Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

Guy Has A “No Chocolate” Rule While Babysitting His Sibling’s Kids, They Break It So He Says He’ll Never Babysit Again
Guy Has A “No Chocolate” Rule While Babysitting His Sibling’s Kids, They Break It So He Says He’ll Never Babysit Again
1.2K

Guy Has A “No Chocolate” Rule While Babysitting His Sibling’s Kids, They Break It So He Says He’ll Never Babysit Again

205

ADVERTISEMENT

This story comes from a single and childfree 37-year-old man who is a dad to two dogs that are German Shepherd mixes. Since the author has four sisters with ten kids in total, you can suspect he gets to babysit every now and then. In fact, “I babysit A LOT,” Dogloverforeverr wrote in a post on AITA.

“I have just one super strict rule at my house: no chocolate,” he said and added that not only is it ‘deadly for dogs,’ but he doesn’t ‘like it anyway’. As you can imagine, not every little kid is well aware of how important it is to stick to the rules set by a homeowner.

On one occasion, “I came into the living room and there were obviously chocolate crumbs everywhere.” Understandably, the author got seriously mad. He also found out they always carry some on them since their mom just gives it to them. And this seemed to be the last drop of his patience.

RELATED:

    A man was babysitting his sister’s kids only to find them eating chocolate, which he clearly said was forbidden because of the dogs


    Image credits: Nathan Dumlao (not the actual photo)
    ADVERTISEMENT



    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Anna Dudkova (not the actual photo)

    Interestingly, Canine Cottages’ recent study showed that a substantial 38% of pet owners didn’t know that chocolate was toxic to their pets. So to find out more about the threats it poses to our beloved canines, Bored Panda reached out to Shannon Keary, the Digital PR Manager at Canine Cottages.

    “Chocolate is very dangerous for our dogs because it includes the chemical Theobromine, which acts like caffeine for our dogs. Ingestion of chocolate causes twitching, high heart rate, and hyperactivity in the short-term, but if left untreated, it can cause our pets to develop heart arrhythmias, kidney failure, and even seizures,” Keary explained.

    Keary warns pet owners that if their dog has eaten chocolate, it’s important to seek help from a vet as soon as possible, as they’ll be able to provide help for your pet and provide medicine or pump your dog’s stomach if necessary.


    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Yulia Popyk, an animal behavior expert from Petcube Emergency Fund also told Bored Panda that while chocolate is not immediately poisonous to dogs, it can be dangerous if consumed in large amounts. “Chocolate contains theobromine, a bitter alkaloid that is a stimulant. In small amounts, theobromine is not harmful to dogs. However, in large amounts, theobromine can cause vomiting, diarrhea, panting, excessive thirst, restlessness, and an increased heart rate. In severe cases, theobromine can cause seizures and even death,” she commented.

    There are many other food products that can be harmful to dogs including coffee which contains caffeine and which is also toxic to dogs in large quantities. Alcohol can be fatal to dogs even in small quantities. Grapes and raisins can cause kidney failure in dogs. Macadamia nuts can cause vomiting, diarrhea, and tremors in dogs.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Popyk said that as a dog owner, you should be very careful about what you feed them. “Some human foods are nutritious for dogs and can even help with some medical conditions. However, some human foods can be poisonous to dogs, so it is important to do your research before feeding your dog anything other than dog food.”

    And this is what people had to comment about the incident


    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT



    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT



    ADVERTISEMENT

    ADVERTISEMENT



    ADVERTISEMENT
    Share on Facebook
    Liucija Adomaite

    Liucija Adomaite

    Writer, Community member

    Read more »

    Liucija Adomaite is a creative mind with years of experience in copywriting. She has a dynamic set of experiences from advertising, academia, and journalism. This time, she has set out on a journey to investigate the ways in which we communicate ideas on a large scale. Her current mission is to find a magic formula for how to make ideas, news, and other such things spread like a virus.

    Read less »
    Liucija Adomaite

    Liucija Adomaite

    Writer, Community member

    Liucija Adomaite is a creative mind with years of experience in copywriting. She has a dynamic set of experiences from advertising, academia, and journalism. This time, she has set out on a journey to investigate the ways in which we communicate ideas on a large scale. Her current mission is to find a magic formula for how to make ideas, news, and other such things spread like a virus.

    Kotryna Br

    Kotryna Br

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Read more »

    Kotryna is a Photo Editor at Bored Panda with a BA in Graphic Design. Before Bored Panda, she worked as a freelance graphic designer and illiustrator. When not editing, she enjoys working with clay, drawing, playing board games and drinking good tea.

    Read less »

    Kotryna Br

    Kotryna Br

    Author, BoredPanda staff

    Kotryna is a Photo Editor at Bored Panda with a BA in Graphic Design. Before Bored Panda, she worked as a freelance graphic designer and illiustrator. When not editing, she enjoys working with clay, drawing, playing board games and drinking good tea.

    What do you think ?
    DDmaybeandor
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is completely out of left field, given the article, but the lying aspect brought it to mind and it’s not talked about enough and desperately NEEDS to be shared: DON’T TEACH KIDS TO LIE AND KEEP SECRETS. This is the foundation for “grooming” and cannot be tolerated until they are old enough to understand what a sexual predator is. Grandma, telling your grandchild, “it’s our little secret, don’t tell your parents” isn’t cute, it’s dangerous. You’re teaching children to do things they know their parents wouldn’t like. Creepy Joe next door will start the same way and slowly start blackmailing in a way only kids will fall for. “If you don’t pull down your pants I’ll tell your parents about all the chocolate you are.” Then, “If you don’t XYZ I’ll show them the pic of your pants pulled down”. If you wanna keep kids safe, #1 rule above all others is to have loving and clear communication and trust.

    Nitka Tsar
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This needs to be taught.... at school maybe? I don't know where. Maybe a brochure when you deliver a baby? Not many people even think about such things. We grew up ok like this, why not our own children too? What's so bad about a little secret? You know, ignorance. Sadly, even those who do hear such things, don't take it seriously most of the time.

    Load More Replies...
    UpQuarkDownQuark
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “Putting the dogs before the kids.” No, they put the dogs in jeopardy for a snack.

    Megzymonsta
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes chocolate is toxic to dogs and definitely not worth the risk but I think the biggest issue is that the mother provided her children with "secret chocolate" against the uncle's wishes. Considering it's him doing them a favour I think it's quite reasonable to ask them to go without chocolate for a short time. Small amounts of chocolate likely won't kill a dog but can make them violently ill and cause them pain so it's really not something to scoff at. It's not this guy being TAH and putting his dogs before the "niblings", it's a guy protecting part of his family and giving a basic consequence to other family members who apparently have no respect for him or his home. He's not saying the kids can't eat or have sweets at his place (as far as I can tell) but specifically no chocolate. That doesn't seem unreasonable

    JK Rowling
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Those that starve the most try to eat the hand that feeds. And we can see how that turns out.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    DDmaybeandor
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This is completely out of left field, given the article, but the lying aspect brought it to mind and it’s not talked about enough and desperately NEEDS to be shared: DON’T TEACH KIDS TO LIE AND KEEP SECRETS. This is the foundation for “grooming” and cannot be tolerated until they are old enough to understand what a sexual predator is. Grandma, telling your grandchild, “it’s our little secret, don’t tell your parents” isn’t cute, it’s dangerous. You’re teaching children to do things they know their parents wouldn’t like. Creepy Joe next door will start the same way and slowly start blackmailing in a way only kids will fall for. “If you don’t pull down your pants I’ll tell your parents about all the chocolate you are.” Then, “If you don’t XYZ I’ll show them the pic of your pants pulled down”. If you wanna keep kids safe, #1 rule above all others is to have loving and clear communication and trust.

    Nitka Tsar
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    This needs to be taught.... at school maybe? I don't know where. Maybe a brochure when you deliver a baby? Not many people even think about such things. We grew up ok like this, why not our own children too? What's so bad about a little secret? You know, ignorance. Sadly, even those who do hear such things, don't take it seriously most of the time.

    Load More Replies...
    UpQuarkDownQuark
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “Putting the dogs before the kids.” No, they put the dogs in jeopardy for a snack.

    Megzymonsta
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Yes chocolate is toxic to dogs and definitely not worth the risk but I think the biggest issue is that the mother provided her children with "secret chocolate" against the uncle's wishes. Considering it's him doing them a favour I think it's quite reasonable to ask them to go without chocolate for a short time. Small amounts of chocolate likely won't kill a dog but can make them violently ill and cause them pain so it's really not something to scoff at. It's not this guy being TAH and putting his dogs before the "niblings", it's a guy protecting part of his family and giving a basic consequence to other family members who apparently have no respect for him or his home. He's not saying the kids can't eat or have sweets at his place (as far as I can tell) but specifically no chocolate. That doesn't seem unreasonable

    JK Rowling
    Community Member
    3 years ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Those that starve the most try to eat the hand that feeds. And we can see how that turns out.

    Load More Replies...
    Load More Comments
    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT