ADVERTISEMENT

In the Wild West of modern parenting, some Western parental beliefs are as misguiding as a GPS in a ghost town. Are endless extracurricular activities really forging well-rounded super kids? Should you really leave your newborn crying to “toughen them up”? Is circumcision necessary?
While science backs up many parental beliefs, others do not, in fact, promote the health benefits one might believe they do. As it turns out, sometimes, a bit of free-range parenting—letting kids be kids—might just be the healthiest choice, even if it means a few more scraped knees and a bit less résumé padding.
Dr Christina Scott, professor of social psychology at Whittier College in California, whose research focuses primarily on sex and relationships, has offered her expertise to comment on those beliefs.

#1

Circumcision

Circumcision

Circumcision, a procedure that involves removing the foreskin from the human penis, gained popularity in the US and English-speaking countries during the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

The procedure was initially promoted to discourage masturbation and reduce sexual urges based on moral and religious grounds, a study shows.

Later, modern medical understanding challenged newer claims that circumcision promoted hygiene and prevented disease. 

For instance, the British Medical Association indicated in 2006 that circumcision's health benefits were limited and controversial.

Dr Scott told Bored Panda: “Most parents now cite their primary reasoning for circumcising their male infants as ‘wanting him to look like his father.’ 

“Social comparisons have long been associated with penis size and appearance, and while most of the world does not practice circumcision, most American families have continued the practice for aesthetic reasons and to ‘fit in’ with other males in society.”

nawin/stock.adobe.com Report

Tobias Reaper
Community Member
1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

thats bloody outrageous they are basically mutilating their babies for no reason to fit in with other males its not like when guys get together they get the knobs out and compare them for f***s sake man

View more comments
ADVERTISEMENT
BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting
    #2

    Formula Over Breastfeeding Or Breastfeeding Over Formula

    Formula Over Breastfeeding Or Breastfeeding Over Formula

    Breastfeeding is generally recommended over formula feeding due to the numerous health benefits for both the baby and the mother. 

    Mayo Clinic Press,​​ MedlinePlus, and​​ the Cleveland Clinic support the fact that breast milk provides ideal nutrition tailored to an infant's needs, supports immune system development, and reduces the risk of various infections and conditions like asthma, obesity, and diabetes later in life.

    For mothers, breastfeeding can promote faster recovery post-delivery, reduce the risk of certain cancers, and help in bonding with the baby.

    While formula feeding is a viable and nutritious alternative, especially when breastfeeding is not possible, breastfeeding is often considered superior due to these comprehensive health benefits​, as per the World Health Organization.

    While breastfeeding does provide significant immunity benefits over formula feeding, it is critical to consider that some women simply cannot breastfeed, Dr Scott told Bored Panda in an email. 

    “Milk either does not come in or there are other medical considerations [that] make it impossible,” the professor said. 

    She added: “Women who breastfeed in public are often shamed for not ‘covering up.’ However, women who cannot breastfeed (or choose not to) often face even harsher criticism, especially from other mothers. 

    “Caring for an infant is exhausting, and how a mom chooses to feed her baby is no one's business but her own.”

    Lucy Wolski/Unsplash Report

    Calfun
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Ooh, can we shove the screw up their a*s?

    Load More Replies...
    David
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Title is weird on this one. "...or breastfeeding over formula". It then goes on to state how breastfeeding IS better than formula. I agree with not shaming mothers who are not able to breastfeed for various reasons, but recommending it as the preferred thing for the baby is not shaming.

    Mary Kelly
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    agreed...and, the milk is only better than formula when the mom is well-nourished, well hydrated, and not stressed...

    Belle Miles
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've had six kids and absolutely HATED breastfeeding. I was a teenager and my mother demanded that I breastfeed. You want to know how many people come to visit while your teenage boob is hung out? Every one you know. And they get right up close to you and put their face five inches from your own. Guess who who winds up with body dysphoria? Breastfeeding always felt like a parasite was attached to my boob every time I tried even as an older adult. My sister also has five kids and has NEVER bought a can of formula. My kids are humongous compared to hers. My preemie weighed more than her full term when the were six months old. People who say breast is best can kiss my grits. Fed is best.

    Kalikima
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I never got any milk in to breastfeed with.. if it wasn't for formula, my son would have died.

    Lou Cam
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My Grandad, born 1908, was given watered down condensed milk because his Mum was too ill to produce breast milk. His sister died from failure to thrive. There was no infant formula at the time and wet nurses were for the rich. Whilst breast is best there needs to be a safe viable alternative which formula is. Unfortunately capitalism got in the way and you have large corporations actively pushing formula over breast with deadly consequences in some developing countries with no access to sanitation of bottles or clean water. This does not mean that formula itself is evil. Personally, I had one formula fed (I lost 3 litres of blood in labour in a traumatic birth and my milk just didn't come in) and one I did manage to breast feed for nearly 3 years. There is no difference to their health even years later and studies agree that at age 5 you'd be pushed to scientifically discern the difference.

    KnightOwl
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    As long as the baby is being fed it really shouldn't matter how. I hate all the judgement around this subject. Some people physically can't breastfeed, some people just don't want to, they shouldn't have to explain the reasons to anyone.

    Jude Laskowski
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Kudos to women who donate breast milk.

    Couragetcd
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I tried to donate, after 4 months of feeding and expressing, I felt like I should start mooing! My freezer was full of bags of milk, I was expressing 2 full bottles per side every 3-4 hours, and there was no where in my area to donate. I called the hospitals, shelters, local charities...

    Load More Replies...
    Gretchen
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I agree with the last comment

    Rhett Magnum
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited)

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    No... breastfeeding is superior. Period. I'm tired of this dancing around it to spare people's feelings. Health issues that keep a woman from producing enough milk are incredibly rare. Nearly all women can produce enough milk. Here in Europe it's posted on signs in every pediatric office to debunk the myth. Yes, I agree we shouldn't shame women for not breastfeeding because we never know the situation and shouldn't shame anyone (they might even be doing mixed feeding, who knows). But the fact of the matter is, breastfeeding is what's best for a baby, and physically and emotionally, and most mothers are perfectly capable of providing it if they have the support and discipline to build their milk supply.

    C S
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You said "breastfeeding is superior", but then went on to list situations where it isn't superior, such as health situations, low supply, no support, etc. Don't even get me started on you stating the mother should have the "discipline" to build a supply. Having a baby is hard enough, don't add to their to-do list. If the child was the only issue, yes, breastfeeding is superior, but there are too many factors impacting the mother, for it to be superior in all cases.

    Load More Replies...
    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #3

    Baby Walkers

    Baby Walkers

    Dr. Annalisa Abjelina, a pediatrician, had some harsh things to say about the device used by infants who cannot yet walk on their own to move from one place to another. 

    “Using a baby walker will not help babies learn to stand or walk,” she wrote on Children's Primary Care.

    The pediatrician added: “In fact, there are strong associations between walker use and developmental delays in balance skills that are needed for walking. “Walkers may also interfere with muscle and joint development.”

    Baby walkers were initially adopted for the convenience they offered parents, allowing them to keep their babies occupied while attending to other tasks. 

    Research now suggests that baby walkers might cause more harm than good.

    Statistics show that over 40% of children who use a baby walker end up getting hurt (an estimated 4,000 injuries occur per year in the UK), Walkerville Chiropractic notes.

    근형 김/Pexels Report

    Nitka Tsar
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That‘s not new though. We knew that for at least 10 years slready

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #4

    "Sleep Training"

    "Sleep Training"

    Sleep training methods commonly practiced in Western parenting, such as "crying it out," have been debated for their effectiveness and impact on infants. 

    Research suggests that while these methods may lead to quicker sleep onset, they do not necessarily improve long-term sleep patterns or emotional development.

    "Western countries are typically more individualistic in nature, meaning that we put the needs of the individual above the needs of the group as compared to collectivistic nations, which focus on the welfare of the group as the priority," Dr Scott told Bored Panda.

    She continued: “The Western practice of letting a baby ‘cry it out’ definitely matches with our sense of individualism and the need for babies to self-soothe. 

    “When asked ‘How would you describe yourself?’, most children from individualistic nations will pick personal adjectives such as ‘smart, funny, happy,’ etc., while children from collectivistic countries will choose words to describe their relationship to others, [such as] ‘sister, daughter, friend,’ etc.

    “American babies typically learn to ‘self-soothe’ and ‘sleep through the night’ around six months of age, but the lessons on identity and community will impact them for a lifetime.”

    Kin Li/Unsplash Report

    CanadianDimes
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This one really pisses me off. Crying is the main way babies have of communicating that something is wrong, and newborns don't have the capacity to deceive, so it's not like they're just crying for the hell of it.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #5

    Perfect School Attendance

    Perfect School Attendance

    Perfect attendance awards in schools have historical roots in promoting punctuality and discipline, traits valued during the industrial era when absenteeism could disrupt production.

    According to educational historians, such awards were part of efforts to instill habits that would prepare students for future roles in the workforce. 

    Dr Scott told Bored Panda: “Especially with the interruption in learning due to COVID-19, schools are eager to motivate students to have perfect attendance. 

    “Unfortunately, many students (and parents) start to equate ‘perfect attendance’ with ‘perfect performance.’”

    According to the social psychology expert, some students, especially in high school and university, may expect that simply showing up to all of their classes should earn them higher grades, regardless of the quantity or quality of the assignments they have submitted. 

    She further explained: “Encouraging students to attend class with an award can create an ‘extrinsic motivation,’ where we expect a reward instead of taking pride (internally) for our accomplishments. 

    “Without question, social recognition is valuable, but teaching children to take responsibility for their academic success and to have pride in themselves is priceless.”

    CDC/Unsplash Report

    arthbach
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Perfect attendance, be it at work, or at school, normally means the person doesn't care about the health and well-being of others. They come in when they are sick, and spread their germs. If they had just stayed at home, the total cases of sickness would be far less.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    #6

    Babies In Separate Rooms

    Babies In Separate Rooms

    In many non-Western cultures, co-sleeping with infants is the norm, often seen as crucial for nurturing and bonding. 

    On the other hand, the practice of having babies sleep in separate rooms has become common in the West.

    With important social class disparities, co-sleeping came to be associated with poverty and racial minorities in Westernized society, Hey, Sleepy Baby reported.

    In the early 20th century, Western parenting trends emphasized raising children to be tough and independent, which led to practices that encouraged emotional restraint. 

    This was epitomized by the book The German Mother and Her First Child, which gained popularity during the Nazi regime, promoting strict and detached parenting methods​, Basis Online noted.

    Courtney Kammers/Unsplash Report

    arthbach
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    For the last 30 years at least, in the UK it has been strongly advised that babies under 6 months old sleep in the same room as their parent(s).

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #7

    Pureed Baby Food

    Pureed Baby Food

    According to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, solid foods may be introduced to a child in any order. 

    However, puréed meats, poultry, beans, and iron-fortified cereals are recommended as first foods, especially if a baby has been primarily breastfed, since they provide key nutrients. 

    The Academy states that softer textures are very important when first introducing foods, with infants usually starting with pureed or mashed foods around six months. 

    Certain research suggests pureed baby food was actually adopted due to convenience, both for consumers and manufacturers, and it was only later claimed to be better for digestion, according to Food Timeline.

    Companies like Gerber launched extensive advertising campaigns in the 1930s to persuade parents and doctors of its benefits, emphasizing safety and ease of use over homemade options,​ Solid Starts and Science Minded reported​.

    Karolina Kaboompics/Pexels Report

    Laugh or not
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I didn't think pureed food was easier for digestion, I thought it was easier for mastication on humans that have only a few teeth. Some food can be pretty tough.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #8

    Screen Time

    Screen Time

    “There are plenty of concerns about kids choosing ‘screen time’ over social interactions with peers, sports, and academics,” Dr Scott told Bored Panda.

    The mental health expert continued: “Research is piling up that says Gen Z (and likely Gen Alpha) lacks the social skills and self-confidence to interact with their peers in comparison to previous generations.”

    Nevertheless, some research shows that certain concerns over screen time initially stemmed from anxieties about media influencing societal values, often driven by conservative viewpoints wary of moral impacts. 

    As highlighted by scientists, the evidence did not support implementing less than two hours of screen time a day, as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

    Przemek Klos/stock.adobe.com Report

    Colt Winkler
    Community Member
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I am here to say that everyone can have screen time between 2-4 hours on bp and the interweb/screens. this is not bad in my opinion. screentime is not good, yet not bad. if you are abusing it to the point where you can not have the ability to interact with the world, touch some grass.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda
    #9

    Braces

    Braces

    Braces have a long history, initially associated with status and wealth

    Ancient civilizations, including the Egyptians, used primitive orthodontic devices, often made from gold, to straighten teeth, Acceledontics explains. This practice indicated both a concern for appearance and social status. 

    In the 18th century, modern braces were developed by Pierre Fauchard and later refined by Edward Angle, primarily targeting the wealthy who could afford such treatments. 

    Over time, the focus of braces shifted from merely aesthetic improvements to emphasizing dental health and functional alignment, leading to their widespread use today, as explained by​ Loudoun Orthodontics.

    milanmarkovic78/stock.adobe.com Report

    GirlFriday
    Community Member
    Premium
    1 year ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    How is providing dental health for your child 1.) American and 2.) bad for the child? I know many people that without the help of braces could not speak or chew properly or who were in pain before the braces.

    View more comments
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    See Also on Bored Panda