Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

MIL Uses Babysitting To Baptize Grandson, Dad Forbids Her From Seeing The Kid Without Supervision
A priest holds a baby in a white christening gown for a baptism. A child baptized is the main focus of this image.

Couple Returns From Vacay To Find Their Son Baptized, MIL Loses Privileges For Doing It In Secret

42

ADVERTISEMENT

Not everyone is allowed babysitting privileges. For instance, I wouldn’t allow just anyone to look after my pets without the absolute confidence that they’re trustworthy and will take care of them properly.

While I don’t have any children, I can only assume that when it comes to actual human babies (not just furry ones), the responsibility must be even more daunting. Trusting your own son to someone is a big deal, and it normally falls to grandparents. You’d assume they’d know what to do, but in today’s story, common sense went completely out the window.

Read more: Reddit

RELATED:

    Grandparents are often the free babysitting choice for most new parents, but unfortunately, they can’t always be trusted

    Image credits: freepik / Magnific (not the actual photo)

    A couple entrusted their 2-year-old son to the mom’s parents while they were off to celebrate their anniversary

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: freepik /Magnific (not the actual photo)

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Once they returned, the man’s mother-in-law admitted she had finally baptized the toddler so his soul would be saved from the devil

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Walter Gadea / Unsplash(not the actual photo)

    While both parents grew up in religious households, neither of them wanted the kid to be baptized, and the dad was especially angry about this

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits:

    The man decided to revoke all unsupervised babysitting privileges to his parents-in-law, but his wife didn’t agree with his decision

    We can make a lot of assumptions, but you never truly know what might come your way, as today’s Original Poster (OP) found out. The story is told by a father who explains that, during a weekend getaway with his wife, they left their 2-year-old son with his in-laws. The couple expected everything to go smoothly, but when they returned, his mother-in-law greeted them with an unexpected surprise.

    As it turns out, while they were away, she took the opportunity to have her grandson baptized without the parents’ consent. The OP says he isn’t necessarily an atheist. In fact, he explains that he was raised Lutheran and his wife was raised Catholic, but neither of them actively attends church, and early on they decided it would be best not to baptize their son. However, the grandmother clearly never accepted their decision.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The shocking news that their child had been baptized became a major issue for the couple. The OP explains that he was so blinded by rage that he grabbed his son and left immediately. Once they got home, the couple discussed what had happened, and the father decided he would no longer allow his in-laws to be alone with the toddler, explaining that he no longer trusted them.

    Meanwhile, his wife begged him to forgive her mother, but the narrator stood firm, saying he would not change his decision. To the OP, his mother-in-law’s decision to go behind his back was a serious breach of trust, and he no longer felt comfortable letting her watch his son, as she had clearly disregarded his wishes as a father. Ultimately, the situation sparked major family drama.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Wavebreak Media / Magnific (not the actual photo)

    Unfortunately, while this situation is more specific, it illustrates a typical example of intergenerational conflict, which is very common. Experts explain that this phenomenon occurs when the beliefs of two generations converge. In this case, the grandmother believes her traditions and values should override the parents’ wishes. This can obviously lead to stress and discord.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    It also creates a precedent that both parents probably wished to override. While both parents were brought up in religious households, studies show that 36 – 44% of adults under 30 are religiously unaffiliated in the U.S. alone, so it isn’t at all that surprising that nowadays young parents are actually trying to stray away from enforcing a religion upon their kids, in order to give them freedom to choose it themselves.

    That said, after this situation occurred, what can the parents do? The OP suggested that he and his wife could go to couples counseling, as they were not seeing eye to eye, which could be a starting point. As for the mother-in-law, psychologists indicate that the best way to resolve conflicts is through establishing firm boundaries and roles. A firm conversation and an agreement on boundaries are necessary.

    Netizens supported the OP’s decision while bringing up a good point in the comments, though. Many Baptist churches actually forbid secret Baptist ceremonies, and the situation could easily be reported to the bishop in question. So, do you think the dad is actually overreacting over some “water,” as the wife put it, or do you think his reaction is warranted? Let us know in the comments.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Netizens advised the man to talk to the bishop due to a possible illegal baptism and report the situation

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Francisca Santos

    Francisca Santos

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less »
    Francisca Santos

    Francisca Santos

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    What do you think ?
    Earonn -
    Community Member
    3 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    just a little bit of water. Just a little snip. Just a little bit of coconut oil. It's not about the baptism, it's about the "I'm doing with YOUR child what *I* want!". Also, that priests needs to be fired instantly. Wonder what he believes his god thinks of this sort of lie?

    WindySwede
    Community Member
    3 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Also "you are doing it wrong! I know better! Im saving the baby from the imaginary train that is satan from rynning it over!"?? Also, might be a priest who think the baby now is saved from satan? But yes. 🫤

    Load More Replies...
    Trillian
    Community Member
    3 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Wouldn't an actual baptism (that would result in the child becoming a member of the catholic church) require parental consent?

    Lee Gilliland
    Community Member
    Premium
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Depends on the church. Catholic and Episcopalian, yes. LDS and Baptist, no.

    Load More Replies...
    J R
    Community Member
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    NTA. For centuries, Christians have forcibly converted others to their religion. Into the late 1900s, they kidnapped Indigenous people from their families and gave them to Christian schools and families. This reminds me of the Mortara Case. For those who don't know of it, in the mid 1800s, a Catholic servant of a Jewish family secretly baptized their infant son (Edgardo) when they thought he was about to d*e. Thankfully, he survived, but in the eyes of the church, this made him a Catholic. So the church kidnapped Edgardo and raised him themself. The Mortaras tried to get him back, but could not. He was raised as a Catholic and became a priest. They had little contact with him throughout the years, but he had been taken at such a young age (6) that of course he identified more with his kidnappers. It doesn't matter if there's no danger of it going this far. This act cannot be seen outside of its historical context. Christians have a duty to study history and not repeat the crimes.

    Load More Comments
    Earonn -
    Community Member
    3 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    just a little bit of water. Just a little snip. Just a little bit of coconut oil. It's not about the baptism, it's about the "I'm doing with YOUR child what *I* want!". Also, that priests needs to be fired instantly. Wonder what he believes his god thinks of this sort of lie?

    WindySwede
    Community Member
    3 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Also "you are doing it wrong! I know better! Im saving the baby from the imaginary train that is satan from rynning it over!"?? Also, might be a priest who think the baby now is saved from satan? But yes. 🫤

    Load More Replies...
    Trillian
    Community Member
    3 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Wouldn't an actual baptism (that would result in the child becoming a member of the catholic church) require parental consent?

    Lee Gilliland
    Community Member
    Premium
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Depends on the church. Catholic and Episcopalian, yes. LDS and Baptist, no.

    Load More Replies...
    ADVERTISEMENT
    J R
    Community Member
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    NTA. For centuries, Christians have forcibly converted others to their religion. Into the late 1900s, they kidnapped Indigenous people from their families and gave them to Christian schools and families. This reminds me of the Mortara Case. For those who don't know of it, in the mid 1800s, a Catholic servant of a Jewish family secretly baptized their infant son (Edgardo) when they thought he was about to d*e. Thankfully, he survived, but in the eyes of the church, this made him a Catholic. So the church kidnapped Edgardo and raised him themself. The Mortaras tried to get him back, but could not. He was raised as a Catholic and became a priest. They had little contact with him throughout the years, but he had been taken at such a young age (6) that of course he identified more with his kidnappers. It doesn't matter if there's no danger of it going this far. This act cannot be seen outside of its historical context. Christians have a duty to study history and not repeat the crimes.

    Load More Comments
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT