Supervisor Demands Security Check Every 3rd Car, They Maliciously Comply, Cost Him A Billion
Interview With Author
One of the things we associate with the military the most is discipline. Without it, high status and order would not be possible, and anyone who tries to disrupt it is often penalized.
However, this officer’s punishment for security workers was not particularly well thought out. Only when he ordered every third car to be checked instead of the usual 15 did he realize the traffic jam he had caused and how it would affect his career.
Unfortunately for him, waiting in the 2-mile-long line was a 3-star general who was very unhappy that his precious time was being needlessly wasted trying to get to his destination.
Scroll down to find the full story and a conversation with FetzerRayne, the original author, who kindly agreed to tell us more about it.
The military environment is all about discipline
Image credits: seventyfourimages / envatoelements (not the actual photo)
However, this officer’s attempt to discipline security workers quickly backfired
Image credits: haymarketrebel / flickr (not the actual photo)
Image credits: FetzerRayne
“The best way to get rid of a stupid policy is to follow it to the letter”
Image credits: RDNE Stock project / pexels (not the actual photo)
Bored Panda reached out to FetzerRayne, the original author of this story, who kindly agreed to tell us more about it. Naturally, we were curious to know what inspired them to share it online.
They told us, “I was actually talking with my friend, who was also a fellow guard at the time. He was the officer doing the searches as I pulled them over. We have joked about often in the past about “the best way to get rid of a stupid policy is to follow it to the letter.”
Then, I discovered the subreddit, and texted him excited as I had personally never known the term for what we did as malicious compliance. After talking to him about our memory of that time, I decided to share it.”
In 2022, the US spent 877 billion dollars on its military, making it the highest military spending country in the world. So it is understandable that such investments need to run smoothly and maintain a high status, hence the discipline instilled in personnel.
However, Major Michael Petrusic from the U.S. Army claims that over the past decade discipline within the Armed Forces and the techniques used to maintain it have been criticized at a level only seen following World War II.
This begs the question of whether something as (mass) punishment really works to ingrain order and make army members execute commands more efficiently. Being surrounded by a similar environment, our interviewee believes that “Punishments, as defined by behavioral science as “a consequence that is aimed at reducing said behavior” can indeed work, however, punishments in the traditional sense of write-ups, demotions, and reassignments do not.”
Any results from punishments are often temporary
Image credits: Mikhail Nilov / pexels (not the actual photo)
As redditor FetzerRayne already mentioned, in psychology, punishment refers to the use of negative consequences to reduce or stop unwanted behavior. The goal is to form an association between an unwelcome action with a negative outcome in hopes that it will be less likely to occur again.
However, any results from punishments are often temporary, and such behaviors are likely to reappear after the consequences have passed. Several behavioral studies show how punishment promotes obedience but doesn’t help with moral reasoning, which leads them to act incorrectly without an authority figure present. The shock of negative consequences eventually wears off and they might start behaving in the same way, especially when they know that there’s no one to punish them. The most significant drawback of this is that it doesn’t teach a person what they should be doing instead.
Another thing to consider is that such discipline can have unplanned and unwanted consequences. Researchers have found that punishment increases mental health problems and leads to no positive outcomes. An individual also may develop resentment towards the person punishing them, and the moment this feeling appears they stop trying to acknowledge the things that are expected of them.
Redditor FetzerRayne proposes that “If you want to effect positive and efficient change in the workplace, work with the people who are “on the front lines” and know the challenges faced by each step of a process firsthand. Make new policies, and clarify existing ones by working together with these workers’ input.
Avoiding retaliation of any kind, but especially the petty kind like adding unneeded workloads, at all costs, as the consequences of those retaliations are often the most costly. Workers will be more motivated and inspired to make improvements to policies and procedures when they are included and considered in them.”
The post received various reactions
Commenters that also happened to be associated with the military shared similar stories
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
You May Also Like
Woman Refuses To Chip In For Babysitting Because She Doesn’t Even Have Kids, Asks If She’s A Jerk
Do you think childless individuals should be expected to chip in for group babysitting costs during friend gatherings?
17 Y.O. Is Done Sharing Her Birthday With Her Late Twin, Parents Are Not Having It
Do you think the girl should be allowed to celebrate her birthday without the remembrance of her deceased twin?
I once worked in Occupational health in a tobacco factory. (Imported tobacco, made into cigarettes.) The main part of the work area was 'bonded' because the tax had not been paid on the tobacco yet- ie, you had to go through customs to get in or out (prevention of smuggling). We once had an emergency call that someone was ill on the shop floor so a team of nurses went down to render aid. Got through OK, but the stretcher got 'pinged' on the way back and the security team demanded a search... Luckily the person was 'unwell' but not in immediate danger, but security insisted, as you could hide quite a bit on the stretcher....
Somewhere I worked had searches based on the current threat level in the country. When it was at the highest level (which at the time I think was black) after a terrorist attack every car and person had to be searched, it could take upwards of two hours to get through security and the traffic jams were a nightmare.
I have more problems with the fact there's nothing malicious, just compliance & unintended consequences.
Load More Replies... I once worked in Occupational health in a tobacco factory. (Imported tobacco, made into cigarettes.) The main part of the work area was 'bonded' because the tax had not been paid on the tobacco yet- ie, you had to go through customs to get in or out (prevention of smuggling). We once had an emergency call that someone was ill on the shop floor so a team of nurses went down to render aid. Got through OK, but the stretcher got 'pinged' on the way back and the security team demanded a search... Luckily the person was 'unwell' but not in immediate danger, but security insisted, as you could hide quite a bit on the stretcher....
Somewhere I worked had searches based on the current threat level in the country. When it was at the highest level (which at the time I think was black) after a terrorist attack every car and person had to be searched, it could take upwards of two hours to get through security and the traffic jams were a nightmare.
I have more problems with the fact there's nothing malicious, just compliance & unintended consequences.
Load More Replies...
29
5