Woman’s Husband Gets A Huge Promotion With Triple The Salary, Reveals His True Colors
There’s nothing quite like a promotion to give you a reason to celebrate. It feels good to be recognized, to know your hard work paid off, and to finally enjoy a bit more comfort in life, right?
But when this Redditor’s husband got a raise that tripled his salary, the excitement didn’t last long. Even though she was genuinely thrilled for him, things took an unexpected turn when he insisted she quit her job now that they “didn’t need” her income. She loved her career and had no intention of giving it up.
He couldn’t understand why—turning what should’ve been a happy moment into a tense, uncomfortable discussion. Read below for the full story.
The woman was thrilled when her husband told her he’d gotten a promotion that tripled his salary
Image credits: Timur Weber/Pexels (not the actual photo)
But things quickly got uncomfortable when he started insisting she quit her job because of it
Image credits: Ivan S/Pexels (not the actual photo)
Image credits: Haunting_Dog_2214
Financial independence protects women in relationships
Image credits: Samson Katt/Pexels (not the actual photo)
In marriage, we’re there to support our partners. That support looks different for every couple: sometimes it’s financial, sometimes emotional, sometimes practical. There’s no universal formula, only what works for the two people involved.
For the couple in this story, that balance suddenly took a hit. After his promotion, the husband began insisting he should be the sole provider and that his wife should stop working entirely. While that might sound ideal to some, not everyone wants or benefits from stepping away from their career.
There’s no shame in being a stay-at-home wife, and it shouldn’t be an issue if a woman prefers the opposite. The problem begins when a couple’s expectations don’t align and one partner tries to impose their vision on the other. And when financial independence is part of that disagreement, the pressure can become a serious concern.
It’s also important to remember that women’s financial autonomy is relatively new. In many European countries and in the United States, women could only open bank accounts without a male co-signer in the 1960s and 70s. What feels normal today was out of reach just two generations ago.
Even though progress has been made, old expectations haven’t vanished. Cultural pressure and even online trends like the “trad wife” movement can still encourage women to give up independence once they marry.
A 2021 YouGov poll found that 35% of women are fully or partially financially dependent on their partner, compared to just 11% of men. That kind of dependency carries real risks. A Glamour survey revealed that one in three women has stayed in a relationship simply because they couldn’t afford to leave. If a spouse suddenly passes away, financially dependent partners may be left extremely vulnerable.
Forbes suggests several ways women can protect their independence, even when one partner earns significantly more or one chooses not to work.
One big area is how couples manage their money. Joint bank accounts are convenient, but if only one partner controls them, the other may end up without real access to the household finances. Keeping a personal account alongside a shared one can make a world of difference, especially when it’s backed by even a small independent income.
Remote work has made that far easier. Plenty of stay-at-home parents take on flexible online jobs now, giving them their own earnings while still managing family responsibilities. It’s a straightforward way to stay financially connected without disrupting home life.
Another crucial point is staying involved in financial decision-making. In many relationships, one partner naturally becomes “the one who handles the money,” and the other gets left out of budgeting and long-term planning. Sharing those responsibilities helps both people feel informed and secure.
Even with all that in mind, some might still argue that the wife in this story should simply “enjoy” the easier life her husband’s promotion could offer. But research paints a more complicated picture: women feel more financially satisfied when couples manage money together, while men report higher satisfaction when they’re the ones in control. That alone is a reminder of how easily imbalances can develop.
And really, it took a lot of effort to get to a point where women can choose their own financial paths without question. Protecting that progress means paying attention when support starts to feel more like pressure. At the end of the day, love works best when both partners have the freedom to stay true to themselves.
The author later shared more details in the comments
Many commenters thought the husband’s demands were a major red flag
Others, however, argued that the woman wasn’t being appreciative enough of the opportunity his promotion created
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
The first comment sums it up. Being financially dependent on your partner isn't freedom. And if he wants a maid at home he can just hire one.
He doesn't even want a maid. He wants somebody who is dependent on him for everything. He either has a fantasy of a Little Wife Waiting Patiently For Him At Home, or has a need to control her the same way that his mother is evidently controlling him.
Load More Replies...Did we just go back 50 years where everything we fought for is a privilege and not a right? F*****g trads.
Rather 70, and that was also just propaganda. After WWII, (when many women had to enter the workforce, as men were recruited in the war) they wanted to stuff the genie back into the bottle, meaning sending the women back to the kitchen. Of course, only (upper) middle class women, as others have always worked, since the dawn of time. An entire machinery of propaganda started, planting this weird dream into people's head about the perfect family, where women are at home and men earn the bacon; also, started accusing working women making their sons gay. I'm pretty sure other accusations were also prevalent.
Load More Replies...YTAs are stupid and I have no nice words for them, only swears (ETA: And also incredulousness at how *that* particular fishy thing was the one that made it to the egg.). If hubby feels 'emasculated' by his wife then he (actually) needs to grow a pair. Some women see it as a failure to be dependent on their partner financially and want to have their own financial "value". Others realise that if the relationship becomes abusive, you want (*need*) to have access to money. There are so many reasons why a woman wouldn't want to stop working and become a pampered princess just because her husband got a raise (without taking into account what if he loses it?).
The YTA's are quite literally insane...and probably incels...which is the same thing.
I've recently read an article on the Guardian, where a researcher from Australia, Anne Summers said: "A lot of men resent the fact that women have rights and have entitlements and have freedoms, and especially have economic freedoms that make them less dependent.” Instead of seeing those freedoms as a benefit – “as any sensible man would” – some men “just can’t cope"". Personally, I feel like gender equality has brought to light how many men only had a partner, because women had no choice...
As an aside, Anne Summers is a saucy underwear and toy range in the UK
Load More Replies..."traditional gender roles exist for a reason", what reason? Old traditions? Religion? Sexism?
If they both work and save, and organise their pensions and investments, they can both retire early, then enjoy travelling the world or whatever they want to do.
This is really a good point. But I'm afraid that the husband's mindset is too backwards and controlling to let him see the eventual benefits of having his wife keeping her job. In his mind there isn't a partnership, two people working towards a common goal. He wants to be be the one in charge and in control of everything, including his wife, and tries to masquerade it under the "being a provider" bullshît
Load More Replies...She should tell him she's pleased about his promotion and very happy she can now do her job which she loves and is a huge part of her without having to worry what the salary is. Put it that way, how is it any worse than a hobby - oh yeah, because if she actually gives it up, she's reliant on him and he gets control. She needs to think long and hard about this relationship.
This! He wants her to be free? Well, she's free to choose to keep a job she enjoys, indeed. Strangely enough, when she makes that choice, he no longer supports her "freedom"...
Load More Replies...Andrew Tate, Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentes, and religion have done a great job indoctrinating GenZ and Millie males on the alpha male and provider myths. Hubby is a controlling POS
YTAs sound @busive as h6ll. OP run don't walk, and protect your birth control and job because it sounds like your BF and his mom would try and sabotage them. Gender roles exist for one reason: to keep women from being human beings.
So we are back 70 years to the d**g addicted alcoholic bored rich wife/woman like the movie "mrs Robinson"... OMG... women doesn't want your money - they want freedom, respect, support and love now! As they always has wanted! The women in nordic countries in the Viking time was the boss! She had keys to the house!
"Traditional gender roles exist for a reason." Exactly! They exist because women were treated like property and indentured servants. Women have choices now. If a woman wants to be reliant on a sole provider, that's their choice and I wish them well. But that doesn't mean it has to be every woman's choice.
What century are people living in that think it's OK to strip away a woman's agency just to make a man feel better?
His mother said that traditional gender roles exist "for a reason". Yes, and whether we're talking about traditional gender roles or the modern gender movement, that reason is to keep women 'in their place', subservient to men and with nothing exclusively for themselves. The only difference between the 'traditional' and 'modern' versions is that nowadays not even the very basis of 'womanhood' itself belongs to women alone.
I upvoted you because I don't necessarily agree with your last sentence either, but you smashed the rest. I love reading your comments.
Load More Replies...Hope OP locked in her birth control method cuz it sounds like he will absolutely try to baby-trap her.
Yep. An implant lasts 5 years, and you don't have to remember to take daily tabs.
Load More Replies...w*f is with them troll YTA ! f**k am I being a sahm cos I’m TOLD TO , I was when my kids where born, but I also worked of an evening ,when ex husband got home a few evenings a week in a pub , COMPROMISE , but then I’m an older mum, n have being ain two a*****e marriages ,one physical,second mentality cruel, even then I worked ,no kids tho with them thank god , so I can see the signs ,and this man wants u where he can control you , the fact he got mummy dearest to intervene speaks volumes !! ,, DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR JOB and please start putting money aside in your own account as a safety net , cos I honestly can’t see this marriage continuing,and PLEASE DO NOT HAVE KIDS WITH HIM !! he’s doing the opposite of freedom !! He’s locking you up ,where he wants you like his idiot mother did !! we ain’t in the dark ages any more , little wifey at home chained to kitchen sink , n ,an hunter gatherer, !! op NTA but your husband VERY MUCH IS update plz
These are some huge red flags. He's insisting she quit working. Why? So she will be dependent and he will be in control, along with him dumping all housework and drudgery onto her plate. Now he's sharing their personal business with mommy. Uh oh! Do we have a "mommy's boy" here? Because they make terrible partners. I have a feeling this marriage will not survive.
A form of control..once she said that she did not want to quit her job because she loves it, he should have backed off. This is a form of control with a side of mommy issues thrown into the mix by the husband. Opportunity some say..Only for him. She said No thank you, that should be the end of that conversation. Why is what he wants more important than what she wants? Why is he so insistent? RUN girl!! Get out now before this gets worse..and it will get worse.
Not the AH. Even if you did agree to give up your job, he’ll use it against you, that he gave you money for this and that. Red flag walking…
The Misogynists came out in force to scream "YTA!!!" I see. The husband first says that now she can do what she wants, then decided that he doesn't like the fact that she wants to work. While I don't like people who automatically jump to the worst conclusions, I cannot see this as anything but controlling. He said that she should take up a hobby, but screams and kicks when that hobby is actually a job that provides a salary. There is no good reason that I can think of for him not wanting her to get a salary.
Even the YTAs don't get it. His approach and attitude are the problem and indicate a bigger issue. It's one thing to go, "Hey honey, I just got a huge raise, and I can afford everything and MORE. This means that if you want to change jobs, or have no job, you can do that. Even if you just want to take time off to find the perfect job, or start your own business, you have that flexibility." But he immediately started to pressure her to give up her job. The kids aren't even conceived yet, why the rush? Why does her refusal to quit her job hurt his feelings?
If he only suggested that maybe she would like to quit her job now and she blew up at him instead of giving a polite but firm no, I'd understand people calling her unreasonable. But that's not what happened. He refused to take no for an answer and is now trying to bully her into letting him have his way, to the point of involving a third party when it should be none of her d a m n business. He has way, WAY overstepped the line into controlling behaviour. The people calling her ungrateful are either illiterate or just jerks.
Woould he quit his job to stay home if you suddenly got a big promotion and were making more than him? If not, time to go.....
The first comment sums it up. Being financially dependent on your partner isn't freedom. And if he wants a maid at home he can just hire one.
He doesn't even want a maid. He wants somebody who is dependent on him for everything. He either has a fantasy of a Little Wife Waiting Patiently For Him At Home, or has a need to control her the same way that his mother is evidently controlling him.
Load More Replies...Did we just go back 50 years where everything we fought for is a privilege and not a right? F*****g trads.
Rather 70, and that was also just propaganda. After WWII, (when many women had to enter the workforce, as men were recruited in the war) they wanted to stuff the genie back into the bottle, meaning sending the women back to the kitchen. Of course, only (upper) middle class women, as others have always worked, since the dawn of time. An entire machinery of propaganda started, planting this weird dream into people's head about the perfect family, where women are at home and men earn the bacon; also, started accusing working women making their sons gay. I'm pretty sure other accusations were also prevalent.
Load More Replies...YTAs are stupid and I have no nice words for them, only swears (ETA: And also incredulousness at how *that* particular fishy thing was the one that made it to the egg.). If hubby feels 'emasculated' by his wife then he (actually) needs to grow a pair. Some women see it as a failure to be dependent on their partner financially and want to have their own financial "value". Others realise that if the relationship becomes abusive, you want (*need*) to have access to money. There are so many reasons why a woman wouldn't want to stop working and become a pampered princess just because her husband got a raise (without taking into account what if he loses it?).
The YTA's are quite literally insane...and probably incels...which is the same thing.
I've recently read an article on the Guardian, where a researcher from Australia, Anne Summers said: "A lot of men resent the fact that women have rights and have entitlements and have freedoms, and especially have economic freedoms that make them less dependent.” Instead of seeing those freedoms as a benefit – “as any sensible man would” – some men “just can’t cope"". Personally, I feel like gender equality has brought to light how many men only had a partner, because women had no choice...
As an aside, Anne Summers is a saucy underwear and toy range in the UK
Load More Replies..."traditional gender roles exist for a reason", what reason? Old traditions? Religion? Sexism?
If they both work and save, and organise their pensions and investments, they can both retire early, then enjoy travelling the world or whatever they want to do.
This is really a good point. But I'm afraid that the husband's mindset is too backwards and controlling to let him see the eventual benefits of having his wife keeping her job. In his mind there isn't a partnership, two people working towards a common goal. He wants to be be the one in charge and in control of everything, including his wife, and tries to masquerade it under the "being a provider" bullshît
Load More Replies...She should tell him she's pleased about his promotion and very happy she can now do her job which she loves and is a huge part of her without having to worry what the salary is. Put it that way, how is it any worse than a hobby - oh yeah, because if she actually gives it up, she's reliant on him and he gets control. She needs to think long and hard about this relationship.
This! He wants her to be free? Well, she's free to choose to keep a job she enjoys, indeed. Strangely enough, when she makes that choice, he no longer supports her "freedom"...
Load More Replies...Andrew Tate, Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentes, and religion have done a great job indoctrinating GenZ and Millie males on the alpha male and provider myths. Hubby is a controlling POS
YTAs sound @busive as h6ll. OP run don't walk, and protect your birth control and job because it sounds like your BF and his mom would try and sabotage them. Gender roles exist for one reason: to keep women from being human beings.
So we are back 70 years to the d**g addicted alcoholic bored rich wife/woman like the movie "mrs Robinson"... OMG... women doesn't want your money - they want freedom, respect, support and love now! As they always has wanted! The women in nordic countries in the Viking time was the boss! She had keys to the house!
"Traditional gender roles exist for a reason." Exactly! They exist because women were treated like property and indentured servants. Women have choices now. If a woman wants to be reliant on a sole provider, that's their choice and I wish them well. But that doesn't mean it has to be every woman's choice.
What century are people living in that think it's OK to strip away a woman's agency just to make a man feel better?
His mother said that traditional gender roles exist "for a reason". Yes, and whether we're talking about traditional gender roles or the modern gender movement, that reason is to keep women 'in their place', subservient to men and with nothing exclusively for themselves. The only difference between the 'traditional' and 'modern' versions is that nowadays not even the very basis of 'womanhood' itself belongs to women alone.
I upvoted you because I don't necessarily agree with your last sentence either, but you smashed the rest. I love reading your comments.
Load More Replies...Hope OP locked in her birth control method cuz it sounds like he will absolutely try to baby-trap her.
Yep. An implant lasts 5 years, and you don't have to remember to take daily tabs.
Load More Replies...w*f is with them troll YTA ! f**k am I being a sahm cos I’m TOLD TO , I was when my kids where born, but I also worked of an evening ,when ex husband got home a few evenings a week in a pub , COMPROMISE , but then I’m an older mum, n have being ain two a*****e marriages ,one physical,second mentality cruel, even then I worked ,no kids tho with them thank god , so I can see the signs ,and this man wants u where he can control you , the fact he got mummy dearest to intervene speaks volumes !! ,, DO NOT GIVE UP YOUR JOB and please start putting money aside in your own account as a safety net , cos I honestly can’t see this marriage continuing,and PLEASE DO NOT HAVE KIDS WITH HIM !! he’s doing the opposite of freedom !! He’s locking you up ,where he wants you like his idiot mother did !! we ain’t in the dark ages any more , little wifey at home chained to kitchen sink , n ,an hunter gatherer, !! op NTA but your husband VERY MUCH IS update plz
These are some huge red flags. He's insisting she quit working. Why? So she will be dependent and he will be in control, along with him dumping all housework and drudgery onto her plate. Now he's sharing their personal business with mommy. Uh oh! Do we have a "mommy's boy" here? Because they make terrible partners. I have a feeling this marriage will not survive.
A form of control..once she said that she did not want to quit her job because she loves it, he should have backed off. This is a form of control with a side of mommy issues thrown into the mix by the husband. Opportunity some say..Only for him. She said No thank you, that should be the end of that conversation. Why is what he wants more important than what she wants? Why is he so insistent? RUN girl!! Get out now before this gets worse..and it will get worse.
Not the AH. Even if you did agree to give up your job, he’ll use it against you, that he gave you money for this and that. Red flag walking…
The Misogynists came out in force to scream "YTA!!!" I see. The husband first says that now she can do what she wants, then decided that he doesn't like the fact that she wants to work. While I don't like people who automatically jump to the worst conclusions, I cannot see this as anything but controlling. He said that she should take up a hobby, but screams and kicks when that hobby is actually a job that provides a salary. There is no good reason that I can think of for him not wanting her to get a salary.
Even the YTAs don't get it. His approach and attitude are the problem and indicate a bigger issue. It's one thing to go, "Hey honey, I just got a huge raise, and I can afford everything and MORE. This means that if you want to change jobs, or have no job, you can do that. Even if you just want to take time off to find the perfect job, or start your own business, you have that flexibility." But he immediately started to pressure her to give up her job. The kids aren't even conceived yet, why the rush? Why does her refusal to quit her job hurt his feelings?
If he only suggested that maybe she would like to quit her job now and she blew up at him instead of giving a polite but firm no, I'd understand people calling her unreasonable. But that's not what happened. He refused to take no for an answer and is now trying to bully her into letting him have his way, to the point of involving a third party when it should be none of her d a m n business. He has way, WAY overstepped the line into controlling behaviour. The people calling her ungrateful are either illiterate or just jerks.
Woould he quit his job to stay home if you suddenly got a big promotion and were making more than him? If not, time to go.....






































44
59