Someone Optimized Famous Logos To Use Less Ink And Be More Environmentally Friendly – What Do You Think?

I blame the players and the game. I think its very unwise to give your money to a company that contributes to the cutting down of the rainforest. I also blame the press for not educating the masses (cause mcdonalds pays there salaries in advertisements). and I blame the company's for the direct impact they have on our natural world. I mean you could say if we don't do it the next company will, but that doesn't mean they are not responsible. I mean where do you draw the line, is it okay to kill if someone else will do it if you don't? surely not, no judge would ever see it as justification. I think its the same for making a species go extinct because you pay for the deforestation of a big part of the amazon. That doesn't mean though that we don't need better laws and regulations to stop the cutting. I once heard that we could have saved the rainforest if we had put all the money from the Iraq war into saving the rainforest. Just imagine the diference, no Isis and save lungs of the earth

Gloria you are wrong. McDonald's in France/Belgium is an independent branch from the USA one (it's the only independent branch). They did so because they didn't want to be forced to use USA products that are full of GMOs and hormones. On top of that, they decided to introduce a lot of environment friendly measures like banning plastic spoons, banning the mandatory 12 straws they gave before, replacing plastic cups by cardboard cups etc. This is a shame to NOT blame McDonald's for purposely refusing to make an effort. As a consumer, you barely have any effect on the profit of McDonald's since their main profit is made through franchising and not selling. And franchising won't stop because people will always invest in cheap food. That's why McDonald's is not as much popular in Europe, because it remains expensive (5-15 euros for a menu).