Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Dan Schneider’s Defensive Statement Resurfaces As Amanda Bynes Breaks Silence On Disturbing Viral Video
Amanda Bynes breaking silence and Dan Schneideru2019s defensive statement resurfaces amid viral video controversy.

Dan Schneider’s Defensive Statement Resurfaces As Amanda Bynes Breaks Silence On Disturbing Viral Video

-9

ADVERTISEMENT

After Amanda Bynes broke her silence about a disturbing rumor that emerged this week, netizens were quick to resurface “strange” comments that former Nickelodeon producer Dan Schneider made about the teenage star.

Schneider’s resurfaced comments reignited scrutiny about his behavior toward Bynes and her fellow child stars. Netizens also took particular notice of the former Nickelodeon producer’s defensive statements about his shows’ inappropriate jokes.

Highlights
  • Dan Schneider’s past comments about Amanda Bynes recently resurfaced after a viral, disturbing TikTok video accused the former Nickelodeon producer of impregnating the teenage star when she was 13.
  • Amanda Bynes broke her silence about the viral TikTok video’s allegations, clarifying that the rumors were false.
  • Despite this, the TikTok video’s accusations and Schneider’s own comments around Bynes' teenage years reignited debates around his past behavior.
RELATED:

    Dan Schneider has defended his work at Nickelodeon, arguing that the shows’ jokes were written for a kid audience

    Image credits: Jeff Kravitz/Getty Images via FilmMagic

    Dan Schneider had previously spoken about Bynes in a conversation published on his YouTube channel, DanWarp, where he spoke with BooG!e, the former iCarly actor who played T-Bo. 

    ADVERTISEMENT

    During their conversation, BooG!e pointed out that some of the jokes Schneider wrote for his Nickelodeon shows were now being viewed as inappropriate for children, even though they were often delivered by kids

    Schneider pushed back on the insinuation, insisting that “every one of those jokes was written for a kid audience because kids thought they were funny, and only funny.”

    Image credits: Jon Kopaloff/Getty Images via FilmMagic

    He also insisted that he was not reluctant to remove jokes that didn’t hold up over time. 

    “Let’s cut those jokes out of the show, just like I would have done 20 years ago or 25 years ago,” he said.“I want my shows to be popular. I want everyone to like (the shows), the more people who liked the shows, the happier I am.”

    Netizens, however, were not as easy to convince. Following his comments, netizens pointed out that Schneider didn’t seem very apologetic at all.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Jeff Kravitz/Getty Images via FilmMagic

    “He’s saying he’s sorry but then he’s still blaming his inappropriate jokes for kids on the people who were offended.  He’s not saying he was wrong, he’s just saying he’s sorry that it hurt people,” one commenter stated.

    Another simply stated, “The damage is already done! These kids are adults in their 30s, and sorry just isn’t enough!” 

    Dan Schneider also described his and Amanda Bynes’ working relationship

    Image credits: @Emilio2763/X

    During the discussion, Schneider also recalled that Bynes, who was around 16 or 17 at the time, had expressed interest in becoming independent from her parents, something he described as not uncommon among young actors during that era.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    According to Schneider, Bynes had gone to her professional team, which consisted of her agent, manager, publicist, and lawyer. He said that he was one of the people she approached for advice during that time. 

    Image credits: @Emilio2763/X

    “Amanda was between the ages of 16 and 17, and she wanted to get emancipated from her parents, which was a fairly common thing with successful young actors,  at least at the time…. We supported her, she tried to get emancipated, and it ended up not working out and she didn’t,” he said.

    He also recalled a separate incident in which Bynes allegedly tried to run away from home after a conflict with her parents. Schneider said she had contacted him in distress, prompting him to call someone he believed could help her. 

    Image credits: Let’s Get Into It/YouTube

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “One night very late, well after midnight, 1 or 2 in the morning, phone rang, I answered, it was Amanda. She was upset. She was in distress. She had had some conflict with her parents, I think her father, and she called me. 

    “I was immediately concerned about her safety. I called someone that I knew was fairly nearby. That person was able to go and pick her up. I knew she was safe, I felt better. She ended up being taken to the police,” the former Nickelodeon producer said.

    Image credits: @Emilio2763/X

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Bynes, for her part, recently stepped in to provide the facts about a TikTok rumor alleging that Schneider had gotten her pregnant at 13.

    According to the former actress, the video came from a fan account and was not something she had created or endorsed. The claims, she emphasized, were false, according to an Unilad report.

    Dan Schneider responded to allegations as legal battles continued

    Image credits: MEGA/GC Images

    The resurfacing of Schneider’s old interview also brought renewed attention to his direct response to the allegations raised in Quiet on Set. In the same video, he said watching the documentary had been emotionally difficult.

    “Watching (the documentary) over the past two nights was very difficult, me facing my past behaviors, some of which are embarrassing and that I regret,” Schneider said. “I definitely owe some people a pretty strong apology.”

    While the documentary generated widespread reaction, Schneider also pursued legal action. In 2024, a California judge ruled that he could move forward with a defamation claim against Warner Bros. Discovery and the producers of the series. 

    In his comments, Judge Ashfaq G. Chowdhury stated that Schneider’s case was not brought “on frivolous grounds, simply to harass defendants.” He added that it was “not the type of baseless lawsuit… that the anti-Slapp statute was designed to w**d out.”

    “He’s suing Defendants about a documentary they made about him, that focuses on his activities, and, which a reasonable viewer might conclude makes damning implications about his conduct,” Judge Chowdhury said.

    Netizens shared their thoughts on Dan Schneider’s comments about Amanda Bynes on social media

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Read more »

    After almost a decade of reporting straight hard news, I now bring that discipline to entertainment writing at Bored Panda. I cover celebrity updates, viral trends, and cultural stories with speed and accuracy, while also embracing the lighter, evergreen side of pop culture. My articles are often syndicated to MSN, extending their reach to broader audiences. My goal is straightforward: to deliver trustworthy coverage that keeps readers informed about the stories dominating the conversation today.

    Read less »
    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Peter Michael de Jesus

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    After almost a decade of reporting straight hard news, I now bring that discipline to entertainment writing at Bored Panda. I cover celebrity updates, viral trends, and cultural stories with speed and accuracy, while also embracing the lighter, evergreen side of pop culture. My articles are often syndicated to MSN, extending their reach to broader audiences. My goal is straightforward: to deliver trustworthy coverage that keeps readers informed about the stories dominating the conversation today.

    What do you think ?
    Epona
    Community Member
    1 week ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm not sure I understand the comment from Jodi Angle. Prove Dan is the father of who? Amanda didn't have a kid!

    Epona
    Community Member
    1 week ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Weed out is not a reference to d r u g s, BP censors! It is a phrasal verb meaning "remove an inferior or unwanted component of a group or collection."

    Epona
    Community Member
    1 week ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm not sure I understand the comment from Jodi Angle. Prove Dan is the father of who? Amanda didn't have a kid!

    Epona
    Community Member
    1 week ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Weed out is not a reference to d r u g s, BP censors! It is a phrasal verb meaning "remove an inferior or unwanted component of a group or collection."

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT