All misinterpreted concepts that drive you crazy belong here.
This post may include affiliate links.
Are you wanting a pacific example?
There trying too tell you that specific and pacific are one in the same
In my husband's defense he has cerbal palsy and had to do speech therapy. I tease him from time on this one.
People use the word whenever instead of just saying when a lot now. They are not the same thing. Also then and than.
Nuclear is pronounced new-clee-ar, not new-kyoo-lar
YES I WANTED TO YELL AT MY CHEMISTRY TEACHER YESTERDAY ABOUT THIS
bee was just wondering if you got my email? you didnt get back to me (it was an email regarding crowspectre) was wondering if hes still on BP?
Load More Replies...Ahh another person who hates the mispronounced words. I knew I wasn't the only one.
George W. Bush figured Homer Simpson says new-kyoo-lar, and he ought to know
Anything where a character becomes a martial arts master via training montage and effortlessly defeats multiple opponents. It takes years to master skills like that, and most martial artists are smart enough to know that regulated sparring/drills do NOT translate to a fight. We're trained to block, disarm/disable, and call for help. Not to fight them. (at least in my experience)
Most of that is true, but in my experience we are trained to break, mutilate, and kill. If someone attacks you they forfeit their right to walk.
I absolutely hate it when people confuse astronomy and astrology just because the only thing they have in common is stars
Anybody who thinks that zodiac signs control their personality annoy me. Like oh I got an F on a test, must be because I’m an asparagus.
I don’t exactly believe in astrology, but I find it amusing that my sign is pretty accurate in a lot of ways (I’m a Pisces)
YES. The times that I have seen people do that is enough to give me a permanent cringe on my face.
I once mentioned I was into astronomy to a teacher and she went “oh, you also like the zodiac signs”
Load More Replies...When people say “I COULD care less”. That means you care A harder one: affect and effect - R.A.V.E.N: Remember, Affect is a Verb, Effect is a Noun The worst: when someone says “I will borrow you something“ - you can borrow something FROM someone or lend something TO someone
I have a few pet peeves, but one of my strongest is "I could of" or "He must of." It's"have". Not "of". Stop spelling what you think you're hearing.
THANK YOU!!! This kind of lazy English drives me bonkers! (Actually, it's more of a putt...a very short putt...edge of the cup putt. 😂)
Load More Replies...If you're writing about what people say, my bugbear is the annoying American saying that they 'drugged something' . You dragged it, not subjected it to being drugged with medication or illegal drugs.
Can you itch my back for me? That one drives me CRAZY. Itch is the sensation, you want me to SCRATCH your itch.
Why can't you borrow something for someone else? Like a third party transaction in progress.
Or spelling etc. as ect. It's short for et cetera. I've known many smart people who make this mistake and all I can think is "I know you're smarter than that."
My bug bears too.plus when people say "I aksed" instead of "I asked" or "I seen" when should be "I saw".
I've never heard "I'll borrow you something" but I can say "loan" is not a verb
Well-meaning people often tell folks who are going through difficult times, “The Bible says that God won’t put on you more than you can bear.” The Bible DOES NOT say that, and does not promote that concept. The scripture that people use to say that is 1st Corinthians 10:13, which says: “ 13 No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it.” That scripture is specifically about temptation, but folks have misinterpreted it to apply to incredibly tragic and devastating situations in life. People go through things that are more than they can bear every day: the death of a child, the loss of a job, the end of a marriage; all of these things are “more than they can bear”. When people misquote this scripture to suffering people it implies that they are weak and inadequate. It has been used to discourage people from seeking outside help for emotional disorders and other problems. I’m a former pastor and I spent a great deal of my time trying to help suffering people deal with things that were more than they could bear, and not feel guilty about breaking under the pressure.
I have stage 4 cancer and I don't mind if someone says they'll pray for me. I figure all good wishes count.
Load More Replies...Yes. When a cascading series of four unavoidable, unpredictable misfortunes in a row ended with my cousin's little boy dead, when any one of those events going another way would have saved him, I nearly couldn't bear it. I don't know how his parents, his brother, and his grandparents got to the next day still sane and breathing. If you tell me a god had anything to do with that day, I will tell you that you follow a cruel and unworthy god.
If anyone says that near me I always say, "Then explain suicide and heroin addicts..." and walk the fug away. It is a truly cruel thing to say to someone suffering.
Religion has an answer for everything like "God answers all prayers; sometimes the answer is no". Prayers are like birthday wishes; sometimes they come to be, sometimes they don't, but I doubt a God has anything to do with it. But by all means, if it brings you comfort, go for it. The only precise words FROM GOD are the Commandants, (which are broken daily often by those who claim to be the most religious), and that's only if you believe Moses actually got them from God. 40 days and 40 nights TWICE can do a lot of chiseling. He was a politician, saying whatever was necessary to keep his people in line, and THAT hasn't changed. Bible books were determined by men deciding what they wanted to include and what to omit, or possibly, what they wanted us to know and NOT know. Keep in mind that until 500 years ago, man thought the world was flat and still burned witches even more recently. But we accept what men of 10,000 years said about God speaking to them in a dream. GEEZ!!
I never took that saying to include the assumption of "without help," On the other hand God is definitely not the author of my troubles so I agree the saying is suspect for that reason. Perhaps we should remember the Beatles and "get by with a little help from our friends."
Introverts hating all people. You just have to get us to open up to you. Plus we have friends… sometimes. Quit categorizing us and saying we’re all the same!
I agree in part and disagree in part. I agree that we introverts are not all the same and that being an introvert doesn’t mean that we hate people. Where I disagree is the statement that “you just have to get us to open up to you”; I don’t want anyone to try to “get me to open up to them”, that’s not anyone’s job, and it’s annoying when people try to force me to be social. The better course of action is to respect my comfort zone and understand that social interaction is energy-draining and can be uncomfortable. We introverts are often told that we need to break out of our shell; but who’s telling the extroverts that we’re not broken, we don’t need to be fixed, so they should just leave us alone.
Yeah, I might have explained myself wrong, but I agree with you fully. I’m not that good at explaining real stuff.
Load More Replies...Ok can someone explain to me what feeling introverted is like cuz I thought I was introverted but then after a few years of being in an accepting and awesome friend group and community, I came to a revelation that Im just a socially anxious omnivert and worrying about what to say to people was the draining/tiring part. But I’m starting to get past the anxiety and I really love talking to people and learning more about them cuz people are so interesting! When I’m feeling super introverted I just want to talk to nobody and just chill while my friends talk and I listen, but I’m not exactly sure if that’s how everyone feels. But the more I think about it i get more confused cuz humans are social animals so every human has an instinct to want a social connection like having friends/family, and if you don’t isn’t that like schizoid personality disorder or something? The more I think about it I’m just like really confused 😐
When I speak of being an introvert, it has very little to do with being awkward in social situations. It’s not about being shy, or uncomfortable in front of people. It’s more about how my energy flows in social situations. Social situations take energy from introverts and to recharge we need time and space alone. Extroverts, on the other had, get energized when they are with other people and seek out those opportunities.
Load More Replies...True this comes from buzzfeed but the definition suits me well I'm an ambivert. Also true I have bipolar disorder.lol
Just because I am a male doesn't mean that I want to avoid child care duties. I have no problem changing my child, however, I've noticed many establishments do not have changing stations in the men's room. They will often not have a family room either but will have the changing stations in the womens. It's very frustrating, we are partners and therefore should be sharing the responsibilities. It's not one sided
My husband gets so happy when we find the few places that have them in both. He has always felt frustrated about the lack of them because it made it so much harder for him to take the kids anywhere if I was at work.
Men are welcome to come in to women's washrooms with babies if this is a problem, why do people care? Most men are not creeps, especially with a poopie diaper! We have stall doors, why not both sex bathrooms? My friend had to bring his daughter into the men's washrooms as a single father, until she was 6, she got to see the urinals being used. I thought he should just use the women's when he had to change her/wipe her bottom.
Most Malls in NZ have Changing rooms that can be used by men or women. You may need to explain that to some very ignorant women who consider that it's their place alone. I wonder how they'd get on with a single Dad?
Words in the English language are often misused. Here are a few examples: It's supposedly, not supposably. Flustrated is not a real word. You're either frustrated or flustered. Are and our cannot be used interchangeably. Same goes for ensure and insure. They have completely different meanings.
I use flustrated the same way I use fantabulous. For specific effect.
I feel like we should make flustrated a word , as a combination between the two lol
Aesthetic. "That is very aesthetic." Means absolutely nothing!! Ugh.
I'm surprised this wasn't brought up: the overuse of "I" to somehow sound more educated, when "me" is actually the correct choice. For example, someone saying, "It happened to Susan and I." If you use the trick of splitting the sentence in two - "It happened to Susan" and "It happened to I" - it's seen quickly that "me" is the correct choice. Just because you think the use of "I" makes the sentence sound classier doesn't necessarily mean that's true. *Steps down from soapbox.*
Don't forget "elicit" and "illicit." And "complementary" and "complimentary."
Predominate is a verb, not an adjective, and predominately is not a real word
Not every autistic person is a savant! It's a spectrum, and some people will find things easier than others. Also, our special interests aren't always trains or dinosaurs. It might be a show or an animal, and I know that multiple people have autism as their special interest!
My son's interests are movies. He knows everything about the movies he has watched. He studies the credits and knows who the director and producer are and can give you a list of other movies they have made. He especially likes Japanese monster movies and series. He can tell you who the suit actors were for every Toho movie. Someday he might be the film historian in some documentary, who knows. I'm very proud of him. 😊
I'm on the spectrum and as a video game addict, I occasionally find video games that can get super hard and end up getting really good at them. my big three are tetris attack (or anything of the same exact type), worlds hardest game, & I've currently got a record of 18 minutes 33 seconds in OvO. :)
Load More Replies...Thank you! My special interest is pet chickens! Everyone thinks it's dolls or something, but no, I love dresses (ball gowns) and chickens. Also most people don't believe I'm on the spectrum because I can make eye contact and hold a conversation. Being autistic means that you have dips in some skills and rises in others. And where they are is different for each autistic person
So does that mean that anyone who has an extreme passion for something and will constantly talk about that thing could be on the spectrum? (I'm sorry if that sounds mean or anything I'm just not very familiar with how autism works.)
Load More Replies...I don't understand anyone who makes those generalized ideas why would all people who have an autism like one thing. It's like saying all girls like dolls or dresses. Stupid is far more prevalent than intelligence. Well this one is ignorance.
When you say you're from New York and people automatically think NYC. Hello! There is a whole other land of Upstate NY that is (mostly) quite lovely.
Or from New Zealand and thinking Auckland is the be all and end all of NZ. It isn't! There are far more great places around NZ to visit.
I've lived in eight New York counties and spent time in lots of others. At one time I had one neighbor family in a half mile radius (everything else was apples or corn), at another I had a Mexican restaurant and a falafel place in my building, and now the closest place with a cash register is two miles away
Sometimes people realize there is more to the state than NYC, but even then it's only Westchester or the Catskills. Nothing west or north of that exists it would seem 🤷♂️
Lose and loose. You lose a game, the ball is loose. They are NOT interchangeable!
I've been seeing this on certain captions and I wish I could get my hands on them to redo them!
Venom vs Poison. Yes they are both toxins, no they aren't the same thing. Venom has to be injected via fangs or a stinger. Jellyfish, Man o' wars, bees, ants, wasps, spiders, scorpions, turantulas, some plants, lionfish, stonefish, cone snails, octopus, squid, beaded lizards, gila monsters, komodo dragons, and roughly about 600 out of the roughly 3,600 species of snakes are venomous. Poison has to be absorbed either through contact with the skin or ingestion. Toads, newts, and some frogs are poisonous. Garter snakes, tiger keeldback snakes, and hognose snakes are both venomous and poisonous. (Garter snakes and hognoses are harmless, please love them.) The most important thing to remember though is that if you see an animal and you aren't sure if it is poisonous and/or venomous just leave them alone and they will leave you alone. Animals are afraid of us and it is important to respect them and admire them from a safe distance. :) Love all animals you see. They are adorable :)
If it bites you and you die: venom. If you bite it and you die: poison.
I see it more in online dialogue than anywhere else, but when people say they "c/w/should of" done such-and-such, it drives me crazy. Properly, and sensibly, it is "c/w/should HAVE" or "c/w/should'VE" as the contraction. "Of" is a preposition, not a verb; you are describing a past action by using the phrase "could have"___.
Some would of benefitted from paying attention in english class /s
I guess the irony is lost on someone who doesn't capitalize "English" or use punctuation.
Load More Replies...Ah. I made a comment about this earlier before seeing this bit. Thank you.
I also dislike "if I would have" as opposed to "if I had," but that might be a personal thing
Me too, though I don't see/hear that as often (thankfully!!!)
Load More Replies...Heaphones/earbuds mean I do not want to talk to anyone. Do not attempt conversation, I will ignore you.
Headphones/earbuds mean I want to avoid some ambient distracting/painful/irritating noise, not talking to people.
Instruments are not the same because they look similar. A cello is very different from a doublebass. A piccolo is very different from a flute, and both are different from an oboe. A marimba and vibraphone are different. But the worst? A violin and a viola are not the same. You get the picture.
As an oboe and English Horn player this drives me nuts. No, an oboe is not a clarinet. And an English Horn is nothing at all like a French Horn.
Nor is an English horn English, unless it's a Howarth... I've also met people who get oboe and cello mixed up, I guess because they both end with an "O" sound? And I once met somebody who said "Saxophone--is that the one that goes like this?" and made trombone gestures
Load More Replies...Yeah, I'm a cellist and I can't stand it when people who aren't in orchestra just assume all string players are violinists.
Load More Replies...People who begin everything they say with “so”.
People who think that breast cancer is always curable and that all it takes is a fight. If breast cancer only stayed in the breast, it could be curable. The problem is that it spreads to important parts like the brain, lungs, liver and bones. Once it spreads it is classified as metastatic breast cancer or stage 4. So far, it cannot be cured at this stage and no amount of fighting will change that. You hope your doctor can find a treatment that works for you and doesn't have too many side effects. And you hope it works as long as possible.
It's "library", not "libary". So annoying.
Off topic, slightly, but I've been seeing this more often and it's one of my bugbears: punctuation goes INSIDE quotation marks. There are a few exceptions (according to whichever style guide is referenced), but in most cases this is the correct usage. For example: 'It's "library," not "libary."'
When people say, "Blood is thicker than water." The full proverb is, “The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb.” It means that bonds we choose are stronger than bonds of family. You can choose to have a great bond with your family, but just because they are family, does not mean you must, or that those relationships are more important than others.
This appears to be wrong. From the wikipedia article discussing the saying: "Two modern commentators, author Albert Jack[17] and Messianic Rabbi Richard Pustelniak,[18] claim that the original meaning of the expression was that the ties between people who have made a blood covenant (or have shed blood together in battle) were stronger than ties formed by "the water of the womb", thus "The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb". Neither of the authors cite any sources to support their claim.[17][18]"
The constant misuse of "women" vs "woman" in sentences. Women is the plural, it's not interchangeable except under special circumstances. For example: - The woman says hello, and the women went for a drink. (The first one is singular and the second refers to a group of 2 or more) - Fighting for women's rights and a woman's purse was left behind. (The first one infers all women as a group in the possessive, while the second only refers to one). You CAN fight for a woman's right to a fair trial, for example, but you wouldn't say "the women was brought up on charges" referring to the same person. Drives me crazy in news articles and poorly written e-books. Please don't get me started on social media.
Some speech no-nos just seem to become common usage like ending a sentence with a preposition, but others we hear from people who should know better like politicians, newscasters, celebrities who influence the young, and, yes, even teachers, are so unnecessary. "Him and me are going to the movies". Anyone, regardless of failing education, should acknowledge that they probably wouldn't say "him is going" or "me is going" so if there's any light in that head, they should be able to figure out that it should be "he and I are..." Also applies to objects of prepositions such as "with she and I" (with is a preposition for anyone who didn't know that) - if you wouldn't normally say "with she" or "with I", then again, that light, dim as it might be, should tell you something doesn't sound right.
Us are going to where them are, to hang out with they
Load More Replies...Ending a sentence with a preposition is perfectly acceptable. Stop getting your infected from Beavis and Butthead
It's only acceptable because, AS I SAID, it's become common usage. But still, formal or intelligent speech still recommends a correct sentence. But, sadly, these days properly wording a sentence with a preposition would amount to "Duh, with whom are you f-in' going". Kind of defeats the purpose of attempting to sound intelligent.
Load More Replies...I have a couple: Antisocial does not mean you don’t like talking to people. That’s asocial. Antisocial means that it is counteractive to society and laws of society, such as antisocial personality disorder/commonly known as psychopathy. “I’m a little OCD about this” just because you want something organized a certain way. OCD is your head telling you “do this or else [insert something bad] happens!” Although these intrusive thoughts can sometimes happen to anyone, it’s not considered a disorder unless it is stopping you from doing stuff or harming you (you’re unable to clean your room because you can’t touch dirty things, you wash your hands to the point that they’re drying out and bleeding, not doing everything completely symmetrical gives you extreme anxiety, etc.)
That because you are doing well financially your friends and family think you are a ATM they can hit up whenever they want.
Sociopath vs. Psychopath. The main difference is whether or not the person has consciousness. A psychopath will deceive and steal without remorse, possibly pretending to feel guilty. But, a sociopath typically retains some level of consciousness and may experience regret after theft, as they have some awareness of right and wrong.
Yes thank you!! Consciousness just means they are alive and able to have a conversation somehow!
Load More Replies...I think psychopaths are born, physically lacking empathy, while sociopaths are made through a lax conscience (being exposed to/doing something bad so many times it doesn’t feel bad anymore). However it’s just a hypothesis and there’s no evidence to support it (I couldn’t gather any data really without probably an unethical experiment, or talking to sociopaths/psychopaths, which I have no means to)
No. The main difference between a psychopath and a sociopath is that both are made up psychological phenomena that psychologists no longer recognise! Historically, a psychopath is unable to feel because they do not understand emotions. A sociopath uses the emotions of others to manipulate them- they have a very good understanding of human emotions but don't care unless it can benefit them somehow.
The trouble being that some sociopaths take great pleasure in the harms they cause and it can be both consciously or subconsciously. A dangerous thing.
Incorrect. True psychopaths are not aware of the concept of right and wrong and will often commit heinous crimes and be found at the scene, because they don't feel the need to flee. They often exhibit "weird" or "crazy" behavior and have trouble keeping a home or a job due to their abnormal behavior. Sociopaths KNOW the difference between right and wrong and will flee a crime scene, hide evidence, lie to police etc. They however, are generally seen as "normal" and harmless. Most sociopaths are SOOO GOOD at pretending to have feelings and compassion, that EVERYONE is shocked when they commit a crime against a person. Psychopaths don't understand that their actions hurt others, Sociopaths know.....they just don't have the capability, mental capacity or desire to care.
The saying that represents itself as an actual definition, which is; the definition of insanity, doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome. No, that is closer in relation to stupidity. There are alot more factors in insanity. The answer is not a rubber stamp one. It is a more complex answer that i would like to type here but can't think of right at this moment.
I think the original quote said "ONE definition of insanity," but the quote is so old that I doubt anyone had a correct definition yet
I think this definition you're talking about started out as a joke like having hair on you knuckles - and looking for it.
I could be wrong, but I seem to recall that said quotation (if we're gonna be d1cks here - "quote" is a verb; "quotation" is the noun 😛) was made by Albert Einstein, in what one can only assume was a cheeky way. I don't imagine he was trying to insert himself into any dictionary. 🤣
Any time anyone asks, "What was your name?" IS! IS MY NAME! I'm right here, I'm not dead yet.
I hate how a lot of straight people think that just because someone is bi-sexual, they're attracted to everyone of their gender.
I wouldn't even have considered that, but try to be patient with them or at least ignore them for whatever ignorance you think they may have. People are still trying to wrap their heads around all these 'sexualities' that have cropped up in recent years, some that are probably legit, others that sound like bull. And I don't worry so much about all this business going on about schools keeping secrets about a child's choices. The grapevine, the Internet or another spiteful child will let the cat out of the bag. What would disappoint me and hurt me is that my child didn't come to me first. But I realize not ALL parents have UNCONDITIONAL love.
Bashing others for incorrect pronunciations while their native languages don't have some sounds
I would take the person with the incorrect pronunciation, whether English or a native language, over the person rude enough to mention it anytime. People have a tendency to notice the mistakes of others while ignoring their own.
Yes! They are not stupid b/C they can't pronounce/hear certain letters. Or do not know the ideal grammar. I cannot hear differences in Mandarin inflections at all. French male/female inanimate objects and grammar is a whole lot of memorization.
Inertia vs Momentum. Momentum is that a body in motion will stay in motion unless acted upon by another force. Inertia is that a body at rest will stay at rest unless acted upon by another force. I see these constantly misused
In my physics class we’re taught that inertia is just the inherent property of a body that allows it to either continue staying in rest forever or continue moving in motion forever unless acted upon by an external force
Newtons first law of motion: Every object perseveres in its state of rest, or of uniform motion in a right line, unless it is compelled to change that state by forces impressed thereon. (Aka Inertia) 😁
Load More Replies...Absolutely wrong. Momentum is just mass times velocity, a measurement and not a law. Inertia is a concept covering an object both tending to stay stopped when stopped, and tending to stay in motion when in motion until, in either case, another force interacts with the object. Inertia is both of the things you described covering objects interacting with forced and momentum is a whole other quantity that is conserved when objects interact with other objects.
To put it in more practical terms, momentum is the amount of work required to change the velocity of an object.
Load More Replies...That older people's terminologies such as "colored people" and "gays". May just be just be the names stuck in their dialog but don't always represent their actual more up-to-date views.
Older person here with an honest question. I thought two men who are a couple were considered "gay." What is the acceptable terminology? Not that it comes up in conversation. If I have to make introductions I usually just say "this is John and Robert, we work together..." or something like that. It's not my place to divulge anyone's private life to anyone else.
What they're referring to is using "the gays" as a broad brush term, almost always negatively. To use "gay" as an adjective, if you're sure that that's what they are, is fine AFAIK.
Load More Replies...In my lifetime the "correct" noun for many groups of people have updated to a noun deemed by the group as insulting ten years prior. It's exhausting to stay pc anymore.
I still call them “ queers” . Gay is an adjective not an noun. Please read English authors for a sense of the words gay I still use the word queer. Gay is not an noun , it is an adjective and many excellent authors have used it correctly
Gluten is bad for our health. If you not ceoliaque, gluten is perfectly fine for you. My son is ceoliaque and I’m sick of people playing the gluten-free game!!
My mom is too, and people keep telling her to stop the diet, they don't believe her when she says she's actually allergic to it
British spelling: coeliac is derived from the Greek word koiliakos, which means pain in the bowels.
I managed a gluten-free bakery for a while; before which, I'd been working in foodservice right round the dawning of the Atkins nonsense that had people convinced that low/no-carb was the way to be... I can't even begin to count the number of efftards that claimed to have coeliac disease, just because they were too embarrassed aboot their dietary preference and too ignorant to realise that the GF (usually rice-based) version of their dish was easily higher in simple carbs and lower in fibre than the EVIL wheat-based version! (These same people also tended to be fine with ordering Alfredo/gravy/etc. made with a wheat flour roux, but hey - WTF would I know? I only make the $€i+ for a living...)
When I go to a restaurant and ask for gluten free food and they ask "Celiac, allergy or preference." It shouldn't matter, I don't want it.
It does matter, though. With coeliac or a severe allergy, cross-contamination is a big problem. If you just prefer not to eat wheat (which is, of course, a valid dietary preference, just like me being vegetarian) trace amounts won't do you any harm. Some kitchens may not feel comfortable serving people with coeliac/allergies because they can't provide the necessary level of safety, but may be fine serving gluten-free meals to those who prefer them.
Load More Replies...Synergy. The concept that diverse parts working in harmony can achieve far more than the combined efforts of the individual pieces working separately is a brilliant revelation that can actually make a difference in organizational culture. Instead it for co-opted as a dumb buzzword for executives to try and sound smart and now just gets mocked as meaningless.
I almost wish I needed a job, because I'd love to write on an application that I have facilitated synergistic paradigms
Rogue and rouge are not the same thing.
Ewes and you . ewes are female not the plural of you.
Uh, actuallyyyy it's spelled 'yous' or 'youse' and it's perfectly good regional English, just like single-syllable 'flower' or double-syllable 'bear' or whatever new vocab the youths are using for 'commendable' these days.
And yews are bushes/shrubs that were once used to make chemotherapy drugs. I believe they are now just made in a lab.
Using “of” instead of “have” (could’ve, would’ve, should’ve = could have, would have, should have). Honorable mentions are the mispronunciation of jewelry and mischievous. Joo-wuhl-ree, not joo-luh-ree. Miss-che-vus, not miss-chee-vee-us.
The hijab ban in France, Uyghur Muslims in China, and Israel’s occupation on Palestine.
AI. People who think Chat GPT is magic and has all the answers. They're literally programs that guess the next word and they're getting better at remembering more of the previous words.
"The customer is always right" is a severely misrepresented idea. The actual quote is "The customer is always right in matters of taste."
It's not a quote it's a slogan popularised by Selfridge and it always was just "The customer is always right".
The comment is wrong regardless of which one you use. Some customers have bad taste. And as for being right? Yeah, nah. Unless you have the law backing you up.
They can have bad taste according to you, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't give them what they want.
Load More Replies..."The customer is always right" is a severely misrepresented idea. The actual quote that this comes from is "The customer is always right in matters of taste." This simply means that the customer always knows what they like and want regardless of anyone else's opinion.
Actually, this is the 3rd or fourth time you posted it. Enjoy the downvotes.
"He/she is good people."
I think everyone who says this is aware of the correct grammar. Singular and plural are pretty easy concepts that stay more or less the same in all European languages. There's nothing wrong with colloquialisms.
Heaphones/earbuds mean I do not want to talk to anyone. Do not attempt conversation, I will ignore you.
As most of us would ignore you. Unless it is important to get your attention. Like you're about to walk into something.
Multi-tasking is not a thing. No one can efficiently do more than one thing at a time.
I can. I can read music, play an instrument, keep a steady beat, and follow a conductor at the same time :) musicians do it all the time, we have to.
May I also add; keeping step, walking in the right direction, and avoiding potholes to that list ( that is if you are in a marching band )
Load More Replies...I multitask all the time. Due to ADHD I get more done if I'm multitasking. It drives me absolutely crazy when people tell me that's impossible. Just because you can't do it doesn't mean I can't. ESPECIALLY WHEN I LITERALLY DO IT IN FRONT OF YOU!
Multi-tasking does not necessarily mean that you can do two or more things all in the same split-second. It generally means that you can fold a load of laundry, wash the breakfast dishes, answer the phone, pick up your child at his sleepover, throw in another load, and pee all in the same hour before walking the dog. It requires haste rather than laziness, and that's why some people can't multi-task, and it can be applied to any several chores you may have within an hour or a day.
So, what about breathing? Reading and breathing? Eating, reading and breathing?!
People do when they drive. Or perform a plethora of other tasks.
As someone who is incredibly bad at multitasking, I don't think this is true. Because it is something I find very hard, I notice - with envy - people managing a few things at once without thinking about it. Often, I do in fact complete a task more efficiently than others because I focus on that one task. However, over a number of hours and different tasks, I find I need more time to complete everything than multitaskers. Further, some tasks themselves require the ability to do different things at the same time, if like me that does not come easy to you, then you really notice multitasking is a good skill.
"The customer is always right" is a severely misrepresented idea. The actual quote is "The customer is always right in matters of taste."
Sale vs sell. It drives me crazy especially on the different market places people post on. Saling a 2001 Toyota, don't low-ball me I know what I got! Ffs it's selling and now I wouldn't buy it simply because you're an idiot!
"Lead" pronounced "leed" is the present tense of the verb meaning to guide or command. "Led" is the past tense of that verb. "Lead" pronounced "led" is a soft, dense and poisonous metal. "Metal" is an element or alloy with metallic properties. "Medal" is an award for an accomplishment, as in sports or war.
When a prompt asks for "commonly misrepresented concepts" and 75% of the entries are about misspellings and mispronunciations and dialect per peeves.
Sale vs sell. It drives me crazy especially on the different market places people post on. Saling a 2001 Toyota, don't low-ball me I know what I got! Ffs it's selling and now I wouldn't buy it simply because you're an idiot!
"Lead" pronounced "leed" is the present tense of the verb meaning to guide or command. "Led" is the past tense of that verb. "Lead" pronounced "led" is a soft, dense and poisonous metal. "Metal" is an element or alloy with metallic properties. "Medal" is an award for an accomplishment, as in sports or war.
When a prompt asks for "commonly misrepresented concepts" and 75% of the entries are about misspellings and mispronunciations and dialect per peeves.
