Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Man Expects Wife To Raise Two Kids He Hid From Her For 3 Years, Gets Served With Divorce Papers
Man Expects Wife To Raise Two Kids He Hid From Her For 3 Years, Gets Served With Divorce Papers
3.2K

Man Expects Wife To Raise Two Kids He Hid From Her For 3 Years, Gets Served With Divorce Papers

108

ADVERTISEMENT

Those looking for a long-term relationship often discuss (not) having children in the somewhat early stages of dating. That in no way means that one should start planning a family with a person they’ve been on three dates with; but having at least a brief conversation about it some more dates later might be a good idea.

That’s because people might have different expectations and it’s important for a couple to be on the same page if they want things to last. Unfortunately, for this redditor they didn’t, as her husband revealed he has two kids, which was something she never wanted herself.

RELATED:

    When in a serious relationship, it might be necessary to discuss certain important matters, such as (not) wanting children

    Image credits:  oneinchpunchphotos (not the actual photo)

    This child-free woman said she will divorce her husband if he fights for custody of his two kids he kept secret

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: u/InitiativeDramatic11

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Jena Backus (not the actual photo)

    The number of people who don’t expect to have children is seemingly on the rise

    Nowadays, the idea of having children seems to be less appealing to adults than it used to be. Research suggests that fewer of them expect to have kids in their lifetime than before, and nearly 22% of the US adult population are choosing to be child-free. It’s important to note that unlike childless, the term child-free refers to people who explicitly don’t wish to have children, such as the OP, who clearly stated that she didn’t.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The research suggested that child-free people tend to face a set of challenges, as they might be viewed a certain way at work (for instance, their time might be considered “less valuable”, because they don’t have any little ones to rush home to), or have to deal with stigmatization and negative stereotypes from other adults both with and without children.

    Researchers have delved deeper into where such stigmatization comes from and found that its main source is moral outrage over violating certain social roles and other stereotypic expectations. The expert leading the study, associate professor of psychology at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Leslie Ashburn-Nardo, pointed out that “not having children is seen not only as atypical, or surprising, but also as morally wrong”.

    Image credits: Andre Furtado (not the actual photo)

    “Participants [in the study] rated voluntarily child-free men and women as significantly less fulfilled than men and women with children,” Ashburn-Nardo commented. “This effect was driven primarily by feelings of moral outrage—anger, disapproval and disgust—toward the voluntarily child-free people.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Despite all the stigmatization and negative comments—as well as attempts to convince them they will change their minds—child-free people have their mind made up and typically are not planning on changing it. It seems like the OP is one of such people, as she has not only made up her mind, but taken action about it, too, by undergoing sterilization. As a matter of fact, sterilization is reportedly the most common contraceptive method among women in the US, based on 2017-2019 data.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    In the OP’s case, there was more at play than the matter of raising children

    But in the OP’s situation, stigmatization or comments about the decision to be child-free weren’t the problem; it was the fact that her husband hid something as significant as already having had children from her.

    Image credits: Anna Shvets (not the actual photo)

    A survey of over 2,000 UK married couples, conducted by a UK family law firm, found that roughly one-in-five people keep a major secret from their spouse, Huffington Post reports. The head of family law at the firm, Amanda McAlister, pointed out that people often think it’s many little things that end a marriage; but in reality, “It’s normally the case that one lie or one secret is the undoing of the whole marriage.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    There might be many reasons people choose to keep secrets in their relationships, though, from shame and embarrassment—which seem to be the main ones, according to some research—to trying to safeguard themselves and the relationship. In the OP’s case, it’s unclear why the husband chose to keep such a secret—and for so long, too—but the cat that got out of the bag was simply too big for the redditor to ignore.

    The OP provided more details in the comments

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Fellow redditors didn’t think she was a [jerk] in this situation

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Some time later, the redditor posted an update, revealing she was divorcing her husband

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Miglė Miliūtė

    Miglė Miliūtė

    Writer, Community member

    Read more »

    A writer here at Bored Panda, I am a lover of good music, good food, and good company, which makes food-related topics and feel-good stories my favorite ones to cover. Passionate about traveling and concerts, I constantly seek occasions to visit places yet personally unexplored. I also enjoy spending free time outdoors, trying out different sports—even if I don’t look too graceful at it—or socializing over a cup of coffee.

    Read less »
    Miglė Miliūtė

    Miglė Miliūtė

    Writer, Community member

    A writer here at Bored Panda, I am a lover of good music, good food, and good company, which makes food-related topics and feel-good stories my favorite ones to cover. Passionate about traveling and concerts, I constantly seek occasions to visit places yet personally unexplored. I also enjoy spending free time outdoors, trying out different sports—even if I don’t look too graceful at it—or socializing over a cup of coffee.

    What do you think ?
    Tamra
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Wow. So he lied about having children, then admits he only wants custody so that he can have extra money, then tells her she needs to "step up" despite her adamant no-kids stance. This guy is useless.

    Libstak
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If he thinks he can have more money and more fun while having the kids 50% of the time he plans to utterly neglect them. He is pond scum.

    Load More Replies...
    Funhog
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Aside from the obvious (that his deceit is reason enough for OP to dump this loser), in what world does this guy think that it is morally right -- and less expensive -- to take in 2 minor children for half the time in order to reduce/eliminate his child support expenses so that he has more fun money for himself? Clearly he would take them in with the intention of providing the bare minimum for their care. Also, he seems to be fine with sloughing off their care and expenses onto OP. Yuck! Good on OP for dumping him and getting the marriage annulled!

    Sonja
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Because he planned for OP to pay for them, house them and feed them when he had them, oh and care for them too. So just as you say, planning to slouch the expenses onto OP

    Load More Replies...
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Tabitha
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He waited until he had “trapped” with the marriage so she would have to be his kids’ babysitter while he took the extra cash he no longer had to pay for child support to go off and have fun while she looked after the kids, the house, and everything else. I will bet you anything if she’d stayed married to him any longer than divorced him, that he would try to get half of what she has, or at least a huge chunk. Dumbass didn’t realize he’d married a strong and independent woman who won’t let herself be trapped or let him take half of everything she has. She is lucky he sprang this on her before the ink was dry on their marriage license, so she could have it annulled and cut him loose.

    Monica G
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    She had a prenup. I guess annullment is simpler than divorce. I wonder if he put in writting that he has no children.

    Load More Replies...
    Gabriele Alfredo Pini
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    A lie so big that will render null a Catholic marriage...

    Trillian
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So he lied to her about something that fundamental and only wants the kids in his life bc he thinks he can save money and have more "fun" that way. Duuuuuuuuude. She should divorce him for that alone, no matter the custody decision.

    Alethea Fletcher
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm impressed that she is able to have the marriage annulled, due to it happening while she was being defrauded, by her 'husband', over unknown children. I do hope she finds someone amazing in her future that she can trust, and treats her with love and respect.

    Amy Foley Clark
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Now he won’t want the kids without her to take care of them. What a POS.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He married a woman who was upfront about not wanting children - and he thought he could use her as a babysitter?

    Load More Replies...
    Deborah B
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't get how he thinks he would save money by having the children for 50% of the time? Does he think that means no child support? (spoiler alert: not unless his ex makes the same or more money than him) He hasn't been part of their lives at any point in the last 3 years or longer, why would he even be granted custody in the first place. This guy is clearly an a*****e, a liar, and a fool, and OP is wise to kick him to the curb.

    Rachele Stoops
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Sometimes they feel better about actually paying direct expenses than handing over money to the ex.

    Load More Replies...
    Ash
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So glad she got out. "Hey, I'm going to dump my kids on you constantly and I want to have more fun money. I don't have to pay as much and I STILL don't have to take care of my kids! Also, you're an AH if you say no." WTAF. Delighted she can annul it as an act of fraud. He married her to have a live-in babysitter.

    LH25
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    No, she's not the AH. But those poor kids. I hope this is a false story, but can sadly believe it's not. Maybe she should help the mom keep custody by telling what she knows.

    Load More Comments
    Tamra
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Wow. So he lied about having children, then admits he only wants custody so that he can have extra money, then tells her she needs to "step up" despite her adamant no-kids stance. This guy is useless.

    Libstak
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    If he thinks he can have more money and more fun while having the kids 50% of the time he plans to utterly neglect them. He is pond scum.

    Load More Replies...
    Funhog
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Aside from the obvious (that his deceit is reason enough for OP to dump this loser), in what world does this guy think that it is morally right -- and less expensive -- to take in 2 minor children for half the time in order to reduce/eliminate his child support expenses so that he has more fun money for himself? Clearly he would take them in with the intention of providing the bare minimum for their care. Also, he seems to be fine with sloughing off their care and expenses onto OP. Yuck! Good on OP for dumping him and getting the marriage annulled!

    Sonja
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Because he planned for OP to pay for them, house them and feed them when he had them, oh and care for them too. So just as you say, planning to slouch the expenses onto OP

    Load More Replies...
    ADVERTISEMENT
    Tabitha
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He waited until he had “trapped” with the marriage so she would have to be his kids’ babysitter while he took the extra cash he no longer had to pay for child support to go off and have fun while she looked after the kids, the house, and everything else. I will bet you anything if she’d stayed married to him any longer than divorced him, that he would try to get half of what she has, or at least a huge chunk. Dumbass didn’t realize he’d married a strong and independent woman who won’t let herself be trapped or let him take half of everything she has. She is lucky he sprang this on her before the ink was dry on their marriage license, so she could have it annulled and cut him loose.

    Monica G
    Community Member
    1 year ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    She had a prenup. I guess annullment is simpler than divorce. I wonder if he put in writting that he has no children.

    Load More Replies...
    Gabriele Alfredo Pini
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    A lie so big that will render null a Catholic marriage...

    Trillian
    Community Member
    2 years ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So he lied to her about something that fundamental and only wants the kids in his life bc he thinks he can save money and have more "fun" that way. Duuuuuuuuude. She should divorce him for that alone, no matter the custody decision.

    Alethea Fletcher
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I'm impressed that she is able to have the marriage annulled, due to it happening while she was being defrauded, by her 'husband', over unknown children. I do hope she finds someone amazing in her future that she can trust, and treats her with love and respect.

    Amy Foley Clark
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Now he won’t want the kids without her to take care of them. What a POS.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He married a woman who was upfront about not wanting children - and he thought he could use her as a babysitter?

    Load More Replies...
    Deborah B
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I don't get how he thinks he would save money by having the children for 50% of the time? Does he think that means no child support? (spoiler alert: not unless his ex makes the same or more money than him) He hasn't been part of their lives at any point in the last 3 years or longer, why would he even be granted custody in the first place. This guy is clearly an a*****e, a liar, and a fool, and OP is wise to kick him to the curb.

    Rachele Stoops
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Sometimes they feel better about actually paying direct expenses than handing over money to the ex.

    Load More Replies...
    Ash
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    So glad she got out. "Hey, I'm going to dump my kids on you constantly and I want to have more fun money. I don't have to pay as much and I STILL don't have to take care of my kids! Also, you're an AH if you say no." WTAF. Delighted she can annul it as an act of fraud. He married her to have a live-in babysitter.

    LH25
    Community Member
    2 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    No, she's not the AH. But those poor kids. I hope this is a false story, but can sadly believe it's not. Maybe she should help the mom keep custody by telling what she knows.

    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT