Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
After Target’s Apology Over A Racist Costume Sparked More Backlash, Viola Davis Drops A Scathing Response
Target’s apology over a controversial Halloween costume has failed to quell the backlash, with acclaimed actress and producer Viola Davis now adding her voice to the growing criticism.
The retailer pulled the children’s costume after critics said its black mask, exaggerated grin, and promotional imagery evoked racist Jim Crow-era caricatures.
Highlights
- Viola Davis refused to accept Target’s apology, saying the company failed to understand the “pain” behind the controversial imagery.
- The children’s costume was pulled after critics said its design evoked racist Jim Crow-era caricatures.
- The backlash quickly turned toward Target’s DEI cuts, with critics questioning how the costume made it through multiple review stages.
“I agree with her. This was done on purpose. No company as big as Target should ever do something like this,” one commenter wrote in response to Davis’s statement.
RELATED:
Target pulled the costume after backlash over its striking resemblance to racist caricatures
Target’s controversy centered on its $25 “Kids’ Glows Under Blacklight Circus Clown Halloween Costume,” sold under its Hyde and EEK! Boutique brand.
While marketed as a circus clown costume, critics quickly pointed to several details that made the imagery impossible to separate from racist caricatures.
The costume featured black gloves, a hooded face covering and a small top hat, while the mask displayed an exaggerated, wide smile with bright teeth.
The promotional image also showed a young Black boy wearing the costume.
Critics argued that the combination of the black face covering, exaggerated grin, gloves, and styling echoed imagery associated with blackface and minstrel shows rather than an ordinary Halloween clown.
The promotional pose became another major point of criticism.
Commenters questioned why the child had been photographed with one arm and one leg raised, saying the pose intensified comparisons to historical caricatures of Black people.
“Crazy part is they had him doing the pose and everything. Why would he not just stand straight up????? Also why his parents let him do that???” one commenter wrote.
Viola Davis rejected Target’s apology with a blunt message about “pain” and “dehumanization”
Critics questioned how the product, its imagery, and its marketing could all make it through the company’s approval process without someone raising concerns.
Target ultimately removed the costume from sale and issued a public apology after the backlash intensified.
“As a company, we know we got this wrong, and we are deeply sorry,” the retailer said, acknowledging that the costume was offensive and should never have been part of its assortment.
View this post on Instagram
“We know this is especially hurtful for our black guests, team members, and partners. Removing the costume is an important first step, and the company is looking closely at how this happened and what needs to change to ensure this won’t happen again.”
But the apology did little to end the controversy.
Viola Davis, one of the few entertainers in history to achieve EGOT status, meaning she has won an Emmy, Grammy, Oscar and Tony Award, firmly rejected the idea that the incident was simply a corporate mistake.
On Tuesday, August 25, she directly addressed the retailer on social media, rejecting its apology and questioning whether the company understood the historical significance of the imagery.
She wrote, “Target, I do not accept your apology, and I do not believe that you understand the impact… the pain… the dehumanization of the above. These images laid the foundation and the ideology for every atrocity that has been committed against my people.”
“We MATTER!! You have shown us that you are not on OUR side.”
Target apologized and promised to investigate how the controversial costume made it through its approval process
For Davis, the controversy appeared to go beyond whether the company had made an unfortunate design mistake.
Her words focused on the historical associations of the imagery and the lasting harm caused by representations that dehumanized Black people.
Many social media users echoed Davis’s concerns, criticizing Target for allowing the costume to reach consumers in the first place.
“This is why DEI existed because companies cannot be trusted to do the right thing unless they’re forced to,” one person wrote.
“This is why diversity in the workplace matters! You mean to tell me not one person on that team said ‘uh… this ain’t it,’” another commenter added.
A third user said, “I’ve been boycotting Target for years now, and this just affirms why.”
The controversy has sparked a wider debate over accountability, representation, and whether an apology is enough
Others expressed, “This is not a mistake or oversight. Not a single human can look at this and not understand what the hell this represents. I don’t care if it is the only store in the city, I am not setting foot inside a Target.”
Another comment read, “Targets been getting a lot of things wrong lately. These aren’t mistakes, once they are seen, you can’t take it back. Sorry Target, but not sorry.”
