Child-Free Woman Refuses To Leave Fortune To Siblings’ Kids, Family Turns Against Her
Many childfree people have more money at their disposal than their parental counterparts, for obvious reasons. They get to spend it however they want while they’re alive, and they can decide who to leave what’s left to once they’re no longer around.
A woman says she’s the only well-off one in her family, but has received a lot of flack for not having children. Her siblings have even called her selfish for not having kids. Now, those same siblings are demanding that she leaves all of her money to their offspring “in equal portions.” When she told them she’d be leaving her wealth to charities, all hell broke loose.
She’s successful, wealthy, and childfree but her siblings think she’s selfish for not having kids
Image credits: Getty Images (not the actual photo)
Now, they want her to leave her money to their children and she’s flat-out refusing
Image credits: Tim Mossholder (not the actual photo)
Image source: I_love_me39
She then revealed that she might get a restraining order
More and more people are choosing not to have children but what’s happening to their money once they’re gone?
It’s not uncommon for people to choose not to have children. Some choose to spend all their money while they’re alive. Others go to their grave with a small (or big fortune). So what happens to all that money once a person without kids has passed?
A popular option is to make siblings, nieces or nephews the beneficiaries. “But what’s as common is making an impact or establishing a legacy,” reveals Childfreeinsights.com. More and more childfree people are choosing to give to charity once they’re gone.
“According to Pew Research, roughly 50% of married people without children have a charitable beneficiary in their estate plan, and 30% of unmarried without children do,” notes the site.. “Compare that to only 15% of people with children and only 7% of people with grandchildren. Simply put, the more descendants you have, the less likely you are to give your wealth away.”
Some argue that childfree people should go wild, spend all their money while they’re alive, and not bother about a will. Others say this is simply not true.
“The misconception is that if you are childfree, then you do not need to be worried about succession or inheritance tax planning,” says Diva Shah, the Legal Director of U.K.-based law firm Kingsley Napey. Shah explains that there are tax liabilities to worry about, as well as making sure your general wishes are taken into account.
“A will ensures that your wishes are respected, and your estate is handled in accordance with your preferences. It provides peace of mind for you and clarity for your loved ones during a challenging time,” explains the expert. “You may consider giving to charities or friends and family members. If you have pets, a will is an opportunity to name a guardian or caretaker for them. This ensures that your pets are taken care of by someone you trust.”
Shah adds that even if you choose to spend right down to your last penny, you’ll need to ensure that you’ve planned properly so that your finances carry you through. You can’t underestimate the cost of health and later life care costs.
“Jolt of satisfaction”: many felt the family was getting what they deserved
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
"Hey mom & dad, if I had children then I wouldn't be able to pay for your lodging and care? You better hope I never had children or you'll be on the street."
They don't have the brains to work out that if OP had a multitude of kids like they want she wouldn't be in the financial position to help them out like she has.
Load More Replies...I’m really suspicious of mom trying to poison the dogs. “What if they like the poison? I was just trying to be nice by offering them the poison.” Either something’s wrong with her, like anencephaly, or she’s trying to killl the dogs. Either way, these are NOT people you want in your life. Unfortunately, it’s too late to stop them from procreating and making yet MORE imbeciles, but you’re right: they add NOTHING to OP’s life and so shouldn’t be in it, save for little sister.
Load More Replies...My mom tried to do that regarding my nieces. I had to remind her I have 3 stepkids. She tried to say I wasn’t their family. Thanks to her c**p, I’m not close to my brothers, hence my nieces. I told her I may not be their mother but I consider them my kids. They are my family. She not fond of my stepdaughters because they have called her out before. I’ll leave them something, but our kids will get the bulk.
No obligation to give or bequeath anything to anyone. It's a personal choice. We don't get to pick our family and sometimes things don't work out. We're under no obligation to pay for our parents either. If family members can't remain civil then there is need to stay connected.
Nope. Absolutely no. Leave all your worldly possessions to your dog(s). And make sure to tell them.
I'm not really into childen but I've come to realise that the main problem is usually the parents. Plus, and not knocking those who do have children (and are good parents), but let's be real here, people have children because they want them. Not for the good of the world. That is primarily selfish.
Load More Replies...They’re asking because the edit wasn’t there yet when they read it.
Load More Replies...My dogs only get chocolate the day before they are put down !! ,be it old age and or severe illness ,NEVER BEFORE if I was op those vile parents wouldn’t be in any care home paid for by me !! As for the sisters ( it the youngest ) they can pound sand, hope op is doing well 6 yrs on to ,n hopefully no contact with her twisted family .
No, no, nopity no. Giving a dying dog chocolate is generally considered okay ONLY if euthanasia is imminent. That is within 10 to 15 minutes. This is to avoid potential toxic side effects. If the dog is not being put down immediately, chocolate can cause severe discomfort, including vomiting, diarrhea, and seizures. HOWEVER, what ever is the flipping point? You're viewing chocolate as a wonderful treat purely from a human perspective. A dog never having chocolate has not missed out in the slightest. Just recently had to say goodbye to my precious boy and the vet said he can have ANYTHING to eat, whatever he wants, bar poison (she actually said this). He still didn't get given chocolate. Just no. I know you mean well but, just forget chocolate as a thing for dogs, ever. PLEASE.
Load More Replies...Make sure EVERYONE knows all will be left to charities that way no one gets it in their head for you guys to have "an accident". Also, my vet said his 14 year old dachshund ate a 1 pound box of fudge and half a pound of bridgemix and didn't d*e. It did have terrible fountains of liquid p*o and was kept in the garage a couple days. My dogs have also eaten chocolate without issue, so don't fret but still it should be avoided. Personally I'd move and leave no forwarding address, if possible move to a gated neighborhood so they can't find you and stop by.
Just because your dogs survived, doesn't mean that all dogs will. When you know a substance is toxic to dogs, why even risk it? And I don't believe that story about the vet's dog. That just wouldn't happen.
Load More Replies...The entire world online isn’t all fake ,this kinda shite happens !!
Load More Replies...There are groups that vet charities and will breakdown what percentage of money goes where
Load More Replies..."Hey mom & dad, if I had children then I wouldn't be able to pay for your lodging and care? You better hope I never had children or you'll be on the street."
They don't have the brains to work out that if OP had a multitude of kids like they want she wouldn't be in the financial position to help them out like she has.
Load More Replies...I’m really suspicious of mom trying to poison the dogs. “What if they like the poison? I was just trying to be nice by offering them the poison.” Either something’s wrong with her, like anencephaly, or she’s trying to killl the dogs. Either way, these are NOT people you want in your life. Unfortunately, it’s too late to stop them from procreating and making yet MORE imbeciles, but you’re right: they add NOTHING to OP’s life and so shouldn’t be in it, save for little sister.
Load More Replies...My mom tried to do that regarding my nieces. I had to remind her I have 3 stepkids. She tried to say I wasn’t their family. Thanks to her c**p, I’m not close to my brothers, hence my nieces. I told her I may not be their mother but I consider them my kids. They are my family. She not fond of my stepdaughters because they have called her out before. I’ll leave them something, but our kids will get the bulk.
No obligation to give or bequeath anything to anyone. It's a personal choice. We don't get to pick our family and sometimes things don't work out. We're under no obligation to pay for our parents either. If family members can't remain civil then there is need to stay connected.
Nope. Absolutely no. Leave all your worldly possessions to your dog(s). And make sure to tell them.
I'm not really into childen but I've come to realise that the main problem is usually the parents. Plus, and not knocking those who do have children (and are good parents), but let's be real here, people have children because they want them. Not for the good of the world. That is primarily selfish.
Load More Replies...They’re asking because the edit wasn’t there yet when they read it.
Load More Replies...My dogs only get chocolate the day before they are put down !! ,be it old age and or severe illness ,NEVER BEFORE if I was op those vile parents wouldn’t be in any care home paid for by me !! As for the sisters ( it the youngest ) they can pound sand, hope op is doing well 6 yrs on to ,n hopefully no contact with her twisted family .
No, no, nopity no. Giving a dying dog chocolate is generally considered okay ONLY if euthanasia is imminent. That is within 10 to 15 minutes. This is to avoid potential toxic side effects. If the dog is not being put down immediately, chocolate can cause severe discomfort, including vomiting, diarrhea, and seizures. HOWEVER, what ever is the flipping point? You're viewing chocolate as a wonderful treat purely from a human perspective. A dog never having chocolate has not missed out in the slightest. Just recently had to say goodbye to my precious boy and the vet said he can have ANYTHING to eat, whatever he wants, bar poison (she actually said this). He still didn't get given chocolate. Just no. I know you mean well but, just forget chocolate as a thing for dogs, ever. PLEASE.
Load More Replies...Make sure EVERYONE knows all will be left to charities that way no one gets it in their head for you guys to have "an accident". Also, my vet said his 14 year old dachshund ate a 1 pound box of fudge and half a pound of bridgemix and didn't d*e. It did have terrible fountains of liquid p*o and was kept in the garage a couple days. My dogs have also eaten chocolate without issue, so don't fret but still it should be avoided. Personally I'd move and leave no forwarding address, if possible move to a gated neighborhood so they can't find you and stop by.
Just because your dogs survived, doesn't mean that all dogs will. When you know a substance is toxic to dogs, why even risk it? And I don't believe that story about the vet's dog. That just wouldn't happen.
Load More Replies...The entire world online isn’t all fake ,this kinda shite happens !!
Load More Replies...There are groups that vet charities and will breakdown what percentage of money goes where
Load More Replies...





lifestyle choice of never having kids” />

















































41
46