Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
7K
Kim Kardashian’s Crash Diet To Fit Into Marilyn Monroe’s Dress For Met Gala Causes Major Backlash Online
Lili Reinhart was seriously frustrated with those who went to extreme lengths for Monday night’s Met Gala.
The “Riverdale” actor shared a series of rants on social media where she called out the “stupid, harmful celebrities” who emphasized the dietary measures they took just to “fit in a f***ing dress.”
“So wrong. So f***ed on 100s of levels,” Reinhart wrote in her Instagram story. “To openly admit to starving yourself for the sake of the Met Gala. When you know very well that millions of young men and women are looking up to you and listening to your every word. The ignorance is other-worldly and disgusting.”
She didn’t mention any name, in particular, however, her comments have been interpreted as a jab at Kim Kardashian, who attended the event in the vintage gown worn by Marilyn Monroe to President John F. Kennedy’s birthday celebration in 1962.
RELATED:
Kim Kardashian came to the Met Gala in the same dress that Marilyn Monroe wore while singing for President Kennedy
Image credits: kimkardashian
Image credits: KimKardashian
Here’s how Marilyn looked in it in 1962
Image credits: JFK PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY
The dress is now valued at over $10 million
Image credits: JFK PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY
Kardashian told Vogue she lost 16 pounds in order to fit into the gown, which was on loan from the Ripley’s Believe It or Not! museum and cannot be altered.
“I tried it on and it didn’t fit me. I said, ‘Give me three weeks,'” she explained. “I was determined to fit [into] it. I haven’t had carbs or sugar in about three weeks.”
In the days since the Met Gala, Kardashian’s remarks have drawn a flurry of criticism, with many calling her dieting “extremely dangerous.”
“You should not be celebrated for losing 16 pounds in 3 weeks,” Yahoo Canada lifestyle editor Elizabeth Di Filippo tweeted. “You should not share details on how you unhealthfully lost weight with a major publication.”
Fashion journalist Amy Odell added: “If that’s not the regressive messaging this industry has tried desperately to distance from, what is?”
Kim explained to the press that she had to lose 16 pounds in 3 weeks to fit into the dress
Image credits: Vogue
Image credits: Vogue
Image credits: Vogue
Image credits: Vogue
Image credits: Vogue
You can watch her red carpet interview with Vogue in the video below
Kim has received loads of attention for it
Image credits: kimkardashian
Image credits: kimkardashian
Image credits: kimkardashian
Image credits: kimkardashian
Image credits: kimkardashian
This topic is especially important to Lili Reinhart who has been outspoken about her own struggles with body image.
“Reminder to myself, and to all — you don’t need a flat or perfectly toned stomach to wear a crop top,” the actor tweeted in March. “These ‘summer body’ trends are toxic. Your body is ready for summer no matter what it looks like.”
But not all of it was supportive
Image credits: lilireinhart
Actress Lili Reinhart seemed to be really appalled by it
Image credits: lilireinhart
Image credits: lilireinhart
Image credits: lilireinhart
Image credits: lilireinhart
After Reinhart’s remarks made headlines, she clarified that she’d chosen to speak up “because I don’t see enough people with large platforms calling out toxic behavior in our industry.”
“Some people will never understand where I’m coming from and that’s okay,” she said.
She also highlighted the importance of speaking up
Image credits: lilireinhart
Reinhart wasn’t the only one who had a problem with Kim’s crash diet. Nichola Ludlam-Raine of the British Dietetic Association thinks portraying such a regime was “irresponsible.”
Furthermore, Ludlam-Raine said it would be impossible to lose 16 pounds of fat in three weeks.
Much of it would have been water and glycogen, a form of stored carbohydrates, lost when someone stopped eating sugar and carbohydrates but regained when they resumed.
Kardashian’s comments were potentially “dangerous, especially to vulnerable people” and sent a message that was “completely wrong”, Ludlam-Raine explained.
“It’s really irresponsible because a lot of people will be reading and watching her, especially people with eating disorders, or young women, thinking that it is possible, or it is needed, to lose such a dramatic amount of weight in a relatively short amount of time, when most health experts recommend losing around 1-2lb a week,” Ludlam-Raine said.
“It’s not a sustainable way of living. When you cut out sugars, research shows that we end up psychologically craving it more – and what that can lead to is a binge-restrict cycle.”
Lili’s words really struck a chord with people
Image credits: ivyorchards
Image credits: wildfloweromine
Image credits: jessicadefino_
“She said afterward she was going to have a doughnut or something like that. We want to pull people away from this binge-restrict cycle, and actually show people that they can have the food that you love in moderation whilst achieving whatever health or weight goals you have in mind,” Ludlam-Raine continued.
Ultimately, it’s not about sending your body on a rollercoaster ride but rather finding the right balance. Healthy eating for your body and your soul. “It sounds like she’s done neither over those three weeks prior to the Met Gala,” Ludlam-Raine said.
“People shouldn’t source their nutrition advice from celebrities.”
Image credits: mpbedou
Image credits: mselizabethr
Image credits: _revoltac
Image credits: JennnBen
Image credits: court_breiner
Image credits: wavywhit_
Image credits: KenniMiddleton
Image credits: amyodell
Image credits: StephanieYeboah
Image credits: StephanieYeboah
Image credits: StephanieYeboah
Image credits: chronicparent30
And some thought Kim Kardashian shouldn’t have worn the dress at all
Image credits: porcupine2328
There were, however, folks who thought the internet is blowing things out of proportion
Image credits: courtenayslynch
Image credits: jjag_fl
Image credits: Indicatttt
Image credits: Jerk760881272
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
MrLoufoque 3 years ago
The weight loss issue aside, the difference of elegance and class between Kim Kardashian and Marilyn Monroe is staggering. The dress on Kim just looks plain and ordinary.
Emmydearest 3 years ago
Right? The bleached hair looked awful, to be honest. She could have worn a wig... And the dress did not look good on her. It was ill-fitting, the colour did not compliment her at all, very bland in general
Load More Replies...
Leo Domitrix 3 years ago
First off, ignore the freaking Kardashians. Please. Second, there was serious spandex involved under that dress for KimK. Not a single wubble anywhere? Third, way to insult Marilyn Monroe. Geez.
What?!? 3 years ago
And Kris Jenner dressed like Jackie now that was distasteful and insulting
Load More Replies...
Commander OwO 3 years ago
I'm not trying to support starving yourself or anything, but the more attention we give to these celebrities the more damage will be done. Besides, who takes dieting advice from rich, fake celebrities? Also, I am starting to this Bored Panda is finally turning into Buzzfeed II. Come on.
Catherine Binder 3 years ago
Teens and tweens, and to growing extent weens. They are the ones looking to celebrities for life advice.
Load More Replies...
Loki’s Lil Butter Knife 3 years ago (edited)
What in the world is happening to BoredPanda, a site that I used to love for it's fun artwork and quirky, feel-good articles? It is degenerating into nothing more than a "high-brow" version of Buzzfeed with its slew of celebrity articles, re-posted content content from Reddit, and "Am I the A*****e?" articles. I used to go to BoredPanda to escape the "celebrity onslaught". Can we please stop giving the Kartrashian cult a platform? They have contributed nothing in the way of art and culture. If we stopped posting about this woman constantly, perhaps she would actually fade into the background for a bit.
Anastasia Beaverhausen 3 years ago
BoredPanda is going the way of Cracked. Only clickbait. Plus 90% of the posts are just the top posts of different subreddits.
Load More Replies...
Issey 3 years ago
Comparing KK's behavior to that of an actor losing weight for a movie is ridiculous. Actors start preparing for a role like that MONTHS prior, with dieticians and nutritionists by their side. They don't just "throw out carbs" w***y nilly. Simply because a part in a movie doesn't just require you to walk down a red carpet, but to be on a set up to 10 hours a day, remember lines, run around etc. You can't do that if all you did was basically not eat for three weeks. Also: KK should have NEVER been given access to the original dress. Wearing a replica is paying resect to the original. Wearing the actual original is the opposite of that.
Something 3 years ago
If someone were to lose weight this rapidly for a part in a movie, it would also be bad.
Load More Replies...
Loki’s Lil Butter Knife 3 years ago
Because sadly so many people continue to give them platforms (I'm looking at you BoredPanda) and worship them like goddesses. It is absolutely mind-boggling to me.
Load More Replies...
Lisa 3 years ago
Supposedly she wore the fur because the dress could not be closed completely in the back. I didn't find any shots from the back which is odd because they usually post so many angles, particularly that one. I thought she look ridiculous and saw more of Amber Rose cosplay than MM.
Red Ruffensor 3 years ago
This is correct, her a$$ is still too big, so she had to hide it.
Load More Replies...
Kim Shannon 3 years ago
Have you ever read anything about any of the Kardashian's and thought, "Wow, what a well thought out and intelligent action?" I mean, this is from the family that had MOM shop around a sex tape, because "Everyone makes sex tapes with their boyfriend." Uh, no we don't, and if I did, for damn sure my mom would be the last one to see it. STOP GIVING THEM ATTENTION!
Ray Martin 3 years ago
I still don't give a flying fück about any of them, beyond making it a personal cause to abhor and reject everything these attention whores stand for.
MrLoufoque 3 years ago
The weight loss issue aside, the difference of elegance and class between Kim Kardashian and Marilyn Monroe is staggering. The dress on Kim just looks plain and ordinary.
Emmydearest 3 years ago
Right? The bleached hair looked awful, to be honest. She could have worn a wig... And the dress did not look good on her. It was ill-fitting, the colour did not compliment her at all, very bland in general
Load More Replies... Leo Domitrix 3 years ago
First off, ignore the freaking Kardashians. Please. Second, there was serious spandex involved under that dress for KimK. Not a single wubble anywhere? Third, way to insult Marilyn Monroe. Geez.
What?!? 3 years ago
And Kris Jenner dressed like Jackie now that was distasteful and insulting
Load More Replies... Commander OwO 3 years ago
I'm not trying to support starving yourself or anything, but the more attention we give to these celebrities the more damage will be done. Besides, who takes dieting advice from rich, fake celebrities? Also, I am starting to this Bored Panda is finally turning into Buzzfeed II. Come on.
Catherine Binder 3 years ago
Teens and tweens, and to growing extent weens. They are the ones looking to celebrities for life advice.
Load More Replies... Loki’s Lil Butter Knife 3 years ago (edited)
What in the world is happening to BoredPanda, a site that I used to love for it's fun artwork and quirky, feel-good articles? It is degenerating into nothing more than a "high-brow" version of Buzzfeed with its slew of celebrity articles, re-posted content content from Reddit, and "Am I the A*****e?" articles. I used to go to BoredPanda to escape the "celebrity onslaught". Can we please stop giving the Kartrashian cult a platform? They have contributed nothing in the way of art and culture. If we stopped posting about this woman constantly, perhaps she would actually fade into the background for a bit.
Anastasia Beaverhausen 3 years ago
BoredPanda is going the way of Cracked. Only clickbait. Plus 90% of the posts are just the top posts of different subreddits.
Load More Replies... Issey 3 years ago
Comparing KK's behavior to that of an actor losing weight for a movie is ridiculous. Actors start preparing for a role like that MONTHS prior, with dieticians and nutritionists by their side. They don't just "throw out carbs" w***y nilly. Simply because a part in a movie doesn't just require you to walk down a red carpet, but to be on a set up to 10 hours a day, remember lines, run around etc. You can't do that if all you did was basically not eat for three weeks. Also: KK should have NEVER been given access to the original dress. Wearing a replica is paying resect to the original. Wearing the actual original is the opposite of that.
Something 3 years ago
If someone were to lose weight this rapidly for a part in a movie, it would also be bad.
Load More Replies... Loki’s Lil Butter Knife 3 years ago
Because sadly so many people continue to give them platforms (I'm looking at you BoredPanda) and worship them like goddesses. It is absolutely mind-boggling to me.
Load More Replies... Lisa 3 years ago
Supposedly she wore the fur because the dress could not be closed completely in the back. I didn't find any shots from the back which is odd because they usually post so many angles, particularly that one. I thought she look ridiculous and saw more of Amber Rose cosplay than MM.
Red Ruffensor 3 years ago
This is correct, her a$$ is still too big, so she had to hide it.
Load More Replies... Kim Shannon 3 years ago
Have you ever read anything about any of the Kardashian's and thought, "Wow, what a well thought out and intelligent action?" I mean, this is from the family that had MOM shop around a sex tape, because "Everyone makes sex tapes with their boyfriend." Uh, no we don't, and if I did, for damn sure my mom would be the last one to see it. STOP GIVING THEM ATTENTION!
Ray Martin 3 years ago
I still don't give a flying fück about any of them, beyond making it a personal cause to abhor and reject everything these attention whores stand for.
Related on Bored Panda
127
155