Man So Upset His Wife’s Job Application Got Rejected, Writes Them An Email Raising Questions

Having multiple degrees and over a decade of experience is the sort of thing that most employers are really looking for. So getting a rejection email with vague reasons might end up raising some questions.

A man shared a series of screenshots from a rejection letter his wife got for a remote, Australian bookkeeping job. The issue? His wife was an Australian citizen with 15 years of experience and two Masters degrees. People online gave some suggestions and speculated why the company’s emails were so strange.

When getting a rejection letter, it’s still nice to know why they went with another candidate

Rejection email for woman with 15 years of experience sparks questions about Australian residency and bookkeeping skills.

Image credits: milesb

But one man felt something was off when viewing the email his wife got

ALT text: Text message describing a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a remote bookkeeping role after sending her resume.

Text on a white background stating a message about a wife reading and approving an email before it was sent.

Text showing a response about a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a role explaining why she didn’t reply to rejection.

Screenshot of a rejection email discussing a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a role, sparking questions.

Man with beard in casual clothes holding head in frustration, reflecting feelings of rejection and being overlooked.

Image credits: hryshchyshen (not the actual photo)

Text about a woman with 15 years of experience receiving a rejection email that raises questions.

Text excerpt discussing challenges faced by a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a role.

Text excerpt highlighting experience alignment, referring to a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a role.

Text excerpt from rejection email discussing the response and questioning the woman's 15 years of experience overlooked.

Email text explaining automated recruitment system error causing a wrongful rejection for a woman with 15 years experience.

Rejection email text expressing apology and taking responsibility, raising questions about experienced woman overlooked for role.

Image credits: milesb

The email was confusing enough to raise a few questions

Man in gray jacket showing frustration at laptop with coffee cup nearby, reflecting job rejection and overlooked experience

Image credits: freepik (not the actual photo)

The company’s initial apology for sending the “wrong response template” may well be a reflection of a breakdown in their applicant-tracking system: someone could easily have clicked the wrong thing or mixed up batch mailings, especially on a busy hiring day. In the meantime, the mention of “permanent residency” and “AEST business hours” implies a location-based filter excluding anyone not specifically confirmed as locally based, even though Heryati has lived and worked in Perth for over sixteen years. It’s entirely likely that a look at her résumé created a mistaken assumption that she was based offshore or would not regularly take calls within Australian business hours. However, the specific reasons for rejection listed in the emails still seem strange.

A second factor is the unconscious bias that sometimes creeps into hiring. Unusual-sounding or “foreign”-sounding names can lead to a snap decision, and unless the recruiter takes the extra step of verifying information, citizenship, local address, current employment, those instant conclusions can dictate who even gets to speak with the hiring manager. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation reports that name-based discrimination is still sadly prevalent. In Heryati’s case, her strong qualifications and local experience should have overridden any such bias, but if the system flagged her name as outside the usual candidate pool, the human review might never have happened.

At this point, Miles has a few constructive routes to explore. He could formally request a brief debrief call with the recruiter or hiring manager, framing it as a desire for feedback “to improve future applications” keeps the tone professional and non‑accusatory. Sending a concise one‑page summary that highlights Heryati’s Australian citizenship, Perth address, current local role, and relevant degrees could cut through any lingering confusion. If the company still refuses to move, Miles can remind them gently of anti‑discrimination legislation that covers nationality, name, and residency, often a mention of an equitable‑work policy will result in a more thorough internal rethink.

There are some organizational reasons this could have happened

Man in plaid shirt reacting with frustration while looking at laptop screen about experience overlooked for a role

Image credits: DC Studio (not the actual photo)

If these are delayed, escalating internally within the organization could also work. Reaching out to the People & Culture head or immediate hiring manager (rather than the generic HR email address) sometimes results in faster responses. Alternatively, seeking confidential advice from a workplace ombudsman or legal advisor will clarify Heryati’s rights and prepare them for any formal complaint. If the company truly values its reputation, even a quietly worded LinkedIn or Threads post summarizing the facts, without casting blame, can spur a behind‑the‑scenes re‑evaluation of their processes.

None of these tactics guarantees an offer, but they do introduce transparency, and that in itself has value. By pushing courteously for clarity, documenting facts, and invoking considerations of fair work, Miles and Heryati have a good chance of discovering whether this was an innocent systems glitch or a deeper issue of bias. In either event, they’ll have done everything they could to ensure that merit, not flawed assumptions, drive the outcome.

This story reveals that something as simple as a name can get perfectly viable candidates rejected. The Australian Human Rights Commission found that Anglo-Saxon names had a 42% call-back rate, while indigenous-sounding names had only a 33% call-back rate. Even worse, “middle eastern” names had a 22% call-back rate, almost half that of Anglo names. While there might not be enough evidence to say that is exactly what’s happening here, the truth is that this sort of thing has a precedent in Australia.

Readers were indignant on his behalf

Comment on social media questioning company censorship after woman with 15 years of experience is overlooked for a role.

Social media post questioning legal options for discrimination in Australia, highlighting concerns about rejection and fairness.

Woman with 15 years of experience reacting to being overlooked, showing confusion and skepticism in two side-by-side photos.

Comment from an Australian HR professional advising on lodging a general protections claim after job rejection.

Screenshot of a social media post discussing racism and discrimination faced by a woman with 15 years of experience.

Social media post discussing a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a role, and rejection email issues.

Screenshot of a social media post discussing identity assumptions and experiences of being overlooked despite background and experience.

Social media comments discuss discrimination and lack of explanations for rejection in a woman with 15 years experience.

Tweet questioning why a husband emailed on behalf of his wife after a rejection email sparks experience and role concerns.

Social media post discussing experience of a woman overlooked for a role despite 15 years in an English-speaking country.

Comment detailing a woman's experience of being overlooked for a role despite 15 years of experience and facing rejection challenges.

Social media post discussing a woman with 15 years of experience overlooked for a role due to discrimination.

Former HR manager discusses racial discrimination and rejection email concerns for woman with 15 years of experience.

Screenshot of a social media comment discussing discrimination and questioning the Australian equality commission.

Tweet about job rejection due to cultural bias, highlighting experience overlooked and issues with hiring practices.

Woman with 15 years of experience faces rejection, sparking questions about job interview biases and hiring challenges.

Twitter posts showing a woman with 15 years of experience sharing her rejection email and questioning the hiring process.

Social media post highlighting rejection and discrimination faced by a woman with 15 years of experience in job hiring.

Poll Question

Total votes ·

Thanks! Check out the results:

Total votes ·

Newsletter

Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls

Subscribe

By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.

Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!

Anyone can write on Bored Panda. Start writing!

Follow Bored Panda on Google News!

Follow us on Flipboard.com/@boredpanda!