Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
11
“Why Are They Afraid To Cast Ugly People?”: Casting Of The Beatles Biopic Sparks Mixed Reactions
The cast of Sam Mendes’ Beatles biopics has officially been announced, and fans have expressed doubts about the actors chosen to portray the legendary British musicians.
Star of Gladiator II Paul Mescal will take on the role of Paul McCartney, while Babygirl actor Harris Dickinson will portray John Lennon. Saltburn’s Barry Keoghan will play Ringo Starr, and Stranger Things actor Joseph Quinn will be George Harrison.
Highlights
- The casting of the official Beatles biopics has been announced after months of speculation.
- Paul Mescal will star as Paul McCartney, Harris Dickinson will play John Lennon, Joseph Quinn will be George Harrison, and Barry Keoghan will play Ringo Starr.
- The casting divided opinions, with many fans arguing they wished to see lesser-known actors playing the rock musicians.
Each of the four biopics will be told from the perspective of a different band member. They’re all set to be released in April 2028, in what director Sam Mendes has called the “first binge-able theatrical experience.”
BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting
The casting of the upcoming Beatles biopics has sparked mixed reactions, with some complaining that the actors don’t resemble the rock musicians
Image credits: Eric Charbonneau/Getty Images
It is unclear whether the films will be released simultaneously or spaced a week apart.
“I’ve been trying to make a story about The Beatles for years,” the acclaimed filmmaker said.
Mendes didn’t want to make a mini-series and he worried that “the story was too huge to fit into a single movie,” so he decided on a multi-part project, officially titled The Beatles – A Four-Film Cinematic Event.
Paul Mescal will play Paul McCartney, Harris Dickinson will portray John Lennon, Joseph Quinn will be George Harrison, and Barry Keoghan will take on the role of Ringo Starr
Image credits: CBS Photo Archive/Getty Images
However, many Beatles fans have criticized the casting, arguing that the actors bear little to no resemblance to the iconic musicians.
“No this is an April’s fools joke,” wrote one user on X (formerly Twitter).
“So they just want to use some hot boys instead of actors that look similar,” another complained.
“The only one that looks remotely similar is Barry; everyone else I don’t see it,” a third noted, while a fourth asked, “Why are they afraid to cast ugly people?”
Others defended the choices, arguing that talent matters more than physical appearance in creating a quality biopic
Image credits: Netflix
Image credits: Prime Video
Meanwhile, others took issue with the decision to cast well-known actors instead of bringing new faces to the big screen to play the Fab Four.
“Why do they not cast unknown people for biopics to launch new careers like what used to be done? We’re tired of seeing the same actors on our screens.”
Another person quipped: “Somewhere out there, Timothée Chalamet is brushing up his Liverpool accent just in case.”
The project will consist of four films, each focused on one band member
Image credits: Prime Video
However, another group defended the casting, arguing that people shouldn’t judge until they see the actors’ full hair and makeup transformation and that a convincing performance matters more than appearance.
“They haven’t been transformed into character yet people, why such a bad vibe?” one commented, while another added, “Paul Mescal as Paul McCartney is actually perfect.”
The four-part project marks the first time Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, and the families of John Lennon and George Harrison have granted full life story and music rights for a scripted film.
Image credits: Prime Video
Mendes, the Oscar-winning director behind American Beauty and Skyfall, made a surprise appearance on stage with the cast at CinemaCon in Las Vegas on Monday night (March 31).
He said The Beatles “redefined the culture and stayed with you for a lifetime,” calling them “the most significant band of all time.”
Mendes will also produce the films under his Neal Street Productions company.
“Perhaps this is a chance to understand them a little more deeply,” he continued.
“There had to be a way to tell the epic story for a new generation. I can assure you there is still plenty left to explore and I think we found a way to do that.”
The four films will be released in April 2028 in what director Sam Mendes called the “first binge-able theatrical experience”
Image credits: Eric Charbonneau/Getty Images
Part of the announcement did not come as a surprise to loyal fans of the band. Last year, Gladiator IIdirector Ridley Scott accidentally confirmed the rumor that Paul Mescal would play one of the Beatles.
Asked if Paul would appear in his next film, post-apocalyptic thriller The Dog Stars, the director replied: “Maybe. Paul is actually stacked up, doing the Beatles next. So I may have to let him go.”
Later, the 29-year-old actor said the role “would be a dream come true.”
View this post on Instagram
Ringo Starr previously suggested that Barry Keoghan had been cast to play him, saying: “I believe he’s somewhere taking drum lessons, and I hope not too many.”
About 18 biopics have been made about The Beatles, the most acclaimed of which are 1994’s Backbeat about original bass guitarist Stuart Sutcliffe, and 2009’s Nowhere Boy, which focuses on John Lennon’s childhood.
The rock group, regarded as the most influential band in Western popular music and a key part of the development of 1960s counterculture, formed in 1960 and broke up in 1970.
“Giving unknown actors a chance has truly become a lost art,” one fan wrote
Image credits: baldianass
Image credits: Roguequick
Image credits: xAtomicGirl
Image credits: coag200
Image credits: scoobywizards
Image credits: ashleim1chelle
Image credits: doofinc_
Image credits: M0SD3V
Image credits: BartonBella1
Image credits: gagas
Image credits: Angelica_Reed1
Image credits: ibs0012
Image credits: Colonel_Smiles
Image credits: mimiy4444
Image credits: pawsomesweets
Image credits: TheArtfulMan1
Image credits: positionsmafiaa
Image credits: bigarms4me
Image credits: ashleim1chelle
Image credits: Sicilian1926
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
Apatheist Account2 8 months ago
I just hope that they can play the instruments, and the McCartney can play convincingly left-handed. The only thing that spoiled The Rutles was Eric Idle not being able to play left-handed.
Lee Gilliland 8 months ago
Let's face it, nobody but us Boomers really care, and makeup and decent acting will probably fill the bill. All the same, they could have cast people who were closer looking, but it looks like they're casting for bucks; the latest hot bods that have the talent and are young headliners so they're "more readily affordable" (i.e. cheap).
LauraDragonWench 8 months ago
I agree with those saying that they should've cast unknowns for the roles. That way you could give a break to a new actor and maybe - and this is a wild idea but bear with me - maybe hire actual musicians who can act. They're out there and this film would've been a great vehicle for them. Man, Hollywood sucks.
Apatheist Account2 8 months ago
I just hope that they can play the instruments, and the McCartney can play convincingly left-handed. The only thing that spoiled The Rutles was Eric Idle not being able to play left-handed.
Lee Gilliland 8 months ago
Let's face it, nobody but us Boomers really care, and makeup and decent acting will probably fill the bill. All the same, they could have cast people who were closer looking, but it looks like they're casting for bucks; the latest hot bods that have the talent and are young headliners so they're "more readily affordable" (i.e. cheap).
LauraDragonWench 8 months ago
I agree with those saying that they should've cast unknowns for the roles. That way you could give a break to a new actor and maybe - and this is a wild idea but bear with me - maybe hire actual musicians who can act. They're out there and this film would've been a great vehicle for them. Man, Hollywood sucks.
Related on Bored Panda
24
5