Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
User submission
Stephen Fry Gives Brutal Takedown Of J.K. Rowling, Slams Her As A “Lost Cause”
Something’s brewing at Hogwarts between English comedian and actor Sir Stephen Fry and J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series and outspoken critic of trans people.
Fry, who is gay, narrated the audiobooks for all seven of the Potter novels, and has, until now, kept mum on the topic of Rowling’s anti-trans opinions.
Highlights
- English comedian and actor Sir Stephen Fry opens up for the first time about his one time friend, J.K. Rowling.
- Fry says he feels her hardening transphobia is changing her as a person.
- Online comments are supportive of Fry, but say he could have spoken out sooner.
Speaking on The Show People podcast, Fry said Rowling has said “cruel and hurtful” things about the community and that it has “hardened her.”
BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting
Sir Stephen Fry opens up for the first time about J.K. Rowling
Image credits: Neil Mockford / Getty Images
Image credits: Dia Dipasupil / Getty Images
During a live recording of The Show People podcast in mid June at the cabaret bar The Two Brewers Clapham in London, actor and comedian Sir Stephen Fry sat down with host Andrew Keates to discuss Fry’s life, career and lessons learned along the way.
At one point in the conversation, the topic of J.K. Rowling came up. Well known for her criticism of the trans community, Rowling’s opinions have been a harsh reality for many who feel disappointed in her.
Image credits: The Show People Podcast / outsavvy
Over the years, Fry has held back about commenting on Rowling’s opinions, but during the podcast, he seemed to change his mind and let it be known just what he thought of her transphobia.
“She seems to be a lost cause”: Stephen Fry talks about J.K. Rowling on recent podcast
View this post on Instagram
Fry told Keates that he feels Rowling “has been radicalised I fear and it maybe she has been radicalised by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her.”
Fry, referring to the acronym that stands for “trans-exclusionary radical feminist,” insisted that he always liked her and “found her charming, funny and interesting.”
But he said it seems she is becoming even more hardened against the trans community, which has “completely altered the way she talks and engages with the world.”
Image credits: slinehan1
Image credits: VorpalBi
He confirmed, though, that if she says hurtful things, she should be called out for it.
“(It) will only continue to harden her I am afraid. I am not saying that she not be called out when she says things that are really cruel, wrong and mocking. She seems to be a lost cause for us,” Fry said, according to the Daily Mail.
Image credits: Photograph at WorldPride / Wikipedia
He concluded that Rowling’s “contemptuous” comments “add to a terribly distressing time for trans people.”
“She is a friend of mine”: Fry had taken a more neutral stance in the past
Image credits: jk_rowling / X
Fry wasn’t always this outspoken about his one time friend.
In 2022, on the Beeb Watch Podcast, when the online debate over Rowling’s transphobia was at its zenith, Fry was asked if he would like to make a statement and weigh in.
At the time, he told the host Roger Bolton simply: “I definitely wouldn’t because I am aware that you are talking about an issue where two sides are very sore and anxious about their enemies.”
But he did admit that her stance was hurtful for many friends of his.
Image credits: Elena Ternovaja / Wikipedia
“She is a friend of mine and I have trans friends and intersex friends who are deeply upset by her. That is a circle I have to square personally,” Fry said at the time.
Fry ultimately said during that interview that the topic was “upsetting to both sides and I would wish them both to retreat and to consider that it is possible for trans people to live full, accepted lives according to their terms in society, and for women to have all the rights and dignities they demand.”
Image credits: Twytocrite
Image credits: eepyautumn
Rowling’s history of transphobia is well documented
Image credits: jk_rowling / X
Image credits: jk_rowling / X
It’s no secret that J.K. Rowling does not support the trans community. After years of liking transphobic posts online, Rowling famously penned a lengthy essayon her website outlining why she does not support trans activism.
In the essay, Rowling says she is “worried about the new trans activism” and “the huge explosion in young women wishing to transition and also about the increasing numbers who seem to be detransitioning.”
Image credits: jk_rowling / X
In what had been a simmering discussion, Rowling’s opinions thrust her into the spotlight as being transphobic, with many of the cast from the Harry Potter films publicly distancing themselves from her and her opinions at the time.
The trans and queer communities have been supportive of Fry’s latest comments
Image credits: stephenfryactually / Instagram
For netizens hurt by Fry’s previous unwillingness to come out concretely against Rowling, his latest statements were much appreciated—if a little late.
Commenters were enthusiastic of Fry, but say they hope he continues after previously staying silent.
“I am glad he’s overcome that for now on this issue. Doesn’t change the fact he didn’t when people really needed him to. This has to be the beginning of something or it’s useless,” one person said.
Commenters online praised Fry for finally weighing in on J.K. Rowling’s rampant transphobia
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
7Kviews
Share on FacebookExplore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Deborah B 5 months ago
I still don't understand how giving acceptance and human rights to people who are trans infringes on women. Some women may transition to become men. Some men may transition to become women. Unless they're inviting you to go to bed with them, why does it matter to you what shape someone's genitals are? And before we have the "bathroom" argument: If trans men have to use the ladies room, there are going to be male-presenting people in the ladies room, which would also likely make some people uncomfortable, and potentially provide cover for cis men to enter the ladies room claiming to be trans men now entitled to be there. Telling trans people to use the bathrooms of their biological s*x at birth does not increase women's safetly - in either the ladies room or in the mens room, where trans-women might be at risk.
Vestředuvždyckyjezdí Nývlt 5 months ago
Well, it is really ''brutall' to call sonmebody, who decided to get more attention and popularity by bulling people, who are already heavily bullied by society, a lost cause? Oh, what a naughty man. Seriously - does anybody really believe, that Rowling is 'fighting for women's rights'? How many women here are in danger from a people, whose 'fault' is being born in a wrong body?
Marno C. 5 months ago
The problem with folks fussing about 'protecting' women due to female biology is that it inevitably becomes reductive and objectifying for those women and winds up demeaning them as humans. Here is what I mean: is a woman a woman because she menstruates? Well, what about the women who are menopausal or have PCOS? Are they less than? Is it because a woman gives birth? Then are infertile women inferior? Are child free women denying their womanhood and should comply? Is it breasts? Is a woman with DDs superior to a woman with AAs? Are women who give birth vaginally more motherly than those who have C-sections? A feminine appearance? Well, remember those Olympic athletes who were degraded and mocked? See how all this nasty gatekeeping diminishes everyone?
Deborah B 5 months ago
I still don't understand how giving acceptance and human rights to people who are trans infringes on women. Some women may transition to become men. Some men may transition to become women. Unless they're inviting you to go to bed with them, why does it matter to you what shape someone's genitals are? And before we have the "bathroom" argument: If trans men have to use the ladies room, there are going to be male-presenting people in the ladies room, which would also likely make some people uncomfortable, and potentially provide cover for cis men to enter the ladies room claiming to be trans men now entitled to be there. Telling trans people to use the bathrooms of their biological s*x at birth does not increase women's safetly - in either the ladies room or in the mens room, where trans-women might be at risk.
Vestředuvždyckyjezdí Nývlt 5 months ago
Well, it is really ''brutall' to call sonmebody, who decided to get more attention and popularity by bulling people, who are already heavily bullied by society, a lost cause? Oh, what a naughty man. Seriously - does anybody really believe, that Rowling is 'fighting for women's rights'? How many women here are in danger from a people, whose 'fault' is being born in a wrong body?
Marno C. 5 months ago
The problem with folks fussing about 'protecting' women due to female biology is that it inevitably becomes reductive and objectifying for those women and winds up demeaning them as humans. Here is what I mean: is a woman a woman because she menstruates? Well, what about the women who are menopausal or have PCOS? Are they less than? Is it because a woman gives birth? Then are infertile women inferior? Are child free women denying their womanhood and should comply? Is it breasts? Is a woman with DDs superior to a woman with AAs? Are women who give birth vaginally more motherly than those who have C-sections? A feminine appearance? Well, remember those Olympic athletes who were degraded and mocked? See how all this nasty gatekeeping diminishes everyone?
Related on Bored Panda
32
22