Woman Live-Tweets 2 Wives At Airport Planning To Fly Cross-Country To Catch Cheating Husbands
1.1Mviews
The only thing more fun than people-watching is eavesdropping, especially when a major scandal in someone else’s life is unfolding right before your ears. 27-year-old Brittney-Jade Colangelo was at an airport bar in Ohio when she overheard the two women next to her discussing a devious plan over multiple rounds of shots, and since she figured the Internet would be just as interested in what was going down as she was, she pulled a pro move and live-tweeted the entire thing. Though she knows them only as ‘Shot Lady,’ the more experienced drinker of pair, and ‘Gum Lady,’ due to the ‘extreme couponer’s’ amount of gum in her purse, the glimpse she gives us into their personal lives is shocking.
Twitter was totally hooked, and not only did they draw parallels to the Netflix hit show Grace & Frankie, they demanded that Shot Lady and Gum Lady get their own weekly sitcom. They even went as far as suggesting that Colangelo should have followed the women and invoiced Twitter for the flight costs through GoFundMe. Alas, the fate of these scorned wives remains unknown, leaving us all with a serious lack of closure.
Scroll down to read the scintillating saga for yourself, and with any luck, this story just might find its way to one of these dear ladies in time for them to share the outcome of their scheme.
More info: Twitter
This is 27-year-old Brittney-Jade Colangelo, a Cleveland resident who just eavesdropped on the best scandal ever
The story unfolding right beside her was just too good not to live-tweet for everyone else to follow
People got hooked, and basically started begging for closure by the time they were done reading
What do you think the perfect ending to this sitcom-waiting-to-happen would be? Tell us below!
1.1Mviews
Share on Facebook
!["Karen Complains To HR About My Body, I Uno-Reverse Her Complaint, [And Now] Everyone Hates Her"](https://www.boredpanda.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/coworker-complains-to-hr-about-womans-body-revenge-latest.jpg "\"Karen Complains To HR About My Body, I Uno-Reverse Her Complaint, [And Now] Everyone Hates Her\"")
Seriously? This isn't a soap opera. You are live tweeting these peoples pain. You want to be privately entertained, that is up to you, but broad casting someone else's problems is just wrong
i'm sorry, but broadcasting their pain is only secondary to something else: these WOMEN ARE BONDING over their husbands potentially cheating on them. THIS is 'girl power' at it's FINEST. THIS is how it should be! they could just as easily tear each other up, but instead are LIFTING each other up. regardless of how their marriages work out, i hope to whatever gods there may be they remain the best friends EVER.
So of course they naturally needed some snoopy little toerag to post it all over the web? I don't think so.
This really doesn't belong to the whole world. Get a life and next time you'll find something worthful to do when you have to wait.
I hate to be a buzzkill but I thought the same thing. It's rude to eavesdrop and even worse to put someone else's personal business on twitter. That girl needs to get a life. My generation is so obsessed with drama and exploiting it online.
Katie, did you really think that she was going to be like: 'Hi, I just eavesdropped on your very personal conversation and think that it is great for twitter and I bet I'll get many likes.' Dream on girl, dream on.
This is shadenfreude and it's so unattractive. You are correct, this is NOT for the whole world to see.
Nail on head they invented that word.
It really, truly doesn't.
I agree - I felt bad reading those tweets. Some folks don't know how to mind their own business.
But. You. Read. It. The hypocrisy in this thread is hysterical. "NO! Do not share someone's private moment to the world - we'll just greedily read every detail before announcing our abject disapproval."
Well said!!
The funny thing is, there isn't any name mentioned nor identification on the two ladies nor the husbands (you only have the names so? there are tons of people out there named jeffrey and richard.) so there is no damage done to anyone. Here is another joke, this is indeed "life" and a "story" for you to tell when you hangout with friends, where do you think movie stories inspirations comes from anyway? or your news paper reporting on cheating husband and stuff? One more for you who think this is "lifeless", sit down in a cafe with a cup of coffee. Put your phone down and start listening to people's story around you, look at pass-byers. You will get better stories to share with the world other than foods and party in a night clubs.
Well if the husbands saw these tweets, this would ruin the wives' plan. And anyway, it just seems incredibly rude to share the very personal drama of people, who are also complete strangers to you, on the Internet.
Just playing Devil's Advocate here but if it was that personal they wouldn't be talking about it in earshot of other people in a bar. Also, maybe it is just me but I can usually tell when someone is listening in. It may also be completely fake and played out for their audience. Also, I would like to believe that you will probably find that if they saw these posts, which are very complementary in her comments about them, and the exchange between them, they would get a tickle out of it. No personal data was given out, no way of distinguishing them from anyone else unless they chose to make it known.
I understand your approach, but it seems if I am in an area where no one knows me. The assumption is I can be more frank and not worry about my discussion. Others would not see me again. So even if they heard my conversation, it wouldn't matter or be that embarrassing. I think the issue is partly that she documented the verbal interaction. Then published it with a lot of details. Before the social media scene this kind of conversation might be passed around to others verbally and to a small crowd. This was more like having your personal conversation shown in the New York Times, with names and locations. I think people would find that a rude thing to do.
Because in polite society you do not listen in to other people's personal business much less broadcast to the planet
Pretty sure the men are doing much better things with their time together than reading Twitter...
Ha!
I'm guessing she gave changed the names for the husbands.
Any jerktard that would broadcast a conversation that was none of her business isn't bright enough to change names. Who are you kidding?
Seriously? This isn't a soap opera. You are live tweeting these peoples pain. You want to be privately entertained, that is up to you, but broad casting someone else's problems is just wrong
i'm sorry, but broadcasting their pain is only secondary to something else: these WOMEN ARE BONDING over their husbands potentially cheating on them. THIS is 'girl power' at it's FINEST. THIS is how it should be! they could just as easily tear each other up, but instead are LIFTING each other up. regardless of how their marriages work out, i hope to whatever gods there may be they remain the best friends EVER.
So of course they naturally needed some snoopy little toerag to post it all over the web? I don't think so.
This really doesn't belong to the whole world. Get a life and next time you'll find something worthful to do when you have to wait.
I hate to be a buzzkill but I thought the same thing. It's rude to eavesdrop and even worse to put someone else's personal business on twitter. That girl needs to get a life. My generation is so obsessed with drama and exploiting it online.
Katie, did you really think that she was going to be like: 'Hi, I just eavesdropped on your very personal conversation and think that it is great for twitter and I bet I'll get many likes.' Dream on girl, dream on.
This is shadenfreude and it's so unattractive. You are correct, this is NOT for the whole world to see.
Nail on head they invented that word.
It really, truly doesn't.
I agree - I felt bad reading those tweets. Some folks don't know how to mind their own business.
But. You. Read. It. The hypocrisy in this thread is hysterical. "NO! Do not share someone's private moment to the world - we'll just greedily read every detail before announcing our abject disapproval."
Well said!!
The funny thing is, there isn't any name mentioned nor identification on the two ladies nor the husbands (you only have the names so? there are tons of people out there named jeffrey and richard.) so there is no damage done to anyone. Here is another joke, this is indeed "life" and a "story" for you to tell when you hangout with friends, where do you think movie stories inspirations comes from anyway? or your news paper reporting on cheating husband and stuff? One more for you who think this is "lifeless", sit down in a cafe with a cup of coffee. Put your phone down and start listening to people's story around you, look at pass-byers. You will get better stories to share with the world other than foods and party in a night clubs.
Well if the husbands saw these tweets, this would ruin the wives' plan. And anyway, it just seems incredibly rude to share the very personal drama of people, who are also complete strangers to you, on the Internet.
Just playing Devil's Advocate here but if it was that personal they wouldn't be talking about it in earshot of other people in a bar. Also, maybe it is just me but I can usually tell when someone is listening in. It may also be completely fake and played out for their audience. Also, I would like to believe that you will probably find that if they saw these posts, which are very complementary in her comments about them, and the exchange between them, they would get a tickle out of it. No personal data was given out, no way of distinguishing them from anyone else unless they chose to make it known.
I understand your approach, but it seems if I am in an area where no one knows me. The assumption is I can be more frank and not worry about my discussion. Others would not see me again. So even if they heard my conversation, it wouldn't matter or be that embarrassing. I think the issue is partly that she documented the verbal interaction. Then published it with a lot of details. Before the social media scene this kind of conversation might be passed around to others verbally and to a small crowd. This was more like having your personal conversation shown in the New York Times, with names and locations. I think people would find that a rude thing to do.
Because in polite society you do not listen in to other people's personal business much less broadcast to the planet
Pretty sure the men are doing much better things with their time together than reading Twitter...
Ha!
I'm guessing she gave changed the names for the husbands.
Any jerktard that would broadcast a conversation that was none of her business isn't bright enough to change names. Who are you kidding?