Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
A mother who murdered her two children three decades ago pretended to cry during her sentence hearing—but was ultimately denied parole by the South Carolina Board of Paroles and Pardons.
Susan Smith, 53, drowned her sons Michael, 3, and Alex, 14 months, by rolling her car into a Union County Lake back in 1994.
She was subsequently sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 30 years.
Highlights
- Susan Smith, 53, was denied parole after pretending to cry at a hearing.
- Smith drowned her sons in a lake in 1994, leading to a life sentence.
- Smith claimed she lost touch with reality and pleaded for mercy.
BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting
Susan Smith tried convincing board members to grant her parole by pretending to cry during her sentence hearing—but they weren’t fooled by the act
Image credits: RememberingMichaelAlexSmith
On Wednesday, Susan clutched a tissue to her face and repeatedly dabbed her eyes as she expressed her regrets, though it didn’t look as if there were any sign of tears.
“First of all, I want to say how very sorry I am,” she began, according to NewsNation. “I know that what I did was horrible.”
She tried convincing the board she had learned from her mistakes after being asked about previous disciplinary charges in prison.
Image credits: LiveNOW from FOX
Susan claimed she had lost touch with reality when she committed the heartless act and wasn’t in the right headspace to fully comprehend what she was doing.
The testimony ended as she pleaded for mercy.
Image credits: LiveNOW from FOX
“I am a Christian and God is a big part of my life and I know He has forgiven me and I know that is by His grace and mercy,” she said. “And I just ask that you show that same kind of mercy as well.”
All seven members of the board made the unanimous decision to deny her parole.
Other witnesses present were adamant about keeping Susan locked behind bars
Image credits: LiveNOW from FOX
The boys’ father, David Smith, didn’t hesitate to oppose her.
“I’m not here to speak about what she’s done in prison. You all have the records and accounts of all that,” he stated. “I’m just here to advocate on Michael’s and Alex’s behalf and as their father.
“God gives us free choice, and she made the free choice that night to end their lives. This wasn’t a tragic mistake. She purposely meant to end their lives. I never have felt any remorse from her. She never expressed any to me.”
Prosecutors had alleged that Susan killed her children after the man she was having an affair with left her because he wasn’t looking for kids.
Her lawyers denied this claim, insisting the murders were a “mental health story” instead. They argued she was suicidal and depressed and had initially intended on staying in the car with her boys.
Susan’s decision to drown her kids that fateful day thirty years ago was followed closely around the world
Image credits: RememberingMichaelAlexSmith
In November 1994, Susan Smith, then 23 years old, informed police her sons had been taken when she was carjacked by a black man in the city of Union, as reported by CNN.
A search was launched, and the media kept close eyes on the eerie case.
Image credits: Brooks Kraft / Getty
But authorities said her children were already dead by that time—fastened in their car seats at the bottom of John D. Long Lake.
The investigation turned inwards to the mother until Susan finally confessed. Her story was broadcast internationally, and her murder trial in 1995 gained worldwide attention.
Netizens were convinced Susan’s statement was nothing more than a “fake apology”
Image credits: Tasha77789
Image credits: YoungInjuryLaw
Image credits: dixiejeaux
Image credits: JillChaCha
Image credits: DavidSi27177091
Image credits: marylynngregor5
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Surly Scot 1 year ago
When the gavel came down she should've been walked round the back of the Court, and everyone should have heard the echo of a single gunshot. If you molest a child, abuse an animal, or commit murder without just cause, you should be voted off the mortal coil, you have rescinded your own membership to the human race and we have no space for you anymore. Adios.
FluffyDreg 1 year ago
On principle I oppose the death penalty hard. Not because people like this don't exist and deserve it, but bevayse our justice system f*cks up. For example, Jessica Logan. Comvicted of murdering her infant child on a single piece of evidence... that the police officer thought he could read her mind over the phone call. He decided, before an investigation even started, before a single officer was on the scene, that she murdered her baby, because she said stuff like "My baby is dead." And "I need my baby." No evidence otherwise was found. But she was still convicted. Even though the whole "determine guilt through 911 calls" is a thoroughly debunked method. She was still convicted. So there are people who i agree deserve it... but because our justice system will convict a mother because of how she sounded while in shock on a 911 call, I can't support it.
Load More Replies...
Beak Hookage 1 year ago
Ugh, I remember this case from back in the day. And here we go again with the "makes loud sobbing noises while completely dry-eyed" with a side of "well I'm CHRISTIAN now so that means the evil things I did don't count any more because now I'm MORALLY SUPERIOR!!" Two classic go-to tactics of remorseless sociopaths. Throw her in the deepest dungeon and feed the key to the nearest pig.
Surly Scot 1 year ago
When the gavel came down she should've been walked round the back of the Court, and everyone should have heard the echo of a single gunshot. If you molest a child, abuse an animal, or commit murder without just cause, you should be voted off the mortal coil, you have rescinded your own membership to the human race and we have no space for you anymore. Adios.
FluffyDreg 1 year ago
On principle I oppose the death penalty hard. Not because people like this don't exist and deserve it, but bevayse our justice system f*cks up. For example, Jessica Logan. Comvicted of murdering her infant child on a single piece of evidence... that the police officer thought he could read her mind over the phone call. He decided, before an investigation even started, before a single officer was on the scene, that she murdered her baby, because she said stuff like "My baby is dead." And "I need my baby." No evidence otherwise was found. But she was still convicted. Even though the whole "determine guilt through 911 calls" is a thoroughly debunked method. She was still convicted. So there are people who i agree deserve it... but because our justice system will convict a mother because of how she sounded while in shock on a 911 call, I can't support it.
Load More Replies... Beak Hookage 1 year ago
Ugh, I remember this case from back in the day. And here we go again with the "makes loud sobbing noises while completely dry-eyed" with a side of "well I'm CHRISTIAN now so that means the evil things I did don't count any more because now I'm MORALLY SUPERIOR!!" Two classic go-to tactics of remorseless sociopaths. Throw her in the deepest dungeon and feed the key to the nearest pig.
Related on Bored Panda
14
19