Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

She Pretended To Aid Elderly Women, Until Her Horrific Crimes Were Exposed And She Was Sentenced To 759 Years
A woman with short brown hair, a red shirt, and white eyeshadow, who pretended to aid elderly women.

She Pretended To Aid Elderly Women, Until Her Horrific Crimes Were Exposed And She Was Sentenced To 759 Years

31

ADVERTISEMENT

Before Juana Barraza Samperio became known across Mexico as “La Mataviejitas,” — Spanish for The Elderly Woman Slayer — she had another name. In wrestling circles, she was “The Lady of Silence,” a woman drawn to the masks, belts, pageantry, and theatrical violence of lucha libre.

Those who knew her in that environment later remembered her as calm and friendly, an image that would sit uneasily beside the crimes eventually linked to her name.

Highlights
  • Juana Barraza, once known in lucha libre circles as The Lady of Silence, was sentenced in 2008 to 759 years in prison, the longest sentence in Mexico’s history.
  • Barraza’s childhood was marked by abandonment, violence, and trauma at the hands of her mother.
  • She became known as the “Mataviejitas,” taking the lives of at least 40 elderly women.

By 2008, that same woman had received the longest sentence in Mexico’s history: 759 years in prison.

Motivated by a personal deep-seated hatred of older women, Barraza fatally wounded and robbed as many as 40 victims before being captured.

Less often discussed is that before her homicide spree, Barraza tried to live a normal life, until a series of tragedies pushed her to the brink.

RELATED:

    The Mataviejitas was once an innocent girl subjected to a nightmarish childhood by her mother

    Image credits: Netflix

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Juana Barraza Samperio was born on December 27, 1957, in Epazoyucan, Hidalgo. The violence later associated with her did not begin in Mexico City apartments or behind locked doors.

    By her own account, it began in childhood.

    Her early life as one marked by poverty, abandonment, drinking in the home, physical torment, and intimate violence.

    Image credits: Netflix

    Barraza’s mother was a domestic worker known as Justa Samperio. By most accounts, Samperio was a cold woman, who saw little Juana as nothing but a hindrance.

    Barraza’s father, a man identified as Trinidad who worked as a truck driver, left them both when she was about three months old. After that, Samperio moved with her daughter to Mexico City.

    The weight of having to take care of her child alone made her drinking problems worse.

    Image credits: Canal Catorce

    ADVERTISEMENT

    One day, Samperio went to a bar and took 12-year-old Barraza with her. Finding herself unable to buy any more drinks, she effectively sold her own daughter to a man identified as José Lugo “in exchange for three beers.”

    The man took advantage of her. From that day onwards, a burning hatred started brewing inside Barraza, one that would eventually lead her to claim the lives of dozens of women.

    Barraza became pregnant with Lugo’s child.

    An investigation by the Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) would later reveal that Samperio told authorities that Barraza had gone with Lugo “willingly.”

    Barraza’s childhood trauma became central to her hatred toward older women

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Investigators and commentators later returned to Barraza’s childhood when trying to understand why her victims were so often elderly women who lived alone.

    In court, Barraza gave her own explanation:

    “I hated older women because my mother mistreated me, beat me, and always cursed me. One day she gave me to an older man and I was ab*sed. That is why I hated older women. I know it is no excuse. I do not deserve forgiveness from God or anyone, but I already did it.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    Samperio later entered a relationship with a man identified in one criminological thesis as Gerardo Hernández, with whom she had two children. The same account describes Barraza’s childhood home as poor, violent, and shaped by her mother’s drinking problem.

    Hernández became Barraza’s stepfather. The thesis says he did not let her go to school or leave the house because he believed women did not need education.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    After she gave birth, Barraza’s uncles, described as brothers of her stepfather, learned what had happened and rescued her.

    The child born from that period was named José Enrique Lugo Barraza. Her stepfather took her back home and helped her raise him. When Samperio later passed away of cirrhosis, Barraza reportedly did not mourn her.

    Accounts say she felt relief, while still carrying the resentment that she later linked to her hatred of older women.

    Before becoming a serial criminal, Barraza tried to live a normal life but was met with one tragedy after another

    Image credits: Inside Edition

    As an adult, Barraza moved through a series of unstable relationships. At 23, she married Miguel Ángel Barrios García and had a daughter, Érika Erandi, before leaving him because he became violent.

    She later entered a relationship with Félix Juárez Ramírez, with whom she had two more children, José Marvin and Emma Ivonne. That relationship also ended after violence against her and the children.

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    After the separation, Barraza lived with her younger children in Ixtapaluca, State of Mexico. She had little formal education, no stable protection, and a long record of surviving through low-paid work.

    She cleaned houses, moved through informal commerce, sold clothes and food, and eventually began selling popcorn around wrestling events.

    That contact with lucha libre changed the shape of her life.

    Lucha libre gave Barraza a much needed glimmer of hope, until an injury cut that dream short

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    By most older accounts, Barraza entered the wrestling world at about 30, which places the beginning of that chapter around 1988. It was a striking turn for a woman whose childhood had been defined by feeling powerless.

    In the ring, or at least in the world around it, strength was no longer something used against her. It became something she could display.

    Lucha libre offered Barraza a true escape. Under her mask she could become someone else, build her own mythology.

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    She became “The Lady of Silence,” a persona she reportedly chose because she considered herself quiet and isolated. In one television appearance, when asked whether she was a hero or a villain, she described herself as “a ruda at heart.”

    “Rudos” are the rule-breakers of lucha libre, the villains who fight against the good guys “técnicos” with force, deception, and intimidation. The girl who had been subjugated became a woman who could present herself as untouchable and feared.

    As a wrestler, she wore a pink outfit, a butterfly-like mask, and a belt. She was said to have fought until a back injury forced her to stop, after doctors warned that continuing could leave her disabled.

    Sometime after her injury, Barraza’s first son was fatally wounded in a street fight

    Image credits: Inside Edition

    When that world collapsed, the loss was more than professional. The spine injury ended her time in the ring and pushed her into promotion, but that work was unstable and did not bring enough money to support her children.

    The fantasy of becoming powerful had failed to become a life she could actually live.

    By the mid-1990s, sources place Barraza in theft, shoplifting, street robbery, and later burglaries.

    She still appeared around wrestling gyms and events, and one former colleague later said Barraza would invite people to eat despite having no clear source of income.

    “She spent a lot of money. We didn’t know how she got it. She said she had a good job, but she never explained what it was.”

    Then came another loss.

    José Enrique Lugo Barraza, her eldest son, was fatally wounded at 24.

    Some accounts say he lost his life in a fight, while others describe a street robbery in which a group attacked him and beat him repeatedly with bats. Either way, his passing has been described as Barraza’s last straw.

    Soon after, the first homicides linked to her began to appear.

    The brutality of the attacks led police to assume the criminal was a man

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    The earliest suspected victim in several chronologies was María Amparo González Salcida Yllánez, attacked in May 1998 inside her apartment in Unidad Modelo, Iztapalapa. She was strangled with an electrical cable.

    That same year, a woman identified as Concepción Carranza met a similar fate. Those two incidents form the earliest edge of the Mataviejitas chronology, although not every source agrees on how firmly they should be placed within Barraza’s confirmed series.

    The first homicide with a much clearer narrative trail came on November 25, 2002.

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    María de la Luz González Anaya was an elderly woman living in Mexico City. That evening, around 6 pm, her son-in-law Esteban received a call from her asking for help. When he arrived, he found the gate open, the door closed, and María de la Luz on the floor.

    She was still alive.

    Image credits: Azteca Noticias

    Before passing away, she told him she had let in a woman who presented herself as a social worker. The woman had robbed her, tried to strangle her, and beaten her several times in the abdomen.

    Esteban lifted her from the floor and placed her barefoot on a sofa, where she passed away.

    Her rooms had been searched. Jewelry, watches, and cash were missing. Investigators also found fingerprints on items inside the home.

    María de la Luz had been struck repeatedly with a blunt object or fists, suffering severe internal injuries in the thoracic and abdominal area. Her neck showed signs of manual strangulation. She had been attacked by someone with superior physical strength.

    Because of this, the police made their first mistake. They attributed the crimes to a man.

    Image credits: Azteca Noticias

    Four months later, on March 2, 2003, Guillermina León Oropeza was attacked. She lived alone. Her body was found on a chair near her bed, with a pantyhose wrapped around her neck. The home showed signs of searching, but the door had not been forced.

    A glass of Coca-Cola later yielded fingerprints that matched Juana Barraza.

    Barraza’s homicide spree went into overdrive between 2003 and 2004, taking the lives of 21 women

    Image credits: Inside Edition

    For years, bodies were found in apartments across Mexico City, sometimes days after passing because many of the women were rarely visited by relatives.

    The attacks continued. On July 25, 2003, María Guadalupe Aguilar Cortina was attacked. On October 9, 2003, María Guadalupe de la Vega Morales, followed by María del Carmen Muñoz Cote de Galván on October 24.

    In November 2003, more women were added to the list: Lucrecia Elsa Calvo Marroquín on November 4, Natalia Torres Castro on November 19, and Alicia Cota Ducoin on November 28.

    The next year brought a grim succession of names.

    Image credits: Historias Innecesarias

    Alicia González Castillo was attacked on February 20, 2004. Andrea Tecante Carreto on February 25. Carmen Cardona Rodea on March 20, followed by Socorro Enedina Martínez Pajares on March 26.

