People Online List 30 Mind-Blowing Facts That Completely Changed The Way They See The World
Interview With AuthorIt’s impossible to know all the facts, right? Well, there are facts that probably many of us know because we found them out in some trivia night game or maybe somebody once told them to us, and they just stuck with us because they are surprising. For example, elephants are unable to jump, tigers have also striped skin, or the Spanish national anthem has no words. Probably many of you will agree that you have seen, heard or read these facts somewhere.
However, there are also facts that are not so well-known or often heard and they may not even surprise us, but rather open up a slightly different point of view of the whole world. One Reddit user recently created a thread asking people online to share little-known facts that blow their mind every time they think about them. So scroll down and share your thoughts below!
More info: Reddit
This post may include affiliate links.
something like this is asked every once in a while.
The Pale Blue Dot quote by Carl Sagan really puts OUR lives in perspective. Helped me not take life too seriously.
Some backstory, the Voyager 1 space probe took a picture of the Earth at 6 billion km
"Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there--on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam"
The first time I read it, I teared up.
I still feel something every time I reread the quote or think about it.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.com%2Fnews%2Fscience-environment-51491471&psig=AOvVaw2HOMvjhOUo66O_ZcUos6ze&ust=1707192281326000&source=images&cd=vfe&opi=89978449&ved=0CBMQjRxqFwoTCNis9_2ok4QDFQAAAAAdAAAAABAF
Load More Replies...I can't think about it, every time I think too hard about the vastness of what's around I get vertigo, it's very odd.
I also came to tears the first 500 times I've heard it. I still do on occasion.
Sometimes I dream that I can fly in space like superheroes in comics... :) and then my stupid brain realizes that if I go too far, I would be unable to find the earth and I would be lost in space until my death...
I wholly agree. There is one particular video "The best speech about humanity- Carl Sagan" a must watch
The "Pale Blue Dot" was also the final image taken by Voyager 1. After it was sent, commands were given to purge it's systems of all imaging software and shut down the camera forever in order to conserve dwindling power.
Once you know the difference between sympathy and empathy, you will notice that tons of people lack empathy.
Let me illustrate with an example:
If I told a group of people I was sad because my dog died, a decent amount of people would feel sorry for me. If I told that same group of people I was depressed because my goldfish died, less people would feel sorry for me. "It's a f*****g goldfish, so what?"
This is the fundamental difference between sympathy and empathy. If you feel sorry for me when my dog dies, but not when my goldfish dies you are not being empathic when my dog dies, just sympathic. It's likely you feel sorry for me because you imagine how you would feel if *your* dog died and projecting those feelings on me.
True empathy means acknowledging and valueing emotions, even when you do not understand them. People with empathy don't compare my emotions to how theirs would be in my situation. They can acknowledge my feelings, without sharing them.
I work with fish, it always bothers me when fish die. They all have unique personalities.
I had a goldfish that would WAKE ME UP when I was at uni (more than one ofc, but only one woke me up). He learned if he sucked on the bubbles accumulated at the water line they would pop, sometimes very loudly. Annoying, but it was funny and clever!
Load More Replies...Actually, I think it's the opposite. If they are imagining your pain while not being able to relate to it (goldfish example), they are just being sympathetic. When they can actually put themselves in your place and feel to some extent what you are feeling (dog dying), that's empathy. This is a false statement: "True empathy means acknowledging and valueing emotions, even when you do not understand them." Definition empathy: "Empathy is the ability to emotionally understand what other people feel, see things from their point of view, and imagine yourself in their place. Essentially, it is putting yourself in someone else's position and feeling what they are feeling." If you can't imagine being super upset by a goldfish dying, then you won't be able to empathize, even if you can intellectually or sympathetically understand that other people can feel things that you wouldn't.
@Marnie : I was really perplexed when reading this topic until your intervention. Thanks for putting things in the right direction.
Load More Replies...The downside is that people who regularly experience true empathy often find themselves extremely emotionally overwhelmed. Sympathy, and the ability to calibrate our response to the plight of others, is what allows us to maintain some sort of emotional stability. One who is themselves overwhelmed, cannot very well care for another person in the same state.
This is no quite right. Empahty is fundamentally relating to the human emotion regardless of experience. I have never had a dog but feel the fundamental loss and sadness of someone who loses one. People lack empahty (as the post implies) when they decide not to share the fundamental feeling of loss when they deem the loss unimportant to them. Sympathy is feeling sorry for someone with no fundamental connection, like the "sucks to be them" feeling, but there is a disconnect. Empathy often creates an action response, like a hug or a feelng of injustice. With sympathy you keep eating.
Empathy enables people to fundamentally understand other human's and also other animal's emotions. We start developing mirror-neurons at the age of... don't quote me, but I think three to five years. Before that, our brains are simply too busy caring about ourselves. Only by interacting with other humans do our mirror-neurons fire up and we can understand that someone is crying because of -*causation*- because we're then able to put ourselves in their place and know that we would cry in that situation, too. Sympathy means we LIKE someone. And because we like someone, we might feel more easily empathic towards them than to others but the *ability* to put ourselves in their place is the same whether we like that person or not. We might choose not to if we dislike someone a lot. People with no empathy truly lack the ability to put themselves in other people#s position and possibly might not feel the same kind of emotions other people feel so they truly can't relate.
I think they just misunderstood how rare true empathy is in humans. It's the same with unconditional love, a lot of people get it from someone so they don't realize how rare it is.
“The inspiration for starting the thread came from my innate curiosity about the world and a desire to create a platform for sharing astonishing, lesser-known facts,” the author of this thread, u/foratbahrani, shared with Bored Panda. “It's always exciting to see how such knowledge can shift our perspective and understanding of the world around us."
Grizzly bears in Yellowstone eat around 300,000 moths a month and it accounts for 1/3 of their calorie intake.
...and this is why bears are often hanging outside your door by the porch light yum-moths-...7d-png.jpg
I am going to ride my bike with my mouth open from now on and save a ton on groceries! 😀
I really don't like moths (and a large amount of people), can I adopt a grizzly bear?
Go right ahead, but make out your will first.
Load More Replies...Given my insatiable appetite, it always blows my mind how huge creatures sustain themselves on little, teeny, tiny morsels. Take baleen whales, like the Blue whale, the largest creature on earth, that eats plankton.
I had never heard of this before! https://landresources.montana.edu/Nat%20Geo%20moth-eating%20bear.pdf
Cheetahs aren't big cats. They are very large small cats.
This is incorrect. While originally the classification was only for members of the Panthera family with something special about the throat bone (I can't remember what, but I'm sure you could look it up), meaning they could 'roar'. The original list only contained 4 cats; Lion, Tiger, Leopards, & Jaguar. However, as things progress and we learn new things (such as the snow leopard being a different species from Leopards), the list changes. The current list of big cats now consists of 7 members of the cat family. Lions, tigers, Leopard, snow leopard, Jaguar, Cougar, and Cheetah.
Incorrect. Cheetahs are in the genus Acinonyx, all by their lonesome. There are 5 members of the genus Panthera: lions, tigers, leopards, jaguars and snow leopards. Cougars are in the genus Puma (again, all by themselves). Cheetahs and Pumas are more closely related to each other than the "big" cats, both belonging to the sub-family Felinae, which also has some small wild cats like the Pallas cat and leopard cat. House cats are in the sub-family of Felidae, Felis (with 6 other small wild cat species).
Load More Replies...There's a rumour (started by me) that all cats like Dreamies: even lions and tigers (and bears) Oh my!
They get bullied constantly in the wild. I watched a documentary about them and it really changed my perception of this animal.
They also like dogs. Zoos keep mostly labradors as companion animals for them. If you ever get a chance check out the cheetah run at the Cincinnati zoo on a cool day. (They don't run in hot weather)
The fossil evidence says they evolved on the north American continent. According to this theory, they are the reason pronghorn antelopes are so much faster than all the predators around them.
For those who are interested; how to tell is that small cats can’t roar, big cats can’t purr.
The difference between a million and a billion. A million seconds is about 11 days, a billion seconds is about 31.5 YEARS. Now think about the billionaires.
Can't think of billionaires without thinking about all the people who could benefit from their taxes if only politicians had any balls to crack down on them.
A billionaire paying one million dollars in taxes is equal to taxing one dollar from your $1000 paycheck.
The meaning of a billion always confuses me, because in school I was taught a billion = a million million (1,000,000,000,000), but in the US and calculating finance a billion = a thousand million (1,000,000,000). So which billion are we counting to in the above?
There were differences between British and US definitions. You are showing your age because UK officially changed to the current value of billion = 10^9 and trillion=10^12 some time ago
Load More Replies...Please tell that to the current U.S. Administration, but expound further as to the difference a trillion is. Maybe explaining it in the amount of time it takes to get a mint chocolate chip cone will help it set it.
If you buy mint chip ice cream and some nice waffle cones, you'll get one much faster and cheaper at home.
Load More Replies...Honestly It should be internationally illegal to possess that wealth on a personal basis... I understand if its tied up in economic investments and used to support industry... But to have that much just to spend on yourself is just wasteful...
If you spent $86,400 a day, it would take 31.5 years to spend a billion.
The goverments of the world don't realize for $1000000000000 I can buy your military from out under you and take all the bases and equipment with them then just take the country, because most people in the military will take less then 3x thier pay to flip to my side.
Speaking about the particular facts that were shared by fellow Redditors and stood out to the OP as exceptionally mind-blowing, he emphasized that there were quite a few contributions that he found astounding.
“My favorite one was how Cleopatra lived closer in time to the invention of the iPhone than to the building of the pyramids.”
A female turkey can lay en egg that doesn't need to be fertilised by a male turkey and the baby that hatches will always be a male
Still the picture clearly shows a male turkey. No eggs from this specimen at all.
Turkeys are like rats that travel in packs. Everywhere where I live. And dumb. Dumb. Dumb. Group of them standing in the road, you can honk and they just go on as they were.
They are not dumb. They disdain cars. Anyone who thinks wild animals should understand human behavior has failed to realize that they are not all people in animal suits.
Load More Replies...This can happen with certain plants too but they are feminized seeds
Just think of the uninformed who say the variations we are seeing being expressed in humans don't happen in "nature."
Wait til you learn about the captive shark who recently had a baby without contact with a male
Load More Replies...
its not the climate change alone thats dangerous to humanity, climate has changed multiple times in history, even worse than its now. The issue is the pace at which it happens. if it happens within a few hundret or thousand years, ecosystems can adapt. rn we are climate changing the world at top speed and cause changes that'd usually happen over millenia.
I always recall George Carlin when climate change is brought up... paraphrasing: "The planet will be fine. Humans are F****ED. But the planet will be fine."
The greatest danger to this planet and our species is us. I urge anyone who cares even remotely about the long-term future of our species, to read the thriller novel 10:59 by N. R. Baker. It is one of a very few books that has literally changed the way I see things and live my life.
I spend Sunday afternoons rewatching all the old Classic Dr. Who series. These shows were released in the 60's and 70's, and several episodes highlight human destruction of the planet. There's no excuse. There's never been an excuse. It's greed, plain and simple. Humans want what they want and be damned the future.
The pace at which it is happening and that there are millions of additional people living in places where they weren't where living during the previous climate change events.
Habitat loss and pollution are huge factors to species die off and extinction as well. Arguably habitat loss is the major reason for our rapid decline in biodiversity. Also having a global economy where new diseases and invasive species readily enter new countries is not good. We can put all the protocols in place to stop their spread, but it only takes a few lazy dock workers to miss a bunch of insect eggs on a shipment of materials.
Actually, the closer we get to the tipping point the faster things speed up. We know this from rock and core samples. It's like turning off a frozen pond. All the time the ice is on top the water stays cool, but the minute a hole appears and it starts to break up the water suddenly warms a lot quicker.
Babies can die from lack of love (human touch, cuddles, hugs, nuzzles).
DUDE WHO THE HELL NEEDED TO KNOW THIS? BABIES DESERVE ALL THE LOVES
And those that survive are doing just that. Surviving instead of living full lives.
Read this from psychology today where horrible studies were done with monkeys. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/observer/obsonline/harlows-classic-studies-revealed-the-importance-of-maternal-contact.html
Finally, OP emphasized that his own favorite mind-blowing fact is that we often think of the universe as an expanse filled with billions of galaxies, stars, and planets, but in reality, that’s only what we have discovered so far.
“It's humbling to consider that, much like our ancestors who believed the entirety of existence comprised merely the Earth, Sun, and Moon, we are similarly just scratching the surface. Despite our advanced technology and knowledge, we know only a tiny bit more about the universe's true nature,” OP added.
If you stand in any planet or moon of the solar system and you look up, you'll see the same night sky as we see it from the Earth. Same constellations and all, that's how unfathomably far away the stars are compared to the planets.
However, there's one exception. If you stand in Pluto and look up, you'll see that Proxima Centauri looks slightly "off" compared to its position from the terrestrial sky. That's how unfathomably far Pluto is as well.
Every now and then, I visit a site that puts things into perspective. It's a scale model of the solar system if the moon was 1 pixel. Now obviously, is average distance as most things have an elliptical orbit, but you should check it out: https://joshworth.com/dev/pixelspace/pixelspace_solarsystem.html
Since I can't reply to Rod MCrae's comment specifically, I will just comment here in hopes that he reads this... We rotate on an axis, you idiot!
Yeah - why does he get treated like a dog when Goofy, who's also a dog, gets treated like a person?
Load More Replies...Of all the planets, that one is the most fun to say. In English.
Load More Replies...
Not little known, but perhaps, less thought about or internalized.
Large amounts of children were born from most families in the past due to a horrible rate of infant/child mortality. Nearly everyone had outlived one or more of their children.
That's horrifying.
What we consider the most base of basic medical science, that we teach our young children, has saved countless lives and families.
Wash your hands, please.
Queen Anne of Great Britain died without issue, yet was pregnant 17 times, gave birth 10 times, of which 5 were stillborn, 4 died in infancy and one died aged 11. Just as an example that even royalty were not immune to infant mortality.
And the fact that she didn't die of either infection or in childbirth was down to the additional fact that she had the best medical attention that was available at that time due to her status and rank, regardless of the fact that the 'doctors' had no clue about even the most basic hygiene standards and were for the most part reliant on the books of observations and practices of physicians and healers from antiquity such as Galen and Hippocrates ...... In parts of the World today, not much has changed ; like the USA.
Load More Replies...My great-grandmother had 12 children - 6 boys and 6 girls, and all the girls died.
That’s must’ve been a genetic issue that may not have been avoided even today… sadly I’ve known a woman that had the same issue but it was boys that couldn’t survive… and that was 20 years ago or less
Load More Replies..."Large amounts of children were born from most families in the past due to a horrible rate of infant/child mortality." I had to reread that sentence several times before I understood they meant, "Most families in the past had more children due to a higher rate of child mortality."
Even then, I still didn't understand till I read the whole thing.
Load More Replies...Was coming to say this. Hygiene is great, but vaccines make the biggest difference.
Load More Replies...I think it took a little bit more than handwashing, but yes, essentially, those large families that people supposedly used to have all the time were due in part to high infant mortality rates. (That and the need for free labor.)
Most families in the past had more children because they lacked access to reliable birth control.
And what is your favorite mind-blowing fact that changed the way you view the world? Share in the comments!
Every element heavier than lithium had to be created in the core of a star. Every element heavier than iron had to be created by a supernova.
If some basic geology would be taught in every school, we would treat our Earth's resources with much more respect (geologist here).
Capitalism will not allow that. All resources must be plundered and sold in some form, even human beings are not exempt. The goal of Capitalism is to consume all resources for profit.
Load More Replies...*knocks the jar of lithium batteries off the table and enjoys the Big Crash*
Omg, this one made me laugh too hard and is certainly deserving of upvotes. You cats are your own stars of BP. 😺🌟
Load More Replies...I call b******t. While it is true for some elements, there are other processes that can create an element. For example cadmium, element heavier than iron, it may be created by supernova, but it is also created in stars by a process called slow neutron capture, and it does not need a supernova. Similiar processes exists for most other elements. (Gold for example is created in supernovas AND in neutron stars collisions)
The existence of elements heavier than iron prove that all existing matter comes from stars
Nope. Hydrogen and Lithium were there from the beginning. Those stars had to come from somewhere, aye?
Load More Replies...
Just how capable ancient humans were. At least 50000 years ago humans crossed about 60 miles of open ocean and colonized Australia. The timeline for colonizing America has been consistently pushed back. For tens of thousands of years modern humans coexisted with other ancient hominids, essentially but not quite the same as us but close enough to breed and produce viable, nonsterile offspring. I find it absolutely mind blowing to think about
For those who didn't cross by sea, they crossed by land, there are land bridges around the world and the only continent that is not connected by land and never has been is Antarctica.
Ancient humans were not stupid, they were merely ignorant of the technology we have today. All through history, people have come up with ingenious solutions to problems they faced.
Neither. They land hopped. Even now you can get to Australia, via New Giunea, in 15 mile hops.
Load More Replies...Think about this: The oral history of the original Australians stretches back 30,000 years. Thirty Thousand Years.
It took Humans less than 66 yrs from first discovering the flight (1903) to landing a man on the moon (1969)
My Dad's family had a horse for transportation in the 1900s; Dad lived to see Armstrong walk on the moon.
And on Apollo 11, Neil Armstrong brought a piece of the Wright Flyer to the Moon.
The human that discovered flight was the first one to observe birds.
The Montgolfier brother flew the hot air balloon in 1783. The Wright brothers were the first powered and controlled flight.
This is incorrect. "Discovering" flight would precede any flying apparatus, and even first human flying off of the Earth's surface was way before XX century. It was November 21, 1783 in Versailles - in a hot air balloon.
Also, even if you consider "flying" to be contraption heavier than air (so not balloons and blimps) and carrying a human, with a degree of control over direction and such, gliders would be first with attempts by Otto Lilienthal, Jean Marie Le Bris and others in mid XIX century.
Load More Replies...
Experiments suggest that subconscious parts of our brain start sending signals to perform actions well before the conscious part of our brain makes the decision to do it. Sometimes it's a few microseconds earlier, sometimes it can be minutes, depending on what's being done and what prep is needed.
The implication is that decisions are actually made at the subconscious level, and what we think of as the conscious process of "making a decision" may actually be more like "justifying a decision."
This is backed up by split-brain experiments, where epileptics have had the two halves of their brain severed and unable to communicate. They'd put up a partition and hold up a sign asking one half to pick up a pencil. Then they'd ask the other half (which controls speech) why they did it, and they'd quickly come up with sometimes-ludicrous rationales for why they did it. It seems our brains have built-in expert mechanisms to justify actions after the fact.
Neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky makes some excellent points regarding whether we even have free will. His take: we don’t.
Myehhh I'm reading some of his stuff and he doesn't account for the fact that things change and evolve, like, as a rule. That's why we aren't still living in the ocean, and why our planet exists and on and on. Of course it's all biological - we are, after all, all made of the same meat - but awfully teenage nihilistic to talk about how we are ONLY governed by what happened before and that nothing ever changes.
Load More Replies...We have free will the amount of decisions you have to make a day is freaking mind blowing 😂 but it's easier to say that we don't some people believe in destiny or this b******t we have free will and choice we are responsible for are decisions but it's easier to blame everything else whatever floats your boat donwnvote me if you will
Ohhhhh. This explains a lot about my ADHD and constant decision paralysis. My brain doesn't do that. But if everyone else's do, it explains why they aren't as constantly exhausting from making decisions as I am.
I signal the brain that I need to get up in the morning. About half an hour later my brain tells my muscles to finally move and get up so I can still make it to work on time...
so, my procrastination is not a conscious decision. I have no control over it.
The latest psychological science on this indicates that because we can choose against the basic instinct to survive, we have the choice to say "No." Thus, in fact, have free will. Nobody would be able to unalive themselves without free will (oversimplified but to the point).
most people value short-term "good feelings" more than "long term stability". if you understand this, much in the world will be better understandable to you.
That is because tomorrow is not promised. I don't want just a boring mediocre meandering life that is just day after day surviving and soul rotting. I want to actually live.
Oh, I understand it. Just don't expect me to approve. This short-term thinking is why we're killing the only habitable planet in the system.
Homo sapiens is a very selfish species. I want mine now and screw the next generation is why we are doomed.
It's called living in the moment and there is much opportunity for joy in it.
Yes, but short-term thinking can also be selfish and dangerous.
Load More Replies...I'm going to go ahead and, once again, state that long term stability will lead to much more happiness.
The energy stored in all the oil and gas in the Earth is the equivalent of just eight and a half days worth of sunlight hitting the surface of the planet.
I live in a country dependent on oil and gas and it bugs me so much that we don't make any real steps towards renewable energy.
Because Big Oil keeps gaslighting the world that renewable energy isn't working
Load More Replies...Sounds like we should be investing in making more efficient photovoltaic cells then shouldn't we. We literally have access to a fusion reactor and we don't know how to use it to make power for us. We're f*****g stupid.
Non-renewable energy is necessary to start up solid renewable energy. As we worked our way up in technology from banging things with rocks and now use precision laser cutters or made our way from jodeling to smartphones to transfer messages over distance, the evolution of this energy thing is not very impressive.
Obviously. We don't have the infrastructure yet for wide-scale use of renewable (and some parts of the world refuse to even take one step because *crosses arms* "we don't wanna!". But that said: we should have started WAY earlier with doing more than we have. Solar and Wind-energy isn't new. It has been blocked and ignored for decades because Big Oil and its compatriots have spread their spindly little fingers into every part of the world. We are so behind in our own "evolution", dinosaurs would roll their eyes at our ignorance.
Load More Replies...There's methods that could produce nearly endless energy harnessing the sun... Look up the solar hydrogen solution... Its sad that hyper rich people who own fossil fuel companies wont let a transition away from them happen... Humanity must begin to value efficiency over profit before its too late
Over 99 percent of all Species to ever exist on Earth are extinct.
Actually the vast majority of extinctions happened before the human race even existed.
Load More Replies...One must take into consideration just how long life has been in existence on this planet, that comparison makes little sense or difference. However, the speed at which it’s happening now may be our fault. But, that statistic is also not necessarily accurate. We are counting every rodent, bird, flower, leaf, blade of grass when we use that comparison, every tiny amoeba, not just the obvious species. It is a bald fact that we really DON’T KNOW how many species we have not found. There could be millions or even billions of species that died in the 3.5 billion years that have seen life here. We are actually counting a double bucket full of creatures without being actually able to count how many hundreds of backhoes full of species we will never find. We are losing too many species, true, but we have no way of knowing what we haven’t found. We still need to fix our actions, lest we be the fastest extinction out of them all, including the slightly more primitive species of Homo sapiens, like Neanderthal and Danisovians.
There are more people living in slavery now than at any time in human history.
Just for transparency; The report that announced this finding, included a great deal that was not previously considered 'slavery'. As times change, so do our definitions of things. Situations such as indentured servitude, forced labour of prisoners, domestic servitude (either through religious belief/pressure or otherwise), Sex trafficking, and substandard wages (ie. Farmer workers that get paid 1 dollar a week, or are paid in food). None of those things were considered slavery in the past so it is almost impossible to compare, as they were definitely about and probably more common as it was more acceptable a few hundred years ago.
Nah, all of those fit the DEFINITION of slavery, just cause some a******s decided to ignore the dictionary for their own moral well being doesn't mean they weren't enslaving people and didn't mean they didn't know it, they just sugar coated it to make themselves feel superior just for transparency.
Load More Replies...There are more people living now than any time in history. Nearly 10% of the people who have ever lived in all of history are alive right now. How are we doing on the percentage? Are we at least getting less per capita?
This needs to be better known and not just excused away as if somehow implying that the fewer slaves in the past didn't matter or it was somehow less bad because there were fewer. It's not an either/or situation. They are both independent facts bonded by the common thread of slavery, but both equally important and both to should be addressed. It's a shame many of those hyper focused on the monstrosity of slavery in the past do nothing or try to cover up the fact that there ARE MORE people, precious human beings, enslaved now than ever before. You would think people who are decedents of slaves would be taking an active stand against this.
Let's correct this: There are more people living in slavery now than the TOTAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE who lived in slavery prior to 1900.
Which is why protesting statues and apologising for past wrongs is pointless. Do something real! And now!
Modern slavery is abhorant, far more common than we all think and usually horrific for the victims. However, to compare 21st century silvery to 18th century slavery is too much of an oversimplification. They are and were awful problems. But they required/require drastically different approaches and solutions.
Don't forget that the human population grows exponentially so whereas the population today is around 8 billion, the population in 1850 (a time I've picked because a) I have a figure for it, and b) we think of it as being the height of slavery) was only 1.2 billion.
Load More Replies...But America is still the evil colonizers. HELLO, that's the British be pissed at them for all this s**t.
You always have more knowledge than you can put into words (Michael Polanyi). You can never *fully* articulate, for example, *all* of the knowledge that you rely on in order to ride a bicycle. There is always some remaining knowledge that you're leaving unspoken. Polanyi's book *Personal Knowledge* blew my mind.
Edit: *The Tacit Dimension* is a more compact book covering some of the same ideas.
Thank you! I know stuff...I just get anxiety when asked and forget 95% of it. Lol
"Do thoughts occur in words, or in images or other concepts?" "Oh, definitely words!" "All right. Now picture an automobile crankshaft. What words did you use in your mind to visualize it?"
I am editing this because I misread your statement. "picture an automobile crankshaft". OK.. "what words did I use in my mind to visualize it?" Yours, Bill, because you had already said it. Sorry. This is a bit of a conundrum. You use the word, I picture it with that word attached. Had I SEEN the object without your word "automobile crankshaft" mentioned, I would probably have named it "thingamabobber" because I am not a car mechanic. However, knowing what it does I was able to visualize it and now I know that thingamabobber is called "crankshaft". I have watched a mechanic work on a motor before so I knew which part it had to be.
Load More Replies...THIS!!! This is why I don't support home schooling! Because children need to gather information from various people. You can't learn enough from just one person. Being your child's only teacher basically guarantees that your child will not turn out as smart as you.
You know, Bill Bryson talks about this in his book “The body”. He describes tacit knowledge, a type of knowledge that all humans develop through experience, but that no one can accurately articulate in words. For example, we all know how to identify colours, but I bet no one can properly explain why a banana is yellow and not blue. It’s fascinating, this particular fact, and Bryson’s book, too.
As Daryl Hall and John Oates would say, “Some things are better left unsaid.”
This has always been my issues with school, studying, and tests. I never learned how to "study". People have tried teaching me but it never made sense to me. I dont know what i dont know unless i am tested. So best i can do is maybe re-read chapters or whatever but i won't really know if i retained anything until i have been tested (and i almost always pass with high grades)
I was thinking about this in regards to IQ. I am not big on this number vs that number, but I recognize some people are more intelligent than others. But on a standardized test, that comes down to square roots, or spelling long words, or whatever. But does the concept of IQ come into play when you are judging if you have time to pass another vehicle on a 2 lane road? Is someone with a higher intelligence, better able to judge something abstract, like the passage of time? "Well, he was just stupid to even try to make that jump!" Maybe he was?
This is because verbal language is not the basis of all knowledge. Without verbal language, we still have thought—this has been repeatedly demonstrated with infants and animals—even though we cannot verbalize anything. That level of thought never goes away; it is simply not accessible to the verbal consciousness, because it isn’t stored linguistically.
Benford's Law. How large datasets of numbers behave in very predictable ways. It's one of the easiest ways to detect if a company is cooking its books.
I just watched that again last night. Such a good movie
Load More Replies...It's not if a company is cooking its books, it how much cooking and ingredients is in involved.
I wish this entry actually explained what the law is and how it works in detecting fraud. In current form, I find it useless trivia... All I learned is that person named Benford has a mathematical law named after them :/
What a shame that you're completely and utterly incapable of using google
Load More Replies...
Apollo Guidance Computer, which was the Apollo 11 (space craft that landed humans on moon) Command Module had on board, a machine that had 64 kilobytes of memory and operated at 0.043MHz.
Trying to process all the adverts?
Load More Replies...It about what it was designed to do, not how much of kB or MHz it has. Single function doesn't require huge amount of computing power. And the results were displayed on dot matrix single line unit.
Don’t forget there was nothing in existence that could compare. We may think it primitive, but it had a single task and could not fail. It was truly a masterpiece made by geniuses.
And if you look on YouTube, you can see videos from people who are restoring one to working condition. Here's the first installment. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KSahAoOLdU&list=PL-_93BVApb59FWrLZfdlisi_x7-Ut_-w7&index=1
At one point the human population was between 1,000 and 10,000 we came so close to going extinct.
If Earth knew what we'd become it never would have allowed them to make it
The Toba catastrophe theory: From Wikipedia: "The theory is that it was 74,000 years ago. From Wikipedia: "The Toba eruption (sometimes called the Toba supereruption or the Youngest Toba eruption) was a supervolcano eruption that occurred around 74,000 years ago during the Late Pleistocene[1] at the site of present-day Lake Toba in Sumatra, Indonesia. It is one of the largest known explosive eruptions in the Earth's history. The Toba catastrophe theory holds that this event caused a severe global volcanic winter of six to ten years and contributed to a 1,000-year-long cooling episode, leading to a genetic bottleneck in humans.[2][3] A number of genetic studies have revealed that 50,000 years ago, the human ancestor population greatly expanded from only a few thousand individuals."
Fortunately, everyone switched to electric cars and humanity was saved.
I don’t think we were ever down to 1000, but, since our ancestry has been traced to one woman in Africa who was the first human, we certainly had a period when there were only 1000 of us. Could have gone extinct easily. Now, we’re doing our best to pull that off!
Its gotta be closer to 10000... Thats still way below the benchmark to prevent regular genetic defects in a breeding population... 1000 just isnt viable even with defects... It mustve been a real messy comeback for humanity genetically speaking
The use of fingerprinting can be traced back to China in the 700's for identification. It wasn't used for forensics until the 1800's.
Animal numbers in Africa are still recovering to their historic levels after rinderpest almost wiped out most ungulates (things with hooves) in the 1800s, introduced from Europe of course. It wiped out so many animals that the environment changed with it and also helped ignite the scramble for Africa by causing famines
I wish I knew more about African history, I’m sad it’s not more widely taught and I’m going to try to educate myself more
There’s a cool giant book called ‘the history of Africa’ it’s a fun and long read, even had accounts from the guy who had the first bicycle in Africa. So detailed and fun
Load More Replies...Famine today due to climate change is driving Africa's animals to a rapid extinction...too many humans
Most of the world's problems stem from Europeans, and the US would be included in that list since it was Europeans who took over what is now the US.
As it happens, rinderpest supposedly originated in Asia and had arrived in Africa by around 3000 BC. While I'm here: us Europeans have certainly caused lots of problems, but we've also come up with an awful lot of solutions too. Synthetic fertilisers, electrical technology, antibiotics, good quality dentistry, photography - the list of European evils is a very long one, but so is the list of European good points, some of which turned out to be not as good as originally thought and so the wheel keeps turning...
Load More Replies...
Given the size and age of the universe, our lives on Earth are totally insignificant.
Going by the number and variety of cells, we are the lesser part of a symbiote; the greater part is our gut biota that we feed ,water and protect and live off its leftovers. Because our gut is open at both ends it is really 'outside' and we are in a sack around it.
This nihilistic BS again? We exist, and therefore we are significant. And you can't convince me otherwise.
this is such a stupid f*****g take. yeah the universe is big dude. that doesn't make life "meaningless" and if you think that way you're disregarding the fortune your soul has to live in a vessel. nice cutting and wicked comment, now try saying something true and beautiful
Can't say I agree with this take... As long as something matters (or has mattered) to someone, anyone, it is significant. If you care about yourself, you're significant. If a friend or family member cares about you, you're significant. If a pet cares about you, you're significant. Heck, remember that person you smiled at last year because they were having a bad day? You made an impact. YOU. ARE. SIGNIFICANT.
I thought this would be a great sci Fi concept. A race of beings wanted to venture out, and so created ships that could sustain them. Eventually the ships became so sophisticated, that they could completely support the beings inside them, and self navigate. Eventually the beings inside became so docile (a la WALL-E) that they evolved into simple bacteria.
Colors are subjective and cultural.
There is a tribe in Polynesia that has the same color for blue and green (lets call it grue). They see the difference as shades of the same color, for example "sea grue" and "tree grue".
In Dannish there is no word for pink or orange, they call it "light violet" or "redish brown" for example.
This post is just being pedantic about definitions. The colors are still different, they just use different words.
But isn't it interesting that I think of pink as a different color than red. Even though I know it's light red. But we use a totally different sounding word. I would never think of light blue as different from blue. Pink and red even seem to clash to me. Whereas blue and light blue are complimentary. Language affects thought.
Load More Replies...the word "pink" comes from roses of that color whose edges were ruffled, or pinked (like pinking shears). It went from pinked roses to pinks to pink. In most other Indo-European langauges it's either 'light red' or 'rose.'
I should find that tribe. I'm blue- green colorblind (my doc thinks due to damage to my rods & cones as an infant/ toddler. I'm biologically female so colorblindness is beyond rare for my gender) so both colours looks like shades of blue to me. For example: most tree leaves look the same colour as summer sky, just a different saturation level. I've learned to differentiate the shades of blue that are blue & the shades of blue that are green by comparing them to things that I've been told are 'green'. I still get it wrong sometimes & tend to do 'colour checks' with someone else if I'm buying things online. ~~ Even so, I've had shirts that I thought were blue that I found out years later were actually green. *sigh*
Sigh. No. They. Aren't. That is a load of BS, invented by people without an understanding of culture, biology, or physics. Yellow is a f*****g wavelength, and it is the same wavelength everywhere on the f*****g earth. Is this idiot going to claim that people only started seeing orange when a name was invented for it? That until then, nobody saw orange in Europe? Why the f**k did they ever invent a word for it? We see colors on a continuum, and the divisions are cultural, not the colors. There is a strong cultural association to depth, hue, apacity, etc, but not to what people see.
When OP said "they see" it was meant as described by their language" or "understood in in their mind". Pretty much as your last sentence explains it. Not what their eyes actually see. Read some of the recent comments where people explain things like seeing pink as a red color or a color of its own, simply because of what it's called in their language. Others say similar things about other colors. THAT is what OP meant. Also, for example when someone says "light blue" not everyone is going to think of the same shade of light blue, because that is subjective.
Load More Replies...
One little nugget of info I love is that there are parts of Scotland so ancient that they predate the m***********g dinosaurs. Oh, and that we're still rising out of the ocean after the last Ice Age (so up yours, climate change!)
Nope. About 2.7 million tons of the Earth doesn't even predate Columbus showing up in what's not the Bahamas. Over 300 billion tons of the Earth doesn't predate even a single dinosaur.
Load More Replies...i don't get this fact. aren't many parts of the landmass of earth older than the dinosaurs since they, you know, lived on it?
Here’s a comment from another user on the Reddit thread: “It's really quite simple. There are parts of Scotland that predate the dinosaurs. Dinosaurs first appeared 200 million years ago - we have mountains that go back 500 million years and there's a ripple of land forming the Western Isles and the western coastal fringe of Scotland (including every fat tourist's favourite destination: Skye) that goes back over a billion years. To make it even more mind-boggling - we're older than visible starlight.” I guess if you realize that some mountains and land features formed in the last few million years after dinosaurs, it kinda makes sense?
Load More Replies...Oh dear, what terrible thing did we do now to get censored like that
Apparently the dinosaurs must have had coitus with their mothers.
Load More Replies...Hawaii wants you to have this clue. Untitled-6...30e520.jpg
Climate change is an on-going process that is being affected by humans for our own selfish benefit of wanting to live easier and more comfortable lives.
What on earth is this argument. It’s like saying, sharks predate grass so up yours to clouds.
Damned if I can remember the name of the Scottish comic, who said the Scots would be laughing on the tops of their mountains, throwing rocks, watching England sink!
There are only about 25 blimps in the world
I said this earlier this week. It's not been a Goodyear for them...
I really hate that I have to upvote this.
Load More Replies...
Vacuum decay… essentially, at any given moment without warning, the universe can cease to exist and never exist again.
Vacuum decay explains why my carpets are dirty. Time to get the vacuum fixed.
I had to explain this to my son after it kept him awake one night. He was eight-ish.
Load More Replies...Big Think: "a change in the energy level of the Higgs field would cause a "bubble" of broken physics to expand throughout the universe at the speed of light." Approximately in Googol, which is 10 to the 100th power, or 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 years.
"A wave needs a medium", interesting how we keep flip-flopping about whether light needs a medium and what it is: aether, "space-time", and now the Higgs field.
Load More Replies...Marvel tried that, back in the 80's or thereabouts. Those titles didn't sell.
Load More Replies...
Hershey Chocolate and Hershey ice cream. Are two completely separate and unrelated companies.
Correct, Hershey's 'chocolate' is a vile, lightly vomit flavoured abomination that deserves to be eaten only by a certain type of person who has no taste, critical thinking ability or sense of right and wrong (looking at you #45 supporter) ...... No wonder it is not allowed to be sold in pretty much every country in Europe.
Load More Replies...I haven't had it in a while but it used to be absolutely amazing
Load More Replies...Definitely not after they recently changed ingredients. I can't even enjoy a Cadbury cream egg. Very unfair and I hope Cadbury yanks the right to call them that from you. Bad hershey Very Very bad.
It's a feud that dates back to 1894. https://www.snackstack.net/p/the-snacks-that-hate-each-other
You can't fall into Black Hole. Yes, not even a light can escape the Black Hole but it's actually almost impossible to really fall or get into one. I am not a scientist but as I understand it has a field around it made from Hawking rays, and you would have to go faster than the speed of light to get over that field and get to the point of no return which is Event Horizon. Right now, with our technologies, even if we tried we could not get inside it. Also, they are not as destructive as some people think and they can also "die".
If I have one chance in a million of winning a pull on a slot machine it's not impossible but far from certain I will win. If I pull the lever a billion times it is certain I will win. The only difference between impossible and certain is the amount of chances and the time it takes. Therefore, anything you can imagine already exists or has existed in the universe.
Here's a scary fact: the human population has DOUBLED since 1974. There will soon be literally nowhere left to grow food, and the planet's resources are already starting to become depleted. All of the climate change chaos is because there are simply too many humans on the planet. I urge everyone (especially couples unsure about whether to have kids or not) to read 10:59 by N. R. Baker. It's a thriller novel, exceptionally well written, but littered with facts that will seriously make you think twice. Brilliant reviews on Amazon and Goodreads, if you need convincing.
The population will not double agaiin for another 200 years because it is in a severe decline in many places. It is already in crisis mode in South Korea and Japan, and China is in real trouble. All through the 80's we were told how we were overpopulating, but much of the developed world is on a rather steep decline.
Load More Replies...You can't fall into Black Hole. Yes, not even a light can escape the Black Hole but it's actually almost impossible to really fall or get into one. I am not a scientist but as I understand it has a field around it made from Hawking rays, and you would have to go faster than the speed of light to get over that field and get to the point of no return which is Event Horizon. Right now, with our technologies, even if we tried we could not get inside it. Also, they are not as destructive as some people think and they can also "die".
If I have one chance in a million of winning a pull on a slot machine it's not impossible but far from certain I will win. If I pull the lever a billion times it is certain I will win. The only difference between impossible and certain is the amount of chances and the time it takes. Therefore, anything you can imagine already exists or has existed in the universe.
Here's a scary fact: the human population has DOUBLED since 1974. There will soon be literally nowhere left to grow food, and the planet's resources are already starting to become depleted. All of the climate change chaos is because there are simply too many humans on the planet. I urge everyone (especially couples unsure about whether to have kids or not) to read 10:59 by N. R. Baker. It's a thriller novel, exceptionally well written, but littered with facts that will seriously make you think twice. Brilliant reviews on Amazon and Goodreads, if you need convincing.
The population will not double agaiin for another 200 years because it is in a severe decline in many places. It is already in crisis mode in South Korea and Japan, and China is in real trouble. All through the 80's we were told how we were overpopulating, but much of the developed world is on a rather steep decline.
Load More Replies...
