payment. The remaining items were acquired by other museums and even some private collectors.
That's called the spoils of war. When the war ended there wasn't any agreements about returning looted goods. Fair game!
Many other items in the British Museum have come from archaeological excavations across the globe. These digs, which continue today in regions from the Caribbean to the Nile Valley, aren’t just about acquiring relics: they aim to answer research questions and provide deeper historical context to existing collections.
The Early Shield From New South Wales, Australia
The Aboriginal Australian shield, presumably originating from the coastal regions of New South Wales, dates back to the late 1700s and was made from the bark of the red mangrove plant. It has a distinct hole near the center, most likely from being hit by a spear. Despite several requests from Aboriginal communities for its return to Australia, the shield remains at the British Museum in London.
It's interesting which things you don't want to tell us the method of acquisition ...
For this particular shield, the detailed providence is unknown, and that's essentially why the method of acquisition is not mentioned here. The shield and attempts at determining providence are mentioned here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gweagal_shield under the heading "Aboriginal shield in the British Museum".
Load More Replies...How did we acquire it? Was it an archaeological dig, conquest, theft, purchase?
No one is entirely sure, but the most common theory is purchase back when Australia was a British Penal Colony. The main issue is, even the Aboriginal people aren't clear on its origin... which makes sorting out the history of it difficult.
Load More Replies...It was only in the last 5 years or so (iirc) that skulls and other remains of Aboriginal people were repatriated from Britain :(
According to the aboriginal people, they were peaceful and at one with the land and each other. If this was the case, why do they need shields. There will be a whole lot of aboriginal people not wanting this back as it destroys their narrative of being a peace loving people.
That's just pure fabrication---and I mean your fabrication. Australian Aboriginal people had inter-tribal rivalries, just like any other groups of people living in close proximity, and it's not denied by the majority of Aboriginal people. Finding a small group of people who may claim otherwise is evidence of nothing (e.g., otherwise you could legitimately claim that western people think the world is flat, god created the world 4 thousand years ago, and evolution is BS).
Load More Replies...The Lewis Chessmen
The Lewis Chessmen are a group of chess pieces from the 12th century, carved from walrus ivory. After their discovery in Scotland in 1831 and exhibition that same year, 67 chessmen and 14 tablemen of the 94 objects available were purchased on behalf of the British Museum. As of today, 82 pieces are exhibited in the British Museum, 11 at the National Museum of Scotland in Edinburgh, with the last chess piece privately owned.
How are these considered foreign if their location actually pits them in Great Britain? The same country as the British Museum?
They were originally from Norway before being lost and found on the Isle of Lewis, Scotland. At the moment there is one set (32 pieces) on display in the British Museum, with some of the rest on display in Stornaway, close to where they were discovered. They are amazingly beautiful pieces and well worth seeing in real life!
Load More Replies...A few of them can actually be seen at the small museum inside Lews Castle, Stornoway / Isle of Lewis, where they have been discovered. I am not sure if the exhibition is permanent, though.
They weren't stolen, they were bought. Also, Scotland is part of Great Britain, so what is the problem with the British Museum having them - it's not as though they were stolen.
They should be in the place where they were found. If not Lewis then at least Scotland. Scotland is very much a different country than England despite the fact we are dominated politically and culturally by them.
Load More Replies...I think they are quite cute and fun looking. Hope they reside wherever they can most brighten people's days.
Despite these legitimate contributions, many of the museum’s most famous and controversial pieces are of foreign origin. As Euronews highlights, although England contributes the largest volume overall, it’s often the globally sourced items that spark the loudest calls for return.
The Animal Mummies
The British Museum houses one of the largest collections of animal mummies in the world, with around 500 examples of cats, crocodiles, fish, snakes, and more. Originating in Ancient Egypt, these mysterious mummified animals were excavated in large numbers across different sites in Egypt. The crocodile mummy excavated in 1895, at Kom Ombo, Egypt, hasn’t been on display at the British Museum for 75 years. This is due to the complex conservation processes required to keep it intact for future exhibitions.
I know I risk sounding awful, but Egypt is profoundly bad at preserving it's own past. At least the UK is keeping it safe
Not just UK, there's a wonderful display of Egyptian stuff in the art history museum in Vienna. And the Egyptian museum in Turin (which my Egyptian friend took me to).
Load More Replies...These were almost certainly completely legally acquired. Sure they're foreign, which is all the title says, but all museums have foreign things. The issue with the British Museum is looted and stolen things.
The Oxus Treasure
The Oxus Treasure is a collection of 180 pieces of silver and gold that were found in the Oxus River between 1877 and 1880. Said to be from a larger collection of around 1500 items, the pieces date back to the 5th century BC. Currently, the British Museum holds the surviving collection, which includes a gold model chariot, a pair of armlets, and other metalwork.
One of the museum’s harshest critics is Geoffrey Robertson, an Australian-British barrister and human rights advocate. He has condemned what he terms the museum’s “unofficial stolen goods tour,” pointing to pieces like the Elgin Marbles (claimed by Greece), Hoa Hakananai’a (from Easter Island), and the Benin Bronzes (claimed by Nigeria).
The Beard Of The Sphinx Of Giza
In the 19th century, fragments of the Beard of the Sphinx of Giza were discovered in the debris surrounding the base of the iconic sculpture. According to the British Museum, the beard was likely an enhancement added to the Sphinx by King Thutmose IV. The piece is currently located in the British Museum while other fragments are housed in the Egyptian Museum in Cairo.
Given that the museum in Cairo has some major security concerns, and was looted in 2011, as well as has multiple issues regarding their attempts at 'preservation' of the artifacts inside the museum... frankly, it's better off where it is until Egypt can get its act together.
“According to the British Museum…” UGH! Let’s have artifacts go back to their country of origin, please!
Little difficult when those countries of origin can't provide enough security to actually make certain that looters aren't going to destroy the artifacts, or steal them; or their own attempts at 'preservation' end up destroying the artifacts. Which sadly... Egypt is known for those very issues.
Load More Replies...The Admonitions Of The Instructress To The Court Ladies
In 1900, during the Boxer Rebellion in Beijing, Captain Clarence Johnson acquired a silk scroll depicting a poetic narrative painting by the poet Zhang Hua. This scroll was called the Admonitions of the Instructress to the Court Ladies, and its text was aimed at correcting the behavior of an empress. Johnson then sold the scroll to the British Museum, which only displays it for six weeks every year due to its sensitivity to light.
Bought. By all accounts, he bought it at a market of all things.
Load More Replies...Whether taken through conquest, colonialism, or negotiation, the history of these artifacts is complex. Many hold deep historical, cultural, and emotional importance for their places of origin. The question remains: Should such items be returned to their homelands, or does the museum serve a broader purpose in preserving and showcasing global heritage?
Which of these historical pieces do you think holds the strongest case for being returned? Or should they remain where they are for global education and access? Let us know what you think.
The Glazed Dragon Tiles
This collection of 20 glazed tiles, made during the Ming Dynasty, once adorned the roofs of small buildings in a temple in Shanxi, China. Seen as a symbol of protection against fire, the tiles are arranged in two rows, one with yellow dragons and the other with blue dragons. The colors and designs of the tiles also symbolize Chinese beliefs in the powers of Yin and Yang. The British Museum acquired them in 2006, and they have been on display ever since.
So, these are a legitimate acquisition, unlike other items that the British just stole.
The Tsavo Lions
The Tsavo Lions, also known as the Tsavo man-eaters, were a pair of maneless male lions in the Tsavo region of Kenya. They were responsible for over one hundred human fatalities on the Kenya-Uganda Railway in 1898. British Lieutenant-Colonel John Henry Patterson eventually did away with the lions in December that same year. Patterson kept their skins as rugs in his home until he sold them to the Field Museum of Natural History in 1924. Today, after being reconstructed, the lions are on display at the museum along with their skulls.
OK I thought listing something in the V&A was annoying when the article says it's about things in the British Museum, but the Field Museum is in CHICAGO!
A British guy killed two predators who had killed over 100 people. I'm not a fan of the Brits, but this one seems to me to definitely belong to them.
Hey Maria, let’s now do threads in a similar vein on museums in Paris, Boston, Chicago, New York, Berlin etc etc
Or an article about how in a lot of countries those artifacts get sold to private collectors to finance whatever the regime spends money on
Load More Replies...How many if these pieces would still exist, let alone be available for public viewing, if they had not been acquired and cared for by the British museum?
This is a tricky one. The British museum is not as safe as you might think. There was a director of antiquity there who was stealing Roman jewellery, forging notes on the cards, clipping out the cameos and gems to sell on eBay, and melting down the gold for scrap. It was going on for YEARS. Large objects may be safe at the museum, but many small ones have been lost over the years. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpegg27g74do
Load More Replies...All museums around the world should return items that were stolen from their originating cultural sites. If the items were purchased from that original source location, then OK keep it in your collection.
What about if you were the ones who financed the excavations and found the pieces? After all, the chances are they’d still be unknown and buried in a lot of places around the world. That’s where it gets tricky.
Load More Replies...While I tend to agree with the sentiments that stolen artefacts and those with questionable histories must in essence be given back to their Country of Origin, I do have a rosey view and wish that as a unified front Historians across the world would open "Global" museums, wherein objects that can safely be moved from location to location are frequently switched between Global museums and thus give more people the opportunity to see these pieces of history. Like how the Terracota soldiers are often shipped around for displays. That way there is a global understanding of the items origins, but also showing the history of its excavation and turbulent politics surrounding it (aka. The Brits stole it and got dodgy with returning it). AND it gives opportunities to people of all walks of life to see these unique and priceless parts of world history without needing to buy a plane ticket to do so. But I'm an idealist. I know there's substantial reasons making that impossible...
It's almost like the violently conquered a large portion of the planet.
It amazes me that people think the British museum is always the bad guy. The amount of history that would've been lost due to these bad guys is unknowable. It would have been a lot though. Not returning things sounds bad without the details, but the Museum isn't inherently evil.
There's nothing wrong with having foreign items as long as they were legally acquired and are treated respectfully. Should all Van Gogh paintings be returned to the Dutch? And what about empires that crossed borders. Should Roman artifacts all be returned to Italy regardless of the country they were found in?
There is a difference between legally acquired and looted. Also between countries of origin that are safe vs. war-torn. In the National Museum in Copenhagen, first floor, there is a display of North American Indigenous art, including a large buffalo skin that has pictures of tribal history etched into its pelt. While the ground floor of the museum (Danish history) has been modernized, the other floors are rather boring, old-fashioned collections crammed into cupboards behind glass. Not a lot of visitors seemed interested in the upper floors. Considering how much these native tribes are aching to restore the heritage that was stolen from them, it was just so wrong to see this item collecting dust in a random foreign museum.
The British Museum has Montezuma's crown and they will not return it to Mexico. Give the people back their artifacts.
Hey Maria, let’s now do threads in a similar vein on museums in Paris, Boston, Chicago, New York, Berlin etc etc
Or an article about how in a lot of countries those artifacts get sold to private collectors to finance whatever the regime spends money on
Load More Replies...How many if these pieces would still exist, let alone be available for public viewing, if they had not been acquired and cared for by the British museum?
This is a tricky one. The British museum is not as safe as you might think. There was a director of antiquity there who was stealing Roman jewellery, forging notes on the cards, clipping out the cameos and gems to sell on eBay, and melting down the gold for scrap. It was going on for YEARS. Large objects may be safe at the museum, but many small ones have been lost over the years. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpegg27g74do
Load More Replies...All museums around the world should return items that were stolen from their originating cultural sites. If the items were purchased from that original source location, then OK keep it in your collection.
What about if you were the ones who financed the excavations and found the pieces? After all, the chances are they’d still be unknown and buried in a lot of places around the world. That’s where it gets tricky.
Load More Replies...While I tend to agree with the sentiments that stolen artefacts and those with questionable histories must in essence be given back to their Country of Origin, I do have a rosey view and wish that as a unified front Historians across the world would open "Global" museums, wherein objects that can safely be moved from location to location are frequently switched between Global museums and thus give more people the opportunity to see these pieces of history. Like how the Terracota soldiers are often shipped around for displays. That way there is a global understanding of the items origins, but also showing the history of its excavation and turbulent politics surrounding it (aka. The Brits stole it and got dodgy with returning it). AND it gives opportunities to people of all walks of life to see these unique and priceless parts of world history without needing to buy a plane ticket to do so. But I'm an idealist. I know there's substantial reasons making that impossible...
It's almost like the violently conquered a large portion of the planet.
It amazes me that people think the British museum is always the bad guy. The amount of history that would've been lost due to these bad guys is unknowable. It would have been a lot though. Not returning things sounds bad without the details, but the Museum isn't inherently evil.
There's nothing wrong with having foreign items as long as they were legally acquired and are treated respectfully. Should all Van Gogh paintings be returned to the Dutch? And what about empires that crossed borders. Should Roman artifacts all be returned to Italy regardless of the country they were found in?
There is a difference between legally acquired and looted. Also between countries of origin that are safe vs. war-torn. In the National Museum in Copenhagen, first floor, there is a display of North American Indigenous art, including a large buffalo skin that has pictures of tribal history etched into its pelt. While the ground floor of the museum (Danish history) has been modernized, the other floors are rather boring, old-fashioned collections crammed into cupboards behind glass. Not a lot of visitors seemed interested in the upper floors. Considering how much these native tribes are aching to restore the heritage that was stolen from them, it was just so wrong to see this item collecting dust in a random foreign museum.
The British Museum has Montezuma's crown and they will not return it to Mexico. Give the people back their artifacts.
