Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
Lady “Kidnaps” Cat And Neuters It, Shocked Pet Owners Wreck Her Reputation Online
Interview With ExpertEven people with the best intentions can sometimes get carried away, and that’s why it’s important to reflect before being impulsive. This is especially true when the decisions can have a significant impact on other folks.
That’s exactly what happened when a woman who cared for feral cats decided to sterilize someone’s pet cat without even asking them. She got so caught up in her ‘good deed’ that she didn’t realize how the owners would feel about her actions.
More info: Reddit
RELATED:
Every pet parent cares for their furry friend and would feel worried if they felt the animal was in any danger
Image credits: Merve / Pexels (not the actual photo)
The poster shared that she ran a non-profit to care for feral cats and that she covered the cost of rehoming, neutering, and releasing the felines
Image credits: Nothing Ahead / Pexels (not the actual photo)
One day, the woman came across someone’s pet cat roaming freely, so she decided to drop him off at his owner’s, until she realized he wasn’t neutered
Image credits: freepik / Freepik (not the actual photo)
She took matters into her own hands by neutering him and then decided to contact his owners to pick him up, who were understandably angry
Image credits: anonymous
The cat owners exposed the woman’s actions online and accused her of catnapping the feline and fixing him illegally
The poster had been caring for feral cats for quite a while since she ran a non-profit. All of her efforts were dedicated to controlling the stray feline population, as well as rehoming or releasing them. That’s probably why, when she saw the unneutered pet cat roaming freely, she felt that it was her duty to get him fixed.
Animal experts say that it’s important to check for identification first when you come across someone’s pet. Rather than picking the animal up and taking it to another location, it’s best to contact the owners and let them know you’ve come across their furry friend. Their contact information or address will most likely be included on the animal’s collar.
Even though the OP saw that the feline had a collar on, she decided to go ahead and neuter it anyway, as she thought she knew what was best for it. She was probably worried about the stray cat population increasing and wanted to get a handle on it so that there would be no issue later.
The only problem is that she didn’t check in with the owners before making such a big decision. To understand more about this situation, Bored Panda reached out to Joanna Lodge, who is the Head of Legal Operations for Cats Protection.
She said that “cats in many countries are regarded as property in the eyes of the law, so neutering them without the consent of the owner could be an offence under legislation in some countries. Also, in many countries, vets are not allowed to carry out surgical procedures, such as neutering, without consent from the animal’s owner.”
Image credits: onemtask / Freepik (not the actual photo)
The owners confronted the poster and got mad at her for giving them and their child such a scare. She felt that she had done nothing wrong and that the feline needed to be neutered if they were going to leave it outside. Whether the cat parents agreed or not, they felt that she should have contacted them first before taking any action.
In situations like this, pet owners can take legal action and make a police complaint if they have evidence that a person has abducted their animal or done anything to it. It’s important to collect enough evidence when making a claim so that the authorities can follow up and decide what action to take.
Joanna added that “in many countries it is a criminal offence to steal other people’s pets and/or have them neutered. For example, the Pet Abduction Act applies to England and other parts of the UK, as does the Criminal Damage Act.”
These cat parents also decided to share the full incident online and let people know what the OP had done. She checked with an animal rescue friend of hers regarding whether her actions were wrong, and the other woman also felt that she had made a big mistake. That’s finally when the poster decided to apologize.
It’s clear that the woman didn’t mean any harm to the orange furball, but her mistake was not letting the owners know what was happening to their pet. This situation obviously scared them and made them realize they probably need to chip their cat. In the end, it might teach both the OP and the pet parents a valuable lesson.
Do you agree with the woman’s actions, or do you feel that she was in the wrong? Let us know your honest opinion.
Folks were divided on the issue, with some feeling the woman was too impulsive, and others thinking that the pet owners should have kept their cat safe
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
We ride at dawn biatches 2 months ago
It wasn't her cat, it has an owner and she knew it. I understand the frustration but she shouldn't have done it
Anthony Elmore 2 months ago
I'm kind of in this boat. Poster made the medical decision and specifically chose to remove the ability to make that decision from the owners, despite knowing how to get in touch with the owner. She did effectively kidnap and mutilate their cat. A reminder, spaying and neutering is still mutilation, even if well-intentioned. I'd argue that the family really SHOULD have had their pet spayed/neutered, but being hesitant about mutilating your cat is a lot less dodgy than opting someone's pet for a medical procedure without giving them a heads-up or choice when able to.
Load More Replies...
JL 2 months ago
What kind of logic is that from the vet? There was no address on the tag so the vet said it was fine. There was a phone number on the tag.
Ace 2 months ago (edited)
Yes, and it makes me even more suspicious of the OP's motivation and honesty in this case. Any rational person would have simply called the number and dropped the cat off with its owners. I don't believe the vet would have knowingly neutered an animal who they knew did not belong to the OP and had contact details for the owner. Sounds to me like the OP is on some sort of personal crúsade, and while I agree that pet cats should be neutered (I've had close to 20 cats over the last 40 years, always neutered them at the first opportunity) it is absolutely not her decision to make.
Load More Replies...
FreeTheUnicorn 2 months ago
Spay and neuter your pets. It's is irresponsible not to. They live longer, healthier lives.
We ride at dawn biatches 2 months ago
It wasn't her cat, it has an owner and she knew it. I understand the frustration but she shouldn't have done it
Anthony Elmore 2 months ago
I'm kind of in this boat. Poster made the medical decision and specifically chose to remove the ability to make that decision from the owners, despite knowing how to get in touch with the owner. She did effectively kidnap and mutilate their cat. A reminder, spaying and neutering is still mutilation, even if well-intentioned. I'd argue that the family really SHOULD have had their pet spayed/neutered, but being hesitant about mutilating your cat is a lot less dodgy than opting someone's pet for a medical procedure without giving them a heads-up or choice when able to.
Load More Replies... JL 2 months ago
What kind of logic is that from the vet? There was no address on the tag so the vet said it was fine. There was a phone number on the tag.
Ace 2 months ago (edited)
Yes, and it makes me even more suspicious of the OP's motivation and honesty in this case. Any rational person would have simply called the number and dropped the cat off with its owners. I don't believe the vet would have knowingly neutered an animal who they knew did not belong to the OP and had contact details for the owner. Sounds to me like the OP is on some sort of personal crúsade, and while I agree that pet cats should be neutered (I've had close to 20 cats over the last 40 years, always neutered them at the first opportunity) it is absolutely not her decision to make.
Load More Replies... FreeTheUnicorn 2 months ago
Spay and neuter your pets. It's is irresponsible not to. They live longer, healthier lives.
Related on Bored Panda
42
66