Guy Plans His Baby Assuming His Sis Will Provide Free Childcare, Loses It When She Shuts That Down
After decades of restrictive population policies, many prosperous countries are facing a different problem: there aren’t enough kids, and the age pyramid is becoming alarmingly like a tree with an ever-expanding ‘crown’ of elderly people. Now, governments are encouraging us to have kids, but this raises a question that’s difficult for even the most competent government to solve.
The babysitting issue. Because, for example, relatives aren’t always thrilled when asked to babysit for free. And even less so when you try to trick them into babysitting, as actually happened to the user u/Apprehensive-Fox2655, the author of our story today.
More info: Reddit
Deciding to have a baby actually means a great responsibility on the parents, and some couples don’t even suspect how huge it is
Image credits: Andrej Lišakov / Unsplash (not the actual photos)
The author of the post is a mom whose youngest kid recently went to school, and the lady expected to have some rest, but to no avail
Image credits: Apprehensive-Fox2655
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photos)
It turned out that her brother and his pregnant girlfriend expected her to babysit for them regularly – and even told other relatives this behind her back
Image credits: Apprehensive-Fox2655
Image credits: Liza Summer / Pexels (not the actual photos)
The aunt-to-be, however, didn’t want to delve into this process once more, and said a flat-out No to bro in a frank conversation with him
Image credits: Apprehensive-Fox2655
The guy didn’t want to sacrifice his and GF’s gym-going to babysitting, but expected the sister to give up her hobbies instead
The Original poster (OP) is a stay-at-home mom whose kids are finally at school, and she hoped that at least now she could breathe a sigh of relief after years of this truly devastating toddler race. But it wasn’t to be! A recent Thanksgiving family gathering brought her both happy news and some rather discouraging news, too.
So, our heroine learned that her brother and his girlfriend are expecting their first baby. This news alone is very joyful, but then the author discovered that the parents-to-be not only expect her to be the primary babysitter, but are also telling all their friends and relatives about it as if it were a fait accompli. But the truth is, they haven’t even talked about it yet!
Furthermore, the lady has absolutely no intention of becoming a full-time babysitter, something her brother and his partner had talked about as if it were a fact. Sure, she could easily help her bro with this from time to time (even though he’s never babysat for her), but not permanently for sure. Well, the OP also has her own hobbies that she wants to devote some free time to.
The brother and his girlfriend also have hobbies – they are both avid gym-goers, and the man fears that taking care of the baby will put an end to their interests. When our heroine, in a frank convo, reasonably pointed out that he wanted her to give up her own hobbies, he declared that the child was more important than her activities. So, the OP simply hung up and decided to vent online, seeking some moral support from netizens.
Image credits: Getty Images / Unsplash (not the actual photos)
I want to point out right away that many people around the world repeatedly encounter requests, pleas, and even demands from fam to babysit for them, and that we’ve even compiled collections of the wittiest refusals. But the case described in this story is exceptional. Because the partners based their very plan to have a baby on the patently false assumption that the auntie would happily agree to give up everything and babysit.
Perhaps, if the expectant parents aren’t ready to give up their hobby, they should consider paying? “The amount of hours expected during that caregiving time – acknowledging the labor involved in caring for children – is the first step to having a successful relationship,” Care quotes Abbey Sangmeister, a therapist, life coach, and founder of Evolving Whole. Well, this really makes sense.
But the original poster herself admits that the brother and girlfriend can hardly afford childcare. In any case, honesty is the best option, and the couple should’ve definitely talked to the OP first – perhaps she would’ve agreed. But insistence is also unacceptable here. For example, this dedicated article at Scary Mommy claims that voluntarily involved relatives are, in fact, a true gift for any parent.
And what do the commenters under the original post think about this? Well, almost all of them do agree that infants actually suck up a lot of time, effort, and brainpower – so the author was absolutely right to reject her brother’s entitled demand. “You really need to stand up for yourself when you hear things like that,” one person concluded reasonably. So do you, our dear readers, also agree with this point?
Most people in the comments gave the author their sincere support and claimed that she doesn’t need to be a free babysitter for her entitled sibling
Explore more of these tags
Oh, so working out 2 hours a day will mess up his mental health but having a child to take care of won't? He should have read up on what it's like to have a child. Far too many people don't realise the realities of taking care of a new-born.
On top of it, they assume she’ll be the nanny WITHOUT TALKING TO HER? What if she and her family had plans to move out of state or to another country? Then what? They’d haul the baby to work and the gym? What if one of them got a cancer diagnosis, or an in-law got one and they had to care for the in-law, either in their house or the in-laws’? These people don’t sound *remotely* qualified to bring a child into this world because they can’t seem to think in the future tense, about the baby, the sister, or themselves. My cow; I gather it’s too late for a D&C, but it’s NOT too late to get the child adopted.
Load More Replies...LOL! I would have just said, "Don't have children you don't want to raise. Maybe you should give it up for adoption, since you're clearly not up for parenting yourself".
It's so sexist to look around for the nearest female and p**n off your child on them. Brother is the parent. He should cut out the gym and be there for his child. It's insane to expect someone else to spend most of their waking hours in unpaid babysitting just because they have a womb. They would never ask this of a man.
I don't know why they took out the word p*a*w*n, which is not indecent so far as I know.
Load More Replies...I would have clearly said at the time that I hadn't been asked and was too busy to make a commitment. Dirty looks just aren't clear enough. Any embarrassment at the time is all on them for being entitled AHs.
I’d have worded it a little more clearly: “You really should have asked as I’m not available. At all. For babysitting ANY baby, least of all someone else’s.” Or “It’s not MY baby; you raise it. I’m not available.” And then I’d have cackled loudly and said to whoever is near me in a loud voice, “Can you believe it? THEY DON’T WANT TO RAISE THEIR OWN BABY!”
Load More Replies...So they planned to have a baby and then have somebody else look after it?
I sincerely hope that OP's brother comes back to her after having the child to apologise. The realities of parenting are so foreign to him right now, and it sounds like he's doing absolutely nothing to prepare for it. Say goodbye to your gym membership, you entitled d*******g.
I have no children and when my niblings come over with their parents I generally end up supervising/playing with them while the parents chill out with the rest of the family. But that's because I choose to, and I've got training and experience in taking care of young children as well, so it's not too hard. And you bet I get a lot of gratitude for being such a good aunty to them. If I'd had them dumped on me at any point without even being asked, I'd have ripped their parents three new a******s. If you're not going to take care of your kid, DON'T HAVE A KID.
I thought that this was fairly poorly worded (perhaps English isn't the poster's first language, so fair enough) but given the basics of what I was able to get, OP is NTA. Nobody should plan around their sibling being available to look after their baby just because they're child-free. We don't sit around picking our noses; we do actually have lives.
OP has kids but they're at school age, but makes no difference. Even if we sit around all day doing fluff all, it's stupid and disrespectful to consider that it means free babysitting, without asking!
Load More Replies...In reality, she’ll only have a few hours of time without her own kids. They aren’t in school that many hours and have school free days, but her brother expects her to sit a newborn for the entire day and then some! A lot of her ‘free’ time is still spent cleaning, laundry, and cooking despite the kids being in school. Her brother and girlfriend need a reality check and they’ll soon get it once the baby is born.
If they use family helps family... tell them I'm glad you think that .... and say I'm buying another house and I volunteer you to pay the mortgage... but I want to pay it off fast so we will need triple the mortgage for the next 15 plus years .... you know family helps family thanks bro
Parenting means sacrificing some of YOUR free time, not forcing someone else to sacrifice their free time.
All these comments deal with the fact that the relatives committed the OP to this without asking. None of them are mentioning that they wanted her to do it 40-50 hours a week for FREE. A nanny would be at least 1000.00 a week. Would either of the parents agree to work full-time for free? I don't think so.
Several of them mention it, but to save you from having to read the comments, just peep the last one.
Load More Replies...No. I'm sorry, no. Actually, I'm not sorry. The baby is innocent in all of this. It did not ask to be created, it did not ask to be born. It is absolutely vile that you think a helpless infant deserves to suffer because of the actions of its parents.
