Welcome to Part 2 of the Ultimate Spelling Challenge! 🗣️
Over the next 28 questions, you won’t just spot misspellings…You’ll dive into grammar, synonyms, tricky plurals, contractions, and more.
From identifying verbs and subjects to choosing the correct spelling and punctuation, every question is designed to push your grammar skills to the test.
Remember, only the sharpest minds will nail every answer. The question: Are you one of them? Prove it in the next 28 questions 🧠✍️.
In case you’ve missed Part 1, check it out here.
🚀 💡 Want more or looking for something else? Head over to the Bored Panda Quizzes and explore our full collection of quizzes and trivia designed to test your knowledge, reveal hidden insights, and spark your curiosity.💡 🚀
Image credits: Jay-r Alvarez
•
Not Quite Done Yet!
Discover Your Competitive Edge
Subscribe Premium to Compare Your Stats with Others
More Premium features:
How did you score compared to others?
Your general stats:
| User | Result | Reward |
|---|---|---|
| / 28 | |
| / 28 | |
I'm not sure what search words I could use to confirm this, but isn't "She had already eaten lunch" also correct, under certain circumstances? For example in a past-tense novel, you could write: "Josie wasn't very hungry because she had already eaten lunch."
12. Complete the sentence: "If I ____ earlier, I wouldn't have missed the bus." UK English it would be 'had left' - needs an auxilliary verb. I also think 'she had already eaten lunch' is more appropriate as the lunch was in the past.
Load More Replies...Nothing. "She had already eaten dinner" is the past-perfect tense of eat, and "she has already eaten dinner" is the present-perfect tense. Both should be correct. I guess it might be implied from the picture that this is a current situation, so the present-perfect might be preferred?
Load More Replies...I have to admit, I do like calling feet "feets". I never claimed it to be grammatically correct, however.
Q4: the explanation says 'The tricky word "mischievous" has only one "i" after the "v."' No it doesn't. It has only one 'i' and it comes *before* the 'v'.
Well yes, the description was wrong, but so is yours. There are two 'I's..
Load More Replies...#17 - "They are" and "you are" would make a valid sentence if you are questioning what someone has just told you.
In the vernacular, yes, but they are not grammatically correct as questions. 'Are they...?' is a question and 'they are...' is a confirmatory statement.
Load More Replies...I'm not sure what search words I could use to confirm this, but isn't "She had already eaten lunch" also correct, under certain circumstances? For example in a past-tense novel, you could write: "Josie wasn't very hungry because she had already eaten lunch."
12. Complete the sentence: "If I ____ earlier, I wouldn't have missed the bus." UK English it would be 'had left' - needs an auxilliary verb. I also think 'she had already eaten lunch' is more appropriate as the lunch was in the past.
Load More Replies...Nothing. "She had already eaten dinner" is the past-perfect tense of eat, and "she has already eaten dinner" is the present-perfect tense. Both should be correct. I guess it might be implied from the picture that this is a current situation, so the present-perfect might be preferred?
Load More Replies...I have to admit, I do like calling feet "feets". I never claimed it to be grammatically correct, however.
Q4: the explanation says 'The tricky word "mischievous" has only one "i" after the "v."' No it doesn't. It has only one 'i' and it comes *before* the 'v'.
Well yes, the description was wrong, but so is yours. There are two 'I's..
Load More Replies...#17 - "They are" and "you are" would make a valid sentence if you are questioning what someone has just told you.
In the vernacular, yes, but they are not grammatically correct as questions. 'Are they...?' is a question and 'they are...' is a confirmatory statement.
Load More Replies...


20
22