15Kviews
A.I. Shows What Old Hollywood Celebrities Would Look Like If They Were ‘Modernized’ (20 Pics)
15Kviews
Hollywood is known for having the best, most talented, and beautiful actors and actresses. Most of us probably know great actresses from old Hollywood. Like the beautiful and talented Audrey Hepburn, or the icon of beauty—Marilyn Monroe. But how would they and 18 more women look if they lived in today's times?
I decided to use A.I. and many other applications to colorize and modernize these photos. It's interesting to see what famous actresses would look like in the 21st century. Of course, A.I. is not perfect yet, so some photos are kinda wonky and some even change the faces completely. Tell us what you think in the comments and upvote your favorite remake!
More info: deepai.org | doctormacro.com | faceapp.com | gradient.photo
This post may include affiliate links.
Rita Hayworth
They should have given her back her natural hair color. The studio made her get her hairline raised and lighten her hair. Rita also used her mother's maiden name because her birth name of Cansino sounded too Spanish.
Claudia Cardinale
Audrey Hepburn
So by ‘modernising’ we simply mean filtering? They all lose their authentic beauty and charisma if you ask me,
Vivien Leigh
The color image looks like it was grabbed from "Gone with the Wind". (Which was shot in Technicolor)
Ingrid Bergman
Making the upper lip fuller destroyed her identity, she now looks anonymous.
Judy Garland
They made her smile more, what is with people asking women to smile more!
Carole Lombard
It's funny because all the left pictures have been heavily retouched themselves. Carole Lombard had a not insignificant scar on her left cheek (if you watch My Man Godfrey, and you should, it's most noticeable in her side profile when sitting at the dump). She had another one near her left eye and one more by her mouth. Nearly every released picture of her had this airbrushed out; it was airbrushed in most movies, where possible, such as in strong front shots or when they couldn't use trick lighting to hide it.
Katharine Hepburn
Ava Gardner
Jayne Mansfield
Yeah, I hate this. You changed the stunning looks of these classic women for the worse, stripping them of their individuality. The worse was Marlene Dietrich. Sorry that I hate this.
I agree. Enlarging lips and more hair plus more eye makeup do not result in modernizing a particular person. Perhaps I interpreted the artist's intent wrongly. I believe I thought the effort was to show how they would look today. The title could have been 'How I Would Alter Old-Time Movie Stars'. Still a fun and skillful presentation.
Julie +
kimberlypelham Good response!
frecklebuddy haha
vernier-benoit love
Julie what
motojam lol
motojam love
motojam what
These women were just fine the way they looked. Why use AI? Can't we just colorize the photos and not have a program change their features and make completely new women out of them? I'm not mad at you, just the whole notion of women adapting to beauty standards set by society, even posthumously.
I found it fascinating how many of became almost identical to some of today's stars.
Because they so many of them have lip fillers and nose jobs and end up looking fairly similar in their endeavour to meet the beauty ideals of the current time. These women were all stunning before because they had very unique features. All this did was make them far more bland.
My Name Here ?
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
My Name Here haha
Fail. She isn't Audrey Hepburn anymore. You have changed her natural beauty into the airbrushed, photoshopped fake version popular today -- which nobody likes. Creating a template or definition of attractive is harmful. Instead of seeing individually and imperfections as beautiful, "attractive" is narrowly defined. I couldn't look at the rest.
Sorry. I didn't compliment how skilfully this was done. Regardless of the subject matter, your images are beautiful.
Yeah, I hate this. You changed the stunning looks of these classic women for the worse, stripping them of their individuality. The worse was Marlene Dietrich. Sorry that I hate this.
I agree. Enlarging lips and more hair plus more eye makeup do not result in modernizing a particular person. Perhaps I interpreted the artist's intent wrongly. I believe I thought the effort was to show how they would look today. The title could have been 'How I Would Alter Old-Time Movie Stars'. Still a fun and skillful presentation.
Julie +
kimberlypelham Good response!
frecklebuddy haha
vernier-benoit love
Julie what
motojam lol
motojam love
motojam what
These women were just fine the way they looked. Why use AI? Can't we just colorize the photos and not have a program change their features and make completely new women out of them? I'm not mad at you, just the whole notion of women adapting to beauty standards set by society, even posthumously.
I found it fascinating how many of became almost identical to some of today's stars.
Because they so many of them have lip fillers and nose jobs and end up looking fairly similar in their endeavour to meet the beauty ideals of the current time. These women were all stunning before because they had very unique features. All this did was make them far more bland.
My Name Here ?
This comment is hidden. Click here to view.
My Name Here haha
Fail. She isn't Audrey Hepburn anymore. You have changed her natural beauty into the airbrushed, photoshopped fake version popular today -- which nobody likes. Creating a template or definition of attractive is harmful. Instead of seeing individually and imperfections as beautiful, "attractive" is narrowly defined. I couldn't look at the rest.
Sorry. I didn't compliment how skilfully this was done. Regardless of the subject matter, your images are beautiful.