Sister Demands Child-Free Sibling Take In Her 3 Kids In An Emergency, Surprised It Doesn’t Go Well
Helping out a sibling in need is a pretty normal part of family life. Sometimes that involves giving them a ride, and sometimes it means babysitting during a family emergency. However, boundaries, rules and expectations can all mix into a dangerous cocktail if not managed well.
A netizen asked the internet if they were wrong to demand their sister come pick up her kids after they broke their expensive, antique clock. As it turns out, they were babysitting the kids, both between six to ten, during a family emergency and they decided that leaving them unsupervised was the best course of action. Netizens shared their thoughts and debated who messed up in the comments.
Young children shouldn’t be left unattended
Image credits: prostooleh / freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: margonikolskaya / freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: romanshyshak / freepik (not the actual photo)
The netizen added some more info later
Image credits: zinkevych / freepik (not the actual photo)
Image credits: IFeelForMeg
Rowdy children are a menace, but that’s no excuse to just ignore them
Image credits: lookstudio / freepik (not the actual photo)
On the surface, the poster seems to have a point. They were coerced into babysitting against their will, set clear boundaries about not touching their belongings, and suffered real financial loss due to the children’s actions. The destroyed clock wasn’t just any decoration but a valuable antique, and children old enough to be in elementary school should understand not to handle other people’s precious items without permission.
However, the online community largely sided against the poster, and it’s not difficult to see why. The tone throughout the post drips with contempt, referring to the children as “spawn” and displaying zero empathy for what was supposedly a family emergency. The poster isolated themselves in another room while leaving three young children essentially unsupervised in an unfamiliar environment filled with valuable, fragile items. Any parent or experienced caregiver knows that elementary-aged children, especially when left alone, will inevitably get curious and touch things they shouldn’t.
The later edits only made things worse. The poster revealed that their strained relationship with their sister stems from jealousy, real or imagined, over their success, illustrated by an anecdote where they posted vacation photos on Facebook while her sister’s family was experiencing serious financial hardship. The brother-in-law’s accident turned out to be a drunk driving incident, which they mentioned almost dismissively. Most damningly, they announced her intention to sue her struggling sister’s family over the clock, despite earlier claiming they couldn’t afford to pay anyway.
Many readers had their issues with the story
Image credits: freepik (not the actual photo)
The comments section erupted with judgments of “YTA” (You’re The “jerk”), with many pointing out that accidents happen, especially with children. Commenters noted that if you leave valuable, fragile items within reach of unsupervised children, you bear some responsibility for what happens. Others observed that their complete lack of compassion, combined with the consistent contempt for her sister’s family and their financial struggles, painted a picture of someone more interested in being right than maintaining any sort of family relationships.
What makes this case fascinating is that it touches on broader questions about autonomy and obligation. Should we be forced to help family members when we genuinely don’t want to? At what point does saying no become cruel rather than simply maintaining boundaries? The poster clearly values independence and a child-free lifestyle, which is entirely valid. However, there’s a difference between having boundaries and lacking basic human empathy.
Sometimes greed blinds people
Image credits: lookstudio / freepik (not the actual photo)
The real issue isn’t the clock or even the children’s behavior. It’s the netizen’s apparent inability to extend grace in what was presumably a stressful emergency situation. Kids make mistakes. Accidents happen. A more measured response might have been to explain to the children why what they did was wrong, contact the parents calmly, and either request reasonable compensation or accept it as an unfortunate accident. Instead, the poster’s nuclear response, coupled with her evident disdain for their sister’s entire existence, suggests deeper issues at play.
The discussion in the comments reflected a consensus that while the poster had every right to be upset about the damaged property, the complete lack of compassion, the failure to properly supervise children they agreed to watch, and their punitive attitude toward the financially struggling sister’s family made them the “jerk” in this scenario. Sometimes being technically right doesn’t make you morally right, and this appears to be one of those cases where standing on principle comes at the cost of basic human decency.
Many thought that they should have just helped their sister
Some thought everyone was being a jerk
A handful sided against the user
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
It's hard for me to make a real judgment here because OP comes off sounding insufferable, arrogant, and judgmental. Jesus Christ Almighty, not only would I not ask them to babysit under any circumstances, I wouldn't want to be around them at all whether I had kids or not.
NTA for refusing to babysit them initially. She should have kept refusing if she knew she couldn’t bother to watch them. She left three children under 10 alone in her house and simply said “don’t touch anything.” I’m not a child person but I would sit in the room with them and watch TV for an evening if it was a family emergency. I wouldn’t trust three children in my house unsupervised. They could break something or they could get hurt. They could have opened the front door and walking into the road, turned on the oven because they were hungry and being ignored... OP sounds awful. The relationship with the sister probably didn’t turn toxic because of sister’s jealousy. Sister’s husband lost his job last year and OP’s response was “you shouldn’t have had so many kids.” OP didn’t have to help them out, but it seems like she isn’t capable of feeling empathy or compassion.
Load More Replies...OP sounds like an insufferable t**t, but so does everyone else
How is it an accident when you are driving under the influence? And this was considered a family emergency?? Definitely NTA. There was no reason for both your sister and her husband to go to the hospital together therefore no urgency or need for you to watch the kids.
The obvious solution was for the brother to go see about his brother, and the mother to stay with the children (not because she is the mother, but because she is not a blood relation). Why leave 3 young children with somebody who has no clue about how children behave since they have no interest in children, and seems to be open about?
Load More Replies...All the NTA people on here suck. This woman is obviously a self-absorbed t**t. She can't watch 3 kids for one evening? She leaves them totally unsupervised while she holes up in her office. One of those kids could've gotten hurt. Then she knows her sister struggles financially but she is going to sue bc the kids broke something when she left them totally unsupervised? Cruella here. This woman is disgusting. The people defending her are lousy, incredibly selfish, human beings.
NTA. Why did her sister have to go with BIL? He could have gone himself. OP made it clear she didn't want to watch the kids.
You can tell by the way OP talks about her sister that she hates her. It doesn't even seem to matter what OPs sister has going on, OP uses highly negative phrasing and assumes the worst. OP sounds like an extremely bitter person.
10 is old enough to watch your siblings, and while it would have been better to get someone to stay at their house with them, kids between 6 and 10 know not to take things off people's shelves and walls and mess with them. Even if the 6 yo suggested it 10 is old enough to say no unless there's some serious issues going on but if you know that's the case, why not have someone watch the kids at their own home? Very suspicious that sister and BIL have no friends they can call. Makes me think they've burned through all their social relationships and that's why they are asking family.
Exactly this more than old enough to know that when someone says DO NOT TOUCH ETC you bloody well don’t , assume of course unlike these feral brats their parents actually taught em manners n respect in first place , right
Load More Replies...It's hard for me to make a real judgment here because OP comes off sounding insufferable, arrogant, and judgmental. Jesus Christ Almighty, not only would I not ask them to babysit under any circumstances, I wouldn't want to be around them at all whether I had kids or not.
NTA for refusing to babysit them initially. She should have kept refusing if she knew she couldn’t bother to watch them. She left three children under 10 alone in her house and simply said “don’t touch anything.” I’m not a child person but I would sit in the room with them and watch TV for an evening if it was a family emergency. I wouldn’t trust three children in my house unsupervised. They could break something or they could get hurt. They could have opened the front door and walking into the road, turned on the oven because they were hungry and being ignored... OP sounds awful. The relationship with the sister probably didn’t turn toxic because of sister’s jealousy. Sister’s husband lost his job last year and OP’s response was “you shouldn’t have had so many kids.” OP didn’t have to help them out, but it seems like she isn’t capable of feeling empathy or compassion.
Load More Replies...OP sounds like an insufferable t**t, but so does everyone else
How is it an accident when you are driving under the influence? And this was considered a family emergency?? Definitely NTA. There was no reason for both your sister and her husband to go to the hospital together therefore no urgency or need for you to watch the kids.
The obvious solution was for the brother to go see about his brother, and the mother to stay with the children (not because she is the mother, but because she is not a blood relation). Why leave 3 young children with somebody who has no clue about how children behave since they have no interest in children, and seems to be open about?
Load More Replies...All the NTA people on here suck. This woman is obviously a self-absorbed t**t. She can't watch 3 kids for one evening? She leaves them totally unsupervised while she holes up in her office. One of those kids could've gotten hurt. Then she knows her sister struggles financially but she is going to sue bc the kids broke something when she left them totally unsupervised? Cruella here. This woman is disgusting. The people defending her are lousy, incredibly selfish, human beings.
NTA. Why did her sister have to go with BIL? He could have gone himself. OP made it clear she didn't want to watch the kids.
You can tell by the way OP talks about her sister that she hates her. It doesn't even seem to matter what OPs sister has going on, OP uses highly negative phrasing and assumes the worst. OP sounds like an extremely bitter person.
10 is old enough to watch your siblings, and while it would have been better to get someone to stay at their house with them, kids between 6 and 10 know not to take things off people's shelves and walls and mess with them. Even if the 6 yo suggested it 10 is old enough to say no unless there's some serious issues going on but if you know that's the case, why not have someone watch the kids at their own home? Very suspicious that sister and BIL have no friends they can call. Makes me think they've burned through all their social relationships and that's why they are asking family.
Exactly this more than old enough to know that when someone says DO NOT TOUCH ETC you bloody well don’t , assume of course unlike these feral brats their parents actually taught em manners n respect in first place , right
Load More Replies...




















































36
37