Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
“Stuff Gets Broken”: Dad Tries To Protect His Son’s Gift From His Ex’s New Family, Drama Ensues
Managing shared children after a pretty hostile divorce is much like disarming old landmines, one wrong step and you’re in a world of hurt. So most families in this sort of predicament tend to navigate the holidays very, very carefully.
A dad turned to the internet for advice after getting into a dispute with his ex-wife. Her new family included three kids from the other man and she insisted that her ex-husband treat them the way he treats their shared son. So when he refused to let him take the gaming console he brought him to her house, drama ensued.
RELATED:
It can be tricky to share a kid with someone you divorced
Image credits: DragonImages (Not the actual photo)
But one father ended up in drama when he didn’t want his son to take his new gift to his ex-wife’s house
Image credits: gpointstudio (Not the actual photo)
Image credits: Alixindoring
Co-parenting can be hard in the best of circumstances
Navigating the holidays after a divorce is often like trying to solve a Rubik’s cube where the colors keep changing and someone is screaming in your ear about fairness. We recently came across a story that perfectly illustrates the high-wire act of co-parenting when one side decides the rules of engagement have changed. In this particular case, a father found himself in the crosshairs of his ex-wife’s new family dynamics, leading to a Christmas standoff involving a highly coveted gaming console and some very blurry boundaries. The core of the issue wasn’t just about a video game, it was about the fundamental misunderstanding of what a co-parenting relationship should look like once new partners and additional children enter the picture.
When you transition from a nuclear family to a co-parenting situation, the goal is usually to provide stability for the child you share. However, as this father discovered, some ex-spouses believe that the non-custodial parent’s resources and time should be distributed equally among their new household. This is a common pitfall in blended family dynamics, where the lines between the two separate homes start to bleed into one another in ways that are neither healthy nor sustainable. It is essential to remember that while you are a village for your biological child, you are not a general contractor for your ex-wife’s new life.
The friction in this story started long before the holiday season. The ex-wife expressed frustration over the father taking their son to Disney because she had a five-year plan to take her new family there. This is a classic example of experience gatekeeping. A parent shouldn’t have to put their child’s joy on a five-year hold just because the other parent wants to be the one to claim the first time experience. In high-conflict divorces, one parent often tries to claim ownership over certain milestones to feel a sense of control. This type of behavior can actually harm the child more than help, as they miss out on current opportunities for the sake of a hypothetical future event. Experts often suggest that successful co-parenting requires letting go of the need to control what happens on the other parent’s watch.
Image credits: freepik (Not the actual photo)
Some things are impossible to compromise on
The situation reached a boiling point over the purchase of a Switch 2. The father bought the console for his ten-year-old son, but the ex-wife demanded it be brought to her house so her other four children could use it for family gaming. This highlights a massive issue regarding property and autonomy. When a parent buys an expensive gift, they have every right to decide where that gift stays, especially if there is a history of items being broken or lost at the other house. Keeping high-value items at one location isn’t about being petty, it’s about asset management and ensuring the child actually gets to enjoy their gift without it becoming a source of conflict or a casualty of a chaotic household.
Ultimately, the father in this story is standing his ground against a concept of fairness that isn’t grounded in reality. He is responsible for his son’s happiness and upbringing, not for subsidizing the experiences or entertainment of his ex-wife’s stepchildren or her new biological child. Blended families are wonderful, but they require a unique set of rules that respect the biological parents’ roles while maintaining the integrity of each separate household. Attempting to force a former spouse to treat a new family as their own is a recipe for resentment and legal mediation.
Managing joint childcare after a bitter divorce requires a thick skin and a clear set of priorities. By focusing on the son’s individual needs rather than the demands of the ex-wife’s expanded household, the father is actually protecting his son from being caught in the middle of a loyalty conflict. It is perfectly fine to say no to sharing gifts across households and it is perfectly fine to provide experiences that the other parent cannot currently afford. Equality in co-parenting refers to the rights and responsibilities regarding the child you share, not the equalization of wealth or experiences across two different families. Staying the course and keeping the focus on the child is the best way to ensure the holidays remain about joy rather than jurisdiction.
Image credits: senivpetro (Not the actual photo)
Many thought he was being perfectly reasonable
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
LakotaWolf (she/her) 14 hours ago
This sounds like a situation where OP should perhaps pursue sole custody; perhaps not now as his child is 10, but in a few years when the courts/a judge would take the child's wishes into account. It honestly sounds like, the gaming console snafu and breaking of stuff aside, ex-wife's house and "new" family is NOT a happy or healthy place for the 10-year-old. I may be reading between the lines a little too hard here, but it sounds like ex-wife is favoring her stepchildren and younger bio child (her "new" family members) over her 10-year-old, even if it's indirectly. OP is NOT dad or even stepdad to ex-wife's "new" kids and owes them literally nothing.
Trillian 13 hours ago
What he does with his son during his time at his house is of no concern to the ex and her family (unless it's unsafe). They can be upset all they want. Also special toys that he bought can of course stay at his house. Fair doesn't mean everyone gets the very same things. Also it was their choice to have yet another kid.
Zuri Austin 1 hour ago
I ɢᴇᴛ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ᴏᴠᴇʀ $120 ᴘᴇʀ ʜᴏᴜʀ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ. I ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜᴛ ɪ'ᴅ ʙᴇ ᴀʙʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ɪᴛ ʙᴜᴛ ᴍʏ ʙᴜᴅᴅʏ ᴍᴀᴋᴇs ᴏᴠᴇʀ $13,453 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ᴅᴏɪɴɢ ᴛʜɪs ᴀɴᴅ sʜᴇ ᴄᴏɴᴠɪɴᴄᴇᴅ ᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀʏ. sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴇᴀʀɴɪɴɢ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴄᴀsʜ ɪɴ ᴘᴀʀᴛ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ʙʏ ꜰᴏʟʟᴏᴡ ɪɴsᴛʀᴜᴄᴛɪᴏɴs............ 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲𝟭.𝗰𝗼𝗺
Load More Replies...
LakotaWolf (she/her) 14 hours ago
This sounds like a situation where OP should perhaps pursue sole custody; perhaps not now as his child is 10, but in a few years when the courts/a judge would take the child's wishes into account. It honestly sounds like, the gaming console snafu and breaking of stuff aside, ex-wife's house and "new" family is NOT a happy or healthy place for the 10-year-old. I may be reading between the lines a little too hard here, but it sounds like ex-wife is favoring her stepchildren and younger bio child (her "new" family members) over her 10-year-old, even if it's indirectly. OP is NOT dad or even stepdad to ex-wife's "new" kids and owes them literally nothing.
Trillian 13 hours ago
What he does with his son during his time at his house is of no concern to the ex and her family (unless it's unsafe). They can be upset all they want. Also special toys that he bought can of course stay at his house. Fair doesn't mean everyone gets the very same things. Also it was their choice to have yet another kid.
Zuri Austin 1 hour ago
I ɢᴇᴛ ᴘᴀɪᴅ ᴏᴠᴇʀ $120 ᴘᴇʀ ʜᴏᴜʀ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ. I ɴᴇᴠᴇʀ ᴛʜᴏᴜɢʜᴛ ɪ'ᴅ ʙᴇ ᴀʙʟᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴅᴏ ɪᴛ ʙᴜᴛ ᴍʏ ʙᴜᴅᴅʏ ᴍᴀᴋᴇs ᴏᴠᴇʀ $13,453 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ᴅᴏɪɴɢ ᴛʜɪs ᴀɴᴅ sʜᴇ ᴄᴏɴᴠɪɴᴄᴇᴅ ᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʀʏ. sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴇᴀʀɴɪɴɢ ᴍᴏʀᴇ ᴄᴀsʜ ɪɴ ᴘᴀʀᴛ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ʙʏ ꜰᴏʟʟᴏᴡ ɪɴsᴛʀᴜᴄᴛɪᴏɴs............ 𝗝𝗼𝗯𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗺𝗲𝟭.𝗰𝗼𝗺
Load More Replies... You May Like Guy Snaps After Wife Leaves Baby In His Care For 2.5 Hours, She Stops Doing Anything For Him Guy Endures Girlfriend’s Dad’s Job Jabs For Ages, One Salary Reveal Later And The Laughing Stops “AITAH For Kicking Out My Sister And Her Family Because Of Her Son And Husband’s Entitlement?”
Monika Pašukonytė
Rūta Zumbrickaitė
Monika Pašukonytė
Related on Bored Panda
35
9