I read some of the comments. That was such an easy analogy and yet some people STILL try to argue against it. What is so hard to understand?!

That's what I am always saying! The fact that people get raped or robbed means there is something wrong with people who rape or rob. A human being should be able to walk the street drunk and naked and NOT BE TOUCHED!!! Everyone should be able to keep their houses/cars open and not be robbed. If you lose your phone/wallet/anything, you should be able to go to the same spot and find it UNTOUCHED. The fact that we have to be careful not to get raped/robbed/murdered/beaten means there is something terribly wrong with the society. NEVER blame the victim.

Great response. No means no and that f'd up boys will be boys excuse is complete b******t and no that's is not normal behavior for teenage boys, young men, old men, or any other type of person.

Just yes. This shows how ridiculous it is.

The title should be changed to "so people finally understand" because sadly many women think that a drunk woman should have known better.

Love this. That woman, is my hero!

I'm not sure why this is necessary? I don't think the issue behind consent is what the word "No" means.. that is pretty clearly rape? I'm confused why it's titled as "perfectly explains consent" so "men can finally understand" - it literally only explained the meaning of "No" (which is important.. but this post was her beating a dead horse). I think an analogy that accurately showed how lack of consent does not imply consent would have been more useful and um.. praiseworthy?

Anyone else notice the shown FB comments where they missed the whole point of Alice Brine's analogy* - which is brilliant - seem to be male? (ZOOM!) *analogy - a comparison between two things, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

hell f*****g yeah!

Weird way to compare but sure...However lets say the victim, a lady, is wearing a short skirt and rocking a cleavage, no it doesn't mean she's asking for it in any way, but apperently guys are thick like that and thinks so, but lets put the truth out there, women are also sexual beings and lets turn the tables, a man is shirtless, the ladies like what they see, they cannot however touch him without consent, but, HE'S ASKING FOR IT??? right? Being shirtless and all? So what would the difference between short skirts and cleavage be to being shirtless, neither should be unconsentually touched and neither are asking for it, however I think a shirtless man is better comparison.

Oh my gooood, how many times are people gonna explain consent in some kind of BRILLIANT or GENIUS way?? Enough already! People get it. Unfortunately a lot of people just don't care about consent. It's not that they don't understand it, they are just heaps of human c**p.

This is not an analogy, it's a fallacy. This implies that all acts or allegations of 'no consent' with regards to sexual assault is a premeditated act by the accuser, which just ins't true.

It boggles the mind that some people don't understand the concept of consent- I can only assume that those same people are indeed f*cking r******d.

No means no. Even if you are already naked in bed- no means no. But the cases are different. Because if both go home with each other, they both have first the intent to sleep with each other. No one will invite someone home with the intent to be the victim of burglary.

YES!!! Excellent...have you considered joining the Supreme Court?

Oh no, she never gave consent, just shared a cab with him, led him back to hers, opened the door, undressed herself and invited him to bed. But she never SAID it...

No one takes a person home expecting they'll stal from them. No one goes to a persons home home expecting the man will just do gangham style for them and call it a night. The issue is expectation in taking someone home and them accepting. She shud have said I'll be taking men to their homes, not going home WITH. taking them implies carrying them into the car, etc while they are unaware they're in the presence of anyone else going home

Oooooooh my god. It just hit me. I can't believe how completely and utterly r******d this girl is. So they will "finally understand"? Seriously? She's trying to compare drunk sex, to STEALING s**t from guys? Are you serious? Sex is something that two people do WITH each other and rape is when one person decides to do it TO another. There are MANY situations where sex is good. In fact, the vast majority of sex is good and enjoyed, more or less, by both parties. BUT THERE IS NO SITUATION (okay, insurance fraud maybe) WHERE SOMEONE STEALING YOUR S**T IS GOOD! This...the fact that she thinks this "shows them" or "puts them in their place" is idiotic in and of itself. Holy jesus...why don't people think of these things?

Uh this is already a thing.

The problem is people like you making jokes.no what if that drunk guy said yes yes take all my s**t I want you to have it so bad. Then in the morning he is embarrassed he gave you all his stuff and realizes you are not coming back to get more stuff from him so out of shame and humiliation he reports that you stole it all. Now without any proof or evidence of what happened ,just his word you are convicted and life destroyed.you now have to register as a thief and shamed more all because someone felt ashamed and embarrassed about giving their stuff away to someone that only wanted stuff.

I think I am officially old and grumpy, I was out at the word "gunna". If you are trying to educate people on a situation (A.K.A teach them something) don't use fake words! Mostly joking, her post is funny and makes a good point, I'm just old.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

*so that all PEOPLE can finally understand it. Women predators and rapists exist too, so let's not go down the road of "your sex defines you" b******t.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

I am against any kind of rape and don't think any of those rapist had any right to do any harassment of any kind. Although I think there is a hole in her argument. One night stand or should I right out call it having sex is natural and not illegal. Although forcing/rape is a crime. Law has a hard time seeing the difference and lawyers find these flaws in the law and abuse them. But stealing or taking is unnatural and illegal more often than not. I mean maybe a friend won't mind you taking his stuff, more like borrowing. But still it is never OK for some to take wallets, watches or even their cars. I would basically say this is good point but not really logical

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

you know what I am sick of.... I am sick of reading these supposedly funny posts and realizing they are not funny nor interesting at all...

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Terrible analogy. Some girls DO have the intent of flirting, wearing clothing to hint at intentions, going home with a dude and getting it on. That happens in clubs and bars all over all the time. It's a real thing and both sides of the equation want the same thing. Zero people want to get robbed. That's why this analogy is awful. If dudes showing off their fancy watch sometimes really did wanna get robbed, then this analogy might make sense. C'mon people, tell me with a straight face that girls never, ever actually go home with a strange dude because they're horny and want to do something about it.

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

Oh FFS... Really, painting every single guy as a rapist, thanks, I appreciate that... It's great to see so many people agreeing with this stupidity, come on, you can't possibly think every guy is a rapist. Is victim blaming even a thing anymore? I never hear anyone victim blaming anymore, this seems like a 1980's thing. I can't be the only guy who thinks this "analogy" ridiculous...

This comment is hidden. Click here to view.

ahhhhh.....womansplaining