Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
Victoria’s Secret Ad Prompts Fears Of Regression After Model Sparks Severe Backlash
Victoria’s Secret thought it was selling an appealing new slip dress, but the ad has viewers questioning whether the brand is quietly bringing back a controversial old beauty standard.
The TikTok campaign has sparked a wave of backlash, with some viewers accusing the lingerie giant of normalizing an extreme body ideal.
One person reacted, “Victoria’s Secret never left the 2000s they just pretend they did… this proves it!”
RELATED:
Highlights
- A Victoria’s Secret ad is sparking backlash over fears that the ultra-thin beauty ideal is returning.
- Viewers are divided over the model’s strikingly slim appearance, with some defending her natural body type.
- As critics invoke the brand’s 1990s and 2000s image, genetics and metabolism add another layer to the debate.
Victoria’s Secret’s latest ad has sparked backlash as netizens scrutinize the model’s extremely thin appearance
The controversy centers on a TikTok video Victoria’s Secret posted to promote its Tease Satin Lace-Trim Mini Slip Dress.
The satin style has a vintage-inspired silhouette, with lace detailing, a V-neckline, adjustable straps, and a short hemline.
Across social media, viewers focused on the model promoting the dress, identified as Amalie Bladt, particularly her exceptionally slim frame.
View this post on Instagram
Some argued that the imagery looked like a throwback to the ultra-thin beauty standards that dominated fashion advertising in the 1990s and 2000s.
One viewer wrote, “Just got this victoria secret ad this is insane. She is like borderline needing to be hospitalized. Crazy of a company to post this…”
Another user added, “I got a Victoria’s Secret ad on TikTok with a very clearly extremely underweight model and was kind of shocked that we’re at this stage in beauty standards being normalized again.”
Critics fear the campaign could signal a return to Victoria’s Secret’s ultra-thin past from the 1990s and 2000s
A third commenter wrote, “She’s a very pretty woman, but she’s also visibly severely underweight. It is unusual to see massive brands like victoria’s secret using models as thin as her nowadays.”
Another comment read, “Just remember ladies you’re not supposed to be able to see your sternum.”
Others expressed, “I feel like Hollywood and the media are desperately trying to normalize this look as the standard of beauty again.”
“Why are the brands doing this? They want to sell to everyone, and for sure majority of women do not look like this.”
The backlash is particularly notable given Victoria’s Secret’s long and complicated history with ultra-thin beauty standards.
Some viewers defended model Amalie Bladt and warned against judging her health purely based on appearance
For years, the brand’s famous Angels were synonymous with exceptionally thin, conventionally glamorous bodies.
When the Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show returned in 2024 after a six-year hiatus, the company promoted the event as a more inclusive version of its famous spectacle.
CEO Hillary Super has described the brand’s current identity as “s*xy, glamorous, accessible luxury,” while also arguing that s*xiness should not be tied to one prescribed appearance.
However, for viewers who remember the era when Victoria’s Secret’s Angels helped define what “s*xy” was supposed to look like, seeing a similarly lean silhouette in a modern campaign can feel less like nostalgia and more like regression.
But not everyone agreed with the backlash, and some commenters turned their criticism toward those attacking the model herself.
One defender argued that the model in the latest ad has always had a naturally slim build, writing that she was “always this skinny even as a teenager” and had previously attributed her appearance to her metabolism.
Medical factors like genetics and hypermetabolism can influence body composition, even when a person eats a healthy diet
Another supporter added, “The outrage around her is crazy, she’s been on the internet since she was a teen and has always been this skinny. She can’t gain weight, that’s just how her body is. This is massive body shaming y’all are doing…”
Genetics can play a role in body composition, and differences in energy expenditure and metabolic rate can help some people naturally maintain a very lean physique.
In some cases, hypermetabolism can also make gaining weight difficult.
That, however, does not mean every exceptionally thin person has a “fast metabolism.”
Ultimately, much of the criticism is directed at the beauty standards promoted by the fashion industry rather than at the health or genetics of the individual models it hires.
“The way her knees and elbow joints are poking out, the 90s are back…” one netizen wrote
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
marianne eliza 29 minutes ago
Nothing like a female who doesn't even have to spread her legs. /s
MedusaWasBeautiful 4 minutes ago
Victoria's secret will never achieve the renown it had in the early 1990s. If you saw the magazines then there was so much variety in the clothing they sold.
Ace 20 minutes ago
Whether it's a healthy size/weight or not is, to my mind, irrelevant. If they had a fat model they'd be getting praised for their body-positive message, but surely that should work both ways? If they're being accused of promoting an unhealthy body ideal then all the fat ones, much more likely to be much less healthy, should be banned as well.
Apatheist 7 minutes ago
I think the body-positivity bandwagon has been somewhat derailed by Ozempic and the like. The fact is that there is a healthy body range - which isn't the same for all body types - but a model, by definition, is supposed to be promoting the "ideal" look. Unhealthily fat or thin is equally bad. As they say, life is like a box of chocolates - if you're overweight, it won't last as long.
Load More Replies...
marianne eliza 29 minutes ago
Nothing like a female who doesn't even have to spread her legs. /s
MedusaWasBeautiful 4 minutes ago
Victoria's secret will never achieve the renown it had in the early 1990s. If you saw the magazines then there was so much variety in the clothing they sold.
Ace 20 minutes ago
Whether it's a healthy size/weight or not is, to my mind, irrelevant. If they had a fat model they'd be getting praised for their body-positive message, but surely that should work both ways? If they're being accused of promoting an unhealthy body ideal then all the fat ones, much more likely to be much less healthy, should be banned as well.
Apatheist 7 minutes ago
I think the body-positivity bandwagon has been somewhat derailed by Ozempic and the like. The fact is that there is a healthy body range - which isn't the same for all body types - but a model, by definition, is supposed to be promoting the "ideal" look. Unhealthily fat or thin is equally bad. As they say, life is like a box of chocolates - if you're overweight, it won't last as long.
Load More Replies...
Related on Bored Panda
21
11