‘Shrekking’ Dating Trend Sparks Heated Debate And Raises Concern Among Experts
Shrekking is a new term for an old dating strategy where individuals (mostly women) date significantly less attractive men (by the norms of their society), hoping that by lowering their standards, they will wield more power in the relationship.
But this is not how it plays out—not ever, says the broad-thinking Master Social Worker Heather Spurrel, dating coach Amy Chan, and relationship expert from the American dating platform Seeking.com, Emma Hathorn.
- Shrekking is a new dating buzzword for “dating down” in looks.
- Experts say it ends in disappointment instead of the expected better treatment.
- Men counter with their own term: “getting Fiona’d.”
The term has since made its way onto social media and is causing men and women to clash.
Instead of being treated well, they are “traumatized” by a “troll”
Image credits: Unsplash+
“A new dating term came out and it’s called getting [shrekked],” says a woman using the handle This is why I am single, on TikTok.
“It is where you are traumatized by a man who literally looks like Shrek,” she clarifies before claiming, “we’ve all been there.”
“We give the guy that we’re not attracted to a chance, thinking that he will for sure know what he has and treat us well.”
But alas, with this phenomenon, the opposite occurs:
Image credits: Paramount
“And then we get traumatized by a whole troll,” she concludes.
A social worker and relationship expert says the practice usually ends badly for both parties
Spurrell, who graduated with a master’s in her field, consults on relationships and is (as her Instagram description describes her) a “boundary coach,” delves into the practice under its formal name, “dating down.”
On her website, Rewilding, she claims that individuals (mainly women) do it because it makes them feel in control and thus more emotionally secure.
@9news Have you ever been ‘shrekked’? #shrek#shrekislove#dating#9News♬ original sound – 9News Australia
“It’s what people sometimes refer to as ‘trust issues’ or ‘commitment issues,’ but the truth is, the pattern only plays out one way…” she writes.
“No matter how much you try to coerce yourself into believing it’s a real and worthwhile relationship, the endgame of this pattern is heartbreak.”
And said “heartbreak” will cut both ways, hurting the “Shrek” and the “Shrekked.”
Experts claim women expect to be treated better when they date someone less attractive
Image credits: Unsplash+
Another fundi in the field, Amy Chan, who authored the book Breakup Bootcamp: The Science of Rewiring Your Heart, describes it as “dating an ogre without the princess treatment.”
Speaking to USA Today on August 21, she confirmed, “The term might be new, but the behavior isn’t.”
“Plenty of people have put looks lower on the list or hoped attraction would grow over time.”
She explained that there is nothing wrong with practice per se, but rather the expectations they come with that create problems.
@jaxitodwyerDid you get shrekked?♬ original sound – jaxitodwyer
“Where it backfires is when someone assumes that just because they’re dating ‘down’ in looks, they’ll automatically be treated better,” Chan elaborated.
Another expert explains that people can be attracted to each other for reasons other than looks
Dating fundi from the platform Seeking.com–which boasts nearly 50,000 users–Emma Hathorn sums it up as women stepping out of their “comfort zone, but instead of being rewarded with growth or connection,” end up “regretting the experience.”
The alternative is finding real commonalities and true attraction, which she asserts can and often will go beyond mere physical appearances.
Image credits: Paramount
“When two people are genuinely driven towards a similar goal and values, they can find an attraction in each other that surprises them and refutes the shallower factors,” she told the outlet.
Men disagree with women’s perspective on the topic
As a testimony to the practice’s prevalence, numerous men and women have weighed in on This is why I am single’s post.
Image credits: RightGlockMom
“The guy I dated [for] the last two years,” wrote one woman in response. “I got Shrekked before it was cool and had a name,” echoed another who ended up marrying the man 12 years ago.
Speaking for the opposite side was a man who married someone who may have thought herself too attractive for him.
“That he will know what he has,” the individual quoted the TikTokker before asking, “which is what exactly?”
Men’s version of the phenomenon is getting ‘Fiona’d,’ and it runs on deception
Image credits: CBS / Today
This critical man justified his perspective with a personal experience, writing, “I had a drop d**d gorgeous wife who was an insufferable diva” whose beauty was allegedly disproportionate to her character.
Apparently, men experience a similar phenomenon on the digital dating scene, in which they often unwittingly find themselves with a woman who is less attractive than they initially thought.
“We men call [it] ‘getting Fiona’d’ when her profile pic looks like Princess Fiona, but we meet in person and they are ‘catfish Fiona’. And look nothing like their profile picture.”
While hardly a nice thing to say about women, this man’s retaliation appeared to appeal to This is why I am single’s sense of humor, and she responded with a laughing emoji.
To the internet, shrekking sounds like a “Gen A thing”
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
This whole article is a mess, I don't understand. Ok, so they go on date with someone whom they consider unatractive. Then they complain that this person does not act the way they imagined?
Yeah, that's the gist of it. Some women seem to believe that by "dating down" the guy is going to feel lucky to have scored someone "out of his league" and treat the woman like she's a princess. And when he doesn't - - the woman considers herself as having been "Shrekked". 🙄 It's all very stupid.
Load More Replies...It's setup to fail because it relies on the premise that the beautiful lady actually IS worth more than the man, and for him to accept that and live his life accordingly.
Attraction has to come first, but attraction isn’t based on looks only. Attraction has to be mutual, it is called passion or sexual chemistry, and it can occur between anyone regardless of their looks. The problem with Penny and Leonard is not that Penny looks better than Leonard, but that Penny wasn’t attracted to him to begin with, and then basically settled for him. It’s an artificial sitcom trope, not real life.
This. I find intelligence and personality far more important ingredients to "attraction". I mean, looks matter, anyone who says different is lying or trying to sell you something. A wicked sense of humor and self esteem also go a long ways.
Load More Replies...Generally, we enter relationships with people who are pretty much equal to us in appearance and intelligence. I didn’t meet mine until I was almost 40, so I have a load of dating experience with all kinds of men. I have dated men who were handsome, and most of them were either conceited or vapid. I have dated attractive men who were very successful, and most of them were insufferable conceited a******s. Of course there were exceptions, but they were the exception and not the rule. Now, the man who was my first love was not handsome. But he was smart, classy, worldly, kind, gentle, and an all around lovely person inside. He will always be my first love and I am so happy I got to spend time with him. I was in my early twenties when I dated him, and it’s when I realized that looks aren’t everything. It’s a person’s intrinsic qualities that are the most important. Relationships are not power plays, as the “power” is something that should be equal—-not always strictly 50-50, however. Sometimes 51-49, sometimes 30-70, sometimes other splits, but still averaging 50-50. It should come from a place of respect, as in respecting your partner’s opinions, experience, expertise, wants, needs, observations, etc when making decisions for you little family, especially the big decisions. If you have that with the person you’re in a relationship with, then how each of you look doesn’t matter a d**n, because you have been blessed with a great relationship. That’s worth so much more than all the riches in the world.
I do often get confused by what exactly is meant by "dating". It somehow implies going on more than one date, but surely the whole purpose of a 'date' is to get to know someone and then decide if you want to go on a second or further date? If you dont click with your date why would you carry on seeing them?
It seems doomed to fail because 1. Relationships are hard, and if appearance is more important than considering character or compatibility you aren't going to put the work into the relationship to make it work. 2. You are starting the relationship from a position if contempt. 3. If you think all you have to offer in a relationship is physical attractiveness, you are going to really struggle when you start to age (and it happens a lot sooner than you realize).
All dating these days seems to value looks above everything in one way or another. This whole thing included. Having recently (at 60) ended up with my absolutely perfect partner, to whom I wasn't even slightly physically attracted to before, I can confirm, 100%, that looks aren't even slightly important. To me she looks wonderful, obviously, but not because she's my 'ideal' body type or anything. But because we are compatible, intellectually and emotionally. Looks are not only overrated, they are actually damaging to a REAL relationship if too much emphasis is placed on them. It's an incredible waste of time. Yes, I used to go for looks. I'm so glad I'm over that now! Accept all types. F8nd out WHO they are before judging them. You may be very pleasantly surprised!
I've tried to date men more attractive. Knowing I'm not as attractive as the women they typically date. They turned out to be horrible people
Are we really trying to generate backlash aimed at people prioritising temperament over looks? As long as you're hot for your partner, why worry how other people rrate them? Besides it all depends on what more power in a relationship means. For a lot women in hetero relationships, parity is more power than they are used to.
This whole article is a mess, I don't understand. Ok, so they go on date with someone whom they consider unatractive. Then they complain that this person does not act the way they imagined?
Yeah, that's the gist of it. Some women seem to believe that by "dating down" the guy is going to feel lucky to have scored someone "out of his league" and treat the woman like she's a princess. And when he doesn't - - the woman considers herself as having been "Shrekked". 🙄 It's all very stupid.
Load More Replies...It's setup to fail because it relies on the premise that the beautiful lady actually IS worth more than the man, and for him to accept that and live his life accordingly.
Attraction has to come first, but attraction isn’t based on looks only. Attraction has to be mutual, it is called passion or sexual chemistry, and it can occur between anyone regardless of their looks. The problem with Penny and Leonard is not that Penny looks better than Leonard, but that Penny wasn’t attracted to him to begin with, and then basically settled for him. It’s an artificial sitcom trope, not real life.
This. I find intelligence and personality far more important ingredients to "attraction". I mean, looks matter, anyone who says different is lying or trying to sell you something. A wicked sense of humor and self esteem also go a long ways.
Load More Replies...Generally, we enter relationships with people who are pretty much equal to us in appearance and intelligence. I didn’t meet mine until I was almost 40, so I have a load of dating experience with all kinds of men. I have dated men who were handsome, and most of them were either conceited or vapid. I have dated attractive men who were very successful, and most of them were insufferable conceited a******s. Of course there were exceptions, but they were the exception and not the rule. Now, the man who was my first love was not handsome. But he was smart, classy, worldly, kind, gentle, and an all around lovely person inside. He will always be my first love and I am so happy I got to spend time with him. I was in my early twenties when I dated him, and it’s when I realized that looks aren’t everything. It’s a person’s intrinsic qualities that are the most important. Relationships are not power plays, as the “power” is something that should be equal—-not always strictly 50-50, however. Sometimes 51-49, sometimes 30-70, sometimes other splits, but still averaging 50-50. It should come from a place of respect, as in respecting your partner’s opinions, experience, expertise, wants, needs, observations, etc when making decisions for you little family, especially the big decisions. If you have that with the person you’re in a relationship with, then how each of you look doesn’t matter a d**n, because you have been blessed with a great relationship. That’s worth so much more than all the riches in the world.
I do often get confused by what exactly is meant by "dating". It somehow implies going on more than one date, but surely the whole purpose of a 'date' is to get to know someone and then decide if you want to go on a second or further date? If you dont click with your date why would you carry on seeing them?
It seems doomed to fail because 1. Relationships are hard, and if appearance is more important than considering character or compatibility you aren't going to put the work into the relationship to make it work. 2. You are starting the relationship from a position if contempt. 3. If you think all you have to offer in a relationship is physical attractiveness, you are going to really struggle when you start to age (and it happens a lot sooner than you realize).
All dating these days seems to value looks above everything in one way or another. This whole thing included. Having recently (at 60) ended up with my absolutely perfect partner, to whom I wasn't even slightly physically attracted to before, I can confirm, 100%, that looks aren't even slightly important. To me she looks wonderful, obviously, but not because she's my 'ideal' body type or anything. But because we are compatible, intellectually and emotionally. Looks are not only overrated, they are actually damaging to a REAL relationship if too much emphasis is placed on them. It's an incredible waste of time. Yes, I used to go for looks. I'm so glad I'm over that now! Accept all types. F8nd out WHO they are before judging them. You may be very pleasantly surprised!
I've tried to date men more attractive. Knowing I'm not as attractive as the women they typically date. They turned out to be horrible people
Are we really trying to generate backlash aimed at people prioritising temperament over looks? As long as you're hot for your partner, why worry how other people rrate them? Besides it all depends on what more power in a relationship means. For a lot women in hetero relationships, parity is more power than they are used to.























5
22