Artist Photoshops Tattoos On Famous People And It Changes The Mental Image We Have Of Them (30 Pics)
Would it change your opinion of tattoos if you found out that your favorite movie star or actor was covered in them? We can also invert that question: would you start looking at your favorite movie star or actor differently if you discovered their bodies were inked with tattoos?
Seattle-based artist Cheyenne Randall explores these questions with his digitally-altered photos, which portray actors, musicians, and other famous figures past and present covered nearly head to toe in tattoos.
Continue scrolling to check out the pics and let us know who you think looks better before and who looks better after in the comment section!
More info: cheyennerandallart.com | Instagram
This post may include affiliate links.
Audrey Hepburn was a beautiful, talented, dedicated and fabulous person. She was a member of the underground in WWII, she was a messenger carrier for the underground and she killed a Nazi soldier, I think she was twelve. She makes any of the so-called stars look and sound like spoiled children. She was trained to be a ballerina but because of the war and the food restrictions she couldn't follow through. But she graced us with her screen presence. I miss her.
Didn't think she could get any hotter... I was wrong. Love you Queen Madonna
Doesn't add anything for me- if anything, it takes away from their original creepiness.
Now him? But I would be cool if he actually did have tattoos tho
The Nazi behind Spock the motorcyclist is such a two-faced character.
Seriously? One of the most brilliant artists in the world, and you couldn't tat her with her own stuff instead of flash art?
I wonder what the purpose of this is. If you dislike tattoos, you will think the depicted celebrities got spoiled. If you like tattoos, you will think that society has so much prejudice and will look at the tattoos, not the people. I cannot see this leading to an open debate, really. After all, the goal should be to be comfortable in your own skin, regardless of what others may think.
Spamming low quality and meaningless tattoos on yourself has always puzzled me. You do you, but I think it looks terrible. This style of cartoon-y tattoo spam just looks like you took a nap in a tattoo parlor after insulting the owner's lover to me.
I wonder what the purpose of this is. If you dislike tattoos, you will think the depicted celebrities got spoiled. If you like tattoos, you will think that society has so much prejudice and will look at the tattoos, not the people. I cannot see this leading to an open debate, really. After all, the goal should be to be comfortable in your own skin, regardless of what others may think.
Spamming low quality and meaningless tattoos on yourself has always puzzled me. You do you, but I think it looks terrible. This style of cartoon-y tattoo spam just looks like you took a nap in a tattoo parlor after insulting the owner's lover to me.