“Every year, Target tries their luck to normalize atrocious behavior and then apologize…”
Nadine Smith, president of Color of Change, similarly criticized the retailer, arguing that Target’s corporate decisions had made this kind of “corporate blindness” more likely.
Smith said Target had “made this kind of corporate blindness more likely” by cutting its DEI programs.
She also warned, “Target cannot treat Black voices as expendable in its decision-making and still expect Black dollars at the checkout.”
According to multiple reports, Target dismantled its internal diversity goals and scaled back its Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in January 2025.
Business leaders and activists have argued that reducing these initiatives could mean fewer culturally informed perspectives are involved in reviewing products and marketing decisions.
“Who was the person in charge on this campaign? And thought this was okay? Let’s start to name names!!” one netizen fumed
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
Ali 1 hour ago
I can't see a scenario where this was an innocent mistake. I'm not American, so I have less context- but it looked out of order to me. Since when was a clown a Halloween thing, and that looks nothing like a clown. I also feel the pattern on the main costume gives of a vibe of cartoon prisoner. What next? A ghost that is basically a sheet over your head with convenient eye holes and a pointy top?
Bailey 3 minutes ago
Kids have always dressed up as clowns at Halloween, even before they became considered "scary". On paper, I can see why this costume would get approved. Checkerboard is a classic pattern for clown costumes, and orange and black is a common colour for Halloween outfits. Even the mouth would make sense is a slendermanesque concept for a creepy clown. However, whoever was reviewing the final proofs from the photoshoot should have immediately identified that something had gone wrong with this design, and they should not use this
Load More Replies...
DawnoftheDead 1 hour ago
The team that approved this knew what they were doing. Trump has all but come out and said that its fine to be racist. Target jumped on the trump train when it boot licked maga. This costume was just another way to draw in maga customers and please trump and his racist yes men. I wonder how many maga folks ran out to buy the costume to show their support Target will never see another dime from me. The wrong 80 year old died
Rusty’scate 4 minutes ago
I wanted to do a little research since target does sell outsider brands. The hide and eek boutique is owned and managed by the target company. They approve and oversee design and marketing, once a product is approved they sub the designs out to over seas 3rd party manufacturing firms. So they knew what the approved and how they were marketing it. I completely see the issue here, that being sad they could have put a different race of child in the ad in a different position and it may just looked like a cheap costume but they didn’t. They chose a child of color and told him how to pose and that is disgusting. They should reintroduce the diversity committee and make a huge donation to a charity then benefits black Americans and also give a settlement to the boy model and his family for making a racial mockery of him.
Ali 1 hour ago
I can't see a scenario where this was an innocent mistake. I'm not American, so I have less context- but it looked out of order to me. Since when was a clown a Halloween thing, and that looks nothing like a clown. I also feel the pattern on the main costume gives of a vibe of cartoon prisoner. What next? A ghost that is basically a sheet over your head with convenient eye holes and a pointy top?
Bailey 3 minutes ago
Kids have always dressed up as clowns at Halloween, even before they became considered "scary". On paper, I can see why this costume would get approved. Checkerboard is a classic pattern for clown costumes, and orange and black is a common colour for Halloween outfits. Even the mouth would make sense is a slendermanesque concept for a creepy clown. However, whoever was reviewing the final proofs from the photoshoot should have immediately identified that something had gone wrong with this design, and they should not use this
Load More Replies... DawnoftheDead 1 hour ago
The team that approved this knew what they were doing. Trump has all but come out and said that its fine to be racist. Target jumped on the trump train when it boot licked maga. This costume was just another way to draw in maga customers and please trump and his racist yes men. I wonder how many maga folks ran out to buy the costume to show their support Target will never see another dime from me. The wrong 80 year old died
Rusty’scate 4 minutes ago
I wanted to do a little research since target does sell outsider brands. The hide and eek boutique is owned and managed by the target company. They approve and oversee design and marketing, once a product is approved they sub the designs out to over seas 3rd party manufacturing firms. So they knew what the approved and how they were marketing it. I completely see the issue here, that being sad they could have put a different race of child in the ad in a different position and it may just looked like a cheap costume but they didn’t. They chose a child of color and told him how to pose and that is disgusting. They should reintroduce the diversity committee and make a huge donation to a charity then benefits black Americans and also give a settlement to the boy model and his family for making a racial mockery of him.
Related on Bored Panda
31
8