Server Refuses To Let Autistic Woman Off The Hook, Asks Her To Pay For Food, Her Husband Gets Mad
Let’s be real, you’ve met at least one entitled person, if not a few. You know the type – people who strut through life thinking the whole world owes them a favor and, if you dare question them, there’s almost always drama around the corner.
One server working at an all-hours restaurant, recently turned to an online community to share his story about an autistic customer who refused to pay for her meal because she’d had a panic attack. When he explained to her that’s not how it works, she flipped.
More info: Reddit
Entitled people can make life miserable for everyone, but sometimes they get a reality check that stops them dead in their tracks
Image credits: artursafronovvvv / Freepik (not the actual photo)
A server working at an all-hours restaurant served a couple in their 30s drinks, then took their food order, which was a bit complicated because the woman was autistic
Image credits: DC Studio / Freepik (not the actual photo)
About twenty minutes later, the guy flagged down the server to say his wife was having a panic attack and they had pay for their drinks and leave fast
Image credits: Drazen Zigic / Freepik (not the actual photo)
When the server went to cancel the couple’s food order, however, he discovered that it was already prepared, so he told the couple he’d box it to go
Image credits: just-another-gringo
The woman said she wasn’t going to eat it and refused to pay, so the server had to give her a reality check, but asked netizens if refusing to comp the meal was a jerk move
The original poster (OP), a server working a late-night shift, was approached by a couple in their 30s around 2 a.m. The husband mentioned his wife was autistic and needed all her food served separately. When she ordered a kids’ meal, OP explained restaurant policy: adults could order the same items, just at a slightly higher price.
As the kitchen worked through a busy homecoming rush, the husband flagged OP down 20 minutes later. Apparently, his wife was having a panic attack, and they needed to pay for their drinks and leave. Their food, however, was already prepared, so OP quickly arranged to have it boxed up so they could take it to go.
But the woman insisted she couldn’t eat due to her panic attack and refused to pay. OP apologized but explained that once food is cooked, customers are still responsible for the bill. He even offered to comp their drinks. The woman insisted that the restaurant should’ve recognized her medical episode, but OP held firm.
The next day, corporate got a complaint accusing OP of discrimination, but he stood by his actions, saying he treated the customer the same as any other guest. Even though his manager backed him up, he’s now left wondering if enforcing policy was the right call, or whether compassion should have come before the rules?
To be honest, folks in the service industry have to deal with all kinds of customers (and let’s be real, their not-so-fair share of difficult ones) so it’s not surprising OP stuck to the restaurant’s rules. But did the autistic woman deserve more empathy, or was she just acting entitled? We went looking for answers.
Image credits: karlyukav / Freepik (not the actual photo)
The Autism Speaks website says that sensory issues are common in people with autism. They can experience both hypersensitivity (over-responsiveness) and hyposensitivity (under-responsiveness) to a wide range of stimuli, and most people have a combo of both.
The folks over at Autism Today say sensory overload happens when an intense sensory stimulus overwhelms your ability to cope. This can be triggered by a single event, like an unexpected loud noise, or it can build up over time.
According to those in the know, sensory overload can feel like crushing anxiety, combined with a need to escape the situation or having difficulty communicating. Sounds a lot like OP’s customer, right? Except for the fact that she had no problem arguing with him about paying the bill – not exactly a hallmark of a full-blown panic attack.
Now that corporate has provided some clarity on how to handle these kinds of situations, OP can hopefully dodge any similar drama in future. Because the last thing he needs is to find himself caught in the middle of a discrimination lawsuit just for following company policy to the letter.
What would you have done if you’d found yourself in OP’s shoes? Do you think he did the right thing, or should he have let the couple leave without paying? Share your thoughts in the comments!
In the comments, readers seemed to agree that the server had not been the jerk in the situation and that the customer sounded like a nightmare with an enabling husband
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Absolutely NTA. I'm fed up to the eyeballs with ''autism'' being used as a fkn excuse for EVERYTHING >.<
I wouldn’t say panic attack, or even autism. 2 am? That’s when bars close in most places, so my best guess is drunk and belligerent, not autistic and having panic attacks.
People don't rationally argue about a bill when they have a panic attack. Now, maybe she felt the panic attack was imminent and had to leave before it actually came on, but it doesn't sound like that's the case. Anyway, this has absolutely nothing to do with autism. It has to do with panic attacks. I suspect it's what you say, or it was a scam, or they're just super self-entitled people.
Load More Replies...I'm sorry, how is your incompetence in handling public life anyone else's problem but your own? Just like everybody else, when you order food, you have to pay for it. The delusional entitlement here is stunning. If you can't cope, I sympathize, but you still have to pay for your food that you oredered.
Yeah, he was right to do so. Nowadays it seems like everyone is on the spectrum, just for the comps. Disgusting
There are VERY FEW COMPS. Pretty much none for most people. There are a lot more autistic people because they folded Asperger's into Autism Spectrum Disorder, and more people trained to diagnose, so they are diagnosing people who got missed in the past. But if you think most people (you said "everyone") somehow got a professional to diagnose them "just for the comps", you are just flat out wrong. Because there are no comps. And most people, autistic or not, would agree that this woman should have had to pay for her food. (And it was about a panic attack, not autism.)
Load More Replies...I'd say "Sorry ma'am, entitlement is not a disability." Entitlement is the problem, not her autism and panic attacks. I have a chronic ilness and mental health problems so I sometimes have to cancel activities too. So part of the time I pay for something and have to leave before I get to enjoy it. You just factor that in beforehand: if I have to leave 50% of the time, 1 dinner on average costs twice as much. And sometimes you come to the conclusion that it's not worth going, because it gets too expensive when you have to cancel often. And that is heartbreaking. But that's my burden to carry, not the restaurant. You can ask as a favor if they can cancel parts of the order that they haven't started preparing yet. But once they started preparing, they have made costs, and it's not fair for them to not get paid for the ingredients and the work they've put in.
Panic attacks suck. Been there, done that, got the tee-shirt, etc -- as I'm sure many of us have also. However, no way in hell is that an excuse not to pay. NTA. Of course the higher-ups would say "just comp the customer!" because they're not actually at the coal-face *dealing* with them. It should be mandatory for anyone above manager position/in an HR role to work in a store for a month (minimum) so they can get an actual idea of what their staff have to deal with day to day.
She can take it with her and eat it later. If I order too much or the portion is too large, I take it with me for later.
I never understood the brevity of a panic attack until I had my first (and thankfully only) panic attack last year. They're not a little bit of hyperventilating and I would certainly have not come out of it to argue about a bill less than 5 minutes later. So on this occasion, I am calling b******t. I wonder if they could try this with a pizza delivery...?
Absolutely NTA. I'm fed up to the eyeballs with ''autism'' being used as a fkn excuse for EVERYTHING >.<
I wouldn’t say panic attack, or even autism. 2 am? That’s when bars close in most places, so my best guess is drunk and belligerent, not autistic and having panic attacks.
People don't rationally argue about a bill when they have a panic attack. Now, maybe she felt the panic attack was imminent and had to leave before it actually came on, but it doesn't sound like that's the case. Anyway, this has absolutely nothing to do with autism. It has to do with panic attacks. I suspect it's what you say, or it was a scam, or they're just super self-entitled people.
Load More Replies...I'm sorry, how is your incompetence in handling public life anyone else's problem but your own? Just like everybody else, when you order food, you have to pay for it. The delusional entitlement here is stunning. If you can't cope, I sympathize, but you still have to pay for your food that you oredered.
Yeah, he was right to do so. Nowadays it seems like everyone is on the spectrum, just for the comps. Disgusting
There are VERY FEW COMPS. Pretty much none for most people. There are a lot more autistic people because they folded Asperger's into Autism Spectrum Disorder, and more people trained to diagnose, so they are diagnosing people who got missed in the past. But if you think most people (you said "everyone") somehow got a professional to diagnose them "just for the comps", you are just flat out wrong. Because there are no comps. And most people, autistic or not, would agree that this woman should have had to pay for her food. (And it was about a panic attack, not autism.)
Load More Replies...I'd say "Sorry ma'am, entitlement is not a disability." Entitlement is the problem, not her autism and panic attacks. I have a chronic ilness and mental health problems so I sometimes have to cancel activities too. So part of the time I pay for something and have to leave before I get to enjoy it. You just factor that in beforehand: if I have to leave 50% of the time, 1 dinner on average costs twice as much. And sometimes you come to the conclusion that it's not worth going, because it gets too expensive when you have to cancel often. And that is heartbreaking. But that's my burden to carry, not the restaurant. You can ask as a favor if they can cancel parts of the order that they haven't started preparing yet. But once they started preparing, they have made costs, and it's not fair for them to not get paid for the ingredients and the work they've put in.
Panic attacks suck. Been there, done that, got the tee-shirt, etc -- as I'm sure many of us have also. However, no way in hell is that an excuse not to pay. NTA. Of course the higher-ups would say "just comp the customer!" because they're not actually at the coal-face *dealing* with them. It should be mandatory for anyone above manager position/in an HR role to work in a store for a month (minimum) so they can get an actual idea of what their staff have to deal with day to day.
She can take it with her and eat it later. If I order too much or the portion is too large, I take it with me for later.
I never understood the brevity of a panic attack until I had my first (and thankfully only) panic attack last year. They're not a little bit of hyperventilating and I would certainly have not come out of it to argue about a bill less than 5 minutes later. So on this occasion, I am calling b******t. I wonder if they could try this with a pizza delivery...?































29
24