“Can You Really Tell A Fox From A Dog?”: Prove You’re Not Clueless About Animals
Do you think you have a sharp eye for wildlife? Then we challenge you to put those skills to the test! We’ve gathered a wild mix of creatures—from the elephant to the tiny tick, from the speedy cheetah to the quirky alpaca—they’re all waiting for you to guess them just from their silhouettes. Some may be obvious, others not entirely.
Are you up for this challenge? Let’s see if you can master this animal silhouette showdown! 🐾
Image credits: Phil Mitchell
•
Not Quite Done Yet!
Discover Your Competitive Edge
Subscribe Premium to Compare Your Stats with Others
More Premium features:
How did you score compared to others?
Your general stats:
| User | Result | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| / 22 | |
| / 22 | |
I’m no expert but that “alpaca” still looked an awful lot like what I understood to be a llama. Clearly I need to watch Emperor’s New Groove another 300 times.
The elephant's trunk appears too short and is easily mistaken for tapir. A kangaroo and wallaby are shaped alike with one just smaller, same with a llama and an alpaca
Load More Replies...A lot of these were poorly designed. With the rough silhouette it's hard to get the correct one- especially considering a lot of the pictures are from angles where it's virtually impossible to identify. The panda??? We don't see enough of its actual silhouette due to the angle PLUS it's a pixelated image- blurring the finer details. And the ostrich and emu, again with it blurred and the angle you arent given enough to go on. Dont even get started on the elephant that deliberately had its features hidden so you can't see it properly.
This is just invalid and unreliable test design. The elephant image is misleading.. The trunk is curled to make it look more taper-ish. I stopped taking the quiz then because many of the quizzes on this site have edited questions designed to throw off the test takers.
the one that was supposed to be a bee looked like a barboach to me, so i think im playing too much pokémon. 20/22
I’m no expert but that “alpaca” still looked an awful lot like what I understood to be a llama. Clearly I need to watch Emperor’s New Groove another 300 times.
The elephant's trunk appears too short and is easily mistaken for tapir. A kangaroo and wallaby are shaped alike with one just smaller, same with a llama and an alpaca
Load More Replies...A lot of these were poorly designed. With the rough silhouette it's hard to get the correct one- especially considering a lot of the pictures are from angles where it's virtually impossible to identify. The panda??? We don't see enough of its actual silhouette due to the angle PLUS it's a pixelated image- blurring the finer details. And the ostrich and emu, again with it blurred and the angle you arent given enough to go on. Dont even get started on the elephant that deliberately had its features hidden so you can't see it properly.
This is just invalid and unreliable test design. The elephant image is misleading.. The trunk is curled to make it look more taper-ish. I stopped taking the quiz then because many of the quizzes on this site have edited questions designed to throw off the test takers.
the one that was supposed to be a bee looked like a barboach to me, so i think im playing too much pokémon. 20/22


5
24