Bored Panda works better on our iPhone app
Continue in app Continue in browser

The Bored Panda iOS app is live! Fight boredom with iPhones and iPads here.

“I’m Done With Him”: Jordan Peterson’s Viral Debate With 20 Atheists Has The Internet Talking
Jordan Peterson speaking intensely during a debate, facing opponents with microphones in an indoor setting.
176

“I’m Done With Him”: Jordan Peterson’s Viral Debate With 20 Atheists Has The Internet Talking

18

ADVERTISEMENT

Jordan Peterson, a controversial right-winged psychologist, is facing the heat after arguing in a debate against 20 atheists.

Airing on Monday, May 26, the 62-year-old Canadian author was featured on the YouTube channel Jubilee amidst their Surrounded series, where one person is typically pitted against 20 audience members who share different views. They each take turns debating a specific topic before time runs out.

Highlights
  • Jordan Peterson faced tough criticism during a debate against 20 atheists on Jubilee's Surrounded series.
  • Peterson repeatedly avoided questions about his religious beliefs.
  • Social media users widely panned Peterson’s debating skills, calling his performance humiliating.

Most debates have had an undercurrent of respect for the one person in the hot seat. But this time, Peterson was met with a wave of roasts for his performance.

RELATED:

    Psychologist Jordan Peterson was brutally roasted for his debate against 20 atheists

    Image credits: Jordan B Peterson

    The commentator, who is best known for speaking on subjects such as free speech, transgenderism, feminism, religion, and COVID-19, took his seat to answer questions on Christianity, its morality, and the teachings of the Bible.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    But a few moments in, the nearly 90-minute debate had viewers cringing — most prominently when he would not confirm nor deny which religion he followed.

    Image credits: Jubilee

    As reported by news.com.au, the episode was originally slated to be titled 1 Christian vs 20 Atheists, before it was instead changed to Jordan Peterson vs 20 Atheists a few hours after its publication.

    “You’re a Christian,” one debater named Danny said as he sat down, after asking Peterson about his views on Catholic teaching.

    The author repeatedly avoided questions and refused to give direct answers

    Image credits: Jubilee

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “You say that, I haven’t claimed that,” was the author’s response.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Confused, Danny asked, “What is this, is this Christians versus atheists?”

    Image credits: Jubilee

    “I don’t know,” Peterson said.

    “You don’t know where you are right now,” Danny fired back, to which the 62-year-old warned, “Don’t be a smart*ss.”

    “Either you’re a Christian or you’re not — which one is it?” Danny questioned.

    He never confirmed nor denied whether he was a Christian

    Image credits: Taylormusic67

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Image credits: Jubilee

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The back-and-forth happened for quite some time, with Danny getting increasingly frustrated as Peterson refused to answer his initial question. The debater told the psychologist, “You’re really quite nothing” at one point before the line was drawn.

    Peterson claimed, “Okay, I’m done with him,” either prompting the next question to be asked if time ran out or for another debater to try his hand.

    Image credits: CSchroeder125

    But this wasn’t the only exchange that stood out for viewers.

    Parker — a debater who has appeared in several Jubilee episodes and is known for his strong left-wing views — asked if he “believe[d] in the all knowing, all powerful, all good notion of God.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Peterson asked, “What do you mean by believe?” to which Parker provided the definition, “You think it to be true.”

    Snippets of the debate quickly went viral

    Image credits: Jubilee

    But the author once again avoided the question, saying that was a “circular definition.” At another point in time, he declined to answer the hypothetical question of whether he would lie to save his life or someone else’s.

    “If you were in Na*i Germany and there’s Jew*sh people in your attic, would you lie to the Naz*s?” Parker grilled.

    “I would have done everything I bloody well could so I wouldn’t be in that situation to begin with,” said Peterson. “It’s a hypothetical. I can’t answer a hypothetical like that. Don’t play games.”

    Image credits: theelapislazuli

    Image credits: DrKarlynB

    Various clips of the debate went viral on social media, and it’s safe to say netizens did not let Peterson get away unscathed.

    “Jordan Peterson, apparently, is very bad at debating,” said one simple comment.

    Netizens pointed out his debating skills and said he’d never been challenged by a group of people before — contributing to his flawed approach

    Image credits: Jubilee

    Another read, “One reason Jordan Peterson is so poor at reasoning is he’s surrounded by sycophants who don’t give him feedback on his extremely flawed arguments. Here’s what happens when he tests his ideas against someone who isn’t in his close circle of salad brain pseudointellectuals.”

    David Pakman, a Youtuber, gave his side of things, saying, “Jordan Peterson’s completely humiliating and failed attempt to debate 30 random atheists is a great reminder that he’s really not worth paying attention to.”

    Image credits: Philosophi_Cat

    Image credits: mattsdoormats

    “Posited nothing of interest or meaning and simply played semantics games every time he was outmatched, which was often.”

    As reported by the outlet, the author has described himself as Christian in the past, but other times, like the debate, has declined to talk about his faith in more detail.

    The nearly 90-minute video was talked about all over social media

    Image credits: Jubilee

    Image credits: Jubilee

    His wife, Tammy Peterson, converted to Catholicism in 2024 following a battle with cancer.

    Though divided, a few online supported the debaters who took Peterson down a notch

    Image credits: BillboardChris

    Image credits: Rodrigu93989836

    Image credits: abierkhatib

    Image credits: J0hnADouglas

    Image credits: iansmithfitness

    Image credits: Asher73979290

    Image credits: ibdhippo

    Image credits: LexsinDay

    Image credits: EvB05034506

    Image credits: Lead_Flinger

    Image credits: SamPhelps448922

    Image credits: IgnorantHussy

    Image credits: kendall6699

    Image credits: Rodrigu93989836

    Poll Question

    Total votes ·

    Thanks! Check out the results:

    Total votes ·
    Share on Facebook

    Explore more of these tags

    Michelle Tian

    Michelle Tian

    Writer, Community member

    Read more »

    Hi, there! I'm a newswriter at Bored Panda, born and raised in Vancouver, Canada. I have a bachelor's degree in journalism from Boston University, as well as a philosophy minor. A few of my other hobbies include dancing, reading, cooking, or listening to a true crime podcast. My favourite thing to report on includes groundbreaking news in the field of science — particularly marine biology! I definitely didn't do well very well studying it in school, but being a journalist lets me live out those dreams in a different and exciting way!

    Read less »
    Michelle Tian

    Michelle Tian

    Writer, Community member

    Hi, there! I'm a newswriter at Bored Panda, born and raised in Vancouver, Canada. I have a bachelor's degree in journalism from Boston University, as well as a philosophy minor. A few of my other hobbies include dancing, reading, cooking, or listening to a true crime podcast. My favourite thing to report on includes groundbreaking news in the field of science — particularly marine biology! I definitely didn't do well very well studying it in school, but being a journalist lets me live out those dreams in a different and exciting way!

    What do you think ?
    RedMarbles
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Saying you can't answer hypothetical questions in a debate of ideas is the height of intellectual cowardice.

    Michael Meitbual
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's a terrible, lazy philosopher that can't engage with the most basic of epistemic interrogations. "What do you mean by believe?" would be peak intellectual cowardice if Peterson was capable of taking a stand of any kind.

    Zero Costa
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “You’re really quite nothing” is hilarious

    Austzn
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've always thought this guy Peterson was a blow-hard.

    veirdbuttrue
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That Danny kid OWNED Peterson!!! I was very deeply amused

    Apatheist Account2
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    People tend to avoid questions that they don't have a justifiable answer to. This episode seems entirely pointless.

    Petra Peitsch
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I never ever heard about this guy. I also didn't read a word from this post, just the title stating his name. I was just coming here to comment. WHY TF IS BORED PANDA, A EUROPEAN BASED SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IS POSTING PLENTY OF AMERICAN GARBAGE POSTS? We never heard of of 80% of people mentioned here, and NO, we won't google them.

    RedMarbles
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I had to look up who this guy is and he is Canadian. Apologies for the American garbage posts. Sincerely, an American.

    Load More Replies...
    Mike Elek
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The entire debate was a greatest hits of logical fallacies. Jordan Peterson offers little more than fallacies. Once you see that, his arguments are exposed as vacuous and his credibility crumbles to nothing.

    Kyle Hopkins
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He made his millions, this all this Harvard Clinical psychiatrist has to do with his time to debate randoms that disagree with his finding god moment ?

    roddy
    Community Member
    9 months ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    He seems harmless enough to me. Not sure why all the antagonism. I'm an atheist, too, btw.

    RedMarbles
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    Saying you can't answer hypothetical questions in a debate of ideas is the height of intellectual cowardice.

    Michael Meitbual
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    It's a terrible, lazy philosopher that can't engage with the most basic of epistemic interrogations. "What do you mean by believe?" would be peak intellectual cowardice if Peterson was capable of taking a stand of any kind.

    Zero Costa
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    “You’re really quite nothing” is hilarious

    Austzn
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I've always thought this guy Peterson was a blow-hard.

    veirdbuttrue
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    That Danny kid OWNED Peterson!!! I was very deeply amused

    Apatheist Account2
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    People tend to avoid questions that they don't have a justifiable answer to. This episode seems entirely pointless.

    Petra Peitsch
    Community Member
    9 months ago (edited) Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I never ever heard about this guy. I also didn't read a word from this post, just the title stating his name. I was just coming here to comment. WHY TF IS BORED PANDA, A EUROPEAN BASED SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORM IS POSTING PLENTY OF AMERICAN GARBAGE POSTS? We never heard of of 80% of people mentioned here, and NO, we won't google them.

    RedMarbles
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    I had to look up who this guy is and he is Canadian. Apologies for the American garbage posts. Sincerely, an American.

    Load More Replies...
    Mike Elek
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    The entire debate was a greatest hits of logical fallacies. Jordan Peterson offers little more than fallacies. Once you see that, his arguments are exposed as vacuous and his credibility crumbles to nothing.

    Kyle Hopkins
    Community Member
    9 months ago Created by potrace 1.15, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2017

    He made his millions, this all this Harvard Clinical psychiatrist has to do with his time to debate randoms that disagree with his finding god moment ?

    roddy
    Community Member
    9 months ago

    This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

    He seems harmless enough to me. Not sure why all the antagonism. I'm an atheist, too, btw.

    You May Like
    Related on Bored Panda
    Popular on Bored Panda
    Trending on Bored Panda
    Also on Bored Panda
    ADVERTISEMENT