Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Husband Takes Twin’s Side After She Disregards His Pregnant Wife’s Severe Peanut Allergy, Wife Livid
Pregnant woman looking distressed on a couch, highlighting risks of anaphylaxis from ignoring no-peanut rules at home.

Husband Takes Twin’s Side After She Disregards His Pregnant Wife’s Severe Peanut Allergy, Wife Livid

48

ADVERTISEMENT

We’ve already told you numerous stories about how food allergies, particularly peanut allergies, actually impact people’s lives. And not just from a medical perspective, but also their relationships with relatives and significant others.

For example, the narrator of our story today, the user u/Potential_Piece_776, once experienced not only her sister-in-law blatantly ignoring her food allergy during her pregnancy, but also her own husband’s attitude toward a conflict situation that some might consider a kind of betrayal.

More info: Reddit

RELATED:

    Food allergy could be a real life-threatening risk, but it becomes even more serious when the allergic person is pregnant

    Pregnant woman and husband holding hands outdoors, highlighting risks of anaphylaxis and family conflict over peanut allergy rules.

    Image credits: Cezar Sampaio / Unsplash (not the actual photo)

    The author of the post is pregnant, and she’s afraid of any contact with peanuts even more now

    Woman at risk of anaphylaxis as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut allergy rule, causing family conflict.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text excerpt from a pregnant woman sharing her severe peanut allergy and past anaphylactic shocks, highlighting allergy risk.

    Text on white background about husband being understanding of no nuts rule with baby on the way, woman risks anaphylaxis from peanut exposure.

    Text describing a woman risking anaphylaxis as her sister-in-law ignores a no-peanut rule, with her husband siding with the sister.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text excerpt about woman’s allergy to peanuts, highlighting risk and family conflict over no-peanut rule and anaphylaxis.

    Image credits: Potential_Piece_776

    Three glass jars containing peanut butter, shelled peanuts, and unshelled peanuts on a dark surface, highlighting peanut allergy risk.

    Image credits: azerbaijan_stockers / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    After the COVID-19 pandemic, the author’s sister-in-law lost her job, and her husband offered for her to move in with them for a while

    Text excerpt showing a woman’s risk of anaphylaxis due to sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut rule and husband’s betrayal.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text about a woman at risk of anaphylaxis due to her sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut rule in the home.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text excerpt showing a woman confronting sister-in-law about eating peanuts and risking anaphylaxis despite no-peanut rule.

    Text excerpt mentioning a no-peanut rule and warning to clean up to prevent anaphylaxis risk for a woman.

    Image credits: Potential_Piece_776

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Two women angrily arguing indoors, highlighting family conflict and tension around ignoring a no-peanut rule risking anaphylaxis.

    Image credits: Fpressmaster / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    The problem is that the woman likes peanuts and keeps disregarding the author’s allergy in the most blatant way

    Text conversation showing a woman upset about her sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut allergy rules causing anaphylaxis risk.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text showing a woman upset as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut rule, risking anaphylaxis, while husband sides with his sister.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text excerpt describing a woman’s distress over a no-peanut rule being ignored, risking anaphylaxis.

    Woman faces anaphylaxis risk as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut rule and husband sides with his sister.

    Woman at risk of anaphylaxis as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut rule, husband sides with sister in family dispute.

    Image credits: Potential_Piece_776

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Angry woman pointing finger indoors, highlighting risk of anaphylaxis due to ignoring no-peanut allergy rule at home.

    Image credits: The Yuri Arcurs Collection / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    One day, the poster dodged a bullet by catching her sister-in-law touching things in the house after eating a handful of peanuts, and kicked her out

    Update text about husband apologizing for siding with sister despite woman’s anaphylaxis risk from ignored no-peanut rule.

    Text excerpt describing a tense conversation about a no-peanut allergy rule and a husband siding with his sister.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Woman at her parents’ house after anaphylaxis risk as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut allergy rule causing family conflict.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text excerpt about a woman risking anaphylaxis as her SIL ignores no-peanut rule and her husband sides with his sister.

    Image credits: Potential_Piece_776

    However, the husband sided with his sis and even suggested that the wife spend the rest of her pregnancy in the hotel

    So, the Original Poster (OP) tells us that she’s had a severe peanut allergy since childhood. So severe that several times, even simple skin contact with the allergen resulted in anaphylactic shock. Fortunately, without any serious consequences. It’s possible the allergy has become milder over the years, but the author was pregnant and didn’t want to find out.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    After the COVID-19 pandemic, her husband’s twin sister lost her job, and the man suggested she stay with them for a while. Well, after all, she was a close relative… but the problem was that the sister-in-law was quite a sloppy person, and she also loved peanuts.

    The OP warned her about her allergy several times, but she encountered some peanut-containing products and packaging over and over at home. One day, after narrowly avoiding yet another allergen, our heroine simply snapped at the sister-in-law and declared that if she couldn’t respect her health conditions, she should get out of the house.

    A fight ensued, and the SIL was ready to leave… but the author’s hubby arrived and, despite her disappointment, sided with his sis. Furthermore, the man even suggested that if the wife was so concerned for her health, she could spend the remaining months of her pregnancy in a hotel. After all, according to the guy, “they’ve been together longer” with the sister.

    So, it all ended up for the original poster at her parents’ house, in tears, listening to her dad lashing out at the son-in-law on the phone in the next room. Yes, the woman agrees that she’s a bit overreacted, but ultimately, her health and that of her unborn baby are what actually matter, right?

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Pregnant woman looking worried on couch risking anaphylaxis as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut allergy rule at home.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image generated by: Creativedesign297 / Freepik (not the actual photo)

    In fact, even though this woman hasn’t had any peanut-related allergy attacks in a while, pregnancy can be a real aggravating factor for her. Pregnancy brings hormonal shifts that can increase the allergen’s impact on both the pregnant woman and the fetus. Given all this, experts strongly recommend stricter control over potential exposure to the allergen during pregnancy.

    For example, this dedicated article on the VinMec website states that during pregnancy, one should be extremely careful about the composition of the food the mother-to-be is being served. “Not only that, the allergic mechanism can also hinder growth and development or directly damage the lungs and bronchi of the fetus, which is extremely dangerous,” the article also claims.

    As we’ve discussed many times, the significant problem with peanut allergy lies in the body’s extremely rapid reaction to the allergen, so our heroine is doing everything absolutely right here, simply trying to avoid even the slightest presence of peanuts in her home.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Accordingly, it’s not surprising that most readers of the original post sided with the author, harshly criticizing both her husband and his sis. According to the responders, the sister-in-law simply acted unreasonably, and her brother clearly lacks maturity and responsibility in decision-making. So, what’s your opinion on this case, our dear readers?

    People in the comments unanimously supported the mom-to-be, claiming that she was absolutely right and reasonable here

    Screenshot of a Reddit comment about marriage concerns after husband sides with sister against no-peanut allergy rule.

    Comment expressing concern over peanut allergy risks as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut rule and husband sides with her.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Screenshot of a Reddit comment discussing risks of anaphylaxis due to SIL ignoring no-peanut rule and husband siding with sister.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Text post expressing shock over sister-in-law eating peanuts at home despite allergy, with husband siding with sister.

    Comment discussing a woman risking anaphylaxis as her sister-in-law ignores the no-peanut allergy rule during pregnancy.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment about woman risking anaphylaxis due to sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut rule and husband's betrayal.

    Comment discussing woman’s anaphylaxis risk as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut rule and husband sides with sister.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment discussing risks of anaphylaxis and relationship strain due to ignoring no-peanut allergy rules.

    Screenshot of a comment discussing a woman’s risk of anaphylaxis due to a no-peanut rule ignored by sister-in-law.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Screenshot of an online comment discussing anaphylaxis risk and a husband siding with his sister despite a no-peanut allergy rule.

    Woman at risk of anaphylaxis as sister-in-law ignores no-peanut rule while husband sides with his sister in conflict.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Screenshot of online comment discussing a woman’s risk of anaphylaxis due to sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut rule.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment warning about allergic reaction risks as woman faces anaphylaxis from sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut rule.

    Comment discussing husband's betrayal and sister-in-law ignoring no-peanut rule, risking woman's anaphylaxis.

    Comment warning a woman about anaphylaxis risks and her husband siding with his sister ignoring the no-peanut rule.

    ADVERTISEMENT
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Comment discussing allergy risks and epipen use in a text post about a woman’s anaphylaxis and peanut allergy conflict.

    Comment emphasizing allergy safety risks and respecting no-peanut rules to prevent anaphylaxis in a family conflict scenario.

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Oleg Tarasenko

    Oleg Tarasenko

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    After many years of working as sports journalist and trivia game author and host in Ukraine I joined Bored Panda as a content creator. I do love writing stories and I sincerely believe - there's no dull plots at all. Like a great Italian composer Joaquino Rossini once told: "Give me a police protocol - and I'll make an opera out of it!"

    Read less »
    Oleg Tarasenko

    Oleg Tarasenko

    Writer, BoredPanda staff

    After many years of working as sports journalist and trivia game author and host in Ukraine I joined Bored Panda as a content creator. I do love writing stories and I sincerely believe - there's no dull plots at all. Like a great Italian composer Joaquino Rossini once told: "Give me a police protocol - and I'll make an opera out of it!"

    What do you think ?
    Kate Johnson
    Community Member
    Premium
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well that's the end of that. So sad she got pregnant before she found out how utterly worthless this man really is. I'd be getting a divorce, and making my best case to have full custody with supervised visitation and the sister never allowed around the kid. She's obviously completely crazy and dangerous to others. What a psycho b***h.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The OP decided on divorce. The husband offer to pay for a hotel room for his wife (instead of his sister) and his one and his only excuse for favouring his sister is that he's been her sibling longer than he's been the OP's husband (WTF is this - union rules about seniority??).

    Load More Replies...
    KatSaidWhat
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That's one way to get a divorce and lose access to your own child.

    Zoe Vokes
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I really hope their child doesn’t have any allergies because OP would be stressed the whole time knowing his family doesn’t take allergies seriously.

    Load More Replies...
    The_Nicest_Misanthrope
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Let Jaime and Cersei Lannister enjoy their lives together

    Jane Doe
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I really think it is that. They want the interloper and the baby out. I do wonder if he will fight for primary custody so he and sister can raise it.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    Kate Johnson
    Community Member
    Premium
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Well that's the end of that. So sad she got pregnant before she found out how utterly worthless this man really is. I'd be getting a divorce, and making my best case to have full custody with supervised visitation and the sister never allowed around the kid. She's obviously completely crazy and dangerous to others. What a psycho b***h.

    Vinnie
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The OP decided on divorce. The husband offer to pay for a hotel room for his wife (instead of his sister) and his one and his only excuse for favouring his sister is that he's been her sibling longer than he's been the OP's husband (WTF is this - union rules about seniority??).

    Load More Replies...
    KatSaidWhat
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That's one way to get a divorce and lose access to your own child.

    Zoe Vokes
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I really hope their child doesn’t have any allergies because OP would be stressed the whole time knowing his family doesn’t take allergies seriously.

    Load More Replies...
    The_Nicest_Misanthrope
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Let Jaime and Cersei Lannister enjoy their lives together

    Jane Doe
    Community Member
    3 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I really think it is that. They want the interloper and the baby out. I do wonder if he will fight for primary custody so he and sister can raise it.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT