Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
User submission
47
Outrage Erupts After UK Health Guidance Lists “Benefits” Of Marrying Your Cousin
A document published under NHS England’s Genomics Education Programme has triggered widespread criticism and mockery after suggesting that first-cousin marriages may bring “stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages.”
While the guidance acknowledged the elevated risk of genetic disorders in first-cousin unions, many felt its language minimized the practice’s dangers.
Highlights
- Guidance from NHS England sparked intense debate after referencing first-cousin marriage.
- Critics argued that the advice downplays serious health risks associated with genetic conditions.
- NHS England has since clarified that the document was a summary of research, not official policy.
Following backlash from the public and health experts, NHS England clarified that the document was not an official stance but a summary of scientific and policy discussions.
RELATED:
The NHS’ surprising guidance caught public attention
Image credits: NHS
The guidance appeared last week, focusing on the genetics of consanguineous marriage, the medical term for unions between blood relatives.
In it, the document pointed to possible social benefits while also conceding that such relationships increase the risk of passing on inherited conditions.
Image credits: NHS
The document mentioned that marriage between cousins has “long been the subject of scientific discussion,” but it could also be linked to “stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages,” according to The Telegraph.
Critics argued that presenting the issue this way blurred the dangers families face when genetic diseases are passed on to children.
Image credits: Johnstocker / stock.adobe
The document even referenced historical figures, such as King Henry VIII, who married cousins Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard.
This comparison attracted criticism online, with many pointing out that Henry VIII was not biologically related to either women, as pointed out by Not The Bee.
Image credits: trending / X
Dr. Patrick Nash, an Oxford-based academic and director of the Pharos Foundation, described the guidance as “truly dismaying” and urged the NHS to withdraw it.
“This official article is deeply misleading and should be retracted with an apology so that the public is not misled by omission and half-truths,” he said.
Image credits: Olivia Bauso / Unsplash
Amid the backlash, the NHS took down the controversial document.
Experts and politicians slammed the NHS’ controversial, short-lived guidance
Image credits: Prostock-studio / stock.adobe
The reaction was swift across both the medical field and political circles. Many public health specialists emphasized that there is no balance to strike between genetic risk and cultural tradition when it comes to protecting children.
Nash, along with other experts, warned that normalizing cousin marriage in official publications could misinform families about the realities of inherited disease.
“Cousin marriage is in**st, plain and simple, and needs to be banned with the utmost urgency. There is no ‘balance’ to be struck between this cultural lifestyle choice and the severe public health implications it incurs,” the Pharos Foundation director said.
Politicians also weighed in, arguing that healthcare guidance should reflect clear scientific consensus rather than cultural relativism. Tory MP Richard Holden slammed the NHS and Prime Minister Keir Starmer in a comment to the Mail.
“Our NHS should stop taking the knee to damaging and oppressive cultural practices. The Conservatives want to see an end to cousin marriage as a backdoor to immigration too, but Labour are deaf to these sensible demands.
“Sir Keir Starmer should stop running scared of the misogynistic community controllers and their quislings who appear in the form of cultural relativist-obsessed sociology professors, and ban a practice the overwhelming majority, from every community in Britain, want to see ended for good,” he said.
Image credits: micheile henderson / Unsplash
Amid the criticism, NHS England responded by distancing itself from the document.
“The article published on the website of the Genomics Education Programme is a summary of existing scientific research and the public policy debate.
Image credits: Drew Coffman / Unsplash
“It is not expressing an NHS view,” an NHS England spokesperson said.
The internet did not hold back in its criticism of the NHS’ guidance
While the NHS has stepped back from its controversial guidance, netizens were not quick to forget. On social media platforms such as X, Facebook and Instagram, the criticism was notable.
“The fact that cousin marriage is under discussion in the United Kingdom is outrageously disturbing. Criminalize cousin marriage,” one X user wrote.
“Be honest, NHS UK, there are NO benefits to marrying and sleeping with your cousins. It is creating severely disabled children. THIS IS DANGEROUS MESSAGING,” another X user wrote.
“Who in their right mind thinks that’s acceptable in this country?!” An Instagram user wrote.
Image credits: NHS
Jokes about the NHS “promoting” in**st also became prevalent on social media.
“Economic advantages include only having to invite one family to the wedding,” joked one Facebook user.
Image credits: Aditya Romansa / Unsplash
“And you don’t have to change your last name,” joked another.
“When you want your family tree to look like a telephone pole,” wrote another.
Netizens shared their thoughts on the NHS’ quickly-deleted guidance on social media
Image credits: ebeth360
Image credits: ArchRose90
Image credits: ChuckStric75347
Image credits: Dekunle27
Image credits: Niall1874
Image credits: cemoktem89
Image credits: thesundaysport
Image credits: NoContextBrits
Image credits: BlocksNThoughts
Image credits: NixonPunished
Image credits: nclfuzzy
Image credits: HellcatTheHater
Image credits: PortAntonioGirl
Image credits: FireSisterBee
Image credits: riccoker
Image credits: RealLexieLore
Image credits: AwakePatriot_
Image credits: sentra17
Image credits: jaileysjourney
Image credits: TheHauskarl
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
9Kviews
Share on FacebookExplore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Carrie de Luka 5 months ago (edited)
It was not offered up as national guidance, it was a blog published by NHS England’s Genomics Education Programme. The blog was not intended as policy or advice to clinicians but as a summary of existing public policy debate, a discussion piece that was prompted by proposals to ban first cousin marriage that are currently being considered by parliament. It certainly had nothing to do with the Government. Current discussions are about banning it, not promoting it! Here is what the British Medical Journal had to say: https://www.bmj.com/content/391/bmj.r2061.full
Dill 5 months ago
Here's hoping people on BP are smarter and take notice of the facts. One department in NHS England AND entirely due to issues being discussed currently and not promoting it in the slightest.
Load More Replies...
Lou Cam 5 months ago (edited)
This information was actually released to help with education against the practice of cousin marriage but they had to sweeten the message with acknowledgement of cultural community benefits or would lose the audience. A relative of mine works in a hospital in a UK city with a large population of people where cousin marriage is common. There's a large genetics counselling service and lab compared to other cities due to genetic abnormalities. These communities distrust UK authorities already so it's a case of trading lightly. I gather that one of the flag waving Reform voters found this information and decided to parade it around as "proof" that this community is destroying the Uk way of life of some such nonsense.
Anthony Elmore 5 months ago
So we all know that the risk of birth defects is even higher with sibling incest, but is it, like, even worse for identical twins?.... Wait, no, I just realized why that probably wouldn't work.
Carrie de Luka 5 months ago (edited)
It was not offered up as national guidance, it was a blog published by NHS England’s Genomics Education Programme. The blog was not intended as policy or advice to clinicians but as a summary of existing public policy debate, a discussion piece that was prompted by proposals to ban first cousin marriage that are currently being considered by parliament. It certainly had nothing to do with the Government. Current discussions are about banning it, not promoting it! Here is what the British Medical Journal had to say: https://www.bmj.com/content/391/bmj.r2061.full
Dill 5 months ago
Here's hoping people on BP are smarter and take notice of the facts. One department in NHS England AND entirely due to issues being discussed currently and not promoting it in the slightest.
Load More Replies... Lou Cam 5 months ago (edited)
This information was actually released to help with education against the practice of cousin marriage but they had to sweeten the message with acknowledgement of cultural community benefits or would lose the audience. A relative of mine works in a hospital in a UK city with a large population of people where cousin marriage is common. There's a large genetics counselling service and lab compared to other cities due to genetic abnormalities. These communities distrust UK authorities already so it's a case of trading lightly. I gather that one of the flag waving Reform voters found this information and decided to parade it around as "proof" that this community is destroying the Uk way of life of some such nonsense.
Anthony Elmore 5 months ago
So we all know that the risk of birth defects is even higher with sibling incest, but is it, like, even worse for identical twins?.... Wait, no, I just realized why that probably wouldn't work.
You May Like Prince Andrew Arrested At Secluded Cottage Amid Epstein Files Scandal “Creepiest Thing I’ve Ever Seen”: Bizarre Behavior Of Billionaire With Trump Stuns Elon Musk’s Daughter Drops Bombshell Accusation Against Trump As He Vows To Release UFO Files
Karina Babenok
Gabija Saveiskyte
Lei RV
Related on Bored Panda
20
35