Woman Runs Off From Wedding After Groom Decides To Spill Milk On Her Expensive Dress
Weddings are meant to be joyful celebrations. They are filled with laughter, dancing, and happy memories unless some family drama or bad behavior spoils the mood. But no matter how lighthearted the atmosphere, it’s never the right occasion for pranks that can ruin someone’s evening.
For example, a man shared how his brother-in-law, the groom, pulled not one but two outrageous “pranks” on him and his girlfriend. First, he pressured the author to propose to his girlfriend, laughing it off with, “Relax, just a joke, bro!” Then he went even further, spilling milk all over her expensive dress. Keep reading to see exactly how things spiraled out of control.
Wedding guests often spend hundreds of dollars on outfits, making them a prized possession at celebrations
Image credits: LeylaCamomile (not the actual image)
A man shared how his brother-in-law, the groom, took things too far by throwing milk on his girlfriend’s expensive dress as a prank
Image credits: Dhaya Eddine Bentaleb (not the actual image)
Image credits: macondoso (not the actual image)
Image credits: voronaman111 (not the actual image)
He explained who had paid for the dress and why his girlfriend refused to have it cleaned after the incident
Image credits: NonTueWed3099
The man added that he couldn’t understand how his sister found such behavior acceptable at a wedding
Pranks can sometimes unintentionally trigger past trauma or cause anxiety in the person on the receiving end
In recent years, prank videos have exploded online, racking up millions of views and making us laugh at the absurdity of people’s reactions. From perfectly timed jump scares to elaborate setups, these clips are often staged to perfection. But real life isn’t a controlled set, and pranks that might seem funny on a screen can be cruel in person. What’s hilarious to one person can be deeply upsetting to another, turning what’s meant to be a joke into an uncomfortable or even traumatic experience. The intention may be humor, but the impact isn’t always the same.
One of the biggest issues with pranks is when people don’t fully understand the harm they can cause. Many pranksters brush off the reaction of their target, expecting them to “take it easy” or “just laugh it off.” They forget that a joke can trigger feelings of embarrassment, fear, or frustration. It’s easy to dismiss someone’s hurt feelings when you’re laughing at the situation yourself, but that doesn’t make the impact any less real.
Pranks can also unintentionally trigger past trauma or create anxiety. For someone who has experienced bullying, physical scares, or abuse, even a seemingly harmless prank can spark hypervigilance, making them constantly on edge. Imagine a prank involving sudden loud noises or unexpected physical contact. While intended as funny, the victim’s body may respond with real fear, increased heart rate, and stress, like reliving a past experience. This is why it’s important to consider the mental state and history of the person being pranked, even for a joke that seems innocent.
In some cases, pranks can even be used as a way to gain power or control over someone. A prankster might intentionally make someone feel small, embarrassed, or humiliated, all under the guise of humor. For instance, someone hiding another person’s important item in front of friends can make the victim feel powerless while the prankster gains attention or amusement. When pranks are used to manipulate or dominate, they cross from being playful into being psychologically harmful. The line between funny and controlling can be surprisingly thin.
Experts also point out that there is a fine line between pranking and bullying. When jokes are repeated, targeted, or cause distress, what starts as a playful act can quickly become mistreatment. Even a seemingly small prank, like a coworker tricking you repeatedly or an intimate partner repeatedly joking at your expense, can wear on someone over time. It’s the repetition and intent behind the prank that matters. A single harmless joke might be fine, but consistent targeting can harm confidence, trust, and relationships.
Repeated online pranks aimed at intimate partners or close friends can also negatively affect relationships. Imagine someone constantly being the target of staged “funny” videos at home or on social media; while one prank might elicit a chuckle, consistent pranks can erode trust and increase resentment. Partners may feel belittled or undervalued, questioning whether their feelings are being respected. Over time, what’s meant to be lighthearted humor can become a source of tension, stress, or even conflict in a relationship.
When done thoughtfully and harmlessly, pranks can have benefits, like boosting mood, laughter, and even relieving stress
On the flip side, harmless pranks have their benefits too. According to psychologist Susan Albers, PsyD, writing for the Cleveland Clinic, “A well-executed prank or joke will induce laughter. And research shows that laughing has wonderful benefits for our mental and physical health.” Laughter can reduce stress, improve mood, strengthen social bonds, and even give your immune system a small boost. When a prank is genuinely funny to everyone involved, it creates shared joy and memorable moments—something everyone can enjoy without anyone feeling embarrassed or unsafe.
So, while sneaky, harmless pranks can be a source of fun and laughter, it’s important to know the boundaries. If a prank crosses the line into cruelty, triggers anxiety, or targets someone repeatedly, it stops being funny and starts being harmful. The best pranks are those where everyone can laugh together, not at someone else’s expense. Humor should uplift, not hurt. So, next time you plan a prank, think about the person on the receiving end; it can mean the difference between a story everyone tells with laughter and one no one wants to remember.
In this particular case, it seems the groom clearly went too far. Ruining someone’s dress and then refusing to pay for it crosses the line from playful prank to outright disrespect. The author also shared how his girlfriend felt embarrassed and humiliated in front of everyone, turning what should have been a joyful wedding moment into a stressful one. Pranks are meant to be fun, but actions like this show how easily they can hurt. What are your thoughts on this situation? And more broadly, how do you feel about pranks: fun, harmless jokes, or something that can easily go too far?
Online commenters agreed that the groom’s prank crossed the line and was far from funny
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Please don't call people who do things like this pranksters. The correct term is bully.
OP is a far more restrained person than I am. I am horrified that the bride was okay with the groom's behaviour, I would have been mortified and furious if my husband did something like this in our wedding day. The only way forward is NC with his sister.
She was willing to marry him even though she knows his personality. Sister is clearly an idiot. Pranksters are awful
Load More Replies...A prank is defined by 3 things: no long term harm or damage, reversible quickly at no cost, and the target can laugh at it. So many 'pranks' in the world are actually vandalism, destruction of property, and a*****t. This is one of those. Too many people let those idiots get away with it. Don't let him.
Agreed but I would argue a prank has another factor: effort on the part of the prankster. Gluing all someone's furniture to the ceiling: prank. Chucking milk over someone: starting a fight.
Load More Replies...People who do cruel pranks like this are actually likely sociopaths and aren't safe to be around humans. I would stay the hell away from them entirely.
A humorous prank video I’ve seen bouncing around: an elderly waitress carrying a beer on a platter suddenly dumps it on customers, but it’s a trick glass and the beer doesn’t spill, and it’s tied to a string so the glass doesn’t even fall on anything. Multiple customers on multiple tables react with laughter. Note the differences between that and ruining someone’s dress at a wedding.
That is, indeed, a prank. Pranks are no harm no foul.
Load More Replies...Prank? What part of that was supposed to be clever, or funny?
This is what small claims court is for. Also, depending where this happened bil's actions may constitute some sort of a*****t. And if it was me I'd go for both full-throttle, and anything else i could think of.
I very much doubt they'd get the $300 for the dress. Maybe they'd get a tenth of that for the dry cleaning.
Load More Replies..."Hahaha" - takes the glass from him - throws the rest of the milk on the wedding tux
Why was the guy allowed to walk away with the wedding vegetables intact and functional?!
Phonecall on speaker with the sister and her husband "sister, your husband is an AH, I do not want to be around either of you while you are with him. One day he is going to turn that on you, and when that day comes call me and I will help you get away from him, but until then I don't want to hear from you. I love you but I can't watch you be with someone like that."
One day he's going to target someone and regret it. Especially if he lives somewhere where people regularly carry firearms. Or one of his 'pranks' will cause a serious injury (or fatality) to the victim and he'll be looking at a prison sentence. And he'll soon learn that prison is not somewhere you can continue that behaviour...
Dress is not necessarily ruined. Get it dry cleaned and BIL should definitely pay for it since he intentionally dirtied it. If it is stained, then it is ruined and he should pay for it. Intentional pranks still have consequences, so take to small claims court. Maybe this will change his attitude. Sister is complicit.
What's with all the people saying milk can't ruin a dress? If it was silk water could ruin it.
If I was the g/f I would have slapped the hell out of him right then in front of the whole place to see and given him a tongue lashing he would never forget. One way or another he would be paying for that dress!
Kin hell fire I’d have dropped the t w a t , there n then ! That was not funny at all, its only funny if the person you do it to is laughing when they don’t it’s BULLYING plain n simple ,as for throwing liquids in people NEVER DO THIS ,to many women , and men in some cases get acid thrown at them it’s evil ,he’s only one step away from that, he needs a wake up call asap, report him to the police for as s a u l t !, n as a prank towards him get him up in front of judge Judy !! She will wipe the floor with him ,”just a prank mate lighten up “ n I like the idea of starting to play him at his own game ,with those words ever time, think back to all the so called jokes etc he’s done, n one up them , or copy them ,see how he f kin likes it ! OP NTA bil needs locking up for everyone’s safety !
I hate pranks. They are just an opportunity for someone to do something cruel.
oh, i absolutely woulda ruined their wedding day, because i woulda beat the s**t outta the groom on the spot. that's a part of the problem with "pranksters," people don't beat their asses soon enough and often enough. if you knew that you were gonna get ya a*s beat every time you pulled a "prank," you'd prolly stop. ijs...
The question if the apology was enough is absurd, there was no apology. People like this never change, they just get worse.
Why don't people ever "prank" people like this back in a way they wouldn't think was funny, so they can see how it feels?
These aren't pranks; they're basic cruelty in fancy dress. BIL just wants to be cruel to people, and him calling them pranks is just a way of throwing people off the scent (it doesn't mean those people won't still despise him, though)
I'd take him to small claims court just out of pure spite, even though I'd probably lose money with court fees. My late, unlamented father used to play "jokes" on me for which I'm still in therapy, 45 years later.
NTA. Your brother in law and sister are two toxic people I would cut out of my life if I were you.
Throwing a drink on someone at a formal occasion is not a prank, it's deliberate destruction of their outfit, and often counts as a*****t. It's done to force them to leave the event. This is not pranking it's just bullying and harassment. It's obnoxious, and he is legally liable to have the dress professionally cleaned or replaced.
A late outing there for an older meaning of "hysterical" - "prone to bouts of hysteria", which you can see in a lot of turn-of-the-1900s fiction. These days when we say someone is "hysterical" we tend to mean they are a cause of hysteria in others. See also "hilarious", which likewise used to mean "suffering a bout od hilarity" rather than causing one.
I would be informing my sister, our parents, and all other shared relatives that I will not be in the same room as that jacka$$ again. If that means no contact with the sister, that is her burden to bear.....and since she thinks her husband is so funny, the NC would include no support or assistance when she either gets hurt or wises up and files for divorce.
Please don't call people who do things like this pranksters. The correct term is bully.
OP is a far more restrained person than I am. I am horrified that the bride was okay with the groom's behaviour, I would have been mortified and furious if my husband did something like this in our wedding day. The only way forward is NC with his sister.
She was willing to marry him even though she knows his personality. Sister is clearly an idiot. Pranksters are awful
Load More Replies...A prank is defined by 3 things: no long term harm or damage, reversible quickly at no cost, and the target can laugh at it. So many 'pranks' in the world are actually vandalism, destruction of property, and a*****t. This is one of those. Too many people let those idiots get away with it. Don't let him.
Agreed but I would argue a prank has another factor: effort on the part of the prankster. Gluing all someone's furniture to the ceiling: prank. Chucking milk over someone: starting a fight.
Load More Replies...People who do cruel pranks like this are actually likely sociopaths and aren't safe to be around humans. I would stay the hell away from them entirely.
A humorous prank video I’ve seen bouncing around: an elderly waitress carrying a beer on a platter suddenly dumps it on customers, but it’s a trick glass and the beer doesn’t spill, and it’s tied to a string so the glass doesn’t even fall on anything. Multiple customers on multiple tables react with laughter. Note the differences between that and ruining someone’s dress at a wedding.
That is, indeed, a prank. Pranks are no harm no foul.
Load More Replies...Prank? What part of that was supposed to be clever, or funny?
