Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

This Ability Test Is Designed For Kids, But Even Adults Struggle To Finish It: Test Yourself
Visual reasoning test puzzle with colored blocks and multiple choice answers to assess gifted reasoning skills.
Quizzes

This Ability Test Is Designed For Kids, But Even Adults Struggle To Finish It: Test Yourself

25

ADVERTISEMENT

The Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test (NNAT) is a nonverbal assessment designed to measure general reasoning ability in K-12 students, helping schools identify students with strong problem-solving skills and reasoning abilities. 🧩

In the next 24 questions, you’ll be putting your visual and logical skills to the ultimate test. From pattern completion to reasoning analogy, and even spatial visualization, each question presents a visual pattern. Your task is to figure out the logic behind it and then choose the correct answer. If you take your time, observe the pattern, and answer intentionally, you’ll likely ace this quiz. 🧠

And without further ado, it’s time to see if you’d make it in the gifted and talented programs…✨

🚀 💡 Want more or looking for something else? Head over to the Bored Panda Quizzes and explore our full collection of quizzes and trivia designed to test your knowledge, reveal hidden insights, and spark your curiosity.💡 🚀

RELATED:

    Image credits: Merlin Lightpainting

    ADVERTISEMENT

    •

    Progress:

    Give it another try!
    I give up!

    Not Quite Done Yet!

    Continue the Quiz

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    REWARD
    REWARD
    Quiz icon

    View alternative results:

    Quiz icon

    Your general stats:

    TOTAL POINTS
    TRIVIAS SOLVED
    PERFECT SCORES
    QUIZZES COMPLETED
    Your result:
    SCORE
    REWARD

    How did you score compared to others?

    Discover Your Competitive Edge

    Subscribe Premium to Compare Your Stats with Others

    More Premium features:

    Unlimited content
    Ad-free browsing
    Dark mode

    How did you score compared to others?

    You scored better than % of people
    Trivia Takers
    Score

    Your general stats:

    TOTAL POINTS
    TRIVIAS SOLVED
    PERFECT SCORES
    QUIZZES COMPLETED
    User Result
    Reward
    User avatar
    User avatar
    / 24
    User avatar
    User avatar
    / 24
    Trivia Top Performers
    Quiz leaderboards
    Quiz panda avatar
    You
    Share on Facebook
    Raquel Teixeira

    Raquel Teixeira

    Writer, Trivia Content Writer

    Read more Ā»

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less Ā»
    Raquel Teixeira

    Raquel Teixeira

    Writer, Trivia Content Writer

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Erika Saikovskytė

    Erika Saikovskytė

    Author, Photo Editor

    Read more Ā»

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    Read less Ā»

    Erika Saikovskytė

    Erika Saikovskytė

    Author, Photo Editor

    This lazy panda forgot to write something about itself.

    What do you think ?
    Ace
    Community Member
    Premium
    8 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I hate those where you don't have enough information to definitively predict the correct choice, so you have to work backwards to find which one could possibly fit, and sometimes the rules they've used are so contorted and arbitrary - No 16 was perhaps the worse for this - that you could invent another rule to justify a different answer

    WindySwede
    Community Member
    7 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    23/24, missed #16, but afterwards realise why.. 🤦‍♂️

    Ace
    Community Member
    Premium
    8 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I hate those where you don't have enough information to definitively predict the correct choice, so you have to work backwards to find which one could possibly fit, and sometimes the rules they've used are so contorted and arbitrary - No 16 was perhaps the worse for this - that you could invent another rule to justify a different answer

    WindySwede
    Community Member
    7 hours ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    23/24, missed #16, but afterwards realise why.. 🤦‍♂️

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT