Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Brad Pitt Sued By Private Parts Cream Company In Bizarre Legal Battle Raising Eyebrows Across Hollywood
Brad Pitt in a casual purple blazer and white shirt, involved in a bizarre legal battle over private parts cream company.

Brad Pitt Sued By Private Parts Cream Company In Bizarre Legal Battle Raising Eyebrows Across Hollywood

6

ADVERTISEMENT

Brad Pitt has been hit with a lawsuit by a company that sells anti-aging cream for men’s privates.

The Hollywood star, who is already embroiled in a legal battle with his ex-wife Angelina Jolie, owns a unisex skincare brand that has a similar name to the men’s beauty brand that filed the lawsuit.

Beau D, a Malibu-based company that sells a so-called “D. Cream,” is seeking $75,000 in damages and has asked Pitt to rename his skincare line, Beau Domaine.

RELATED:
    Highlights
    • Brad Pitt has been sued by the owner of a male skincare company that sells a cream called “D. Cream.”
    • The company, Beau D, is demanding that Pitt change the name of his skincare brand, Beau Domaine.
    • Founder Brandon Palas is also seeking $75,000 in damages as part of the lawsuit.

    Image credits: Rosalind O’Connor/NBC/Getty Images

    The risqué beauty company launched in 2020, two years before Pitt started Le Domaine, which was renamed to Beau Domaine last year.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The actor’s skincare line was co-founded with the Perrin family, a famed winemaking dynasty in France who are his long-standing collaborators on Miraval wines.

    Its products contain GSM10, a compound extracted from Grenache, Syrah, and Mourvèdre grapes.

    Image credits: beau.domaine/Instagram

    Beau D reportedly made three failed attempts at a private settlement before filing its lawsuit.

    Its founder, Brandon Palas, claims trademark infringement, false designation of origin (misleading consumers about whether two products are affiliated), and common-law unfair competition under California’s Business and Professions Code, AirMail reported.

    Image credits: beaudofficial/Instagram

    Among its products is a $56 cream that promises to “put power in your package.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    According to the website, the product “harnesses the virile energy” of various Chinese herbs.

     

    View this post on Instagram

     

    A post shared by 🎙🗿 (@beaudofficial)

    Palas, who worked for Men’s Vogue, told AirMail that the cream “will help to bring plumpness to that skin, inspire collagen production, and slow down the process of aging.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “When it comes to self-care, men get a little bit schoolgirl giggly about it—sheepish and shy. So humor helps to break the ice,”  Palas said.

    “It’s [men’s] favorite region of the body,” Palas added when describing his product, but he said it’s something that men “sort of dance around when it comes to skin care. We’ll do face and body and leave that part to itself.”

    Image credits: beaudofficial/Instagram

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Beau Domaine has not yet filed a formal legal response in court.

    Palas said the $75,000 lawsuit “isn’t about publicity or punishment.”

    “It’s about protecting the integrity of what we’ve spent years building and ensuring independent brands have the right to grow without being overshadowed or diluted.”

    Given that the name “Beau” is considered too generic, it’s unlikely that Beau D will win the lawsuit

    Image credits: beau.domaine/Instagram

    Image credits: Idiotman420

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: TexPersistence

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Lawyer María Teresa Szendrey told AirMail that she believes Beau D does not have a strong enough case against Beau Domaine.

    As “Beau” is the male-gendered French word for “handsome,” the brand names may be considered too generic to be associated.

    “When you have a generic trademark or a descriptive trademark, you have to prove that when somebody hears the mark, they immediately associate it with your product,” Szendrey explained.

    Image credits: beau.domaine/Instagram

    Moreover, Pitt’s skincare brand was successfully registered with the US Patent and Trademark Office, meaning it was approved by an examiner who did not consider it to infringe on any trademarks.

    Image credits: beau.domaine/Instagram

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Ahead of the brand’s launch in 2022, the F1 actor stated that he wasn’t interested in people associating him with the company.

    “I’m not the face of this line,” Pitt told Vogue. “I don’t want to be selling something. It’s not about a celebrity brand. It’s about the land, the science and the people behind it.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: WutupDough

    Image credits: FD1997

    Pitt is embroiled in a separate legal battle over Château Miraval, his sprawling French estate which includes the vineyard from where Beau Domaine’s ingredients are sourced.

    The $164 million property was co-owned by Pitt and Jolie.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    In 2022, the actress sold her stake to a third party, a move Pitt challenged in court, alleging they had agreed that no one could sell their share without the other’s approval.

    Image credits: Mustafa Yalcin/Anadolu/Getty Images

    Jolie denied the agreement existed and filed a countersuit, claiming her ex-husband has been “waging a vindictive war against” her. The legal dispute is ongoing.

    The most recent update favored Jolie. Earlier this month, a judge denied a motion from Pitt’s lawyers that would have required the mother of his six children to turn over 22 communications related to the winery battle.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: OJislawful

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: amazingmg2

    Image credits: forrestcat12

    Image credits: Yourwrong503

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: TheMochiWochi

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Steven_Monty

    Image credits: LeftCalifornia

    Image credits: wheezerjoe

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: BigChrisTougas

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook
    Marina Urman

    Marina Urman

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Read more »

    With a degree in social science and a love for culture, I approach entertainment journalism at Bored Panda with a research-driven mindset. I write about celebrity news, Hollywood highlights, and viral stories that spark curiosity worldwide. My work has reached millions of readers and is recognized for balancing accuracy with an engaging voice. I believe that pop culture isn’t just entertainment, it reflects the social conversations shaping our time.

    Read less »
    Marina Urman

    Marina Urman

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    With a degree in social science and a love for culture, I approach entertainment journalism at Bored Panda with a research-driven mindset. I write about celebrity news, Hollywood highlights, and viral stories that spark curiosity worldwide. My work has reached millions of readers and is recognized for balancing accuracy with an engaging voice. I believe that pop culture isn’t just entertainment, it reflects the social conversations shaping our time.

    What do you think ?
    Bored Jellyfish
    Community Member
    Premium
    23 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It’s pretty much just clickbait. I fell for it, too.

    Load More Replies...
    PrettyJoyBird
    Community Member
    19 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is hilarious. The names are quite similar regardless if "generic" The other company was started first. Why didnt US Paton catch when Brads lawyers filed? I dont know how pattons work. American small business vs French winery/B. Pitt.

    David Beaulieu
    Community Member
    8 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Suing a famous person for a silly low amount for free publicity? Shocking. Brad probably spent more developing his packaging than $75k. Couldn't settle huh. Did they reach out, or just file the paperwork so they could do this press release and get this social bump?

    Load More Comments
    Bored Jellyfish
    Community Member
    Premium
    23 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It’s pretty much just clickbait. I fell for it, too.

    Load More Replies...
    PrettyJoyBird
    Community Member
    19 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is hilarious. The names are quite similar regardless if "generic" The other company was started first. Why didnt US Paton catch when Brads lawyers filed? I dont know how pattons work. American small business vs French winery/B. Pitt.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    David Beaulieu
    Community Member
    8 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Suing a famous person for a silly low amount for free publicity? Shocking. Brad probably spent more developing his packaging than $75k. Couldn't settle huh. Did they reach out, or just file the paperwork so they could do this press release and get this social bump?

    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT