Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
Russell Brand Learns His Fate For His Horrific Crimes, But Some People Are Furious Over His Sentence
British comedian Russell Brand consistently maintained that his encounters with six women who accused him of misconduct between 1999 and 2009 had been consensual.
Nevertheless, his defence failed to persuade a 12-member jury during proceedings that lasted from October 14 to November 3 and involved seven charges.
The 51-year-old’s actions caught up with him on November 5, as he was found guilty of one count of forced physical contact and three other offences, before learning his fate in a defining moment today (November 9).
Highlights
- Russell Brand was sentenced to 10 years and six months in prison after being found guilty of four offences.
- The judge called the comedian a “s**ual predator,” while prosecutors praised the women who came forward.
- Some social media users questioned the sentence, arguing that the UK justice system treats people differently based on their backgrounds.
Some social media users, however, argued that Brand’s sentencing exposed a double standard in the UK justice system, claiming it treated people of color more harshly than British citizens.
“The UK went after Russell Brand but not migrant r*pe gangs,” one user commented.
RELATED:
Russell Brand’s prison sentence sparked outrage and debate over the UK’s justice system
Brand was sentenced to 10 years and six months behind bars at Southwark Crown Court in London.
Judge Joel Bennathan described the comedian as a “s**ual predator” who had told a “series of lies” during the proceedings.
He also highlighted Brand’s “staggering arrogance” in the way he had treated the victims.
Addressing an incident at a London bar in 2004, per TMZ, the judge accused Brand of lying about grabbing a woman’s breasts.
He noted that the experience had left her feeling sick and traumatized whenever she encountered the comedian on television afterwards.
Another incident involved a woman at the Choice FM studios in either 2004 or 2005.
Brand had allegedly grabbed her face, kissed her and touched her breasts and bottom in front of other people.
Brand received nine years for the forced intimate contact conviction, with additional terms of nine months, 18 months and eight months for the three other offences.
The latter penalties will run concurrently with one another but consecutively to the nine-year term.
According to Sentencing Council guidelines, Brand is expected to serve approximately two-thirds of his sentence in custody before being released on license.
A faction of netizens, though, feel Brand was targeted by the UK’s justice system for being white.
“This trial was nonsense, just like the Johnny Depp trial was. The UK courts have some serious issues,” one said.
“Scary. This is weaponizing the court system,” added another.
Metropolitan Police and Crown Prosecution Service thanked the women who came forward for their courage
Metropolitan Police Detective Superintendent Andy Furphy thanked the complainants for their “bravery, dignity and resilience” throughout the investigation following Brand’s sentencing.
He described the outcome as a significant milestone, adding that the women had endured considerable public scrutiny while revisiting distressing experiences.
Crown Prosecution Service senior prosecutor David Roberts also acknowledged the women whose accounts had been central to securing Brand’s convictions.
In a statement shared with the press, he said, “They did not know each other, and each has carried what happened to them for almost two decades.”
He recognized the emotional difficulty of giving evidence and being questioned about deeply personal experiences in court, describing their participation as an “extraordinary display of courage.”
Roberts acknowledged that the punishment could not undo the hardships they had endured but expressed hope that the outcome would provide some measure of justice.
He further echoed the judge’s characterization of Brand, calling him a “manipulative s**ual predator” who had used his growing fame and influence to pursue women without considering their wishes or the consequences of his behavior.
Brand had previously admitted to using his fame selfishly
Throughout the trial, Brand’s defense barrister, Ian Winter, questioned the complainants’ accounts, including whether their recollections had been influenced by extensive media coverage surrounding the allegations.
Prosecutor Riel Karmy Jones strongly disagreed with the suggestion, questioning whether six women could independently have been influenced into presenting similar experiences.
A pivotal moment in the proceedings came when Brand himself took the stand to testify.
He acknowledged that he had sometimes misused his fame “very, very selfishly.”
Nevertheless, he insisted that consent had always been central to his intimate relationships, describing it as “fundamental, essential, necessary.”
Two of Brand’s victims shared statements following the sentencing.
One expressed gratitude to the police and prosecution teams for taking her testimony seriously, while another said, “I finally feel believed.”
“He is a monster,” a social media user said about Brand
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
What do you think ?
Ace 55 minutes ago
Ridiculous headline BP. " Some People Are Furious Over His Sentence ". No, just a couple of obvious racists using it to have a dig at immigrants, in one case suggesting that “migrant râpe gangs” (which really tells you all you need to know about them, phrasing it in that way) are not treated as harshly as him, that he's getting it worse because he's white.. What these sort of people never do is actually compare sentencing on a like-for-like basis, looking at the sentencing guidelines and listening to what the judge has actually said.
G A 27 minutes ago
There are people DEFENDING this slimeball without any sense of irony. They need their fvcking heads examined.
Load More Replies...
Kate Johnson 39 minutes ago
Since they are considering charging him with additional offenses, I'd say that's a good start.
Ace 55 minutes ago
Ridiculous headline BP. " Some People Are Furious Over His Sentence ". No, just a couple of obvious racists using it to have a dig at immigrants, in one case suggesting that “migrant râpe gangs” (which really tells you all you need to know about them, phrasing it in that way) are not treated as harshly as him, that he's getting it worse because he's white.. What these sort of people never do is actually compare sentencing on a like-for-like basis, looking at the sentencing guidelines and listening to what the judge has actually said.
G A 27 minutes ago
There are people DEFENDING this slimeball without any sense of irony. They need their fvcking heads examined.
Load More Replies... Kate Johnson 39 minutes ago
Since they are considering charging him with additional offenses, I'd say that's a good start.
Related on Bored Panda
27
8