Should airlines be charging passengers based on their weight? According to Fox News, that is the one million dollar question many companies are now debating.
In 2013, Samoa Air first introduced something they called ‘fat tax,’ where passengers paid according to their weight. However, this wasn’t very popular and died down quickly.
- Airlines may be considering implementing weight-based charges for passengers.
- A heated debate was sparked online following the news, surrounding health and discrimination.
- Plus-size influencers advocated for bigger seats, while others said airlines should not have to accomodate their bodies.
Eleven years later, Finnair decided to expand its weight data collection initiative in February 2024. How it worked was that customers voluntarily weighed themselves along with their carry-on luggage at Helsinki Airport. It took place over three months and applied to both short flights and long haul flights.
Airline companies may start charging passenger based on their weight
Image credits: jaebaeproductions
All data remained anonymous, with only age, gender, and travel class being revealed. This information will then be used to “update the airline’s aircraft balance and loading calculations for the period from 2025 to 2030,” wrote the outlet.
Now, there is growing interest in weight-based strategies.
A recent study asked 1,012 U.S. adults for their opinion on charging based on weight. There were three options: a regular fee with a set luggage limit, a ‘weight threshold’ where those who weighed over 160 pounds would pay extra, and a ‘body weight’ model where tickets would depend on someone’s weight.
According to the results, lighter passengers found this to be more favourable than heavier passengers, who preferred the current system. Although, the latter group was still open to the idea.
Image credits: graciebon
But if we migrate over to social media, we’ll find that this option is being heavily debated.
Many influencers were against any changes, sharing their own experiences while traveling.
“Buying two airplane seats don’t fix my problem,” said one person. “Airplanes are too small for big people. It’s 2024 — bodies are changing. So, planes should too.”
Another woman named Jaelynn Chaney, who launched her own petition, claimed, “My body isn’t the problem. The system is. When you’re forced to buy two seats or squeeze into a space that wasn’t designed for your body, it’s not just inconvenient, it’s dehumanizing. This isn’t a luxury — it’s a basic human right to travel with dignity.”
Plus-size influencers shared their experiences traveling, saying they deserved bigger seats without having to pay extra
View this post on Instagram
Nearly 40,000 people have signed her petition at the time of writing, with Chaney’s next goal reaching 50K.
“Demand for the FAA to Protect Plus-Size Travelers,” she wrote with the hashtag reading #BodyEqualityinTravel.
She claimed she and her partner have had unfortunate experiences of “discrimination and discomfort” while on a plane. Her husband was allegedly the subject of many hateful comments and disapproving looks.
Image credits: graciebon
“People with smaller bodies get to pay one fare to get to their destination,” Chaney, who is a size 6XL, said to CNN Travel. “And we have to pay two fares, even though we’re getting the same experience. If anything, our experiences are a little bit more challenging.”
But many of those who watched her video were not in agreement with her solution.
“Stop right there,” said one user. “It’s time to take responsibility for your own life instead of expecting the world to change because you’ve chosen to weigh over 200kg. Your situation is a direct consequence of your choices — just like smokers, alcoholics, and drug users, who also face restrictions and limitations.
“When our luggage exceeds the weight limit, we simply pay the extra fee — we don’t complain or make viral videos about it. So either pay for the additional seats or stop complaining.”
Other netizens, however, didn’t think ‘bigger seats’ was the best solution
Image credits: graciebon
Another stated, “ACCESSIBILITY IS FOR THOSE WHOSE BODIES HAVE FAILED THEM, NOT FOR THOSE WHO FAILED THEIR BODIES! I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again as many times as I have to.”
A plus-sized passenger also weighed in on the issue, writing, “I HATE HATE HATE these videos. As a plus size person, I’ve had to use seat belt extenders in the past. This is a me problem. This is not an airline problem.
“It is NOBODY ELSES RESPONSIBILITY to cater to YOU!!!!! It’s f–cking absurd.”
View this post on Instagram
A fourth recalled, “What’s not fair is that someone else will have paid the full price for the seat next to you but will only get half of it. I’ve experienced this. I was between two large people. No consideration from them.
“One fell asleep and leaned on me even more. It was the worst flight of my life. Your selfish attitude creates the responses that you’re getting.”
One plus-sized passenger even advocated against the influencers
Image credits: jaebaeproductions
Image credits: jaebaeproductions
While no new policies regarding weight have been set, many airlines are considering the ethical and environmental implications of weight-based pricing.
As said by Fox News, climate researchers suggest that this kind of model could “significantly reduce carbon emissions by creating a more direct correlation between passenger weight and fuel consumption.”
Experts have calculated that every additional pound on an airplane increases fuel burn. Some estimates say a reduction of 1% in total aircraft weight may lead to around 0.75% fuel savings.
View this post on Instagram
However, there are technologies that are emerging, such as advanced lightweight materials and more fuel-efficient aircraft designs, that can potentially remove weight-based pricing while simultaneously reducing aviation’s carbon footprint.
“It should be double the cost,” claimed one comment
Image credits: adamfrancisco_
Image credits: ChazSmith
Image credits: truck29144
Image credits: Nava2L8
Image credits: PolarCdn74
Image credits: BarkosBite
Image credits: DesireeAmerica4
Image credits: Old_SchoolEddie
Image credits: DrSyedHaider
Image credits: PatriciaLedoux9
Image credits: smh_sol
Image credits: MaryAnne4ever
Image credits: brown_enzo20834
Image credits: MikRockHill
Image credits: KnaughtyKnancy
Image credits: MihaiF89
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
Its a fad that she will not appreciate having done, when she's older that's for sure
Load More Replies...Physics means more weight = more cost. Truth = more space for you = less space for someone else. Reality = life is unfair. Taller people can play basketball. Shorter people are better gymnasts. Tiny people should be allowed more baggage, because they cost less to fly, and they take up less space in seats, so they are more comfortable in the available space. There's a counterpoint to that. If you weight twice as much, and you take up twice as much width, ..... reality bites.
I would also say as a tall person, I would obviously like more leg room so I take it upon myself to buy the extra legroom…
Load More Replies...Miss BBL needs to pay for three seats, not two, her choice, not genetics or health.
just pay for two seats and there would be no problem. If you are so big that you take up somebody else seat you can´t have both. ' If you think your size is going to incontinence somebody else talk to the airplane company before you leave for your trip. This looks like made up drama for social media.
"Incontinence someone"? Don't you mean inconvenience? Also: if I pay for a seat on an airplane - or bus, or train - I want that whole seat, not someone's overflow. I realize some people have medical issues that affect their weight, but that is still their problem, not mine.
Load More Replies...Charging based on weight doesn't solve the problem of seats that don't fit them, or the person next to them not being able to use their full seat. How could any customer support this?
Obese people should have to buy business class tickets just like tall people who require the extra legroom.
Load More Replies...I'm with the guy who stated a policy fact - airlines charge extra for additional leg room. Height is not a choice, therefore if anyone is being discriminated against, it's tall people. Obese people can't use discrimination as an argument since their weight is due to their bad choices.
Sure il get downvotes. But they want airlines to spend millions to accommodate their surgery for big butt's. And you are only the size of that other lady because you stuff 1000s of calories daily. Not funny
To be fair, i believe the lady in white says people _should_ buy 2 seats.
Load More Replies...The problem here is that the airlines did have a solution and then refused to use it. They don't like to fly half empty planes, so they reduce the number of routes so that the planes will fly full. Then they overbook the flights to make sure they're full. Then they tell people who are overweight to buy two seats. Then if they buy two seats, the flight is overfull, they give the other seat to someone else - who paid full price and isn't even going to get a full seat now, while the person who is overweight and actually bought two seats is going to get a refund and spend the trip jammed into a seat and get told that they should have bought two when, in fact, they already did that.
Its a fad that she will not appreciate having done, when she's older that's for sure
Load More Replies...Physics means more weight = more cost. Truth = more space for you = less space for someone else. Reality = life is unfair. Taller people can play basketball. Shorter people are better gymnasts. Tiny people should be allowed more baggage, because they cost less to fly, and they take up less space in seats, so they are more comfortable in the available space. There's a counterpoint to that. If you weight twice as much, and you take up twice as much width, ..... reality bites.
I would also say as a tall person, I would obviously like more leg room so I take it upon myself to buy the extra legroom…
Load More Replies...Miss BBL needs to pay for three seats, not two, her choice, not genetics or health.
just pay for two seats and there would be no problem. If you are so big that you take up somebody else seat you can´t have both. ' If you think your size is going to incontinence somebody else talk to the airplane company before you leave for your trip. This looks like made up drama for social media.
"Incontinence someone"? Don't you mean inconvenience? Also: if I pay for a seat on an airplane - or bus, or train - I want that whole seat, not someone's overflow. I realize some people have medical issues that affect their weight, but that is still their problem, not mine.
Load More Replies...Charging based on weight doesn't solve the problem of seats that don't fit them, or the person next to them not being able to use their full seat. How could any customer support this?
Obese people should have to buy business class tickets just like tall people who require the extra legroom.
Load More Replies...I'm with the guy who stated a policy fact - airlines charge extra for additional leg room. Height is not a choice, therefore if anyone is being discriminated against, it's tall people. Obese people can't use discrimination as an argument since their weight is due to their bad choices.
Sure il get downvotes. But they want airlines to spend millions to accommodate their surgery for big butt's. And you are only the size of that other lady because you stuff 1000s of calories daily. Not funny
To be fair, i believe the lady in white says people _should_ buy 2 seats.
Load More Replies...The problem here is that the airlines did have a solution and then refused to use it. They don't like to fly half empty planes, so they reduce the number of routes so that the planes will fly full. Then they overbook the flights to make sure they're full. Then they tell people who are overweight to buy two seats. Then if they buy two seats, the flight is overfull, they give the other seat to someone else - who paid full price and isn't even going to get a full seat now, while the person who is overweight and actually bought two seats is going to get a refund and spend the trip jammed into a seat and get told that they should have bought two when, in fact, they already did that.























27
152