From commas and apostrophes to verb tenses and clauses, this 30-question UK English-inspired quiz puts your everyday language knowledge to the test.
Some questions are straightforward, others are designed to trip you up if you’re not paying close attention – just like real English does.
Let’s see how well you really know your grammar. Begin!
🚀 💡 Want more or looking for something else? Head over to the Bored Panda Quizzes and explore our full collection of quizzes and trivia designed to test your knowledge, reveal hidden insights, and spark your curiosity.💡 🚀
•
Not Quite Done Yet!
Discover Your Competitive Edge
Subscribe Premium to Compare Your Stats with Others
More Premium features:
How did you score compared to others?
Your general stats:
| User | Result | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| / 30 | |
| / 30 | |
How is this specifically "UK grammar" and not just "normal English language grammar regardless of what side of the pond you're on"?
#8 with the comma - no, you do not need a comma, As for their explanation "Commas are used after fronted adverbials." W*F? Do they seriously expect anyone to remember such contorted rules like that?
A fronted adverbial is very specific, though, to be fair. It's when the adverb is moved to the beginning of the sentence instead of immediately following the verb ("The door opened slowly" is a sentence in regular form; "Slowly, the door opened" is the same sentence in fronted adverbial form.) It's not a sin to NOT put a comma after the fronted adverb, but it IS generally accepted as proper grammatical/technical form. I was an English major and got my degree in English/Creative Writing, so maybe I remember this stuff more clearly than others, but it's something we were taught. For clarity and technicality's sake, one should put a comma after a fronted adverbial. Otherwise, the sentence can look like a run-on sentence - "Before dawn Kohl jumped on Lakota's kidneys to wake her up" vs. "Before dawn, Kohl jumped on Lakota's kidneys to wake her up." It's a fiddly thing, but it's legitimate and is actually grammatically/technically correct to have a comma after a fronted adverb.
Load More Replies...How is this specifically "UK grammar" and not just "normal English language grammar regardless of what side of the pond you're on"?
#8 with the comma - no, you do not need a comma, As for their explanation "Commas are used after fronted adverbials." W*F? Do they seriously expect anyone to remember such contorted rules like that?
A fronted adverbial is very specific, though, to be fair. It's when the adverb is moved to the beginning of the sentence instead of immediately following the verb ("The door opened slowly" is a sentence in regular form; "Slowly, the door opened" is the same sentence in fronted adverbial form.) It's not a sin to NOT put a comma after the fronted adverb, but it IS generally accepted as proper grammatical/technical form. I was an English major and got my degree in English/Creative Writing, so maybe I remember this stuff more clearly than others, but it's something we were taught. For clarity and technicality's sake, one should put a comma after a fronted adverbial. Otherwise, the sentence can look like a run-on sentence - "Before dawn Kohl jumped on Lakota's kidneys to wake her up" vs. "Before dawn, Kohl jumped on Lakota's kidneys to wake her up." It's a fiddly thing, but it's legitimate and is actually grammatically/technically correct to have a comma after a fronted adverb.
Load More Replies...

33
4