Company Cuts Costs By Taking Away Cars, Learns A Lesson After Employees Maliciously Comply
Quite a few company policies clearly don’t make much sense. Even on paper! But it can take putting these new regulations painfully into practice to finally make the higher-ups realize that they’ve made a massive, massive mistake. Sadly, change only really happens when things start to affect the bottom line.
Redditor u/daft_boy_dim, from the UK, shared a tale of dastardly revenge and malicious compliance from the time that he worked as a project engineer at a power supply company, six years ago. The internet user revealed how he and his colleagues reacted after management took away their company cars. They began following the travel policy—with all of its associated allowances—to the letter.
It took the company 8 weeks to realize just how expensive it was to ‘cut costs.’ Read on for the redditor’s full story, as shared on the massively popular (not to mention thoroughly entertaining) r/MaliciousCompliance subreddit.
A British power supply company decided to take away their project engineers’ access to their fleet of cars
Image credits: Obi – @pixel6propix (not the actual photo)
One former employee shared how everyone began following the organization’s travel policy to the letter to teach the higher-ups a lesson
Image credits: Redmind Studio (not the actual photo)
Image credits: u/daft_boy_dim
As the author of the post pointed out, the decision to revoke the employees’ access to company cars came after someone from finances calculated the costs of keeping the fleet after only reviewing the data for a single quarter. Anyone worth their salt knows just how important it is to take a peek at the broader context and to consider the possible consequences of your decisions. And what a powerful knock-on effect that person from finances had!
Considering how much the engineers traveled across the country all year round, it made little sense to revoke their car access. However, the company was adamant about cutting costs. Cue some well thought-out malicious compliance.
“As we were project engineers we had a very particular set of skills for knowing how to follow rules to the letter and how to do so in a manner that benefitted the company or project or individuals. Usually, if it benefitted the company it benefitted all involved. This was not one of those occasions,” u/daft_boy_dim told Reddit.
After reviewing the business’ travel policy, the engineers began hiring cars and using trains for their trips. What’s more, instead of working overtime as they’d done before, they booked hotels to take “full advantage of the £25 food and drink allowance for dinner.” That’s on top of the work-from-home policy that comes into effect if you were traveling the day before.
It took the power supply company 2 months to get to grips with just how much cash they were bleeding. “Our expenses for the first month after the cars had been returned were more than they were for the previous 12 months combined,” the OP wrote.
The sad reality is that far from every single colleague you’ll work with will be open to honest communication. Not everyone takes feedback well. And definitely, not everyone who works in management or makes executive decisions is beyond control issues, stubbornness, and even basic incompetence. Situations like the one the redditor was in can quickly tell you which of the higher-ups are (in)capable of handling complex, long-running arguments with staff.
As we’ve covered on Bored Panda before, the difference between good and sub-par workplace leaders lies in their character, as well as their relationship with their subordinates. For instance, a strong leader is someone who is principled, moral, and chooses to do the right thing instead of taking the easy road. Compare and contrast that to a weak leader. You’ll know who they are by their flip-flopping opinions, inability to commit to a certain goal or course of action, as well as how much they base their decisions on potential popularity.
A good manager is someone who values empathy, humility, and selflessness. They support, motivate, and elevate their colleagues. However, at the same time, no manager is able to read minds (at least, not yet!). Workers also have the responsibility to communicate with their superiors in a timely manner. Management needs to know what resources, tools, and working conditions they need to get the best results.
The author of the post shared some more details in the comments
Here’s how some internet users reacted. Meanwhile, others even shared similar work stories
Exactly, what the f**k are these ads. I could make a whole a*s book with the amount of ads BP has now
Load More Replies...“bUt If YoU iNcReAsE eXpEnSeS fOr ThE cOmPaNy YoU wILL bE wItHoUt A jOb” hErP dErP . LOL yeah, that’s what is going to put the company out of business. A few percent increase in travel expenses. You can always tell the kids who struggled with math by their comments.
When I had to drive for work, I found I could pay for rental car myself, and mileage paid for everything and I made a few extra dollars. When I spent almost 3 days a week on the road for over a year, I made an extra $200 a week.
Sounds like reason 1 for the company to eliminate such benefits and ENTITLEMENTS. Also hope it was all declared as taxable...
Load More Replies...I would go as far as to let the companies that hire those lazy management who makes those calls, assuming they know it all."lazy" instead going through the policy guidelines with some reading, they would go and loose countless money for their company by being lazy, and yet the company still have them hanging around to do more damage with their laziness.
My husband works administration in our state's department of transportation, which can be pretty sensitive to changes in political office. The current political powers that be want to eliminate the fleet of vehicles that rarely get used. The problem with that is that there is a reason they rarely get used and that's because we go some months and sometimes years without snow, but, when it does snow, those vehicles are essential in administrating safe roadway conditions. They aren't for random travel, they're 4WD vehicles for snow duty. They're still threatening to eliminate the fleet. It could be a very bad winter here if they get their way.
Company I worked for had delivery trucks. Apparently they got someone new in charge of company vehicles, you know the type, smaller engines and smaller vehicles means savings. Fact of the matter is, you can't haul 1/2 a ton of product in a Chevy Aveo or some such POS cracker box car. For the trucks they did buy, they replaced tried and true V6 small pick-ups with 4 cylinder ones. Result? The 4 bangers got at least 4MPG less than their V6 counterparts and of course wore out 4x faster. As for the cracker box cars, They wore out in record time, got less MPG than the V6 trucks, and had astronomically high maintenance costs. Some people never learn that smaller is not always better or more efficient. Those V6 trucks? We used them for 10 years, racked up over 250,000 miles on them. The trucks and cars they've been buying since then? None last more than 2 or 3 years.
Yeah, but they are trying to save money, so this isn't going to work. They'll just remove staff now. Well done guys.
"we had to return the the the fleet company at the end of their leases" Kinda bothers me
I'm just happy these people making far more than all of us still have things to b***h about. Oh noes, you no longer get a free car to help you make six figures gouging everyone for power, how sad for you...it's not even first world problems anymore, it's zero world utopian problems. "I'm so upset they changed the design of these thousand dollar bills, now my stacks of them don't look as good, I have to cry now".
That was the worst article I've read all day. The reddit material was illegible. Are there no editors anymore?
Exactly, what the f**k are these ads. I could make a whole a*s book with the amount of ads BP has now
Load More Replies...“bUt If YoU iNcReAsE eXpEnSeS fOr ThE cOmPaNy YoU wILL bE wItHoUt A jOb” hErP dErP . LOL yeah, that’s what is going to put the company out of business. A few percent increase in travel expenses. You can always tell the kids who struggled with math by their comments.
When I had to drive for work, I found I could pay for rental car myself, and mileage paid for everything and I made a few extra dollars. When I spent almost 3 days a week on the road for over a year, I made an extra $200 a week.
Sounds like reason 1 for the company to eliminate such benefits and ENTITLEMENTS. Also hope it was all declared as taxable...
Load More Replies...I would go as far as to let the companies that hire those lazy management who makes those calls, assuming they know it all."lazy" instead going through the policy guidelines with some reading, they would go and loose countless money for their company by being lazy, and yet the company still have them hanging around to do more damage with their laziness.
My husband works administration in our state's department of transportation, which can be pretty sensitive to changes in political office. The current political powers that be want to eliminate the fleet of vehicles that rarely get used. The problem with that is that there is a reason they rarely get used and that's because we go some months and sometimes years without snow, but, when it does snow, those vehicles are essential in administrating safe roadway conditions. They aren't for random travel, they're 4WD vehicles for snow duty. They're still threatening to eliminate the fleet. It could be a very bad winter here if they get their way.
Company I worked for had delivery trucks. Apparently they got someone new in charge of company vehicles, you know the type, smaller engines and smaller vehicles means savings. Fact of the matter is, you can't haul 1/2 a ton of product in a Chevy Aveo or some such POS cracker box car. For the trucks they did buy, they replaced tried and true V6 small pick-ups with 4 cylinder ones. Result? The 4 bangers got at least 4MPG less than their V6 counterparts and of course wore out 4x faster. As for the cracker box cars, They wore out in record time, got less MPG than the V6 trucks, and had astronomically high maintenance costs. Some people never learn that smaller is not always better or more efficient. Those V6 trucks? We used them for 10 years, racked up over 250,000 miles on them. The trucks and cars they've been buying since then? None last more than 2 or 3 years.
Yeah, but they are trying to save money, so this isn't going to work. They'll just remove staff now. Well done guys.
"we had to return the the the fleet company at the end of their leases" Kinda bothers me
I'm just happy these people making far more than all of us still have things to b***h about. Oh noes, you no longer get a free car to help you make six figures gouging everyone for power, how sad for you...it's not even first world problems anymore, it's zero world utopian problems. "I'm so upset they changed the design of these thousand dollar bills, now my stacks of them don't look as good, I have to cry now".
That was the worst article I've read all day. The reddit material was illegible. Are there no editors anymore?















































78
15