Gay Woman Inherits Summer House, Causes Uproar By Not Letting Her Conservative Family Use It For Free For Weddings
Recently, a 28-year-old woman’s story caught everyone’s attention on the AITA subreddit. “So I am a 28-year-old woman, I am gay (important to the story). Now my mother is a single mother, she comes from a big conservative Christian family,” the author wrote.
The author wrote that after her mom had her at 16, they lived with the grandparents until her mother at age 25 came out as gay. “That was the limit for my grandfather and he disowned my mother and my mom cut all contact with her family.”
The woman lost her closest ones to Covid, and she inherited the family’s summerhouse from her grandma who wanted to make it up as much as she could before she died, too.
Now, the other relatives have reached out to the author expecting to have their wedding there for free but that’s not what the new house owner wanted.
The woman asks if she was wrong to refuse to let her estranged relatives have a free wedding at the family house she inherited
Image credits: Aubrey Odom-Mabey (not the actual photo)
Image credits: Liza Summer (not the actual photo)
Image credits: throwawaygayhouse200
Family members fighting over inheritance is as old as history itself. Recent research found that there has been an increase in inheritance disputes reported annually since 1985. One of the authors, professor Stephan Köppe explained that there are four main reasons why relatives go to court and they include sibling rivalry, the legacy of divorce, owning a business, and wealth.
“Drawing from our court case examples, families should follow a few simple rules. Open and honest communication is essential. In many cultures, it is taboo to talk openly about death, but communicating your intentions and expectations during your lifetime will reduce stress and the possibility of unwelcome surprises for your loved ones,” prof. Köppe wrote in The Conversation.
Another key thing, according to prof. Köppe, keeping your promises is key. “In other words, don’t change your will at the last minute on your deathbed – this can be easily challenged in court.”
And finally, children who fear being left out should seek constructive, non-confrontational conversations during the lifetime of their parents. Prof. Köppe argues that building such mutual expectations during the lifetime is quintessential.
The author provided some more background information about the whole situation in the comments 
Many people showed their support for the author and said that she was right
Others, however, had a different opinion that they shared below
Explore more of these tags
If the cousin had a lifelong dream, she should have picked up the phone and talked to the owner so that she could work out the logistics.
Yup. OP isn't saying, "No, you *can't* use the venue, at all," OP's just saying, "You have to pay for it, like any other wedding party. If you're willing to pay, great, we'll set a date, if you're so entitled you think you should get married here for free, then you're gonna be disappointed. Your call."
Load More Replies...Chuckling at the “Oh but FAMILY…” comments and “what grandma would want”. Just because OP is aware of the background doesn’t make these people more than strangers. They had decades to do so, but didn’t bother to reach out to establish a relationship until they wanted something and instead of asking politely, they demanded free access and became hostile when OP said “Not on that date, the house is already booked, but you can pick another date and pay like normal people do.” As for Grandma’s wishes, if she had any, they should have been stated in her will. OP had/has every right to treat her inheritance as she chooses.
I think there is a middle ground here that should have been sought. Something along the lines of 'you pick a date that is NOT booked, and pay the regular but not the wedding price, you pay some sort of insurance, and you can have your wedding there'. If they reject that, that is on them.
Yeah...I wouldn't charge my relatives full price even if I didn't know them, but then again I've never been ostracized by any of my relatives either so I can't accurately empathize with OP.
Load More Replies...So, the family that wanted nothing to do with your mother and you because you're both gay suddenly plays the Family Card because they want something you have? NTA. I'd tell them to get f****d.
I wonder where all OP's relatives were when she and her mom got kicked out of the family home. I say NTA. Her relatives didn't even try and help them when they had the chance. Why should OP give in? My grandmother's house was sold and even though dozens of us grew up in it, we don't get to use it anymore. Heartbreaking, but none of us could afford to keep it in the family. That's just the way it goes sometimes.
From the start, the aunt should have graciously offered to pay the full price and asked when it was available. This graciousness might have caused the niece in turn to offer a discount, maybe even 100%. Instead, the aunt wielded the hammer of entitlement - it must be free and whenever we say - and that hammer smacked her right in the face. After this, I wouldn't let them on the property at any price on any date. Yes, that might remove them from your life entirely, but in baseball trades that's called "addition by subtraction".
Added thought - Hire security for "their" day, or at least forewarn the police. Your "family" might show up and try to force their way in by shear numbers. (Remember : They're scum.)
Load More Replies...Eh. I don't get it. Why is there even a discussion on making money from it, letting them pay etc etc. Bottom line is that this is her house. If a family member I've not met since I was six suddenly says they want to use my house for their wedding and for free, I would tell them where to go. Entitled much? It's just ridiculous. If it belonged to all the family to use and she's just in charge of it, that's different. Her property now, irrelevant of how they have accessed it in the past, it now belongs to her.
Just reverse the situation and ask the conservative family if they would have allowed the gay OP to have a gay wedding there. The answer would be resounding NO. You are NTA!
I feel if the extended family ASKED instead of just assuming they could host the wedding there (already picked a date and made plans without consulting the legal owner), this would be a different case. The OP even made a point to say that the time they wanted was already booked and they could choose another date. I think that was reasonable. If the grandmother had wanted everyone to enjoy it freely, I feel she wouldn't have just gifted it to the one person but had different shares for it made.
Carefully consider confirmation bias. Once a person, especially a family member, wants to embrace or reject you, there's literally no one and nothing that can change their mind. This is why people can't seem to understand the parts of you that have nothing to do with them. Also, we value relationships based on what we're getting out of them, but we often expect others to be far more accomodating of us than we've been to them. The first time you give in to a family member on this matter, that will be the wedge that keeps he door open, because if you did it for one, then you're supposed to do it for the rest of them. You are the one that will create that expectation. If your grandmaother intended for the summerhouse to remain a memories place for the entire family, then that's the arrangements she would have made. I say this having survived some bitter inheritance disappointments myself. The final say of the person awarding the asset is the final say period.
If the cousin had a lifelong dream, she should have picked up the phone and talked to the owner so that she could work out the logistics.
Yup. OP isn't saying, "No, you *can't* use the venue, at all," OP's just saying, "You have to pay for it, like any other wedding party. If you're willing to pay, great, we'll set a date, if you're so entitled you think you should get married here for free, then you're gonna be disappointed. Your call."
Load More Replies...Chuckling at the “Oh but FAMILY…” comments and “what grandma would want”. Just because OP is aware of the background doesn’t make these people more than strangers. They had decades to do so, but didn’t bother to reach out to establish a relationship until they wanted something and instead of asking politely, they demanded free access and became hostile when OP said “Not on that date, the house is already booked, but you can pick another date and pay like normal people do.” As for Grandma’s wishes, if she had any, they should have been stated in her will. OP had/has every right to treat her inheritance as she chooses.
I think there is a middle ground here that should have been sought. Something along the lines of 'you pick a date that is NOT booked, and pay the regular but not the wedding price, you pay some sort of insurance, and you can have your wedding there'. If they reject that, that is on them.
Yeah...I wouldn't charge my relatives full price even if I didn't know them, but then again I've never been ostracized by any of my relatives either so I can't accurately empathize with OP.
Load More Replies...So, the family that wanted nothing to do with your mother and you because you're both gay suddenly plays the Family Card because they want something you have? NTA. I'd tell them to get f****d.
I wonder where all OP's relatives were when she and her mom got kicked out of the family home. I say NTA. Her relatives didn't even try and help them when they had the chance. Why should OP give in? My grandmother's house was sold and even though dozens of us grew up in it, we don't get to use it anymore. Heartbreaking, but none of us could afford to keep it in the family. That's just the way it goes sometimes.
From the start, the aunt should have graciously offered to pay the full price and asked when it was available. This graciousness might have caused the niece in turn to offer a discount, maybe even 100%. Instead, the aunt wielded the hammer of entitlement - it must be free and whenever we say - and that hammer smacked her right in the face. After this, I wouldn't let them on the property at any price on any date. Yes, that might remove them from your life entirely, but in baseball trades that's called "addition by subtraction".
Added thought - Hire security for "their" day, or at least forewarn the police. Your "family" might show up and try to force their way in by shear numbers. (Remember : They're scum.)
Load More Replies...Eh. I don't get it. Why is there even a discussion on making money from it, letting them pay etc etc. Bottom line is that this is her house. If a family member I've not met since I was six suddenly says they want to use my house for their wedding and for free, I would tell them where to go. Entitled much? It's just ridiculous. If it belonged to all the family to use and she's just in charge of it, that's different. Her property now, irrelevant of how they have accessed it in the past, it now belongs to her.
Just reverse the situation and ask the conservative family if they would have allowed the gay OP to have a gay wedding there. The answer would be resounding NO. You are NTA!
I feel if the extended family ASKED instead of just assuming they could host the wedding there (already picked a date and made plans without consulting the legal owner), this would be a different case. The OP even made a point to say that the time they wanted was already booked and they could choose another date. I think that was reasonable. If the grandmother had wanted everyone to enjoy it freely, I feel she wouldn't have just gifted it to the one person but had different shares for it made.
Carefully consider confirmation bias. Once a person, especially a family member, wants to embrace or reject you, there's literally no one and nothing that can change their mind. This is why people can't seem to understand the parts of you that have nothing to do with them. Also, we value relationships based on what we're getting out of them, but we often expect others to be far more accomodating of us than we've been to them. The first time you give in to a family member on this matter, that will be the wedge that keeps he door open, because if you did it for one, then you're supposed to do it for the rest of them. You are the one that will create that expectation. If your grandmaother intended for the summerhouse to remain a memories place for the entire family, then that's the arrangements she would have made. I say this having survived some bitter inheritance disappointments myself. The final say of the person awarding the asset is the final say period.































98
44