The justice system is supposed to protect us, but Reddit user OrangeKey3135 claims it has harmed him instead.
In a post on r/LegalAdvice, he describes being wrongfully arrested and held in jail for five days, during which he says his two cats had passed away and he lost his job.
According to the Redditor, the charges were eventually dropped, but the damage to his reputation was already done, and now he’s worried that there’s no recourse and fears the shadow of that incident will follow him into the future.
Wrongful accusations can affect a person’s life long after the case is resolved
Image credits: Ron Lach / Pexels (not the actual photo)
This man is unsure if he will ever clear his name
Image credits: Getty Images / Unsplash (not the actual photo)
Image credits: August de Richelieu / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Image credits: OrangeKey3135
Image credits: Timur Weber / Pexels (not the actual photo)
Being wrongfully accused of criminal offenses can lead to serious negative consequences
A systematic review of 20 studies on the psychological and social impact of wrongful accusations found that these experiences, indeed, fundamentally alter a person’s life.
For example, several studies revealed that 60% report permanent changes to their personality, including increased paranoia and anxiety, while 53% feel less confident and hypervigilant.
Research also suggests that 46% notice moderate to high levels of depression, and anxiety disorders affect roughly 38–46%.
Probable PTSD is reported by 42–57% across different studies, and sleep problems—including insomnia and nightmares—were common, affecting up to 80% of some groups.
But stigma and damaged reputations—the things that our Redditor is particularly upset about—are nearly universal. In one study, 29 of 30 participants reported feeling stigmatized by others, while “self-stigma” (guilt, shame) was also widespread.
Relationships often suffered, too. 90% report fractured social networks, 56% experience a strain on intimate relationships, and several report conflicts with children or loss of custody, so families are also affected, with spouses and children experiencing secondary trauma, anxiety, and social ostracization.
As was the case this time, financial and career impacts are severe. People report losing jobs, being denied future work, and facing legal costs ranging from $13,500 to $68,000 or more, sometimes requiring the sale of personal property or reliance on family support.
Traumatic experiences in custody—including fear of a*****t, harassment, and intimidation—exacerbate these effects, and many struggle to readjust to normal life, feeling “frozen in time” while the world moves on.
Hopefully, this man will catch up.
The author of the post provided more information in the comments
And people have had a lot to say about his situation
Poll Question
Thanks! Check out the results:
Explore more of these tags
This is the very reason I advocate for animimity until accusations like this are proven true. This woman destroyed a man's life and should be held accountable.
The OP said he heard recordings of her and she seemed genuine and it's also well documented that eye-witnesses are notoriously unreliable - I would give her the benefit of the doubt and suggest she was just a traumatized victim. But I do agree with the idea of anonymity, the courts should do the judging and punishing, not the internet.
Load More Replies...INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY !!! and names should NEVER BE REALISED TILL A VERDICT IS IN , END OFF USA get a grip !! this is cruel unfair ,ok so the poor woman is very traumatised, but police should have given the constant description changes withheld names ffs , I truly hope we get an update , this poor lad and those poor cats , awful , he’s as much a victim sorry survivor as the girl was , he also needs a councillor , x.
This is the US. There is very, very limited false arrest recourse as there is in Europe or Australia. US police powers are very much akin to Putin’s Russia and in many ways more draconian than China’s.
Load More Replies...The US legal system is an outlier in the developed world and much of the developing world. The US uses the dragnet (there’s a reason the popular LEO show was called that) approach. Whereas most peers are careful not to charge and arrest someone before there are confirmed facts, the US ‘shoots first and asks questions later - often literally. There are also full LEO immunity and virtually no false arrest recourses. Add to this that employers and banks check to see if one were ever arrested and will reject one for that. The presumption is, and always has been the Orwellian one that everyone is guilty of something and an arrest without a conviction is an indictment of ones morality.
Even if you're just arrested, that's enough for some companies.
Load More Replies...This is the very reason I advocate for animimity until accusations like this are proven true. This woman destroyed a man's life and should be held accountable.
The OP said he heard recordings of her and she seemed genuine and it's also well documented that eye-witnesses are notoriously unreliable - I would give her the benefit of the doubt and suggest she was just a traumatized victim. But I do agree with the idea of anonymity, the courts should do the judging and punishing, not the internet.
Load More Replies...INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY !!! and names should NEVER BE REALISED TILL A VERDICT IS IN , END OFF USA get a grip !! this is cruel unfair ,ok so the poor woman is very traumatised, but police should have given the constant description changes withheld names ffs , I truly hope we get an update , this poor lad and those poor cats , awful , he’s as much a victim sorry survivor as the girl was , he also needs a councillor , x.
This is the US. There is very, very limited false arrest recourse as there is in Europe or Australia. US police powers are very much akin to Putin’s Russia and in many ways more draconian than China’s.
Load More Replies...The US legal system is an outlier in the developed world and much of the developing world. The US uses the dragnet (there’s a reason the popular LEO show was called that) approach. Whereas most peers are careful not to charge and arrest someone before there are confirmed facts, the US ‘shoots first and asks questions later - often literally. There are also full LEO immunity and virtually no false arrest recourses. Add to this that employers and banks check to see if one were ever arrested and will reject one for that. The presumption is, and always has been the Orwellian one that everyone is guilty of something and an arrest without a conviction is an indictment of ones morality.
Even if you're just arrested, that's enough for some companies.
Load More Replies...
































41
30