Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
“First Sydney Sweeney, Now Keira Knightley”: Star’s Answer To J.K. Rowling Question Sparks Fury
Netizens were left bitterly disappointed over Keira Knightley’s reaction to the boycott of the Harry Potter universe by transgender activists.
She pleaded ignorance to the controversy surrounding author J.K. Rowling, claiming she was “aware” of it only after joining Audible’s new audiobook rendition of the franchise’s seven books.
Highlights
- Fans expressed disappointment over Keira Knightley’s reaction to the boycott of the Harry Potter universe.
- She claimed she wasn't "aware" of the controversy surrounding J.K. Rowling before signing to be part of the new audiobooks for the franchise's seven books.
- Keira Knightley will be the voice of Professor Umbridge in the audiobooks.
- Some felt the two-time Oscar nominee chose her “paycheck over morals.”
“She looks openly pissed at being asked the question,” one commented online.
RELATED:
Fans expressed disappointment over Keira Knightley’s reaction to the boycott of the Harry Potter universe
Image credits: Swan Gallet/WWD
Keira Knightley agreed to lend her voice to the character of Professor Umbridge in Pottermore Publishing and Audible‘s Harry Potter: The Full-Cast Audio Editions.
The actress claimed she was “not aware” of fans’ calls to boycott the audiobooks over J.K. Rowling’s anti-trans views.
Image credits: Luca Teuchmann/WireImage
“I was not aware of that, no. I’m very sorry,” Knightley told Decider before letting out a laugh.
She then said she hopes people can figure out “how to live together” despite different opinions.
“I think we’re all living in a period of time right now where we’re all going to have to figure out how to live together, aren’t we?” the actress said. “We’ve all got very different opinions. I hope that we can all find respect.”
“I’m very sorry,” Knightley said before laughing in the middle of her answer
Image credits: Harry Potter
The response from the British actress sparked a firestorm of reactions online, with many finding her laugh disrespectful. Some felt she chose her “paycheck over morals.”
“Is she laughing ??? Gosh this is the worst answer,” one said, while another agreed, “That laugh says NOT sorry.”
“‘I wanted the money and I din’t care about human rights’ there I fixed it for you,” read one comment online.
Some felt the two-time Oscar nominee chose her “paycheck over morals”
Image credits: Hits Radio
“Meaningless word salad. This is such a disappointing non-answer. Rowling is the one who lacks respect and refuses to live together,” one said.
“She is, in fact, not sorry,” one said. Another exclaimed, “ewww wtf was that response.”
“Hate isn’t an opinion,” said another.
Image credits: Netflix
One said, “I guess the umbridge role is fitting.”
Others sided with the two-time Oscar nominee and said, “She has nothing to apologise for.”
“Good answer! What else would she say. It’s none of her business,” one said.
Image credits: deciderdotcom/TikTok
Image credits: CashLorenShow
Another wrote, “Good for her! Just ignore the noise, everyone’s trying to cancel everyone. She’s right, just get along!”
“The body language says ‘nope don’t care about all that’ and I love it,” another said.
“First Sydney Sweeney, now Keira Knightley,” one said, possibly referencing headlines about Sydney Sweeney registering as a Republican voter in Florida a few months before the last election season.
Fans have been calling for a boycott of the audiobooks over J.K. Rowling’s loud anti-trans views
Image credits: Wiktor Szymanowicz/Future Publishing
Image credits: stuckinrevmode
The news of the audiobooks left fans outraged as Rowling is the producer through her Pottermore Publishing company.
The author’s vocal, anti-trans opinions have angered fans over the last few years, with actors from the Harry Potter movies distancing themselves and putting out statements in support of the transgender community.
View this post on Instagram
Image credits: Neoncookies111
In addition to talking about the audiobooks, Knightley recently discussed her hit film Bend It Like Beckham.
The original film’s director, Gurinder Chadha, confirmed that a sequel is being developed, more than two decades after the 2002 sports comedy-drama starring Knightley and Parminder Nagra as soccer players hit the big screen.
Knightley said it was “exciting” to see a sequel to her 2002 hit sports comedy-drama Bend It Like Beckham
Image credits: Sundance/WireImage
Knightley said it was “exciting” to see a sequel and hoped to be cast as the coach.
“I need to be the coach,” she said in an AP interview clip.
She expressed gratitude over being part of something that is associated with so much “legacy” and “positivity.”
“I think it’s so amazing that a film that was made nearly 25 years ago, it’s still the one that if someone comes up to me, it’s about that film,” she told People last month.
“Particularly so many girls do play [soccer] now, and they want to come up and talk about it,” she added. “So it’s amazing to be a part of something that has, kind of, legacy and that positivity around it.”
“First Sydney Sweeney, now Keira Knightley,” one commented online
Image credits: loveiaria
Image credits: hotwingheiress
Image credits: kenstromger
Image credits: 2136279841m1
Image credits: debradickerson
Image credits: IronMikeSwims
Image credits: DaleKerr
Image credits: singfromthehair
Image credits: iampankaj_007
Image credits: bellyboy672
Image credits: ContrarianSaver
Image credits: Sorelle_Arduino
Image credits: mr_kemy
Image credits: The_Bubbadude
Image credits: Imran_Akram_001
Image credits: Hippiepig
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
FreeTheUnicorn 4 months ago
If she actually disagreed with Rowlings views, she'd say so. Her silence on the actual issues means she's more than supportive.
UKGrandad 4 months ago (edited)
Right, because saying anything in public that is not 100% validating of the trans ideology doesn't instantly invoke the rage of the El Jibitiqu enforcers, does it? It doesn't matter how accepting and supporting one may be of people to live as they would like to live, unless one also absolutely affirms that one believes the metaphysical claims that men are women if they say they are and that therefore women's rights are actually women's and men who say they are women's rights, one is 'the enemy' and fair game for the hate squads. That final step - the affirmation of the metaphysical - is the only thing that will satisfy them, and the fact that it IS metaphysical rather than reality is neither here nor there, one must take the vow or be forever labelled a 'bigot', 'transphobe', 'hater'. Can you really blame people for keeping their heads down when the alternative is to publicly claim to believe something that clearly isn't true, because that is the only way to stave off the mob once one is on their radar?
Load More Replies...
iseefractals 4 months ago
Always like her, like her even more now. Everyone needs to stop validating the narcissists.
FreeTheUnicorn 4 months ago
If she actually disagreed with Rowlings views, she'd say so. Her silence on the actual issues means she's more than supportive.
UKGrandad 4 months ago (edited)
Right, because saying anything in public that is not 100% validating of the trans ideology doesn't instantly invoke the rage of the El Jibitiqu enforcers, does it? It doesn't matter how accepting and supporting one may be of people to live as they would like to live, unless one also absolutely affirms that one believes the metaphysical claims that men are women if they say they are and that therefore women's rights are actually women's and men who say they are women's rights, one is 'the enemy' and fair game for the hate squads. That final step - the affirmation of the metaphysical - is the only thing that will satisfy them, and the fact that it IS metaphysical rather than reality is neither here nor there, one must take the vow or be forever labelled a 'bigot', 'transphobe', 'hater'. Can you really blame people for keeping their heads down when the alternative is to publicly claim to believe something that clearly isn't true, because that is the only way to stave off the mob once one is on their radar?
Load More Replies... iseefractals 4 months ago
Always like her, like her even more now. Everyone needs to stop validating the narcissists.
You May Like Newly Released Epstein Doc Has 'Harry Potter' Fans Furious With JK Rowling “I’ll Wear It To Your Funeral”: 30 Female Celebrities Who Didn’t Hold Back In Interviews Serena Williams Slammed Over 'Disgusting' Super Bowl Ad Amid Controversial Weight Loss Transformation
Gabija Saveiskyte
Analice Couto
Karina Babenok
Related on Bored Panda
3
42