Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Employee Horrified After Finding Out Company Secretly Profiles Employees, Sparks Debate Online
Female employee in glasses looking concerned at computer, depicting corporate spying on staff in office setting
15

Employee Horrified After Finding Out Company Secretly Profiles Employees, Sparks Debate Online

29

ADVERTISEMENT

The modern corporate world loves its buzzwords. We’re no longer employees; we’re “human capital.” We don’t just work together; we “synergize.” And we’re not just managed; our “resources are optimized.” This high-tech language is designed to make everything sound efficient and futuristic, even when it’s just a fancy way of saying someone is about to get a passive-aggressive email.

So how can we rephrase “corporate spying” to sound a little more appealing? Because we assume they’re just looking for big problems, but maybe they are analyzing our every keystroke like a digital fortune teller. One ex-employee discovered just this. Their company was being a digital Big Brother and weaponizing their data in the most toxic way.

More info: Reddit

RELATED:

    Corporate buzzwords can often hide some deeply unsettling workplace practices

    Office meeting showing employees discussing work, illustrating themes of employee sidelining and corporate spying on staff.

    Image credits: pressfoto / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    An ex-employee revealed a secret system that used an algorithm to flag potential “flight risks”

    Text excerpt about employee getting sidelined after HR used predictive assessment tools for corporate spying on staff.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text explaining how a corporate spying system monitored employee emails, messages, calendar, and login patterns.

    Image credits:

    Woman sitting at desk looking concerned while working on computer, depicting employee sidelined and corporate spying on staff.

    Image credits: EyeEm / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    The company then weaponized this data by secretly sidelining anyone it considered disloyal

    Text describing corporate spying on staff leading to employees being sidelined at work and excluded from key projects.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Employee gets sidelined at work due to corporate spying on staff, facing vague feedback and missed promotions despite talent.

    Image credits:

    Employee carrying a box of personal items at work, symbolizing being sidelined, with a blurred coworker in the background.

    Image credits: seventyfour / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    One colleague was benched for searching salaries, while the narrator was punished for updating their LinkedIn

    Text highlighting corporate spying on staff revealed after employee sidelined and flagged following LinkedIn profile update at work.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text excerpt about employee unaware of corporate spying, overhearing executives discussing retention prediction scores at work event.

    Image credits:

    ADVERTISEMENT

    They discovered the practice only after overhearing executives discussing “retention scores” at a party

    One former employee recently pulled back the curtain on a corporate practice so dystopian it would make George Orwell blush. At user u/Imaginary_Addition21‘s last job, HR wasn’t just tracking vacation days; they were using “predictive assessment tools” to secretly profile everyone. This was a high-tech witch hunt to identify and neutralize potential “flight risks” before they could even think of escaping.

    The system was monitoring everything from company emails and Slack messages to your login patterns. If you started logging in a little later or your communication style changed, a silent alarm would trip in a server somewhere. This data was then used to create a “retention prediction score,” a beautiful piece of corporate jargon for “how likely is this person to leave us?”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    This became a weapon instead of a data source. If you were flagged, your manager was secretly instructed to sideline you, pulling you from important projects and leadership opportunities. One talented colleague was benched simply for searching salary benchmarks on her work laptop. The company created a perfect self-fulfilling prophecy: they treated good employees so poorly that, eventually, they had no choice but to leave.

    The OP only discovered this secret surveillance program by overhearing executives casually discussing it at a holiday party. They later learned that they’d been flagged six months before they quit, right after updating their LinkedIn profile, which explained why they were mysteriously pulled from all the important meetings. It was the ultimate proof that your company might have already broken up with you in their head.

    Employees in a meeting room discussing work, illustrating themes of employee sidelining and corporate spying on staff.

    Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The company’s secret surveillance program is not just unethical, but research also shows it is a fundamentally flawed strategy that actively encourages bad behavior. A major study from the Harvard Business Review found that monitored employees were “substantially more likely to” engage in rule-breaking, from taking unapproved breaks to purposefully working slowly.

    This feeling of being constantly watched creates a culture of anxiety and distrust, not loyalty. According to findings posted by Apploye, over 56% of employees feel anxious about being monitored at work, and a staggering 54% would consider quitting their job if surveillance increased. So in this case, the company’s “flight risk” tool is a self-fulfilling prophecy…

    Ultimately, these tools fail because they measure the wrong things. Dr. Tara Behrend, a professor of human resources, argues that such surveillance is a “mistake because the tools aren’t measuring what’s really important—all the ways a worker is contributing to the organization and generating value.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Has your workplace ever used a creepy or counterproductive tool to monitor its employees? Share your story below. This is a safe space!

    Commenters were quick to share similar stories, adding fuel to the corporate mistrust fire

    Comments on corporate spying on staff, detailing digital surveillance and employee monitoring practices at work.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text conversation discussing employee sidelining at work and discovering shocking corporate spying on staff practices.

    Reddit thread discussing labor laws and corporate spying on staff regarding salary data and employee rights.

    Screenshot of an online discussion about employee being sidelined and corporate spying on staff raising privacy concerns.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Screenshot of online discussion mentioning employees sidelined at work and corporate spying on staff through algorithms.

    Text post about employee frustration with work and anxiety hinting at corporate spying and workplace stress issues.

    Screenshot of a Reddit comment about updating LinkedIn after being sidelined at work amid corporate spying on staff.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment discussing concerns about corporate spying on staff and its serious impact on employees and employers.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment discussing misuse of machine learning models and solutions, highlighting concerns about corporate spying on staff.

    Comment discussing corporate spying on staff behaviors at work and how managers tracked employee actions.

    Screenshot of a Reddit comment discussing an employee sidelined at work and corporate spying on staff.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment discussing corporate spying on staff, employee sidelining, and monitoring impacting productivity in a work environment.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Online comment asking to name the company related to corporate spying on staff and employee sidelining at work.

    Comment on toxic HR environment, questioning the mindset behind corporate spying on staff and employee sidelining at work.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Screenshot of an online comment discussing corporate spying on staff and work-related injustices.

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Louise Pieterse

    Louise Pieterse

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less »
    Louise Pieterse

    Louise Pieterse

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    I am a visual editor here. In my free time I enjoy the vibrant worlds of art galleries, exhibitions, and soulful concerts. Yet, amidst life's hustle and bustle, I find solace in nature's embrace, cherishing tranquil moments with beloved friends. Deep within, I hold a dream close - to embark on a global journey in an RV, accompanied by my faithful canine companion. Together, we'll wander through diverse cultures, weaving precious memories under the starry night sky, fulfilling the wanderlust that stirs my soul.

    Read less »

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Monika Pašukonytė

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    I am a visual editor here. In my free time I enjoy the vibrant worlds of art galleries, exhibitions, and soulful concerts. Yet, amidst life's hustle and bustle, I find solace in nature's embrace, cherishing tranquil moments with beloved friends. Deep within, I hold a dream close - to embark on a global journey in an RV, accompanied by my faithful canine companion. Together, we'll wander through diverse cultures, weaving precious memories under the starry night sky, fulfilling the wanderlust that stirs my soul.

    What do you think ?
    Vinnie
    Community Member
    4 months ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "Flight risk" - what is this, a bail hearing?? It's pretty short-sighted and simplistic to reward "loyalty" over talent. Plus cutting out less "loyal" employees sounds like constructive dismissal. It can also make it easy for another employer to poach talent.

    Debbie
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If they are still doing it , inform former collegues or make a post about it on linkedin. Not explicitly mentioning them, just that SOME companies do this.

    JayWantsACat
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The irony of making decisions to exclude so-called "flight risks" from promotions and projects... resulting in people leaving because they were passed over for promotions and kept from working on important projects. I know managers are stupid but this is next level.

    Mark Stewart
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What a bunch of morons, I wonder how many employees that would have stuck around for long careers did they actually drive away with this nonsense because they saw opportunities to advance evaporate and decided to move on?

    Just a little dog
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Identifying someone as a flight risk is questionable but probably okay. Punishing them for being a supposed flight risk is stupid and shortsighted. Everyone is a flight risk if they think they're being mistreated. What you should do with the data is identify high performers that are possible flight risks and preemptively solve the problems that make them a flight risk before they are actively looking for the exit.

    Miriam Insidecor
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I never use my work laptop for personal stuff because I know for a fact there is monitoring software installed on all the work devices. They also monitor emails sent externally with attachments. Which we often have to do. Always best to keep work and your private life separate.

    Mike F
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This kind of thing was done all the way back in the 70s. If someone suddenly began getting more phone calls (way before email), longer lunches, late arrivals, leaving for the day even a bit earlier than normal... You were branded as "having one foot out the door" and things changed. Sometimes you were even called in for a talk where you were grilled about your intentions. It's always happened, it's just that new technology gives employers new tools.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    4 months ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    "Flight risk" - what is this, a bail hearing?? It's pretty short-sighted and simplistic to reward "loyalty" over talent. Plus cutting out less "loyal" employees sounds like constructive dismissal. It can also make it easy for another employer to poach talent.

    Debbie
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If they are still doing it , inform former collegues or make a post about it on linkedin. Not explicitly mentioning them, just that SOME companies do this.

    JayWantsACat
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The irony of making decisions to exclude so-called "flight risks" from promotions and projects... resulting in people leaving because they were passed over for promotions and kept from working on important projects. I know managers are stupid but this is next level.

    Mark Stewart
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    What a bunch of morons, I wonder how many employees that would have stuck around for long careers did they actually drive away with this nonsense because they saw opportunities to advance evaporate and decided to move on?

    Just a little dog
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Identifying someone as a flight risk is questionable but probably okay. Punishing them for being a supposed flight risk is stupid and shortsighted. Everyone is a flight risk if they think they're being mistreated. What you should do with the data is identify high performers that are possible flight risks and preemptively solve the problems that make them a flight risk before they are actively looking for the exit.

    Miriam Insidecor
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I never use my work laptop for personal stuff because I know for a fact there is monitoring software installed on all the work devices. They also monitor emails sent externally with attachments. Which we often have to do. Always best to keep work and your private life separate.

    Mike F
    Community Member
    4 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This kind of thing was done all the way back in the 70s. If someone suddenly began getting more phone calls (way before email), longer lunches, late arrivals, leaving for the day even a bit earlier than normal... You were branded as "having one foot out the door" and things changed. Sometimes you were even called in for a talk where you were grilled about your intentions. It's always happened, it's just that new technology gives employers new tools.

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT