Get Premium
Dark mode theme is available exclusively for premium users. Learn more about the benefits of subscribing.
No fees, cancel anytime.
Dark Mode 
No fees, cancel anytime 
then open in external browser
and click "Open in External Browser" 
What started as a wholesome way for Katherine Heigl to show her love for abandoned puppies has quickly turned into a legal mess.
The Grey’s Anatomy actress and her mother, Nancy, run an organization called the Jason Heigl Foundation, which was named in honor of her late brother.
Their mission has always been to support animal rescue efforts, particularly saving animals from being put down by specific shelters.
Highlights
- Katherine Heigl sued a nonprofit for defamation over allegations of dog abandonment.
- Heigl's foundation donated $5,000 monthly to The Pitty Committee for puppy rescues of their choosing.
- TPC allegedly mishandled the Heigl Foundation's donations, prompting legal action.
BP Daily - Your Source for Unbiased Reporting
Katherine Heigl and her mother are suing a nonprofit for defamation
Image credits: katherineheigl
“Over 1.5 million healthy, adoptable cats and dogs — about 1 every 21 seconds — are euthanized in U.S. shelters every year. Help us change the statistics,” they wrote on their website.
But such a feat can’t be achieved alone. Both Katherine and Nancy signed a deal to support The Pitty Committee, a dog rescue based in Santa Monica.
According to a new lawsuit, the Jason Heigl Foundation would give TPC $5,000 monthly so that the non-profit could rescue a certain number of puppies of the Heigls’ choosing — a deal that should have ended with two satisfied parties.
However, documents obtained by TMZ show that Katherine and Nancy had discovered TPC was “allegedly mismanaging their donation.” When they asked where their money was going, the dog rescue company didn’t have a great excuse lined up.
Image credits: badlandsranchpets
View this post on Instagram
Their year-long contract ended in December 2023, and the two did not make any moves to renew it. However, Katherine said that TPC exec Alyssa Deetman claimed the Heigls owed them hundreds of thousands of dollars—a year later.
Posting on social media, Alyssa reportedly accused the 46-year-old of putting dogs in small cages, even going so far as to say that she was responsible for the passing of two puppies.
But in the suit, the Heigls remember their interactions going a lot differently.
TPC allegedly wrote to Nancy, “I will sing your praises always… I am so proud of the work [your foundation] does. I respect you, and I respect [Katherine] and I know the work you guys do.”
TPC and the Heigls had struck a deal that lasted until December 2023
Image credits: katherineheigl
Well..our situation with the Jason Heigl foundation is FINALLY coming to light!!
Rest assured that their PR team is…
Posted by The Pitty Committee on Thursday, March 6, 2025
Now, in response, the actress and her mother are suing TPC and Deetman for defamation, saying the horrible comments have hurt their reputation and have greatly influenced their ability to keep working in the world of animal rescue.
However, the rescue organization has shared its side of how things went down.
“We filed a lawsuit against Katherine and Nancy’s phony Foundation for fraud and defamation! The Heigl’s have been known for repeatedly partnering with smaller rescue orgs… and not following through with their financial obligations for the Dogs that they rescued,” they wrote.
Image credits: katherineheigl
“They bully and intimidate smaller rescues and it’s about time someone stood up to them! I am so ready for everything to come to light,” they said, adding, “Seems like Katherine’s PR team is on the offensive lol. They are toast.
“Time to expose them for all they are worth! Shame on the phony Jason Heigl Foundation!!!”
“I will sing your praises always… I am so proud of the work [your foundation] does. I respect you, and I respect [Katherine] and I know the work you guys do,” the NPO allegedly said
Image credits: katherineheigl
The 27 Dresses star has never been shy when it comes to raising awareness of America’s brutal treatment of many animals.
In 2022, she spoke with PEOPLE about the “barbaric” use of gas chambers in order to euthanize shelter animals in Utah.
“It’s preposterous and pretty mind-blowing, actually,” she told the outlet. “Utah, sadly, is one of three states that still does this. It’s such an antiquated and, quite frankly, sadistic way of euthanizing. There’s a million reasons the bill should pass to end it.
“I can’t think of a single reason why it wouldn’t, except if our elected officials have a sadistic streak, and that cannot be condoned on any level.”
She concluded by reaffirming, “The mark of a civilized society is how you treat the voiceless and the innocent among us.”
View this post on Instagram
Particularly, as a mother to six dogs and three cats, Katherine feels overly protective of rescue animals.
“This is a horrible black mark on this really special place,” she said, mentioning that Utah was a very “beloved” state to her. “I would never have thought they would do this.”
Heigl’s decision to sue a rescue didn’t sit well with a few netizens
Poll Question
Total votes ·
Thanks! Check out the results:
Total votes ·
Newsletter
Subscribe to Access
Exclusive Polls
By entering your email and clicking Subscribe, you're agreeing to let us send you customized marketing messages about us and our advertising partners. You are also agreeing to our Privacy Policy.
Thank you! You've successfully subscribed to newsletters!
Explore more of these tags
What do you think ?
UKDeek 9 months ago
Is she really difficult to work with, or does she speak out when she isn't happy about something? I think it has been demonstrated that there are certain practices in "Hollywood" that are not very wholesome, and it is highly possible that she wouldn't put up with these practices. As for this situation, like all things there will be two sides to the story and somewhere in between will be the truth. If it is right that the rescue was miss-handling funds, and then subsequently decided to defame to try and protect their own name, then a lawsuit is more than justified...
Sera 9 months ago
Because they mismanaged your donated funds and then defamed you. The animal rescue world is full of shïtty, shady people who skim more than a little money and lie through their teeth.
Load More Replies...
UKDeek 9 months ago
Is she really difficult to work with, or does she speak out when she isn't happy about something? I think it has been demonstrated that there are certain practices in "Hollywood" that are not very wholesome, and it is highly possible that she wouldn't put up with these practices. As for this situation, like all things there will be two sides to the story and somewhere in between will be the truth. If it is right that the rescue was miss-handling funds, and then subsequently decided to defame to try and protect their own name, then a lawsuit is more than justified...
Sera 9 months ago
Because they mismanaged your donated funds and then defamed you. The animal rescue world is full of shïtty, shady people who skim more than a little money and lie through their teeth.
Load More Replies... You May Like
Related on Bored Panda
5
4