Load More Replies...Oh, so working out 2 hours a day will mess up his mental health but having a child to take care of won't? He should have read up on what it's like to have a child. Far too many people don't realise the realities of taking care of a new-born.
On top of it, they assume she’ll be the nanny WITHOUT TALKING TO HER? What if she and her family had plans to move out of state or to another country? Then what? They’d haul the baby to work and the gym? What if one of them got a cancer diagnosis, or an in-law got one and they had to care for the in-law, either in their house or the in-laws’? These people don’t sound *remotely* qualified to bring a child into this world because they can’t seem to think in the future tense, about the baby, the sister, or themselves. My cow; I gather it’s too late for a D&C, but it’s NOT too late to get the child adopted.
Load More Replies...LOL! I would have just said, "Don't have children you don't want to raise. Maybe you should give it up for adoption, since you're clearly not up for parenting yourself".
It's so sexist to look around for the nearest female and p**n off your child on them. Brother is the parent. He should cut out the gym and be there for his child. It's insane to expect someone else to spend most of their waking hours in unpaid babysitting just because they have a womb. They would never ask this of a man.
I don't know why they took out the word p*a*w*n, which is not indecent so far as I know.
Load More Replies...I would have clearly said at the time that I hadn't been asked and was too busy to make a commitment. Dirty looks just aren't clear enough. Any embarrassment at the time is all on them for being entitled AHs.
I’d have worded it a little more clearly: “You really should have asked as I’m not available. At all. For babysitting ANY baby, least of all someone else’s.” Or “It’s not MY baby; you raise it. I’m not available.” And then I’d have cackled loudly and said to whoever is near me in a loud voice, “Can you believe it? THEY DON’T WANT TO RAISE THEIR OWN BABY!”
Load More Replies...So they planned to have a baby and then have somebody else look after it?
I sincerely hope that OP's brother comes back to her after having the child to apologise. The realities of parenting are so foreign to him right now, and it sounds like he's doing absolutely nothing to prepare for it. Say goodbye to your gym membership, you entitled d*******g.
I have no children and when my niblings come over with their parents I generally end up supervising/playing with them while the parents chill out with the rest of the family. But that's because I choose to, and I've got training and experience in taking care of young children as well, so it's not too hard. And you bet I get a lot of gratitude for being such a good aunty to them. If I'd had them dumped on me at any point without even being asked, I'd have ripped their parents three new a******s. If you're not going to take care of your kid, DON'T HAVE A KID.
I thought that this was fairly poorly worded (perhaps English isn't the poster's first language, so fair enough) but given the basics of what I was able to get, OP is NTA. Nobody should plan around their sibling being available to look after their baby just because they're child-free. We don't sit around picking our noses; we do actually have lives.
OP has kids but they're at school age, but makes no difference. Even if we sit around all day doing fluff all, it's stupid and disrespectful to consider that it means free babysitting, without asking!
Load More Replies...In reality, she’ll only have a few hours of time without her own kids. They aren’t in school that many hours and have school free days, but her brother expects her to sit a newborn for the entire day and then some! A lot of her ‘free’ time is still spent cleaning, laundry, and cooking despite the kids being in school. Her brother and girlfriend need a reality check and they’ll soon get it once the baby is born.
If they use family helps family... tell them I'm glad you think that .... and say I'm buying another house and I volunteer you to pay the mortgage... but I want to pay it off fast so we will need triple the mortgage for the next 15 plus years .... you know family helps family thanks bro
Parenting means sacrificing some of YOUR free time, not forcing someone else to sacrifice their free time.
All these comments deal with the fact that the relatives committed the OP to this without asking. None of them are mentioning that they wanted her to do it 40-50 hours a week for FREE. A nanny would be at least 1000.00 a week. Would either of the parents agree to work full-time for free? I don't think so.
Several of them mention it, but to save you from having to read the comments, just peep the last one.
Load More Replies...No. I'm sorry, no. Actually, I'm not sorry. The baby is innocent in all of this. It did not ask to be created, it did not ask to be born. It is absolutely vile that you think a helpless infant deserves to suffer because of the actions of its parents.
Load More Replies...
























38
35