Zookeeper Finally Explains What Harambe Was Actually Doing With The Kid
Since Harambe, a 17-year-old silverback gorilla was shot dead at Cincinnati Zoo after a 4-year-old kid managed to get into his enclosure, many people were arguing that there was no need to kill the animal, claiming that he was actually trying to take care of the boy. However, Amanda O’Donoughue, a former zookeeper, has a whole different opinion which she expressed on a Facebook post a few days ago.
More info: Facebook
“An adult male silver back gorilla has one job, to protect his group”
“Now Gorillas are considered ‘gentle giants’ at least when compared with their more aggressive cousins the chimpanzee, but a 400+ pound male in his prime is as strong as roughly 10 adult humans. What can you bench press? OK, now multiply that number by ten. An adult male silverback gorilla has one job, to protect his group. He does this by bluffing or intimidating anything that he feels threatened by.”
Image credits: Amanda O’Donoughue
The scene of Harambe with the kid is “pretty much the stuff of any keeper’s nightmares”
“I have watched this video over again, and with the Harambe’s posturing, and tight lips, it’s pretty much the stuff of any keeper’s nightmares, and I have had MANY while working with them. This job is not for the complacent. Gorillas are kind, curious, and sometimes silly, but they are also very large, very strong animals. I always brought my OCD to work with me. checking and rechecking locks to make sure the animals under my care and I remained separated before entering to clean.”
Harambe wasn’t trying to protect the kid – he used him to intimidate people
“I keep hearing that the Gorilla was trying to protect the boy. I do not find this to be true. Harambe the Gorilla reaches for the boy’s hands and arms, but only to position the child better for his own displaying purposes. Males do very elaborate displays when highly agitated, slamming and dragging things about. Typically they would drag large branches, barrels and heavy weighted balls around to make as much noise as possible. Not in an effort to hurt anyone or anything (usually) but just to intimidate. It was clear to me that he was reacting to the screams coming from the gathering crowd.”
Image credits: Courtesy Cincinnati Zoo
Why tranquillizers weren’t an option
“They didn’t use Tranquilizers for a few reasons, A. Harambe would’ve taken too long to become immobilized, and could have really injured the child in the process as the drugs used may not work quickly enough depending on the stress of the situation and the dose B. Harambe would’ve have drowned in the moat if immobilized in the water, and possibly fallen on the boy trapping him and drowning him as well.”
Image credits: William Philpott
“I can’t point fingers at anyone in Harambe’s death, but we need to really evaluate the safety of the animal enclosures from the visitor side…I know one thing for sure, those keepers lost a beautiful, and I mean gorgeous silverback and friend. I feel their loss with them this week. As educators and conservators of endangered species, all we can do is shine a light on the beauty and majesty of these animals in hopes to spark a love and a need to keep them from vanishing from our planet. Child killers, they are not. It’s unfortunate for the conservation of the species, and the loss of revenue a beautiful zoo such as Cinci will lose.”
797Kviews
Share on Facebook
The enclosure should have been better protected for these reasons. The mother of the child was negligent. RIP Harambe.
I fault the zoo AND the parents. If a 4 year old could gain access to that moat, the enclosure was woefully inadequate.
Wild animals need tight enclosures I blame some to parent and some to zoo for not having it secure if the kid got in what's stopping the silverback from finding same hole and getting out remember these are wild they need concrete and safe fences
Load More Replies...
I saw a report on the enclosure yesterday and it was said by someone who went to see it that is would have been very difficult to get in to the enclosure to the Gorilla because there were several barriers to get by to get in there. That child must have been gone for quite some time to get into a situation to see that Gorilla, which he wanted to do. Very Sad!
The enclosure should have been better protected for these reasons. The mother of the child was negligent. RIP Harambe.
I fault the zoo AND the parents. If a 4 year old could gain access to that moat, the enclosure was woefully inadequate.
Wild animals need tight enclosures I blame some to parent and some to zoo for not having it secure if the kid got in what's stopping the silverback from finding same hole and getting out remember these are wild they need concrete and safe fences
Load More Replies... I saw a report on the enclosure yesterday and it was said by someone who went to see it that is would have been very difficult to get in to the enclosure to the Gorilla because there were several barriers to get by to get in there. That child must have been gone for quite some time to get into a situation to see that Gorilla, which he wanted to do. Very Sad!
201
296