This is what small claims court is for. Also, depending where this happened bil's actions may constitute some sort of a*****t. And if it was me I'd go for both full-throttle, and anything else i could think of.
I very much doubt they'd get the $300 for the dress. Maybe they'd get a tenth of that for the dry cleaning.
Load More Replies..."Hahaha" - takes the glass from him - throws the rest of the milk on the wedding tux
Why was the guy allowed to walk away with the wedding vegetables intact and functional?!
Phonecall on speaker with the sister and her husband "sister, your husband is an AH, I do not want to be around either of you while you are with him. One day he is going to turn that on you, and when that day comes call me and I will help you get away from him, but until then I don't want to hear from you. I love you but I can't watch you be with someone like that."
One day he's going to target someone and regret it. Especially if he lives somewhere where people regularly carry firearms. Or one of his 'pranks' will cause a serious injury (or fatality) to the victim and he'll be looking at a prison sentence. And he'll soon learn that prison is not somewhere you can continue that behaviour...
Dress is not necessarily ruined. Get it dry cleaned and BIL should definitely pay for it since he intentionally dirtied it. If it is stained, then it is ruined and he should pay for it. Intentional pranks still have consequences, so take to small claims court. Maybe this will change his attitude. Sister is complicit.
What's with all the people saying milk can't ruin a dress? If it was silk water could ruin it.
If I was the g/f I would have slapped the hell out of him right then in front of the whole place to see and given him a tongue lashing he would never forget. One way or another he would be paying for that dress!
Kin hell fire I’d have dropped the t w a t , there n then ! That was not funny at all, its only funny if the person you do it to is laughing when they don’t it’s BULLYING plain n simple ,as for throwing liquids in people NEVER DO THIS ,to many women , and men in some cases get acid thrown at them it’s evil ,he’s only one step away from that, he needs a wake up call asap, report him to the police for as s a u l t !, n as a prank towards him get him up in front of judge Judy !! She will wipe the floor with him ,”just a prank mate lighten up “ n I like the idea of starting to play him at his own game ,with those words ever time, think back to all the so called jokes etc he’s done, n one up them , or copy them ,see how he f kin likes it ! OP NTA bil needs locking up for everyone’s safety !
I hate pranks. They are just an opportunity for someone to do something cruel.
oh, i absolutely woulda ruined their wedding day, because i woulda beat the s**t outta the groom on the spot. that's a part of the problem with "pranksters," people don't beat their asses soon enough and often enough. if you knew that you were gonna get ya a*s beat every time you pulled a "prank," you'd prolly stop. ijs...
The question if the apology was enough is absurd, there was no apology. People like this never change, they just get worse.
Why don't people ever "prank" people like this back in a way they wouldn't think was funny, so they can see how it feels?
These aren't pranks; they're basic cruelty in fancy dress. BIL just wants to be cruel to people, and him calling them pranks is just a way of throwing people off the scent (it doesn't mean those people won't still despise him, though)
I'd take him to small claims court just out of pure spite, even though I'd probably lose money with court fees. My late, unlamented father used to play "jokes" on me for which I'm still in therapy, 45 years later.
NTA. Your brother in law and sister are two toxic people I would cut out of my life if I were you.
Throwing a drink on someone at a formal occasion is not a prank, it's deliberate destruction of their outfit, and often counts as a*****t. It's done to force them to leave the event. This is not pranking it's just bullying and harassment. It's obnoxious, and he is legally liable to have the dress professionally cleaned or replaced.
A late outing there for an older meaning of "hysterical" - "prone to bouts of hysteria", which you can see in a lot of turn-of-the-1900s fiction. These days when we say someone is "hysterical" we tend to mean they are a cause of hysteria in others. See also "hilarious", which likewise used to mean "suffering a bout od hilarity" rather than causing one.
I would be informing my sister, our parents, and all other shared relatives that I will not be in the same room as that jacka$$ again. If that means no contact with the sister, that is her burden to bear.....and since she thinks her husband is so funny, the NC would include no support or assistance when she either gets hurt or wises up and files for divorce.





























































37
54