Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
Family Drama Ensues As Lady Demands Sibling Childproof Home For Her Son, Furious When Told No
There are some who argue that certain parents expect the whole world to accommodate their children. No matter how old, what kind of needs, or how well-behaved their children are, they just think everyone should fall under their spell. And then, when that doesn’t happen, drama, so big you would think it’s about something actually serious, ensues.
Just like in today’s story, where a mother demanded that their sibling childproof their home so she could visit it with her son. Only the catch was it wasn’t her home, so it wasn’t for her to say whether it was childproofed or not…
More info: Reddit
RELATED:
Some parents expect the whole world to accommodate their kid and can’t handle it when someone doesn’t do it
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Like in this story, where a woman demanded her sibling childproof their home for her son
Image credits: EyeEm / Freepik (not the actual photo)
Yet, the sibling refused, stating that their own daughter no longer needed childproofing
Image credits: Getty Images / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
And they saw no point in installing it for their nephew’s occasional visits
Image credits: anonymous
This made them a villain in their family’s eyes, and that’s why they came online to ask whether they were actually one
After moving into their new home, the couple didn’t bother to childproof it, as they felt their daughter was old enough not to need it. Then, one day, they had their family over, who brought their kid, who tends to get into things. This time, they requested childproofing before their next visit – just so it would be easier to watch him.
Yet, the OP refused to do so – their daughter didn’t need it, and installing it for the sake of the nephew’s occasional visits was just too much of a hassle. Even the family’s offer to pay for everything didn’t change their opinion.
The thing is that their place used to be a designated family hangout spot, but now, since they refuse to accommodate the boy, it’s unclear if it will remain. For instance, they had a BBQ for Memorial Day, but the sister didn’t come, which made the OP a villain in the family’s eyes.
Well, we can’t really judge the author for not wanting to install the childproofing stuff in their home – it’s quite a hassle to do it. Our thoughts instantly go to the storyline from Friends, when Rachel tried babyproofing her apartment herself, but it turned out to be a little too hard for her.
Granted, the character is presented as being one who is just not good at stuff like that, which is why it’s hard for her, but the point that childproofing can be a hassle still stands.
Image credits: Liza Summer / Pexels (not the actual photo)
If you really look into it, all the installation itself isn’t too complicated – after all, babies are just babies, so the safety measures for them don’t have to be on mastermind level. It can include stuff like outlet covers and cabinet, drawer, and window locks that have very basic installation, or something like furniture anchoring that might require some additional help.
Overall, the reason babyproofing is even a thing in the first place is because most injuries for kids under 5 happen at home, and usually, 9 out of 10 can be prevented. That’s where childproofing comes into play – the whole point of it is prevention.
Yet, usually babyproofing is installed in the home where the kid lives, but not every place they visit. So, bringing this back to the family from the story, is it really fair for them to expect the OP to childproof their home just for occasional visits?
The family thought it was. You see, for the sister, it was simply too hard to keep constant watch on her son, as she has to do that everywhere else, so she hopes for her sibling’s home to be an exception to that. Yet, these words didn’t really sway the OP – they still refused to compromise their own comfort for the occasional convenience of their sister.
And netizens agreed with such a stance – it’s their home and they’re not obligated to serve every family member’s requests – it’s about their comfort first and foremost. Do you agree with such an opinion? Share your takes in the comments!
Netizens didn’t think so – it’s their home, so they shouldn’t feel forced to install something they don’t really need
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Alexandra 1 month ago
The problem is that those child-proofing stuff is permanent: you don't install and then then un-install it until the next visit. So it's different from making temporary accomodations for guests. This child has a father: can't one of the parents keep a beady eye on the child while the other is socialising and then swap roles for the next family event?
Carrie de Luka 1 month ago
You can get tool-free magnetic systems that are easy to install and remove. Cost about £30 on Amazon. Isn't permanent and is discreet. Better, also, for those of us with painful hands!! I get why the OP doesn't want to have these things, they certainly don't have to. Yet I do feel for her sister. My friend has a special needs child - they are doing things smaller children do but have more strength which can make it very challenging. That last comment which acknowledges both sides, that seemed a very balanced response. Though you'd think people could take turns and help out more, funny how it so often doesn't happen that way.
Load More Replies...
K Barnes 1 month ago
It's really sad for a severely developmentally disabled child and his family to lose a safe space, however, I understand OP's position. If nephew is over often it would be very kind to keep it a safe space for him, but I don't think they're an AH for not doing it, especially if it's rare or very occasional visits.
Asri 1 month ago
She's not the AH, but it is not an unreasonable request. Keeping a safe area, like outside where everyone is at a BBQ, would be a good way to help accommodate. This problem isn't going to go away for Mom when a developmentally disabled kid gets out of the terrible toddler age.
Lucas 1 month ago
My friend's child is 19 years old, developmental delay has meant that he now has the equivalent ability of a 5 year old. This isn't a problem that's going to go away any time soon. It's not unreasonable. I get it's the OPs home and their choice but this is her sister, her nephew, her family! These days childproofing doesn't have to mean permanent, furniture damaging or ugly. The wee boy can't help it and he'll need all his extended family just as much as any child does.
Load More Replies... Alexandra 1 month ago
The problem is that those child-proofing stuff is permanent: you don't install and then then un-install it until the next visit. So it's different from making temporary accomodations for guests. This child has a father: can't one of the parents keep a beady eye on the child while the other is socialising and then swap roles for the next family event?
Carrie de Luka 1 month ago
You can get tool-free magnetic systems that are easy to install and remove. Cost about £30 on Amazon. Isn't permanent and is discreet. Better, also, for those of us with painful hands!! I get why the OP doesn't want to have these things, they certainly don't have to. Yet I do feel for her sister. My friend has a special needs child - they are doing things smaller children do but have more strength which can make it very challenging. That last comment which acknowledges both sides, that seemed a very balanced response. Though you'd think people could take turns and help out more, funny how it so often doesn't happen that way.
Load More Replies... K Barnes 1 month ago
It's really sad for a severely developmentally disabled child and his family to lose a safe space, however, I understand OP's position. If nephew is over often it would be very kind to keep it a safe space for him, but I don't think they're an AH for not doing it, especially if it's rare or very occasional visits.
Asri 1 month ago
She's not the AH, but it is not an unreasonable request. Keeping a safe area, like outside where everyone is at a BBQ, would be a good way to help accommodate. This problem isn't going to go away for Mom when a developmentally disabled kid gets out of the terrible toddler age.
Lucas 1 month ago
My friend's child is 19 years old, developmental delay has meant that he now has the equivalent ability of a 5 year old. This isn't a problem that's going to go away any time soon. It's not unreasonable. I get it's the OPs home and their choice but this is her sister, her nephew, her family! These days childproofing doesn't have to mean permanent, furniture damaging or ugly. The wee boy can't help it and he'll need all his extended family just as much as any child does.
Load More Replies... You May Like Parents Assume Childfree Cousin Will Babysit For Them On A Trip; Receive A Shocking Surprise Instead Woman Refuses To Host Thanksgiving For 30 People, Pushy Family Still Tries To Guilt-Trip Her Into It "He's Had This Name For A Decade?": Sister Wants To Name Her Son, Freaks Out Over Family Cat
Dominyka Proškėnaitė
Indrė Lukošiūtė
Mantas Kačerauskas
Related on Bored Panda
33
31