    Guadalupe González Sánchez was attacked on May 24. Esthela Cantoral Trejo on June 25.

    In July 2004, Delfina González Castillo, María Virginia Xelhuatzi Tizapán, and María de los Ángeles Cortés Reynoso were all listed in public chronologies tied to the case.

    Margarita Martell Vázquez was fatally robbed on August 31. Simona Bedolla Ayala on September 29. María Dolores Martínez Benavides on October 24. Margarita Arredondo Rodríguez on November 9, and María Imelda Estrada Pérez on November 17.

    By then, police were under severe pressure.

    Investigators considered the possibility of the culprit being a crossdresser before admitting it could be a woman

    Image credits: Azteca Noticias

    Instead of considering the possibility that the criminal was a woman. Authorities came to believe it was a crossdressing man.

    Because of this more than 100 adult industry workers who dressed as women were brought in for questioning. The case also produced wrongful arrests, with at least one woman and one man publicly treated as the Mataviejitas before Barraza was caught.

    The investigation grew large. More than 200 investigators, led by then deputy attorney general Renato Sales Heredia, were assigned to the search.

    Forensic evidence slowly corrected part of the police theory. A sanitary pad found in the trash at two crime scenes finally pointed away from the theory that the criminal was male, since the victims were elderly and the items did not appear to belong to them.

    In 2005, the attacks continued.

    Image credits: Azteca Noticias

    Between January 11 and October 18, public chronologies tied to the case listed 17 more homicides, including several attacks clustered within days of each other in April, July, August, and September.

    The number widened the scale of the investigation, though not every homicide in the broader chronology was later treated with the same certainty as the core attacks for which Barraza was convicted.

    Barraza was finally arrested on January 25, 2006

    Image credits: Family Search

    That day, Barraza entered the apartment of Ana María de los Reyes Alfaro in the Moctezuma neighborhood of Mexico City.

    Some reports described the victim as 81 years old, while others gave her age as 89. The method followed the same pattern. Barraza had allegedly approached her under the pretext of being a social worker, entered her home, and strangled her.

    This time, however, she was seen leaving.

    A witness raised the alarm almost immediately after discovering what had happened. Police were nearby as part of the operation already deployed to catch the criminal. Barraza was detained shortly after the attack, ending the years-long search.

    At the moment of her arrest, she was 48 years old.

    Barraza reportedly admitted only to the final homicide of Ana María de los Reyes Alfaro.

    Image credits: Canal Catorce

    Despite years of investigation, public pressure, forensic comparisons, and the long list of victims tied to the Mataviejitas pattern, solid evidence was available to convict her in connection with 16 homicides and 12 robberies.

    In 2008, the court handed down an extraordinary sentence: 759 years in prison, widely described as the longest sentence in Mexico’s history.

    As of July 2026, Barraza remains behind bars at Santa Martha Acatitla.

    “Misery on both sides.” People reflected on the circumstances that led Barraza to become the Mataviejitas

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook
    Abel Musa Miño

    Abel Musa Miño

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Read more »

    Born in Santiago, Chile, with a background in communication and international relations, I bring a global perspective to entertainment reporting at Bored Panda. I cover celebrity news, Hollywood events, true crime, and viral stories that resonate across cultures. My reporting has been featured on Google News, connecting international audiences to the latest in entertainment. For me, journalism is about bridging local stories with global conversations, arming readers with the knowledge necessary to make up their own minds. Research is at the core of my work. I believe that well-sourced, factual storytelling is essential to building trust and driving meaningful engagement.

    Read less »
    Abel Musa Miño

    Abel Musa Miño

    Writer, Entertainment News Writer

    Born in Santiago, Chile, with a background in communication and international relations, I bring a global perspective to entertainment reporting at Bored Panda. I cover celebrity news, Hollywood events, true crime, and viral stories that resonate across cultures. My reporting has been featured on Google News, connecting international audiences to the latest in entertainment. For me, journalism is about bridging local stories with global conversations, arming readers with the knowledge necessary to make up their own minds. Research is at the core of my work. I believe that well-sourced, factual storytelling is essential to building trust and driving meaningful engagement.

    What do you think ?
    LakotaWolf (she/her)
    Community Member
    Premium
    4 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    These sorts of cases make me simultaneously sad and angry because of the stereotyping that inherently occurs. Not every ábused child grows up to kíll. Not every ábused child grows up hating the "representation" of their original ábuser. Most understand that their ábusers are evil themselves, and it's not "all elderly women" that are evil and must be hated. Juana Barraza had something else wrong with her that wasn't just "she was ábused as a child." But she was very clearly a victim herself and went through hell as a child. She needed help... but culturally speaking, mental health issues are not readily accepted by Mexicans, especially in the 60s/70s. (My mother experienced this growing up, and similarly became an ábuser herself.) This case is really just a shítty tragedy all around.

    amy lee
    Community Member
    4 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    When people are put under pressure you see how different people are. During a disaster people come together and share what little they have or a small number loot and steal. The looters end up on the news but none thinks that every disaster survivor is a looter. It's the same with childhood trauma, most go on to become good people and might even go into fields that help people avoid the same trauma. No-one thinks the minority are the stereotype at all. But the world is fascinated by female mürderers as they are rare and let's face it everyone has a backstory. Hope you're well lakota

    Load More Replies...
    FranSinclair
    Community Member
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My childhood wasn't much different from hers. Im sure they left some out but I think most people would agree my situation (at the hands of my mother) were even worse+more extreme...I would never hurt someone unless its in self defense. Some of my children are adults now and none have never heard me yell or scream, never been hit/spanked, never witnessed me under the influence, never been put down or called a mean name. You are not your circumstances and your circumstances aren't an excuse or justification for your actions. Obviously no child deserves any of this. You're literally forming the future when you speak and interact with youth..they deserve the world and all its love and opportunities BUT while good people sometimes make bad choices, YOU have to ACTIVELY choose to hurt others and take responsibility for CHOOSING to do bad things to other people in adulthood. My circumstances made me a very understanding, loving, non judgemental, foster parent. Bc i chose that.

    FluffyDreg
    Community Member
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You define yourself as a very understanding non judgemental person... but fail to understand how differently ab*se effects, and damages the brain... Some people are strong enough, or the damage to the brain isn't severe enough, that they can mend it and move on. But thats not universal. Sometimes the damage destroys things that cannot be repaired without extensive effort. Think of it like a car crash. Two people can be in the same car crash, but one person could get off with some cuts and bad bruising... and the other could be disabled for life. What she did was atrocious, horrific, and inexcusable. But it doesn't mean she wanted to be like that. And just because you were able to recover from your horrific trauma doesn't mean she was able to.

    Load More Replies...
    LakotaWolf (she/her)
    Community Member
    Premium
    4 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    These sorts of cases make me simultaneously sad and angry because of the stereotyping that inherently occurs. Not every ábused child grows up to kíll. Not every ábused child grows up hating the "representation" of their original ábuser. Most understand that their ábusers are evil themselves, and it's not "all elderly women" that are evil and must be hated. Juana Barraza had something else wrong with her that wasn't just "she was ábused as a child." But she was very clearly a victim herself and went through hell as a child. She needed help... but culturally speaking, mental health issues are not readily accepted by Mexicans, especially in the 60s/70s. (My mother experienced this growing up, and similarly became an ábuser herself.) This case is really just a shítty tragedy all around.

    amy lee
    Community Member
    4 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    When people are put under pressure you see how different people are. During a disaster people come together and share what little they have or a small number loot and steal. The looters end up on the news but none thinks that every disaster survivor is a looter. It's the same with childhood trauma, most go on to become good people and might even go into fields that help people avoid the same trauma. No-one thinks the minority are the stereotype at all. But the world is fascinated by female mürderers as they are rare and let's face it everyone has a backstory. Hope you're well lakota

    Load More Replies...
    FranSinclair
    Community Member
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    My childhood wasn't much different from hers. Im sure they left some out but I think most people would agree my situation (at the hands of my mother) were even worse+more extreme...I would never hurt someone unless its in self defense. Some of my children are adults now and none have never heard me yell or scream, never been hit/spanked, never witnessed me under the influence, never been put down or called a mean name. You are not your circumstances and your circumstances aren't an excuse or justification for your actions. Obviously no child deserves any of this. You're literally forming the future when you speak and interact with youth..they deserve the world and all its love and opportunities BUT while good people sometimes make bad choices, YOU have to ACTIVELY choose to hurt others and take responsibility for CHOOSING to do bad things to other people in adulthood. My circumstances made me a very understanding, loving, non judgemental, foster parent. Bc i chose that.

    FluffyDreg
    Community Member
    2 days ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    You define yourself as a very understanding non judgemental person... but fail to understand how differently ab*se effects, and damages the brain... Some people are strong enough, or the damage to the brain isn't severe enough, that they can mend it and move on. But thats not universal. Sometimes the damage destroys things that cannot be repaired without extensive effort. Think of it like a car crash. Two people can be in the same car crash, but one person could get off with some cuts and bad bruising... and the other could be disabled for life. What she did was atrocious, horrific, and inexcusable. But it doesn't mean she wanted to be like that. And just because you were able to recover from your horrific trauma doesn't mean she was able to.

    Load More Replies...
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT