Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
Woman Finds A 160-Year-Old Victorian Love Letter That Feels Like A Slap In The Face
The dating world is hard for single people. In 2020, 67% of American daters said their dating lives were not going too well. Women had it particularly difficult, with 65% saying they had experienced harassing behaviors during a date or with a person they were dating. But has it always been like this throughout history?
One gentleman’s letter to his mistress might just be proof that men, as Doja Cat would sing in the clean version, ain’t it. 19th-century art and fashion historian Rosie Hart brought people’s attention to the fact that even Victorian boyfriends lacked class by reading said letter to her followers. “Proof that it was embarrassing to have a boyfriend 160 years ago as well,” one commenter quipped.
RELATED:
If you think boyfriends in the Victorian era were all classy gentlemen, you might need to think again
Image credits: Álvaro Serrano / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
One creator recently shared a love letter from the 1800s that proves dating was hell for women even back then
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
Image credits: rosiehharte
The creator’s video garnered over 397k views
@rosiehharte Is this the WORST Victorian boyfriend? 😨 #history#catherinewalters#victorianera#victorianhistory#historyfacts♬ Tchaikovsky “Dance of the Reed Flutes”(1257471) – kzy
Catherine Walters was one of the most famous courtesans in Victorian London
The “Skitsy” in this story is Catherine Walters, a quite famous courtesan of Victorian London. In fact, she was the last courtesan of that era. Her nickname, Skittles, came from her job, apparently. According to legend, Walters worked in the Black Jack Tavern in Liverpool that had a skittles alley, or, as we call it nowadays, a bowling alley.
Throughout her life, Walters was a mistress to many powerful men. Her first was allegedly Lord Fitzwilliam. MP and diarist Henry Labouchère described Catherine as “the most capricious heart I know and must be the only [woman] in history to retain her heart intact.”
Her affair with Spencer Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington, lasted for four years. He provided Catherine with a Mayfair house and a stable. By that time, Walters was an experienced and established equestrienne.
Many highborn women would go for horse rides in Hyde Park. As creator Rosie Harte notes in another of her videos, they would match their outfits to their carriages. But Catherine was, as Harte puts it, “the Goth Courtesan,” always wearing black. Her outfits were another thing that made her famous. According to historians, her tailors were the famous Henry Poole & Co. on Savile Row.
Yet Walters wasn’t highborn herself. Other sources highlight the fact that she rose to a higher social class than she was born into, indicated by her “docklands vocabulary.” However, as a courtesan, she was able to travel to America and Paris, becoming a member of high society.
Skitsy and Lord Hartington’s breakup was just as entertaining as his letters
So, what happened to Catherine’s and Lord Hartington’s relationship? As Rosie Hart details in another of her videos, they had an outlandishly scandalous and embarrassing breakup. Apparently, Catherine was so in love with Cavendish and wanted to become duchess (he was in line to become the Duke of Devonshire) that she started telling people that he had already proposed.
However, Cavendish was eyeing a career in politics and was, for lack of a better word, looking for a “decent” wife. So, like a real gentleman, he wrote her a breakup letter and sent it as he was going away on a trip to America.
When Catherine found out, she decided to follow him, but she couldn’t go on a transatlantic trip unattended. So, she found a young married man, Aubrey de Vere Beauclerk, and traveled to America as his mistress. When they reached New York, Catherine begged Cavendish multiple times to take her back. Yet, every time, he refused.
The brothers of Beauclerk’s abandoned wife chased him and Catherine to America, and the British press reported on this scandal almost daily. Historians claim that Catherine was so mortified by the whole story that she refused to come back to London and thus traveled to Paris, becoming a lover of financier and political advisor Achille Fould.
Was Cavendish really the worst boyfriend in history? Perhaps, but he, like Catherine, was a product of his time, when status and morality could make or break someone’s prospects.
One commenter revealed “Skitsy’s” fate: “She retired a very rich woman”
Many women took this story as proof that men “haven’t changed one bit
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
Apatheist 7 hours ago
Given that the Prince of Wales, later King Edward VII, was infamous for mistresses, it was almost fashionable. Mistresses were absolutely standard until divorce became simpler. As women had very limited opportunities to better themselves or become independent, this was often the only way for some to survive.
Tabitha 2 hours ago (edited)
Fashionable for upper crust men only. Women in the upper classes had very regimented lives and little say in how to live them, for the most part. They had little to no opportunity to cheat on their husbands. Their men, on the other hand, were actively encouraged to play with women from the lower classes and keep them as mistresses. Some even ardently declared their undying love for their mistresses, but they only did it to get in their pantaloons. Then, when they found someone new or their mistress was getting too insistent about marriage if the man was single, they just threw the poor women—-many of whom were honestly in love with them and not just golddiggers—-away. If they had had children with the man, they had NO other way to support themselves and their kids except to become the mistress of another rich man, or walk the streets. The smarter women, like Skitsy here, parlayed their relationships into personal wealth, through gifts of money, jewelry, property, etc, and turned out alright in the end. But they were the exception rather than the rule. However, they weren’t all as smart as Skitsy. For them, there was no coming back from the social disgrace of being considered “damaged goods” and not worthy of marriage, while the men just neatly slipped back into the protection of their money and family power, married rich women from equally, or more, rich and powerful families, only to emerge when another pretty face crossed their view.
Load More Replies...
Apatheist 7 hours ago
Given that the Prince of Wales, later King Edward VII, was infamous for mistresses, it was almost fashionable. Mistresses were absolutely standard until divorce became simpler. As women had very limited opportunities to better themselves or become independent, this was often the only way for some to survive.
Tabitha 2 hours ago (edited)
Fashionable for upper crust men only. Women in the upper classes had very regimented lives and little say in how to live them, for the most part. They had little to no opportunity to cheat on their husbands. Their men, on the other hand, were actively encouraged to play with women from the lower classes and keep them as mistresses. Some even ardently declared their undying love for their mistresses, but they only did it to get in their pantaloons. Then, when they found someone new or their mistress was getting too insistent about marriage if the man was single, they just threw the poor women—-many of whom were honestly in love with them and not just golddiggers—-away. If they had had children with the man, they had NO other way to support themselves and their kids except to become the mistress of another rich man, or walk the streets. The smarter women, like Skitsy here, parlayed their relationships into personal wealth, through gifts of money, jewelry, property, etc, and turned out alright in the end. But they were the exception rather than the rule. However, they weren’t all as smart as Skitsy. For them, there was no coming back from the social disgrace of being considered “damaged goods” and not worthy of marriage, while the men just neatly slipped back into the protection of their money and family power, married rich women from equally, or more, rich and powerful families, only to emerge when another pretty face crossed their view.
Load More Replies... You May Like 128 Short Love Quotes To Melt Your Partner’s Heart 150 Self-Love Quotes To Help You Be Kind To Yourself 49 Body Things That Make People Panic But Are Totally Normal, According To Doctors
Saimonas Lukošius
Miglė
Justinas Keturka
Related on Bored Panda
22
3